User talk:Chiafriend12

Re: Chia says hi (I say hi back)
Well, I figured it's no use crying over spilled milk (not that I'm suggesting you're crying, just an expression), but Vietnam is upcoming and it might help people get interested.

Also, if there had been a "space" level and an underwater level, people would've complained because they want it to be "realistic".

Not a bad idea, though. Maybe make a blog about it?

Just my thoughts,

--  T    C    E   02:03, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

--

Hmm, okay. I see your point.

--  T    C    E   02:16, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re: The REAL Chia says hi
Well, I might be a little late to the punch, but, anyway...maybe that poll could work next week? It sounds good. And I figure it's about time that it's your turn. 03:07, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Something you may like
Try something called Pimp My Gun, I've made a sniper pistol, and you can make a lot of guns, mix and mathch, and edit some popular guns. Peter Griffen Boy 03:07, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Didn't know PMG was so popular. I usually try to make guns that are strange, but have that niiice appeal. Peter Griffen Boy 05:48, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

We got a page. http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User:Peter_Griffen_Boy/The_Gun_Pimpers. You may post your artwork here without permission, just give me a heads up first. Anyway we can put this on the community groups page? Any way we can get a simple userbox that protrays something to do with a strange gun as a picture and says "This user is an artist of The Gun Pimpers." and The Gun Pimpers has a link to our page. Peter Griffen Boy 06:16, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Gallery thing? I don't know how to make those. Honestly, I'm sort of a wikia code noob, I just know the basics. Could you explain how to do it further? Peter Griffen Boy 07:19, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Can you make the pictures bigger. You can't really see the details of the guns. So when someone just adds a piece of work just add there file name and add the bar (where is that on they keyboard anyway? I have to use copy and paste and alt codes) and then write down their comments? It seems a little bit more complicated.

I never thought that they key would be it. It looks this : on my keyboard. Well anyway, you should archive, there's so much code on here it takes a while for the text to register and go onto the internet. Peter Griffen Boy 08:22, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Who did I call a dipshit
Who did I call that too? Honestly I swear so much on this site, I forget when I swear. Peter Griffen Boy 01:41, January 19, 2010 (UTC) I was going to say how I never directly called him that, but my back button ain't workin'. Peter Griffen Boy 01:55, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

