Forum:Proposal:Closing The Requests for Adminship

PLEASE READ THE FORUM BEFORE YOU POST

Hello. I would like to propose that we close the RfAs after the last ones currently up are finished. My reasoning for this is that, if the RfBs here and here finish and are successful, we will have 4 active Bureaucrats and 12 active sysops. In recent RfAs, one of the main reasons against making new admins is thet we simpily have enough to oporate smoothly at all times of day. My proposal is that we close the RfA's until further notice, such as if more than one or two of our current admins/bureaucrats goes inactive for whatever reason. Discuss. 21:39, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 21:41, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * "Hello. I would like to propose that we close the RfAs after the last ones currently up are finished." Please read the page before stating your reason. 21:50, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, alright. Though I am still opposing it per Sgt. Sandwich and Yuri. Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 21:59, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

 Talk 21:42, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I said AFTER the current ones are over. 21:52, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20PX_SIG.gif  Talk 22:00, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Per those two. Yüri Kaslov  21:43, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is this a support or oppose? 8-bit_price_r.jpg Poketape Talk 8-bit_price.jpg 22:27, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's an oppose, as they originally said "no". M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 22:28, January 4, 2011 (UTC) User states vote below. 8-bit_price_r.jpg Poketape  Talk 8-bit_price.jpg 22:31, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you frigging serious? I never knew that.[[file:Menu mp weapons colt.png|30px]]Sgt.Sandwich | Talk shop | Combat record [[file:Emblem-burgertown.jpg|30px]] 21:47, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

-- BobNewbie talk • blog 21:45, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

 Shotrocket6  Talk 21:44, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

21:47, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22:06, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

@WHISKEY, Yuri, and Doctor Richtoffee: Care to elaborate your reasoning? 21:46, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Eh, after re-reading the proposal I see you didn't mean closing currently-up RFAs, but I still think this is stupid. If someone wants to put up an RFA, they should be allowed to. If they don't gather the necessary support, then that's that, but saying that they cannot put up an RFA in the first place is an affront. Yüri Kaslov  21:51, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Sgt.Sandwich | Talk shop | Combat record  21:47, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

We have enough admins. And when we need more they can tell us and people will make them again. Sniper team  82308  21:48, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

- StB  Talk 22:09, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * For reference, Bovell said he's beginning to go inactive, so there will only be 3 active 'crats. Smuff [ The cake is a lie.  ] 22:18, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's all we really need. Bureaucrats are just admins with the power to add or take away user powers. If no one else is allowed to request extra flags (bar from the average rollback request,) there is no need for lots of b'crats. 22:23, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

For reference
Forum:Closing the RFA page

We did it last year with no opposition. 21:51, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

I believe the community last year was different than this year. There seems to be a different kind of attitude this year.  Poketape Talk  22:21, January 4, 2011 (UTC)