User talk:Imrlybord7

my page is fine
look bord there is nothing wrong with my page.

1. Lady Gaga is a bad influence among young women and causes them to act well basically like sluts. to try and spread my dislike for her i came up with that theory to try and make people realise she's an idiot and a bad influence without sounding like a boring old fart

2.if you want to get technical the earth isn't 360 since it is more in the shape of a pear than an apple

3. you must not be British. in Britain we tend to make fun of Americans because we don't like the fact that they are now the world power and we are not.

4. it was actually a misunderstanding as the guy wasn't Brtish and he did not know that in britain we let ex-cons in the army so it wasn't a crappy edit

Archived
Just so people know why my talk page is blank. Imrlybord7 16:17, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Actually...
Hehe, sorry, I did mean to add the stub. I use firefox so you can quickly go through the edit summaries you've previously used and use them again, and I hit the speedy delete one instead of the stub one. It won't happen again sorry, but thanks for pointing that out to me =) Smuff 16:26, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Precordial Thump
Does it really need to be there, it's kind of like an article about blood. It doesn't have much significance in the games and seems out of place. (like my new signature?)

Yeah
It does need some re-working, there's no Gasp article, there's no Jump article, so it does need to be re-writen to be make it more clear. If it does come up, many people want the article Poland erased because it's not directly refrenced in COD3, but you and I both know it still needs to be on there as there are two missions as a Polish tanker. Peter Griffen Boy 16:34, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

My signature
Gage, Saint and I are trying to work with it, we're not that good with codes, so it'll have to do 'till we work it out. For your gamertag, you should try downloaded the McDonalds picture pack (it's free) and get the Sausage Biscut (closest thing to a burger). I go tthe McDonalds picture on mine. Peter Griffen Boy 16:44, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Extra edit buttons
You know when the new welcome templates were put into action, new edit buttons appeared at the top of the edit box? Do you want me to implement some for you which let you insert the Vandalism and Blocked template with a click of the mouse? I was thinking of doing this for all admins and several trusted users, but I want to see what you think. 17:13, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, try editing a page and see if a Black-on-Yellow V and a black-on-white B appear. Those are the Vandalism and Blocked templates respectively. If they do not show up, try refreshing the page several times. 17:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Another RFA
During mid-March, Im thinking about triyng for admin. I most likely won't get in, but I need some work to be done, and seme suggestions would be nice. Peter Griffen Boy 18:49, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff=Vandal
He created a page with the name of Fewrfew_fwerwwert_tt_5t_t_r_re_ret_iytr_y_tiy_65o9i7056_7_emum67_lol Fewrfew fwerwwert tt 5t t r re ret iytr y tiy 65o9i7056 7 emum67 lol. 🇨🇩 22:58, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've unblocked him because that's not something he would do. I think someone else did that on his account. For now let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Also, unrelated to Smuff, I've noticed you've only been handing out minor blocks. Do not be afraid to hand out the occasional 1 week/2 week block for someone who's vandalized more than 3 times in a row, or a particularly extreme/stupid/unfunny vandal. All new admins are reluctant to hand out long blocks at the start, I remember I was.23:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yep, you're one step ahead of me. I'll reinstate the block, sorry for that. 23:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry about what happened, please allow me to explain. In an earlier post on this talk page, I explained I use Firefox, which also remembers Usernames and Passwords for easy login. Alas, I have a four year old brother named Elliott, who unfortunately, cannot type properly, but knows how to use a computer somehow. Anyways, he went onto MY laptop and opened Firefox, which was left open on this wiki. He then logged in and made that rediculous article about god knows what... Having discovered what he did at about 12am, I immediatly told him NEVER to touch my laptop ever again, and as a result, have cleared all passwords from the browser. I would like again apologise for this terrible mishap, and assure you it will never happen again. Also, I'd like to thank you and COD4 for the short ban, I'm sure it stopped him doing any more damage. Btw, if it does happen again, please don't be afraid to issue another 2 hour ban... Smuff 12:50, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks for believing in me there, it means alot. But once again, sorry about that, I swear it shouldn't happen again. I love this wiki way too much to actually vandalise it, I do try improving it with small edits and grammar fixes, and if I got banned I wouldn't have anywhere else to go really... =/ Smuff 13:18, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks. I told you I knew you would be a good admin =) Smuff 13:25, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oh that's excellent! I might try for RFA after about 700-1000 edits maybe when I'm a properly experianced editor, but that may take a while... =D Anyways, let's hope that works out, you'd certainly get some better admins with that system =) Smuff 13:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Dang, boi
You edit VERY fast. Anyway, if you want to change your adminship picture I got the codes on how to do it.