See how you play Runescape. I used to play, like a year ago at least, got bored and stopepd. Used to be a member, but it kind of lost it's point. Peter Griffen Boy 01:56, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Country articles and COD:G
Recently you removed my delete tag on Poland citing its appropriateness as per COD:G (and I was apparently using the wrong delete template anyway, so that works out). I'd like to dispute the application of COD:G for the case of Poland (and other stub articles for countries like Australia). Poland isn't specifically mentioned in any form, which is one of the criteria for COD:G. Call of Duty 3 has soldiers from the Polish Army, but the country isn't included or referred to. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to write an article about the Polish Army and their involvement in the war in COD3 (similar to how we have articles on the United States Marine Corps and Wehrmacht rather than a general stub article about the country? --Scottie theNerd 09:23, January 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * While I don't doubt that the characters may have referred to the country as their "homeland", it's an abstract reference and it serves to show the vagueness of COD:G. The game does not reveal any information about the country, with the result that the article will contain no COD-relevant information. If a character theoretically said, "This place smells like New York", does that mean we create an article about New York? --Scottie theNerd 07:32, January 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the long reply. It was a very interesting state-of-the-wiki reflection, a lot of which I was thinking about. I'll break down my thoughts into their respective topics to resolve some of the issues raised.::*Poland - Somehow this sounds like a German-Soviet political discussion, but that aside, I do generally agree with you on the inclusion of Poland per COD:G. I guess what got to me was that the focus was more on the country rather than the playable aspects.::*COD:G in general - What bothered me when I first read the policy was that it was more of a mission statement than a policy. The "spirit" of the policy seems to be that we should try to include everything from CoD. The problem with that is that there is no limit for how far we can extend the application of its meaning, as highlighted by the smelly New York example. All successful wikis have a scope. Even Wikipedia, the mother of all wikis, has a clear scope defined broadly in its Notability policy and through individual subject-area project pages. "Granularity" isn't something that can lead to a wide knowledge bank especially when considering the limited editing experience of the wiki. In short, we need some sort of boundary with clear examples and clear justifications. I think CoDwiki has been active enough to see how far things can go; now we need restrictions to better focus our efforts.
 * Another issue with COD:G is a simple fact: while other wikis have the luxury of being based on fantasy worlds, Call of Duty is based off real life. There's already a better real-life wiki in the form of Wikipedia, so CoDwiki is better served by focusing on the CoD elements rather than historical backgrounds ripped from Wikipedia. You know something is wrong when we're ripping entire Wikipedia articles to form CoDwiki articles. It's not illegal, but I feel there's a clear line that CoDwiki is not Wikipedia, to the point where I feel it should be a policy. CoDwiki editors, I feel, do not have the knowledge or experience to make articles on firearms and other military-related topics. Most of us are armchair soldiers -- we play CoD, and that's all we know. A minority are actual servicemen; practically none are military scholars. With that demographic in mind, CoDwiki benefits more from focusing on what everyone knows best -- Call of Duty -- and leaving the extended topics (such as firearm classifications, global geography, world history and ammunition types) to places that can inform more clearly and abundantly.
 * Essentially, we don't need articles on Hitler, Erwin Rommel, Douglas MacArthur or technical information like 9mm Parabellum and Bullpup. It's not what I consider to be Call of Duty nooks and crannies. That's real-life information -- and from what I've gathered from the policies, we're trying to focus on CoD and minimise reality. These articles have no bearing in CoD. We can crosslink to a Wikipedia article rather than copy it onto CoDwiki, because we're not exactly going to advance the article content any more than Wikipedia can. CoDwiki documents what Wikipedia doesn't -- every game-related topic what we can think of. If it's not directly related to the game, the information is better found elsewhere. In essence, we don't have to provide the historical framework that CoD is set in.
 * With all that said, in regards to suggestions on the COD:G policy in a much more concise form:::*In my opinion, the policy name should be changed. Even if the policy itself is unchanged, it would be better named as "Inclusion" or "Notability". "Granularity" isn't a concept I feel many editors understand and inherently contradicts the spirit of other policies.::*It should merge with other policies that outline what content is appropriate. At times the Character and Weapon policies suggest otherwise to what COD:G has to say. Have one over-arching policy that outlines what articles should be made and what information should be put in them, in order to ease the policy referencing.
 * It should provide clear examples on appropriate and inappropriate topics in order to answer potential questions. If a character off-handedly mentions penguins in Antarctica, do we write articles on penguins? If Douglas MacArthur has a speech played back at the end of World at War, do we write an article about him? That's what the policy page needs.
 * Ultimately, more referring to the policy. Editors debate policy when it's applied and disagreed on -- and is pretty much the reason why we're having this discussion. COD:G in its current form doesn't leave much room for interpretation; it's pretty much "everything".
 * Anyway, that's enough talk page flooding for now. Thanks for engaging in this discussion, and I hope there's something worthwhile you can find in this message, or we can attempt to resurrect the COD:G discussion in the War Room with these points in mind. --Scottie theNerd 14:54, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Taking Price's cigar a bit further (and yes, I did make that point :) ) -- technically, that information would be trivia regardless of whether it is fictional or not (which also leads to guidelines on what is or isn't considered Trivia). Unless his cigar brand is major congolomerate that appears everywhere in the game, it shouldn't have its own article. That said, it's clear that we agree that some sort of scope needs to be defined, and if necessary amended at a later date. For now, it seems that community discussion on the issue is severely limited. What needs to happen, I think, is that a draft of a more specific COD:G policy (and I personally prefer a different name) should be written and voted upon by the community once the core elements of the policy are agreed upon. Specifics (such as cigar brands and historical leaders) can be debated later. --Scottie theNerd 07:50, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

