Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship

Give a good reason and request for adminship in the bottom subsection if you wish to become an administrator, or bureaucrat.

Requirements for adminship
To qualify to be an administrator, you must meet a set of requirements.

You must
 * Have been here for at least a month or two
 * Have edited at least a few hundred times
 * Be civil
 * Have no record of serious offenses (E.g. vandalism, personal attacks)
 * Be known and trusted by others.

Regulations for voting

 * Keep your cool. RfAs have been known to host some nasty flame wars. If another user disagrees with you and gives you trouble, just keep your cool and don't fight back. That may sound "cowardly", but if you fight back, you could receive a block, and/or make the flame war escalate.
 * New users can't vote. Sorry, but that's the way it is. Someone can easily make a bunch of dummy accounts, all vote for their friend to be an admin, and unfairly turn the tide of the vote. For this reason, new users cannot vote for the possibility of being a sockpuppet. Anyone trying to use sockpuppets will be blocked.
 * Be descriptive. Though you don't have to, it's a lot easier for a discussion if you say why you're voting what you're voting. If you just say "Support - --Example 06:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)", you're not really saying why the candidate should be an admin, and your vote may be excluded and strikethrough ed. It's not just for supports, but for all votes.

Glossary of vote titles
Not just the standard "Support" and "Oppose"s are used in RfAs. This subsections lists mosts vote types.
 * Support - A positive vote.
 * Strong Support - A very positive vote.
 * Weak Support - A positive vote, but the voter is bound to change their vote.
 * Neutral - A vote saying that the voter is unsure about the nominee/between supporting and opposing.
 * Neutral leaning towards Support - A neutral vote, but closer to support than oppose.
 * Neutral leaning towards Oppose - A neutral vote, but closer to oppose than support.
 * Oppose - A negative vote.
 * Pending - Vote not yet decided.
 * Comment - A comment.
 * Not yet - A negative vote saying that the nominee has not been around long enough, but would be admin material if they had been around for a longer time.

Requests
If you feel you are up to the job, make a subsection for your request, and the community will discuss it.

Creepydude
I hereby nominate Creepydude for adminship. He is a frequent contributor of this wiki and has over 900 hundred edits (editcount). We are in need of admins as there are currently no active admins on this wiki--00:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I, Creepydude, accept this nomination, promise to help expand this wiki, and will be here as often as I can. Please do not forget that you can definitely vote for both of us, and I think that things would go very well with both Darkman 4 and I as admins.  I have done my best with things like updating the main page, adding a Call of Duty: World at War Ranks list, creating some templates, and adding the multiplayer maps for Call of Duty: World at War.  I will most definitely not do vandalism, block wars, or any abusing of my powers, as that is just not cool.  One of the things I specialise in is cancling the changes of various vandals around this site.  Please, step up and cast your votes, and don't forget to vote for Darkman 4!    M/Sgt. Creepydude  Sniper   Say Some'at Here!  00:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Support - per my reasons above.--00:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Support - He's done a great job so far and has really helped improve the World at War-related articles! Darkman 4 02:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Strong Support - He's done a great job here, and I hope he does better with more power. :) Roger Murtaugh 03:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Strong Support - Consistently active user with a good record; would be a reliable admin. --Azncutthroat 03:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Neutral - Somewhat low edit count, with minimum participation. Potential is high, but he may be asking to become an admin too prematurely. I am not particularly happy with this users request. Joey -  Talk Contribs 21:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)