User blog comment:Bovell/Opinion: We don't want Black Ops 2/@comment-4820371-20120222003454

I'm sorry but how are some of you people expecting a pre ww1 COD to be successful? I mean cod is generally a fast paced, spec ops, run and gun game with heavy focus on automatic weapons and killstreaks. True automatic weapons only really came out ww1 and you would be by no means getting 360 jumping off buildings killcams with em because their heavy weight. I mean its either gonna be "all the guns are the same and suck" or realism is gonna be strapped to a rocket and shot out the window and fly so far out it can't even be considered *insert era*. I mean minor things such as certain weapons in black ops weren't really invented yet but were believable. Having a smg in the civil war LET ALONE revolutionary would just be ludicrous. Also how would killstreaks work? 25 killstreak= Lincoln assassination? Only thing i could really see would be maybe artillery and gas. I think the best idea was the desert storm, gulf war and such but hey does it really matter, there probably already half way done with cod9. \_(-.-)_/