Some Weapons
Slowrider7 would like if you could give some opinions on our weapons and the weapons on his page and hopefully create some of yours.

RE: Some things that could use more attention.
Actually, I don't like COD:G. It's vague, it was never even completed, and there's so many ways it could be [mis]interpreted. The general premise I'm a fan of.

With your "bottom line", does that also mean we won't have articles on the games either?

And don't worry, I'm quite aware of the thread. 06:31, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You said "Basically, my 'bottom line' opinion on the matter is that we shouldn't have any articles that might as well just be on Wikipedia", so I was sarcastically taking that in a literal context in that since there are Wikipedia articles on the games, we should just let them cover it. 08:46, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * If we had a battle on ice skates, I would win without a doubt! (I actually can't skate on ice for my life.) 08:49, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE:...
Why the manhug? (Not meant in offensive way) Doc.Richtofen 09:57, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

You really don't leave anything else to say. Have you checked my comment on DW112's RFA? Doc.Richtofen 09:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but I don't really now what to say in it. Doc.Richtofen 10:02, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Doc.Richtofen 10:06, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: The philosophy of adminship
I probably shouldn't be sticking my nose into someone else's discussion, but I would say in the case of a user like Scottie theNerd, COD:IAR would apply for nominating him for adminship. A large edit count is a great way to gauge experience, but if it is preventing a very competent user from being nominated, then that prerequisite should be ignored. 12:29, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I read the discussion on Chiafriend's page before you linked me to it. It's an interesting point; however, I think COD:AEAE holds greater weight in this scenario than COD:IAR. Waivering pre-requisites wouldn't be unusual, but I think we should stick to procedure as much as possible unless the situation requires additional admins at short-notice. All users should get a fair chance at going through the RFA process; else the wiki might get drawn into a cycle of picking favourites when there are plenty of editors who would equally be assets to the wiki. Basically, I don't think the demand is great enough at the moment to invoke IAR. I anticipate that the release of COD7 might trigger a need for more admins.
 * For the record, I'm not actively seeking an admin position. I feel that the wiki has plenty of competent admins and other candidates with more experience. I've had my share of admin duties elsewhere and I believe I can do just as well without admin tools on CODwiki. If in the future I feel otherwise, I'll put up an RFA. Thanks for engaging in this discourse. --Scottie theNerd 14:26, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah.
Once I looked over it again, I realized it was kind of a bad move in an RfA. Slowrider7 14:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Boosting
In response to your hypothetical Wikipedia scenario on Chiafriend's talk page, it's nearly impossible for information on Wikipedia to lead to developments in a current event. Wikipedia is a source of information that is taken from other sources. If someone was being searched for, Wikipedia would need another credible source to establish the information as fact. Any developments in the case would be recorded or otherwise influenced by first-party sources rather than Wikipedia. In other words, Wikipedia does not "know" the whereabouts of the person; it reports it very much like a newspaper would by relying on other sources.

In regards to boosting -- CODwiki doesn't provide any new information. It merely documents what is already established and well-known. While potentially harmful to the game, it is a common practice that should be documented, and it's not exactly difficult to ascertain how boosting is done.

In my experience as a GameFAQs moderator, topics that are considered taboo are mainly concerned with EULAs and developer stances. If a developer considers a particular practice to be illegitimate (e.g. 'duping' in Diablo; using third-party mods to alter the game), then it is our moral obligation to condemn the provision and discussion of such activities. In CODwiki practical terms, we shouldn't be providing information that is potentially illegal (e.g. hacks, cracks, etc.), but activities that are merely against the spirit of the game such as boosting have little reason to be smothered. Otherwise, we might as well get rid of camping and other "cheap" tactics! --Scottie theNerd 14:43, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Render
2 words: Copyright issues.

--  T    C    E   17:01, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oops
lol no, I forgot to put the "may" in there :0 🇨🇩 19:33, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

808 seduced me
In IRC he convinced me to do it to get some user opinions, I'm not planning on doing it seriously until around March. I hate how Juan brings up mainspace edits as mainspace edits themselves don't mean shit, unless they've done something.