The Gun Pimpers
When will it appear in community groups? It's gotten a lot of artwork, and I personally think it is ready. Peter Griffen Boy 20:17, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Looking for input...
...On an idea I shamelessly stole from your video channel :P. User:WouldYouKindly/Sandbox, there's only like 5-6 songs on there right now but I just want to see what everyone thinks so far.--WouldYouKindly 03:44, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Haven't decided on one yet. I normally save that part for last because I'm extremely bad at thinking up titles :P. And thanks, I'll keep that in mind if I think of any others I can't do a Wikipedia link to.--WouldYouKindly 05:27, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Lol. (and as a matter of fact we do get W stations here) I was thinking of just having another quote from bioshock (like my username), just because lol "Would You Kindly pick up that Shortwave Radio) or something like that... told you I was bad at it :P--WouldYouKindly 05:36, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. I'm trying to toss a little bit of every type of Classic Rock in there. (I love it all, but I know that's not the case with a lot of people so I'm trying to appeal to as many users as possible)--WouldYouKindly 05:58, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

One last question before I turn in for the night. Is there a way to put a refresh button that guarantees (or at least close to it) that a different video will pop up every time the button is hit? Maybe something similar to the one on the DYK box on the front page? Thanks!--WouldYouKindly 06:26, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think I figured it out this morning actually, the reason I asked is because Firefox doesn't seem to want to do it automatically for me. If you're curious, the link I used is . Might be useful if you want to put it on your userpage.--WouldYouKindly 05:16, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:RFB
I understand that, but my personality isn't one of the best out there, as you may already know, and I have trouble keeping my cool. Yes, I'm like that all the time, not just on the CoD wiki. I should try better though to keep my cool. I'm not going to whinge or cry over what you said so don't worry. We're perfectly fine with one 'crat, epecially one as good as you. I appreciate the fact you bothered to post such long messages on the RfA and my talk page but I in fact already knew that some people would have a problem.

I guess I can admit defeat. If those policies mean so much to you I don't see why we don't add them here. They make perfect sense to me. 14:05, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

FAMAS needs a rollback
Some dumbass has been vandalizing all the weapons pages today MarinesNeverDie 18:00, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Userpage
Oh, thanks so much for noticing that. Honestly, I just copied the HTML from my Halopedia userpage, but I did a poor job changing the content on the page. Sorry if I had caused any confusion. :P Thanks a ton! --

User hilite
Hello Chiafriend, on my RfB you stated that highlighting certain user's names was a bad idea. I agree but when I stated the COD:AEAE you said that wasn't the reason. What was the reason? 19:02, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the feedback. Thanks for the insights. I probably won't try again until CoD7 is released, unless times change. As I stated before we don't particularly need a new 'crat, especially with you as one. So thanks once again. 17:38, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

You may want to take a look at this
I need your input on something: User blog:Peter Griffen Boy/Reasons why I hate Canadians

It's obvious flamebait, but I'm not sure if that's reason enough to delete it. Can you advise? Thanks.--WouldYouKindly 00:36, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Possible Vandalism
User Oblongy - see pages AUG HBAR & Hellhound. I undid AUG HBAR, but it was immediately changed again.

He's also edited Ray Gun, Al-Asad, and TnP's user page. Cpl. Wilding 13:56, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

WTF?!?!
The whole call of duty 4 page has been deleted !!!!!!!

Gulavar

(my tiddles button doesnt work btw)

I figured you might be the right person to ask about this
Seeing as how all of the weapon, perk, and attachment pages are constantly fluctuating in terms of quality, I was wondering if I could somehow write up an official Create-a-Class guide for the wiki, one which only I could edit and would be somewhat heavily publicized by the wiki. Is this at all possible? Imrlybord7 22:04, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
I'm on.

--  T    C    E   06:50, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

--

Not so important Characters
Hey! I've been following the Non-important characters in the War Room, and i'd just like to say i 100% agree with you.

You can make an article of everything you stated, and on Wikia you are supposed to make it as specific as possible. 7th Body 20:41, January 28, 2010 (UTC)7th Body

RE:Ping
Sure. I'll keep that in mind.--WouldYouKindly 05:41, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Welcome!
Thanks for the greeting!

I have a question, how can I avoid getting emails with updates on my watched pages?? I can see them on my "Watchlist", and I don't need the emails

Re: Ping
Sure, I can help out there. There is a bit of work to do, in'nt there?

