User blog comment:Cpl. Wilding/Why the hate in Treyarch/@comment-WaW?/@comment-1494496-20100102015252

I find it hilarious that you choose to quote that specific part of my comment and none of my W/Treyarch points. What's next, going to play the "you made a typo" card?

In any case, one major plot hole in 4 would probably be the inconsistency of the Middle East campaign. One minute you appear to be in Saudi Arabia, then Afghanistan and SSgt. Griggs, who was with you on the prior levels, is nowhere to be seen when the nuke goes off.

MW2: How did TF141 track down the bullet depicted in Takedown? For that sort of imaging you would need to acess the crime scene and take the bullet THEN run it through diagnostics. Makarov left 2 Russian bodies and one American in No Russian, Soap and Price surviving a waterall dive unprepared, Soap pulling the knife out of his chest, need I go on?

How is World at War accurate, you ask? Gore is one. Storytelling is two. Plus, you don't need to be attached to your squadmates to have a good game. In the battlefield emotions can impair your judgement. Other than date inconsistencies WaW has a good flow to it's story and tells a relatively untouched part of WW2: The Pacific. Plus it also removes the M1 Garand mistake that plagued CoDs before it.

I also hope you realize that WaW is essientially the exact same as MW, with WW2 guns and gore. Hating WaW but loving CoD4 is like hating your father but loving your grandfather. It makes no sense.