User blog comment:Bamaman97/Worst Gun????/@comment-2161583-20100702130209

hey maybe you think the MP5K is horrible because it has such a high rate of fire. But if you run around a lot, its probably the best main gun you can have in MW2. With its high rate of fire, its gonna kill with holding the trigger for 1 second on a person. Not to mention its without the attachment rapid fire. But if your going for the worst gun in the CoD series, its got to be the lee enfield in any games or the springfield in CoD:W@W. The springfield with the scope is good, but if you don't use a scope it sucks ass. The springfield M1903(CoD:W@W version), uses an ammo called 30.06. the M1 Garand uses the exact same ammo, but the Garand takes about 2-5 hits and 2-8 shots to kill as the springfield with the scope takes 1-3 hits or 1-5 shots. Also in W@W, the perk jauggernaut was there so it may have taken even more shots let alone misses. The only time that horrible guns are good is if you get a headshot. On all campaigns throughout the CoD series, all of the enemies had low health on the easiest difficulty but got higher every time a harder difficulty was chosen. maybe the springfield was baddass in singleplayer but not in multiplayer online.