Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Damac1214

Hey, so I finally built up enough bravery to do this. I'm Damac1214, and I have been editing on this wiki for the past eight months. Over the course of those eight months I have built up a strong relationship with the community here, a high total edit count and high Mainspace edit count, and a strong understanding of the policies on the wiki. My edits have always been of top quality, and I have never vandalized a page before. I have not been given any warnings since around June-July for trolling when I had just started out on this wiki.

My Main Reasons for this request are:
 * I am very active on the wiki. I am here almost everyday editing pages and commenting on blogs, and you can find me in IRC during most days. I also go into chat occasionally, but not too often.
 * I've never been blocked from the wiki nor banned from chat or IRC. I have recieved warnings in the past however, and I'm not afraid to admit this. Back when I first started out, I was warned for trolling on a blog and involved myself in two edit wars, but I have since grown and learned from my mistakes.
 * I'm friendly with a lot of the community. I know I can be rude sometimes, but I'm sure many of you know I'm a friendly and helpful user.
 * I am a member of the Image Guardians and I have Rollback rights, so I believe Admin powers would only increase my abilities on the wiki.
 * I'm always looking for ways to improve the wiki, no matter how small they may be.
 * I don't know if this holds much weight, but from my time in IRC I fell I have learned when blocks are acceptable and for how long they should be.

Thank you for reading this RfA and for at least considering, no hard feelings no matter what you say on here. Note: I guess i'm not really in a position to make requests, but if you oppose, please give me a reason. Whether this succeeds or fails, i'm going to use this as a learning experience to improve, no ones perfect. Thank you! 22:18, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  22:36, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  23:35, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  15:26, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) One of the nicest well rounded users on the wiki. I have no doubt that he deserves, and will use his tools effectively.
 * 5)  23:02, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Though he is not as experienced as the "big users", I strongly think he should be an admin as his top-notch work would be even more effective.+One of the nicest guys in the wiki? 23:18, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) A good mannered user. I dont remember him ever being rude to other people. He is a little new but I think he could definently use these skills in the right direction. 04:16, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Atleast he made me change somehow. Flag_of_the_Philippines.svg Mirage(kent101299) Talk took an arrow to the knee 11:12, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) I don't see why Damac wouldn't be a good admin. 14:20, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Conqueror of all Zombies 19:41, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Conqueror of all Zombies 19:41, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Conqueror of all Zombies 19:41, January 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Shotrocket6 22:26, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Fuck that.  23:35, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) You are great with your work on-wiki, but as Shot and Redskin said, we need to see a little more. I say you wait. DarkMetroid567 23:37, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Not yet Mac, you show great diligence as an editor and I'm sure you would be a great addition, but I feel that as of now, you should wait a bit. The opposition does have its points, and having too many new admins might not be a good thing. In your next RfA, I'm sure that I will support you if you keep up your good work. 23:10, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Having two new admins isn't a reason in itself. 23:17, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure Shot and Raven know how to use their tools by now, and even if they don't there is more than enough experienced sysops to help. Being a "new" admin isn't any different from being a veteran, except for having the rights for longer and maybe knowing where all the fancy buttons are. Stupid edit conflict x2. 23:19, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn't that we got to new Admins but it is that we have a a group of well established Admin team, that and the fact that I honestly don't see a reason for more Admins as CallofDuty4 says...Argorrath 23:38, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23:21, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) You should probably be here a bit longer. TheEpicShot 02:57, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Not yet Per Callofduty4 and Smuff.
 * 3) Not yet Whilst your MS edits are good I feel the recent issue in chat was not a good display of being ready, whilst an apology was given the actions should never have been done in the first place. - 00:56, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) You should probably be here a bit longer. TheEpicShot 02:57, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Not yet Per Callofduty4 and Smuff.
 * 3) Not yet Whilst your MS edits are good I feel the recent issue in chat was not a good display of being ready, whilst an apology was given the actions should never have been done in the first place. - 00:56, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments/Questions
Shotrocket6 23:01, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, miscount. changed. 23:12, December 30, 2011 (UTC)