User talk:Metlman13

Archived Talk: 1

'''The current page size in bytes is ! I will archive it when it reaches 50,000.'''

Archived
F1r57 p057 01:43, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

RE:
The admin template is for admins. You shouldn't need to edit it for anything. If you want to put it in your sandbox, you can copy the source code and change it from there. And yes, I have heard of Warface, it looks fucking awesome. Shotrocket6 17:46, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Red's Rfa
I responded to one of the things your posted. In short, please know what you're typing, before you type it. 08:04, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

RE:
An anon commented on it 25 minutes ago. I did no bumping. Shotrocket6 02:08, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Sprinkles
I have been doing great its been a while since I've been on the wiki you know school and everything and this is pretty much my states exam panic mode period. Well nice talking to ya bye.Sgt Sprinkles 01:07, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

RfAs in General
All I can say is in this image... 05:54, March 25, 2012 (UTC) http://i.imgur.com/uGybo.png
 * I'm not attacking. I'm offering you advice for the future, so another flame war doesn't start. 05:58, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

*Ahem*
In the answer of your latests messages to my talk, I wish it hadn't come to this point. I really do. But putting the blame on me of the whole clusterfuck you caused on Sam's RfA, and that, for I believe, he will be very dissapointed, and the fact that I'm now "the guy that likes to argue to get ragey and yell at people" (and the other fact that you're using a very old argument between me and Shot, that eventually was settled out) it just can't go on. And I'm not going to be a bitch and be gossiping it behind your back. Why did the clusterfuck happened? Because of you assuming baseless assumptions, and thinking you know everything. Well, news break, mate. You don't know everything, and when you think you do, most of the times you're utterly wrong. Because you don't make the enough investigation on the matter, I don't know. And I don't care. I'm just going to give you a tip, learn to know and accept when you're wrong. It has worked lately for me, and before you go around and start making baseless assumptions of me (of the ones I'm not so insulted, because I don't take the internet seriously), I'd suggest you go to my contribs, and get a big argument I've got on with someone and literally yelled at him. I did that on Sam's RfA, because no matter how many times you had been explained why your vote was flawed, you were like "nope, I'm right, you're wrong". The fact that no other admin has noticed it's because...bingo! I don't have that behaviour. At all. I argue because of, say, the sake of the argument, not my sake. I don't argue because I say "Fuck it, I'm arguing with X so I can piss him off". That would make me a troll, and that's not how I am. I'm a guy who generally likes to settle up things nicely, like right now. The War Room/RfA topics should legitimaly stick up to those spaces, and nothing more. Messaging someone of something that's already over it's like beating a dead horse. To end my message, I'm just going to say that any other messages regarding this topic will not be answered, just left in there adding space to my talk. Sincerely, I'd wish this would not have come to the point of personal attacks, or I'm just being to exaggerated on the word personal? No, just old and long forgotten fights to back up a point attacks. That's all I have to say of the matter. If you feel like this is just a personal attack to you or someone else, please, talk it to an admin so we can sort it out. I tried to be the most polite I could in here, so if you, I don't know, hints of sarcasm or irony in there, I didn't write them with that target in mind. Good day, dear sir.-06:02, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Cooldown block
I've blocked you for two hours so you can come back and act more civil. 06:15, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Stop.
I don't know what you're trying to do but just stop. 16:56, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Forum:Decratting Callofduty4
Please refrain from such comments, I am being serious, considering today's shenanigans in S:C. 03:18, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I just have trouble making the time. Thanks for worrying, thought, it means a lot... You're a pal. FuryExtraLarge 18:25, May 13, 2012 (UTC)

RE:
I'm all for making you an admin, but I haven't had the time. I might have some time to do it over the weekend though. Conqueror of all Zombies 17:46, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Wii group
I'll need your friend code for the tournament. 20:24, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

You were on your last warning anyway, and it's ridiculous for me to have to tell you it's wrong to post personal information in a public chat. Joe Copp 02:41, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * The fact that you were on your last chance does indeed carry significant weight in this situation, and the fact that I shouldn't have to warn you about something like that, much like I shouldn't have to warn you about spamming or posting pornography. Posting a link to personal information of an individual is an extreme infringement upon their personal security and it won't be tolorated. Joe Copp 02:48, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * There are generally two types of banning:
 * One where you get a warning (i.e. trolling, spam, etc.
 * One with no warning (more serious rule breaking that can have more serious results, i.e. shock site, posting personal info without consent, etc.)
 * Now just please take your business elsewhere, because it's not coming back on chat anytime soon. 02:50, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Can I ask where in the rules are these kind of bans specified? I just read through all the rules, and the only times the "No warning" is specified is in Point N° 2 of the Mod rules:"Always issue an initial warning before you kickban. (does not apply to someone spamming/posting a porn/shock link)". If the personal info does apply, please add it to the rules so confusions like this won't happen pl0x-03:00, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Diego, I would also like to see where these rules have been written. 03:06, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * So, when shall we start giving out warning for shock sites and potentially harmful information being passed out? Moderators have a right of way to ban viewing to their discretion, now, thanks for the tip for me to add that to rule. 03:01, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * I just explained to you exactly why what you just said does not apply. You may take this up with Callofduty4 but he will not grant you access to the chat. Joe Copp 02:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, it's written on COD:CHAT now, thanks to your concern, we now have written rules on the subject. And yes, I do have full right to edit that page as a moderator. 03:07, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Now I have one final question. Is my ban still valid, considering that the policy was not written there to begin with? 03:08, May 30, 2012 (UTC)