Forum:Protection Policy

I was thinking, with protection policy, there are three blocks: Now, I know this isn't the most important aspect of the wiki's attention, but the protection status seems to be rather awkward, as the semi-protected group will not stop vandalism fully. An intelligent vandal can simply make an account and can from there-on make the vandalism without any further roadblocks unti someone sees. Plus, as it will say a name rather than the usual "Unregistered Contributor" many will not check the edit made, and it has a higher chance of remaining further, without any protection from further vandalism. Thus, I have an new proposal, adding another bracket to the protection status, that should protect the articles more at risk from vandalism, such as Commando (Perk). Thus, the four brackets would be: While some of you will be wondering if this is even worth mentioning, it should be noted on big wikis such as WoWWiki, it works tremendously well, and does not seem to pose any problems. Now, as the War Room works so you need 50 mainspace edits to begin with to post, this vote should not be too bias. So, anyone backing the idea? Smuff 16:25, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Normal - anyone can edit it, or in some cases, vandalize it.
 * Semi-protected - anyone with an account can edit it, and again, vandalize it, neglecting edit count.
 * Protected - only administrators can edit it.
 * Normal - anyone can edit it, or in some cases, vandalise it, and would cover articles such as John "Soap" MacTavish, which are important and that no-one has a problem with.
 * Semi-protected - anyone with an account can edit it, and would cover more at risk articles such as the UMP.45 and are left indefinitely, to promote registration.
 * Protected - only users with 50+ mainspace edits can edit it. This would be used to cover articles which have been previously vandalized or are higher risk again, such as Stopping Power and the AC-130 pages, along with templates, as these users should know what to do by then.
 * Über-protected - only administrators can edit it, and it can be set indefinitely on high priority articles such as newly announced games and very high traffic pages.

Votes
'''Support as nominator. '''Smuff 16:25, June 28, 2010 (UTC)