Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/MLGisNot4Me (2)

Hi. I think it's time for me to stand up and nominate myself to be an administrator. By now, I'm just about to hit 4,000 edits, and have been active for 6 months. While only nearly 2 months have passed from my previous nomination, in the gap I have been very active for almost every day, in all areas of the wiki, including community discussions (such as RfA, AfD, UotM and FA), War Room and mainspace. In the latter, I have also reverted vandalism (also warned and reported them) and undone bad edits.

To mention, I have a friendly and mature attitude, have a good knowledge of policies (you don't have to mention my little misunderstanding on COD:NOT for a little time) and do my best to make this wiki a better place.

Though El(to)mo and Carb recently got sysop flags, and Drk is likely to become one too next week's Monday, I'd like to remind that there is not a limit to admins (active or not), so please do not use it as an opposing argument.

Also, as MW3 is just around the corner, definitely more people will come here and more active admins will come in handy.

I don't consider adminship being an ultimate goal or a position of higher rank of some sort, but to be given tools to help the wiki significantly more.

Thank you for your time. 18:57, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Support
Per nominator. 18:59, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

I think he knows what he's doing. Tr0529 I'm a nub 19:03, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral
While I think he would benefit greatly with admin tools, I don't think he is quite ready for them yet. And there will be plenty of admins available to keep order on the MW3 pages- And other users for that matter. Also judging by your argument with Callofduty4 over COD:AR played a major factor on voting on your RfA.

Oppose
I do not see a need to give MLG administrative tools, nor have I been totally convinced that he is the right person for them at this time. 19:00, September 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Care to explain? 19:03, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

CoaZ Talk  19:07, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

--Azuris( talk ) 19:07, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I do agree that I was starting to get a little overhyped, but I was still trying to only convince Cod4 that he was too stubborn about it (including trying to keep it as the topic and admitting he was annoying and stubborn). Also, I still kept myself cool so I wouldn't raeg. 19:18, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Telling him "you're too fucking stubborn" isn't exactly keeping your cool in a situation like that. And in an argument like that one, telling someone that they're annoying and stubborn isn't the best way to get them to support whatever your idea is - there is always a more friendly way to handle arguments. --Azuris( talk ) 19:22, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

19:16, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Per all, too many new admins, as far as I'm concerned. You're a good editor though, I'll give you that :) 19:21, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I reminded, there's not a limit to admins. 19:22, September 4, 2011 (UTC)