Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Rambo362

Rambo362
I, Rambo362, hereby nominate myself for the position of Sysop. I have many edits, a lot of them being anti-vandalism related. I am a well known member of the community. I always keep my cool and act as professional as possible when it comes to important matters. I have an understanding of the Sysop tools, their usage, and how they work. Also, per WHISKEY's advice, I have reviewed and answered these following questions,

What will you do as an administrator? - this way the community can know about what you will do with the tools and responsibility, ask yourself this and tell us this so we can know that we can trust you.

Answer: If the vote is successful, I would use the tools for the various tasks that administraitors regularly perform, such as page deletion, image deletion, Off topic blog deletion, anti-vandalism/spam partol and supression, but in the earlier hours (around 7 a.m. EST to 4 p.m. EST before other admins get online.)

What have you done that has made you a good candidate for adminship? - ask yourself this and tell the community about it so that everyone know what you've done, and that you would be a great person at performing the janitorial tasks of an administrator.

Answer: I have mad many anti-vandal edits and reports and I'm active in the War room and around most of the wiki.

Why do you feel more administrators are needed? - so that we know you can handle the tools while other administrators are still active. I doubt anyone wants to have a lot of administrators here, so many might oppose with the reason "enough admins". You should try to convince them of how you would clean up the wiki and perform anti-vandalism/spam tasks, and if you know and can convince others that you will be a good administrator, they will most likely change their vote to a supporting one.

Answer: I believe that we need more administrators because there has been an increase in unregistered users, and with that, vandalism/spam. Also, because of the school year having started a month ago, many of our current admins have become busier with their school work, and aren't on as much to deal with the daily tasks of an administrator, such as in the earlier hours of 7 a.m. EST to 4 p.m. EST. Also there has been a debate to have more administrators because of the release of Call of Duty: Black Ops being merely three weeks away.

Suppose some users got into a flamewar, how would you settle it? - ask yourself and tell the community about this so that we can know how you will handle anything that is disrupting the wiki and it's community. I don't know about you, but I definitely want to know this so that before I can trust you with any tools that can easily be used against the community, depending on the one who uses the tools' actions."

Answer: If two users got into a flame war on a blog, War Room post, Talk page, ect. I would block both offenders until I could hear both sides of the story and confer with my fellow administrators on what punishment, if any, would be just and appropriate.

Please review this post and vote. All comments and concerns can be left for me to answer on either my talk page or here on this RFA. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Neutral
Didn't you say you were leaving the Wiki? Neutral till Answer.Fall 50 cal. Talk?. 23:05, October 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * No that wasn't me. I never threaten to leave.

Oppose
-- 21:06, October 21, 2010 (UTC) User withdraws vote. --azuris ( talk ) 18:57, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a blanket statement. If you oppose a request for adminship, you should be against the nomination in question. The argument that there are "enough admins" (aside from being arbitrary) does not describe how the person is or is not fit for the position. 22:32, October 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * And What would be considered a good answer for that question?

-  21:54, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 22:52, October 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sure you've seen me before.

--Scottie theNerd 12:38, October 22, 2010 (UTC)