Awesome. I'm planning on learning Italian after I get my Spanish down. 22:24, January 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed. 18:50, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:808
OMG Chia? I don't even edit here! O_o User:Chicken7/sig 03:36, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

--

What'd he want with me?... Oh, nevermind.

I think I'm one of the only nocturnal editors out here... --  T    C    E   03:12, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

The Lost Admin
What happened to Fedarated AK74-u? 🇨🇩 05:06, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Question...
If I am not mistaken, bureaucrat's are there only people who can make a final decision in the war room, yes? If so, how long is the time before it can be made official. Or could I ask you to review a topic. Thank you. Doc.Richtofen 19:53, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
--  T    C    E   05:03, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I hope it turns out for the best.
 * Can you read my comment? I hope it doesn't sound like I want it too bad. Don't get me wrong, it'd be nice, but I'm in no rush.

Bovell
Hey Chia. On the RFA page, Bovell's RFA has now reached a 10 to 0 oppose vote. I think we can go ahead and make him an admin now, can't we? 18:02, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hiiii (:d
Thought I might finally tell you. This is Syugecin. If you happen to need proof, I can supply some, but for now, maybe you can take my word for it. :P. Icepacks 00:53, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Third? What was the second? Icepacks 01:08, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * That should've been on my Syugecin account. Dunno though. On an off note, just got my second nuke :) Icepacks 03:45, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Re:Bovell
I understand. I personally have no problem with using policies from other wikis, I mean both of us (and BigM) play RuneScape so I don't see a problem with using policies from the RuneScape Wiki. 14:02, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

The fault in the plan
I caught you on something. On my Rfa, you said no, because I posted to much on blogs then I did on the actual wiki. Now you nomianted 808 for admin position, when his blog posts is nearly as big as his small mainsapce edits. I find this a little hypocritical and a little rude, but it's a site, not real life, so the hell with it. Ur a rly bg sT00pd d0uche Peter Griffen Boy 17:40, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Not quite sure what to do with this...
So, there's this picture, File:Gays.jpg. It could technically be called pornography, but there's no actual nudity. What do you think we should do about it? 22:45, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Since it's only being used to joke someone I don't think it's much of a problem, but still I think it's inappropriate. 22:49, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Good to know. That's what I thought, but I thought I'd check with you first, just to make sure. 18:31, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Getting Ugly
You've probably have already seen this and this, but if you haven't, you might want to direct your attention towards the two links. 02:22, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Usergroups
I feel that the usergroups discussion should be passed, as it had a unanimous vote of 7/0/0, and therefore all pages should be moved, organized, and categorized.

Also, maybe a Call of Duty Wiki: Usergroup of the Month?

--  T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   03:48, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

--

Hmm, I see your point. Maybe make another post on how to organize and plan them, as well as some guidelines? See if that gets passed too.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   17:41, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:PGB
I can delete the info then if you want. On another note, have you played Battlefield Bad Company 2 yet? Great game. 11:09, February 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, ok. Battlefield can suck at times (e.g. when you have a suckish team). I got rid of that info on PGB's page. 11:17, February 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, some of my other friends hate Battlefield for that same reason. The game engine's a lot different from CoD. 20:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

General
I have seen CoD4 trying to get you to buy Bad Company 2. As with many other admin's on this wiki, you do not reveal which platform you use. So, which do you use? Doc.Richtofen 20:02, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

F*** my life
Now PGB is telling me that he IS in the military. What am I going to do now? Help please. 21:02, February 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * 808 told me in IRC that he has a nice piece of evidence against PGB's military service. Ask him about it. Also, in the military policy, it explicitly says that if no substantial proof is provided, they have to stop claiming it whether or not it's true. Imrlybord7 23:27, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
A lot of people have been spaming pages, and I've been very mainsapce editity lately, so I waswondering if I was worthy enough to behold such a great power. Peter Griffen Boy 23:21, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't mean to butt in, but before I saw the subject header, I wondered... Icepacks 02:54, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Requesting a block on II Superlative
He regularly calls people "faggots" and his general behavior has been beyond disgusting. He is incredibly malicious. Imrlybord7 04:48, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