Polnsky's quote
I don't remember him saying the Hard Landing quote ("SHIT! GRENADES!"). Was that his vopice or am I hearing wrong? Cpl. Wilding 20:47, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Here's my question:
How? The IRC? No-one's ever on our main channel. Forums? I don't see that much stuff. Frankly, I know I should get more involved, but it'd be a lot easier if people used the IRC official channel. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:56, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Name Change
Okay, I will ask 808 to modify it (again) to Lt. Dunn. Cpl.  Dunn  01:22, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

NTW-20
I really think they should have missions in Africa in Modern Warfare 3, Infinity Ward could do just as good if not better than Ubisoft's Far Cry 2. This gun should be in it. If you don't know what it is, Google it and you'll know why. In case you've seen it, this gun was used by the MNU officer near the beginning of District 9 to kill the Red-Shirt Prawn. It is also the inspiration for the Halo Sniper Rifle. 🇨🇩 03:10, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

IW doing Far Cry
No, you misunderstand, sorry I wasn't clear. No one can EVER do African landscape as well as Ubisoft, but IW can probably do the cities and small towns better. 🇨🇩 03:20, March 1, 2010 (UTC


 * Yeah. Have you ever tried to make it through the Desert? If you accept a buddy quest from the Arabian guy (forgot his name) then you get a quest that involves finding an Oasis. 🇨🇩 03:25, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, I made the same mistake again, I made two conflicting edits :) 🇨🇩

Far Cry
Did you ever do total stealth? One of my past loadouts was a MP5SD for my primary, IED's for support, and a Dart Rifle. I also had the Camo Suit (for no measly 40 diamonds). I would sneak up on an enemy camp, mark their ammo crates, vehicles, and .50 cal turrets (M249's aren't a problem), plant an IED on the ammo, leave, get to a ridge and scope in on someone who is alone with the Dart Rifle. I shoot, pull out the detonator, click 'BOOM', pick off more helpless enemies, and run before my position was compromised. I would then sneak around, kill anyone in my way with the MP5/Machete, plant another IED in their garage, yet another BOOM, and then bust out of the shade mowing down dazed survivors and throwing Molotovs everywhere. 🇨🇩 03:47, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I never usually planned that much either, but one of the most fun things I did in the game was use the AS50 as an Anti-Materiel Rifle. I would overlook the PetroSahel in the North from a cliff about 2/3 of a klick away, wait for a jeep to drive by, and BOOM! through the engine block, the jeep stops, followed by two dead motherfuckers. Hah, once I actually shot at the driver and got a collateral. As far as I know, the AS50 is the only gun that can stop a car with a few shots. Also, doesn't Far Cry 2 use actual bullets instead of Hitscans? It seems you have to lead targets past 100m. Also, lots of the guns don't have infinite range (a la MP5, MAC 10, any Pistol). There is also mild bullet drop (i think). Can you remember? If so, enlighten me. 🇨🇩 03:59, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, so no bullet drop. It seemed to me that the guns had rather realistic ballistics i.e. any 9mm > AK47 range > AR16 Range > G3A4 Range 🇨🇩 04:12, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

My three loadouts were the aforementioned stealth loadout, the AS50 + IED + M249 SAW (anti-material), the G3A4 + Silenced Makarov + Flamethrower (light assault), and the FAL + M79 + Mortar (heavy assault) 🇨🇩 04:29, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Heh?
Just because I don't know what you were trying to do here, could you enlighten me? 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: The philosophy of adminship
"Adminship is *not* a big deal."

- Jimbo Whales

In an ideal world, anyone who would cause only positive outcomes from gaining adminship would be given adminship, but as humans, we cannot know for sure who those people are, and no one will only cause positive things with their powers.

Because we cannot know who is the equivalent of Jesus incarnate when it comes to adminship stuff, we have RfAs, votes, discussions, and requirements. If we just went on whether or not someone was trustworthy and would do good, we could probably find a few hundred people who are established sysops on other large wikis that have never even been here and give them rights here as well.

While edits and editcounts aren't everything, they show that a said user is dedicated and devoted to the project, and as logic dictates, the more devoted they are, the less likely they would be to abuse their powers and go on a destruction spree.

Stuff like that. 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: A moral issue
Well, you could: -- 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Outright delete it if you really wanted to (I can't guarantee there will be no negative reaction)
 * 2) Balance the information on stopping boosting with information on how to boost
 * 3) Make it more vague when it comes to parts on how to boost

RE: The Cleanup Template
You could make a subtemplate of it for the more serious cases you see, if you really want. 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Code Black
208.108.223.106 <--- dropped a tactical vandalism warhead on the Riot Shield page; I reverted to your last edit, but if you care to check it out, it was PRETTY flagrant. -- Echo Four Delta 16:58, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Not to play vandal's advocate here, but technically all 86.47.130.81 did was change "Riot Dick" back to "Riot Shield." It looks like that was his only edit. -- Echo Four Delta 17:03, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Congratulations Broseph! Enjoy it Brothertim 17:50, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Blocks
Hi Imrlybord. Good to see you're enforcing wiki law more harshly. Dempsey's block may have been a bit too harsh, but I trust you made a good decision. What's up with him? 20:03, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. He's 14, but he fails to behave like a 14 year old. -.- 20:41, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Making a new policy
"The Sigificant Voting Policty"- In order to vote you must have a significant reason to vote.

