User blog:Diegox223/CoD 3, necesarily a bad game?

Everyone (or most) of the people here, find CoD 3 a bad game. (I know its an oldie, but I would like to put my opinion here)

I have CoD 3 for the Wii, and, even with that resolution, is not a bad game, is an enjoyable one, especially because of te CQC battles, and Vehicle driving.

But why do people found it bad? Well, my opinion on the matter is that CoD 3 presented a too much drastic change in the series, the MP changed drastically since the previous release, now featuring drivable vehicles (pretty much like it's Battlefield counterpart).

But, what would have been of the CoD series without CoD 3?

CoD 3 was the first game in the series to present AWESOME graphics (yes, search videos of HQ in Youtube if you can of the Xbox 360 or the PS3)

It was too the first game in the series to present ragdoll physics, and an innovative scripted events rifle CQC.

Also you could destroy buildings in some levels.

But why people find it bad? I don't. The campaign is awesome, the graphics are awesome, and the physics are (kind-of) awesome.

I would like you to tell me if you find it bad, or good, and why.

This is  Diegox223  Talk 22:14, March 6, 2011 (UTC), signing off