WKUK

 * "Hey, kid, what are you doing?!"
 * &#8213;A business man as he spots a youngster hitting a building with a hammer
 * "Hitting this building with a hammer."
 * &#8213;The youngster, stopping for a moment to answer the question
 * "You can't do that! Where are your parents?"
 * &#8213;Business man
 * "They're dead."
 * &#8213;The youngster
 * "Guugh!"
 * &#8213;The business man, angry that his plot to stop the youngster from hitting the building with a hammer was thwarted

That is so Whitest Kids U Know. <font style="background:black">  Maj.Gage   Talk . 04:50, February 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * That show is funny as hell. What's your favorite segment? Mine are the "Cubicle Boss", "Buisness Sniper", "Dear Black People" (I'm not racist, but this was funny as hell. "Dear Danny Matherson, SHUT THE FUCK UP.") "The Grapist", and "Homeschooling". The one with Charlie Chaplin & Hitler was probably the worst. Emblem-loadedfinger.jpg <font style="background:black">  Maj.Gage   Talk

. 04:39, February 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * The one with Abe Lincoln was funny too, I like how he was practically singing "now you fucked up". The segment with the quotes above was funny too ("Did Timmy's mom really die", "No, it was Scott's mom", "YES"). Emblem-loadedfinger.jpg <font style="background:black">  Maj.Gage   Talk

. 02:40, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Danster1000
He created a mainspace article for his clan; I moved it to one of his subpages.

Was this the right course of action?

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   06:04, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

I'm getting really tired of this.
You constantly ignore me. You're more aloof than Doctor Manhattan (Watchmen reference). You run this site like a dictator. I am referring specifically to Cod4's RFB, where despite having a huge majority, which included the support of multiple admins, you simply got to veto it all by yourself for relatively petty reasons, and you will probably do the same to me in my RFA. Why do you deserve the power to destroy the democratic process that this site is supposed to run on? Is it written somewhere that you are allowed to do that? Hell, it doesn't even say anything about how an RFA passes on its project page. And, I'll ask again, why do you barely ever acknowledge my existence? And why do you almost never associate with any of the "commoners?" I know that you are a great asset to the wiki, but I would like you to seriously consider what I am saying and actually respond to me for once. Thank you. Imrlybord7 01:40, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Summers or Sumners?
Okay, so I assume you have CoD2:BRO. Some guy has been going around redirecting Summers' name to Sumners, saying that the developer knows him and that he was named after him. What is the guy's actual name? Icepacks 02:33, February 10, 2010 (UTC) (some links: 1 2)
 * The character is indeed named after me. The level designer, http://monster-clip.com/maps.htm, is a long time friend of mine. I guarantee that "Summers" on the wiki was a typo. I did not create the articles for these characters specifically because I knew they would be in question due to my username. I only made the correction after it was brought to my attention by the developer. -- James Sumners 02:49, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not doubting you or trying to antagonize you, I'm just asking for third-party clarification, or a second-opinion. As I don't have the game, I'm just wondering. Icepacks 02:58, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * No offense taken. Just providing some measure of proof to backup my edits. -- James Sumners 03:38, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi. I was wondering whether yo think I would be eligible for rollback abilities. If you decline I will not be offended.

Also, which platform do you use? I asked previously but to no reply. Thanks. Doc.Richtofen 22:02, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE:
Gah... another one? I hate when people think I was just getting angry at that guy for no reason. He was a vandal and I'd just spent a very tedious hour and a half undoing all of it. I regret getting angry like that, but that kind of tedium tends to put me on a short fuse >.>--WouldYouKindly 03:42, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

I just posted a response on both the anon's talk page and the Gary Sanderson talk page, hopefully that clears a few things up. I'm getting sick of getting hate mail for a lapse in temper that happened 5 months ago...--WouldYouKindly 03:53, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, with that unpleasant topic out of the way, ever played Medal of Honor: Allied Assault? It was made by the same team that split off from EA to start IW and I just picked it up again. Probably one of the best WWII shooters ever before the WWII time period got stale.--WouldYouKindly 04:01, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I still remember spending hours online (I sucked back then, but I had a lot of fun). It's a shame you cant find any unmodded servers anymore--WouldYouKindly 04:04, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Wow.
I just got wrecked.

/bows down Imrlybord7 06:03, February 13, 2010 (UTC)