For example, this is not a good reason "No, Gaz can't be a Featured Article because he's in a recent game."

Really, though look at Captain Price, I'm getting no because he's from a recent game, that has 100% NOTHING to do with article qualitiy. Then look at Poketape's idea for Resnov, because he's not in MW2. Getting my drift. One time someone said, "I want to vote yes for Gaz 'cause he gives the lolz", but it was erased.

Would you support
Would you supprt my idea, some of Poketape's recent nominations and votes have just been "Yes, it's not in Modern Warfare 2" or "No, because it's in Modern Warfare 2" Kind of drags my chains.

That was a joke
It's fron the T.V. show Hogan's Heroes (old) where the main charachter would often seduce a Nazi Colonel's receptionist to get information or convince her to do stuff..

He did
He heavily said I should do it because I'd get lost's of ideas. I'm doing this to get some ideas. COD4 did this a lot and didn't get in until around try four or five.

Re
Yeah, I get what you mean - the people's reasons outweigh the numbers that voted? So if several people voted saying "I oppose because he sucks" or along the lines of such, but less people supported but with actual valid reasons, then the vote would go to the supporters? -ScotlandTheBest 00:37, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Dempsey141

hey, check Dempsey141's user page on the fanon wiki. he's making threats on the wiki and he says you banned him for no reason!

Price25

(Insert incredibly shocked phrase in caps lock here)
So, as I was looking over things, I read Dempsey's talk page, came across the "you sad dick" subsection, and you know what I saw? Well, those first two paragraphs were signed by you, even though Dempsey made the first. I was about to pretty much freak out here on your talk page about why you should never do that, but I looked in the history saw that he just didn't sign his post.

So, uh, it might help if you used   in a situation like this to prevent any further misinterpretations, heh. 06:12, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just be glad I decided to check the history to make sure my eyes weren't deceiving me. :P 06:26, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I just looked at that userpage you linked on Chia's talk page and... wow... I don't know what to say... will the Wiki-drama never cease? I don't even know why that guy thinks the PGB situation has anything whatsoever to do with him, and why he thinks he has the right to try to "force" us to perma-ban him...--WouldYouKindly 06:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I know he's just blowing smoke, but I'm just saying, what the f*** is he thinking?--WouldYouKindly 06:50, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

buttons
True, but I would like an automatic warning template button. would save me the trouble of warning vandals all the time and type... something to tell them to quit. TNT LotLP 14:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, they should work now. I had to manually insert your name instead of the 4 tildes. Sorry about that. 17:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Comment on Griever's page
Alright, I'm sorry. But he was treating me like I was retarded or something, and I wasn't going to take it lying down. To quote from General Shepherd, "I know you understand". Sgt. S.S. 18:53, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

New weapon page
Ocredan has created a page for the Suomi M31, a Finnish gun that doesn't appear anywhere in Call of Duty but is the inspiration for the Soviet PPSh-41. Since it doesn't appear in any CoD game, should we delete the article or let it stay? Cpl. Wilding 20:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Question.
Why do some people undo Unregistered edits, even if theyre perfectly fine? I know you cant answer, but its just something to think about. Edit farming? Not obeying the AGF rule? I dont know man... Slowrider7 20:56, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. I understand. But thats why I love the little page & magnifying glass.

BTW: Your making a very good use of your Admin powers. Kudos.

Slowrider7 21:01, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Well thats good. Dont you kinda think there are alot of RfA's right now? And most of them get approved? At this rate, almost everybody will be an admin by 2012. Seriously. Slowrider7 21:11, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

I know, a few people deserve it 100% and Im directly behind a few people, but dont you think everything is developing kinda fast? I mean, I know a bigger Wiki is a very much better Wiki, but all the big Wikis get more vandals. And just think, if one of those vandals get some hardcore hack or something? We could loose 30,000 men in the blink of an eye, and the world will just fuckin' watch. (ROFLCOPTER) Slowrider7 21:27, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I confuse myself most of the time. Rofl. But I meant this: More Admins -> More edits -> More vandals. Finish the ending yourself. Somebody would get/do something that could really ruin us. I dont like to make the internet very dramatic, but this is kinda serious. This is the only website I go to that is not for school.

RFA
Thank you for supporting me. It really means a lot.

I just hope the rest of the wikia is with you.

My powers move to you.
🇨🇩 is the place to go my friend. If you can stop a shitstorm, you better as hell do it.

My powers go to you
damn computer is so COD:IAR, if I can find a good use to them, I'm pretty sure that big brain of yours can do it as well.

My kewboard is missing up
Your talkpage is so big my computer messed up. I HAVE to go to leave new message to do talkpage. I don't and my keyboard messes up one me. Sorry for that stupid message. "Harry, use it well" Dumbledore said.

