Forum:What to do with inactive admins

I've been thinking about what to do with inactive admins. My idea is that we remove their name from the "admins list", though they'll still have admin powers. If they start editing again, their name can be added back. In case of an emergency, such as someone hacking an admin's account and abusing it, a 'crat can remove their powers until they really come back.

With this solution, we have an accurate list of the true amount of active admins and they still have their powers in case they come back. What do you guys think?

Darkman 4 01:48, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I think that we should remove their powers till they start editing again. What's the point of having inactive admins? And if they're powers aren't going to be removed, then they should definately be taken off of the admins list. This is SkullRod, out. 01:50, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't want a situation where they come back and wonder where their powers went and we have to explain what happened. This way, we have a list of our truly active admins and they get to keep their powers in case they come back. Darkman 4 01:52, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

support I agree, I feel it would be a bit back stabbing to take the powers but I agree with the no list thing  T  C  E   B 01:51, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I think removing them from the list is a good idea. 01:51, June 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I agree. (I would like to say more but I don't want to.) 01:54, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why not? Darkman 4 01:54, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because it was pretty much already said above me, and what I would have said would have been an expanded version of exactly what was said. 01:56, June 23, 2010 (UTC)