Forum:Should we encourage informality?

This is just a proposal, but I was wondering if it would be a good idea to encourage informality on the wiki. On the Grand Theft Auto Wiki, where I am a semi-active user, users (including sysops) follow an "informality policy" in their articles, so they seem more friendly and approachable. This paragraph, taken from the article on a GTA: Vice City mission entitled The Chase, is a good example of that policy in effect:

"You've got a new boss in the form of Diaz - follow the D on your map to Starfish Island, and his palatial estate. Someone's screwing him out of 3%, and it's up to you to find out where the cash is stashed. Follow the pink marker, pilfering Diaz's Infernus  if the whim takes you, until you reach the thief's apartment block. Check the window when prompted, then run after him to the roof. It's a good idea to scout this route before activating the last checkpoint, to make sure where all ramps and planks are, but it's entirely optional. There's a puny  Faggio  waiting for you at the end, and sadly you can't park your car in advance, because when you get back to this spot it will disappear. Basically he runs across the rooftops, stopping to shooting the barrels about third quarter of the way along (tread carefully to avoid being set on fire), then he jumps off at the end, gets in his  BF Injection  and you need to chase him all the way to a mansion in  Prawn Island. Stay far enough back so that you're out of range of his rifle, but don't lose track of him. All you have to do is to wait for him until he runs inside to pick up Diaz's money."

Does anyone think a policy like this could work on the CoD wiki? Sgt. S.S. 19:19, June 1, 2010 (UTC)