Don't got to
I used to have a really fast computer, but I downloaded Call of Duty 1 on it (did that bring back memories) and it crashed, it's my old slow computer that if the article is over maybe 100 lines or so it freezes up and messes up my keyboard.

Why ScottietheNerd should not be an admin
Don't take me wrong, he's a very smart guy, but he hasn't done much on the wiki side, and is to much centered on helping the "atmosphere" of this wiki. Thats one of the reasons I went nuetral on 808 (went to support to stop a shit storm), 'cause he hasn't done anything big but make userbars and the one task bar. Not saying they're bad users, but it's my opinion.

Thing is
I can't go directly to your talkpage and edit it all. That's why I gotta make a new section, or else it'll freeze.

Re:Your behavior in blog comments
Alright, I understand.

Callofduty4
While I well admit I was acting slightly childish, just because he and you have power that I do not have doesn't mean I will not give suggestions or grill you for questions. Just workin' out my freedom of speech.

Thats what I've learned.
Callofduty4 is one of the best editors I know (I heard God once tried to get mainspace,COD4 got more, but he was beat by Chuck Norris, who then lost to MacMillian), and he knows I don't mean to stir up stuff like I do. If anyone can take a rude joke, it's Callofduty4.

I'm going to log off now.
Damn work! Anyway, here's something you better enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxqKTEnfjMw

Re: Protected Template
All I did was revert an edit. If there was a protected template added to the page, it was already there. -Nogert 00:44, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Damn, you're fast
I didn't even know people read edit summaries. Oh, and for some reason, whenever I use my new sig, it puts the timestamp in a dotted box.

--

 T   C    E 

 '''EightOhEight T    C     E

05:28, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

How's BC2?

--

 T   C    E 

 '''EightOhEight   T     C     E 

06:31, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Signature
OK, then. DevilWarrior112 08:15, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

DevilWarrior
He's not sure about making the Sledgehammer Games page becasue you disagree with making it but i agree with making it. Should he be allowed to make it?

My reasoning: Our CoD6 page is basically "It is set in Vietnam and will be heavily plot-focused. The end". I don't see why we can't have a page on Sledgehammer Games that has minimal amounts of info like the CoD6 page does. Darkman 4 08:22, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re.Light Yagami
Nothing I just hate animi. Your old pic looked so much better.

Re:Hola
Me gusta esto, senor, prefiero hablar en espanol. Just kidding. Seriously though, I suppose I should, but I don't think I've made enough edits, and I never know what to say. I'm always worried I'll offend someone. Icepac K s 13:49, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the compliments, but DevilWarrior112 is in a similar situation to me, editcount-wise, and he got opposed by the general amount of the community. I'm also coming off a tough school week, so I haven't edited much, so I have some major work to do. I wouldn't feel comfortable trying unless, as you said, I got a little more involved. Icepac K <font face="Segoe Script">s 00:58, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

FAL page
See, I'm going to you for help =D Anyways, the FAL page has had 3 poorly written edits by unregistered editors in a row, which have all been undone by proper editors. Could you protect the page please? Smuff 19:40, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Correction, make that, four. Smuff 20:14, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, well thanks for explaining to me anyways, no problem. Smuff 20:39, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

WWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
The colors are all changing! OMFG! It's all scary. It's a government warning! WWWWWWWAAAAAAAA!!!!! (p.s. could you change my diaper?)

Cliffhanger - Cleanup
I saw the cleanup template on Cliffhanger, but as much as I look after it, I can't find what's wrong. Could you either take a second look, or point out what's wrong? LC-Tanglestar 22:47, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed it; you can take a look at it to see if I did a good job, but I think it's good. LC-Tanglestar 03:36, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal.
I dont know how you penalize vandals, but here. http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/58.169.67.189 --Slowrider7 00:31, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE
I saw, and to be honest I don't much care what those two think of me. Sticks and stones and all that. :P--WouldYouKindly 00:36, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hey dude.
How well do you think going through EVERY article and fix all the impersonal "you's" look on my RfA? Slowrider7 02:09, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Actully
I assumed as much. Thanks for clearing that up. 02:37, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Do you play Bad Company 2?
Do you play Bad company 2? If you play on the PS3 by any chance, I'd like to have you as my teammate.

It's beaast
I love Bad company 2, I got the limited edition and it came packed with free stuff to use online. What's your favorite weapon on there? Sorry, I forgot sign my posts. Codfan 05:05, March 4, 2010 (UTC)Codfan

Mr Vandal
98.166.27.52 AdvancedRookie 20:34, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

169.227.253.125AdvancedRookie 15:36, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

BC2
Okay, if I manage to prestige this weekend and kill Borderlands yet again, I'll probably purchase BC2.

We should make a squad (Me, you, WYK, and Griever).

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     21:04, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

I would entreat you...
To delete these two pages: this and this, as they are both broken redirects and unnecessary pages. Thank you. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 01:04, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your advice and supportive words, and thank you for deleting those pages. If I find anything else I'll be sure to report it to you. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 01:09, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Random question about BC2
I may be getting BC2 next week and I have a question for you. What exactly does the Dr Pepper promotion give you for BC2? I have 2 codes and I'm wondering if I should save them for when I get BC2 or just blow them on ME2 instead.--WouldYouKindly 01:50, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks.--WouldYouKindly 03:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

BF Wiki Introduction
Sorry, I didn't know you had already seen it. I was speaking on behalf of the whole group.

The Prowling Hours
It's times like these where I wish there were some vandals to block.

By the way - new project. Removing irrelevant pages from categories. (i.e, people adding themselves to the Call of Duty Wiki category, or the Characters category.)

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     07:41, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Fall Damage
Im not the one who created it, but why did you delete Fall Damge. It is part of Call of Duty. We have pages on the engine, so isn't Fall Damage a part of the engine? I think we should keep it and learn more about fall damage. (Ninoaguila 18:15, March 5, 2010 (UTC))

Your Avatar
I know it is Death Note, but is it Light Yagami or L? Mmm, Crispy... 18:23, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

R: Ridiculous
Jumping/Sprinting/etc. could probably be covered concisely in a small, all-inclusive artice regarding player character/environment performance/interaction. This has probably already occurred to you, but I'm just sayin'. -- <font style="background:gold">  Griever0311   20:17, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Don't attack me
You've gotten into some trouble yourself. Poketpae blocking me because I wished to vote, he deserved what I told him. I said he was acting like a pussy, not that he was one. You called me a bitch and dumbass many times, yet I forgave you. Just because someone's an admin does not mean they deserve to be let free, yes Callofduty4 supports me on that last sentence.

Lee-Einfield doing well over 100 damage on all shots
On the Lee-Einfield page it says it'll kill with one shot anywhere. I was watching my pal play some storymode on PC version and we shot a German in the foot and he lived, didn't go into something like Final Stand. I'm starting to think those PC things aren't 100% correct.

When will they learn?
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:206.116.162.21

Vandalism
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/76.16.49.135 deleted the Tactics title on the Afghan page and replaced it with "fuck off mexicans". Lt.  Dunn   00:27, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal.
This guy is just too mutch of a noob to use Ninja so he has to go cry about "how gay" the Heartbeat Sensor. I didnt know inatimate objects can be Gay.

http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/96.251.11.37 Slowrider7 00:40, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Admin
Can you give me tips on becoming an admin?MdDy x GMON3Y 05:35, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Can you go into detail about # 3.MdDy x GMON3Y 23:22, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Link Policy
Do you think that there needs to be a policy that prohibits multiple links to the same article in the same paragraph or transcript, ie:


 * Nikolai appears in Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2. He seems to be a helicopter pilot. In Call of Duty 4, his appearance is not as frequent as in Modern Warfare 2. However, in Modern Warfare 2, he Modern Warfare 2's some annoying Call of Duty 4s, and then they all go and Modern Warfare 2 in the Call of Duty 4.

Just my thoughts.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight  T    C     E     <font color="darkolivegreen">EightOhEight   T     C     E    17:06, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Did you like my example?

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E     <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight   T    C     E     <font color="darkolivegreen">EightOhEight   T     C     E    19:33, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Anon Edits
Sorry, I thought it was an opinion a first. I'll try and improve it instead of undoing it next time. Doc.  Richtofen  21:21, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Never said you weren't
I was asking for some active admin to come, as we're getting plenty of speculation, and all I can do is just erase it to the best of my ability.

Thanks
Thank's for the compliment. <font color="darkred" font size="4" font face="Neuropol">Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C   E 00:13, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Help
Can you please archive my talk page i dont know how. Thanks <font color="darkred" font size="4" font face="Neuropol">Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C   E 01:14, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re. archive
If you think it does not need to be archived then don't. I just felt like my talk page was getting unruly. Yours truly ---<font color="darkred" font size="4" font face="Neuropol">Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C E 01:22, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks <font color="darkred" font size="4" font face="Neuropol">Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C   E 01:25, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal.
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.110.217.10

Slowrider7 12:39, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Another Vandal
Here's the evidence. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 13:04, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe he didn't have enough time to think of something more intelligent. It's better when there's vandalism that's actually funny. Then you can doubly enjoy reverting it, you're taking away someone's fun and gaining some for yourself. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 22:22, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

BATF
Damn they need help, not just editing articles. They have no equivalent to many important things this wiki has. They have an admin back, maybe that will help. You should ask if you could be given sysop powers again to make their stuff look like our stuff. You would have the best chance out of any of us.

Note: Sorry about "Stuff", I couldn't think of anything better. Doc.  Richtofen  17:22, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Block
good work on clearing up these annoying contributors. if only they could be barred for longer, or we could maybe stop the mass deletion of whole page's text

Vandal
Thanks. Doc.  Richtofen  18:27, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

gunboxes
yeah, I'm a total noob at editing. I feel as though the extended mags capacity of a weapon should be noted in the gunbox, as it's a common query users have about certain weapons. What do you think, as an admin? 204.111.222.42 19:24, March 8, 2010 (UTC)Mortsedes

RE: Really?
Well, I didn't know it was allowed, and just for other people to know that this is real. I'm sorry if that counted as Vandalism!

RE: I hate to be picky like this
Well, if I look it back, you are kind of right...sorry again, will not happen!

Yeah, I know.
But you dont know how mutch that sounded like Im saying "LOLOLO IM SRS BUISNESS" in my mind. Slowrider7 21:02, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, you are a very valuable person to this Wiki. Cudos.Your arguing skills are amazing too. If somebody insults you in any way, you just shrug it off. That is how I am too, this is the internet. (And since you know e-memes,) Nobody can be an Internet Tough Guy. Slowrider7 21:11, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Undo
Fingers like lightning. I liked your comment on correcting Lightweight, "Learn Math". Doc.  Richtofen  21:20, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Some recent blocks
I was thinking, on some of your blocks you've been getting at people for one BAD edit, normally as a registered user you should go directly for them, but for IP adresses, a lot of shit has happened to me and I once accidently homepage and practically erased it. I think for all vandal edits (unregistered) edits, no matter how bad (racism and sex edits are automatic) should be givin one warning. Also did you get the sexy vandal I gave to you? http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:206.116.162.21

It's an IP though
Like Smurf though, it may have been a little kid editing a good users wiki, one IP could actully turn out to be Scotland Thebest and someone else did that. I remeber reading somewhere on the little WIKI COMMANDMENTS, that IP's get a warning for one block and get more leeway then normal users, this baby has helped me a lot of times!

Captain Speculation, at your service
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:24.250.210.147

Some help
On Slowriders page you said to be an admin you needed and srs bsn or somethign like that? What the hell is that? Also I'm going to ask Chia for rollback, as I think I've better behaved recently.

CoD4's Semi-Inactivity
I think it's because he's focusing on the Battleifeld wiki. Doc.  Richtofen  21:46, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, we can't do everything for them. I'm going to try for mainspace and maybe someday adminship there. However we can't do all the work, they need to stand on their own two feet. Doc.  Richtofen  21:51, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

I will stand as a regular user, nothing more, nothing less. Doc.  Richtofen  21:59, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Still
someone who hasn't been here as long as I have, but it still a good user, just got away with it, while making a mistake. I make a mistake and get my democracy taken away and banned, with no warning or explanation? Doesn't make sense. I easily forgive people, as this is the internet, nothing here is going to 'cause me to do stuff, as this site is not that important compared to other stuff.

Well...
This website is currently one of the most important (I used to be an ace at Yahoo Answers!, got over Level 7, yet quit due to clones and trolls), but I wouldn't say I'm not in love with it, but it's somewhat important. I got work and stuff to deal with though, so I'm not on as much as I once was.

RE:
Yeah, I understand. Just judging by Bondpedia's comments earlier on your talk page, he seemed pretty aware of the whole situation of his wiki, so I doubted it would offend him.Pup42512n 22:03, March 8, 2010 (UTC)pup42512n

Just wondering...
Do you mind me playing BC2 with you and your friends?

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E     <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight   T    C     E    23:45, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I'm probably going to become an Engineer, in case you guys ever need one (none of my friends bought BC2...)

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E     <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight   T    C     E    23:50, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Gyeahwah?!
Thanks for nominating me for 'cratship. It, uh, means a lot to me. And stuff. 23:55, March 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Apparently. Again, much appreciated.  01:13, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalismo
And here is the proof my good sir. I trust you'll deal with it fairly and efficiently. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 01:06, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, Bovell warned him. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 01:09, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
Here's the proof. I must admit, I agree with the guy, but still. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 13:15, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

MY EDITING OF MW2 PAGES
I am getting really annoyed when people are deleting my posts for no reason, dont get me wrong if I am breaching the conduct thats fine, also if you want to make minor adjustments if I make typos and that, thats fine I notice I put M21 EBR instead of M14 EBR, at one point, and I understand your an admin, but please for the love of ****** god, please do NOT delete my edits that are perfectly true and to the point. I IN NO WAY, BREACHED THE CODE FOR WRITING SUCH AS WRITING IN 3RD 2ND OR 1ST PERSON, MAKING VULGAR COMMENTS OR ANYTHING AS THAT SUCH. I make edits for a reason, they are clear, and true. You wouldn't like it if I deleted information that YOU wrote up, so please dont do the same to me. This is me asking nicely, please do not delete my posts if they are within the code of conduct for writing/editing posts and are COMPLETELY true and legitimate.

Yours sincerely

JouninOfDespair 15:40, March 9, 2010 (UTC) JouninOfDespair

Page For Deletion
The page in question is [[Call of Duty Wiki  Den]]. The guy who made it is a smart cookie, I can't edit it, nor can I add any categories to it. Doc.  Richtofen  16:48, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Semi-activity
Why, I'm at the Battlefield wiki. As I said, I'll be back here at some point. 17:44, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

The Westboro Babtist Chruch
Those people are evil man. They have signs that say "Thank God, for killing those fucking troops!", and will go to ceremonies honoring dead American troops, and do that. There was a story of a man who threatened them with a gun (showed them registration papers as proof) and the police refused to arrest him and even clapped for him. The suits say they're allowed to do it, because of freedom of speech? I mean freedom of speech is a good devil, but now is it changing the freedom of religon? Kids, babies even are forced to do it, and they'll keep on doing it. Thank god for these troops, the American Riders, who track the Westboros down and attempt to delay them anyway possible, and then will stand in front of them and drone out their chanting with patriotic songs? I need support on this, as I think the government should pass a shoot to kill order, and make it look like an accident. Your ideas and thoughts?

Don't Ask, Don't Tell
I'm pretty sure you know what this means, but in case someone else is sparked into our conversation, Don't Ask, Don't Tell allows homosexual people to serve, as long as they don't tell anyone or don't ask anyone if they're homosexual as well. It's not that bad of a policy, but Westboro's have something against it. I betcha if I kill them, I'll win a Medal of Honor.

^That is why the Westboro people hate American troops

No, Medals of Honor are for valorous military personnel who have undertaken actions above and beyond the call of duty, whose character and perseverance in the face of terror, death, and hostile adversity set them apart from common humans. It has nothing to do with the slaying of despicable religious zealots. -- <font style="background:gold">  Griever0311   21:36, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

That was kind of a joke there Griever.

God?
I'm not talking bad about Babtist people, if you happen to be one. Thats the main reason I hate them, is for that one reason they do it. I'm getting my info from the news I watched a while ago. I knew about them, what they did, but I didn't bother to check up on more, till I watched it. Also I'm pretty sure there website is GodHatesFaggiots.com or something like that in a shape or another. I can't believe PETA.org got shut down (People For the Eating of Tatsty Animals) but GodHatesFaggiots.com is not.

Calm down.
Yes I know they hate gays. Why are you insulting me for? I'm not the one whose to know random facts. Really at one point your nice, one point your angry and lightly breaking one of my mitstakes. Really calm down, please.

It's not that bad.
Just because someone's gay (I'm not) doesn't mean they can't be useful. I was going to reply to that, I just asked if you would support me on that, and I say I don't like them because they hate troops and I get flamed. Really settle the hell down

Do you know what DATD is?
It stops the militarry from not letting gay people join the militarry. I'm not gay, but if someone takes lead for you, I don't care if they're communist, they just saved my ass. How is that a hypo statement. I support gays joining militarry and I support DADT, just because I'm not gay doesn't mean I can't support something. I hate homosexuality on all levels, but if someone is willing to serve, their good as hell to me. Take a chill pill dawg.

Read this
Don't ask, don't tell (DADT) is the common term for the policy restricting the United States military from efforts to discover or reveal closeted gay, lesbian, and bisexual service members or applicants.

It stops them from barring them from militarry service just for being gay. Read it. Please, stop. One second your nice, one second your mean to me for being stupid for a second.

You see
There's two gays. Being gay on the job or doing it, or being gay but not doing it. That's two different scenarios.

Arguing
Just stop all these arguments with PGB. The ones you had with him before was a stain on your record. When I voted you for admin I trusted you it will never happen again.AdvancedRookie 22:11, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Camo
Thank you and thank you. About PGB's userpage though, I hope that's okay, I don't want to come off like I ran to you for help or something, because I was scared, and I don't want a big argument to be started. Either way though, thanks on both counts, I'm not diminishing your efforts or thoughts any. Cheers, <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 22:57, March 9, 2010 (UTC)