User talk:Crazy sam10

What is this. http://prntscr.com/2f5upi Cloud&#39; (talk) 16:47, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

DL link for Mission 1 walkthrough.
Here's the link for it: https://mega.co.nz/#!w54XAZqa!Tiz1dS1KeZ9lz3uf8LLCAXB8179J_hJMMzmLB7xt5eo

05:45, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Steam
Works for me. 05:47, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Can I ask why you deleted the page for Call Of DUty: Black Ops 3? It was seriously announced on a blog report via from Activision.

SKILLStoTHRILLS (talk) 22:54, January 8, 2014 (UTC)SKILLStoTHRILLS

So then I should just consider Activision's report on google news fake?

SKILLStoTHRILLS (talk) 23:06, January 8, 2014 (UTC)SKILLStoTHRILLS

Don't search Black Ops 3/lll. Search "Activsion" just Activision, click on google news, the click on the report: Call of duty: Ghosts stale already?

SKILLStoTHRILLS (talk) 23:12, January 8, 2014 (UTC)SKILLStoTHRILLS

It would not let me.

THERE IS SOMETHING KEEPING ME FROM SENDING LINKS! Should I just type it out and you can put it in the search box?

Type in this link: http://motoringcrunch.com/news/cod-ghosts-vs-black-ops-3-activision/1002337/

SKILLStoTHRILLS (talk) 16:36, January 11, 2014 (UTC)SKILLStoTHRILLS

Sorry
I was thinking about how we had the map pack itself as a page so I was thinking it was O.K. to make a page for the gun. Rising Sun 2013 02:20, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

RE;Staff/VTSF
The only reason I needed to go on here was to search for COD4 so...yeah.Amir Kinard 14:26, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Different System in CoD: BOZ?
Ok, I don't understand. I know it works different than in Black Ops Multiplayer, but why was it removed because it's different? It has the same name, and it's already been mentioned in the article. I just want to understand, I don't mean to sound aggrivated. Thanks, RisingSun2013 (talk) 21:04, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

The Call of the Dead crew are playing as themselves not characters. - Section (talk) 12:20, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

Activision page griefed
The two jokers 209.17.191.117 and 85.31.186.106 thought it would be fun to pratically rewrite the Activision page. I just wanted to pass their IPs to you and Cod4 and let you two decide what to do.

Digitized since 95 Pcthomas2 06:13, January 20, 2014 (UTC)

CoDG timeline
I advise you would take a look at the talk page if you want other people to refer to it to contest with the dates. 01:48, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

Untrivial?
I saw on the Peacekeeper page about how it was the first to be added into Call of Duty multiplayer. How is it not as trivial, if not more, that the DG-2 is the very first to added into Call of Duty? I would appreciate if you wrote back. Thanks if you do. RisingSun2013 (talk) 02:29, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

R.E: Opnion blog
I'm sorry. I was under the impression that opnions weren't part of the news. I'll be sure to get my ID card next so the government can keep tabs on me.Hyperborrean22 (talk) 10:42, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

Look, all I'm getting at is the fact that people should be able to make an onion blog without joining a club. I thought we were a democracy.Hyperborrean22 (talk) 14:57, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

I was saying this wiki doesn't have passionate members and needs to step it up! Of course I'm going to get taken down if it's up to others! Look, I wanted to help but censorship makes that impossible.Hyperborrean22 (talk) 17:19, February 2, 2014 (UTC)

1st sorrry for long reply. i was on holiday.

2nd. Dictatorship = censorahip. you just said the blogs are dictated so therefore they are consored.Hyperborrean22 (talk) 10:39, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Well of course i'm going against guidlines. i was saying this place didn't have a true fanbase behind it. besides, i thought guidelines were guidlines and in no way a set amount of rules.Hyperborrean22 (talk) 15:15, February 9, 2014 (UTC)

Look, all i am getting at is that we should be able to make an opnion blog without joining a club. Have you considered making a non-main page area for that like the BF wiki does?Hyperborrean22 (talk) 10:32, February 16, 2014 (UTC)

War room?Hyperborrean22 (talk) 11:11, February 16, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Bad Edit
The Cryptids page mentioned of the creatures existing "before the dinosaurs," and on the Extinction Story page, stating 300 million years prior to humanity (not necessarily "modern life"), which obviously was before recorded history. As such, I wrote "Prehistory" as the section in place of "Long before modern life."

The "One year before the outbreak" section obviously translates to one year prior to Point of Contact, which occurred on July 24, 2016, two weeks after the ODIN attack on the United States, which occurred on July 10th. One year before 2016 is clearly 2015.

The date October 30, 2016 was the date given on the Nightfall page and is exactly "14 weeks after Colorado."

In addition, I was doing my part to edit certain areas of the page where I felt proper grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation was needed, as I do with all pages. -- Green light ops (talk) 03:42, February 3, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's nothing. I'll keep an eye out for more. -- Green light ops (talk) 07:32, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Blog Comments
Why'd you delete a whole thread of comments, with the reasoning being "Flamebait", when there was nothing flambaity about it? 05:37, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a nationality war at all, it was you and Raven flaming someone for asking why a pretty major event wasn't included in the community news. If you wanted to prevent something like that, you shouldn't have participated. 05:56, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd say, if anything, "And the reason that you don't hear about that is because you're in America, where the penetration for anything that's not Handegg, Baseball or Basketball is surprisingly low" from Raven's "nationalized it". And I'm less speaking about a national war and more from a flaming perspective. All the guy did was ask why the super bowl wasn't included in the community news when it's a pretty massive event and a large part of our community is American, and thus likely to watch American football. There's no reason for Raven's or You to flame him into annoyance, no matter how "considerate" you were being with your replies. 06:08, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * If you're gonna quote me, quote the whole comment. "Lol UK people, cry me a river. Let the guy like football" Not only was it a joke in respect to the fact that you two were pretty clearly riling the guy up over nothing, but it was meant in good taste and too just drop the subject. It wasn't heading in any "direction" since the next three comments by Me, Kylet, and Metl had nothing to do with nationality. 06:19, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * So now you are bringing an unrelated situation, involving a user who had a pretty substantial history, into a conversation that doesn't even involve said user? No I don't think the remarks are anything remotely similar, and shouldn't even be looked at as similar. All my comment was was an observation that you two were from the UK, which is why you were picking on a guy for liking American Football. The only "deragatory" part of the whole situation was Raven's calling football "Handegg". 06:26, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Because nothing was wrong until I came in right? Nothing was wrong when Raven's said "Nobody cares about handegg". Nothing was wrong when the Anon tried to defend the strategy aspect of the sport and you said "American Football players confirmed for campers. Noobs." No, the only wrong part was when I mentioned your nationality and said cry me a river cause you were picking on some Poor Anon who just want's his sport mentioned in the COMMUNITY NEWS. That's the wrong part. Didn't matter who's feelings were being hurt when they were just some Anonymous user. No, it only seemed to matter when it was you, apparently. And I guess deleting the whole thread, rather than the one comment that offeneded you, seemed like the way to handle it? I don't think so either. 06:37, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * For starters, you blatantly added to the problem. Not only with your "American Football players confirmed for campers. Noobs." comment, but also with your naming comments. You could tell the anon was riled up and, probably, upset, so why did you keep bothering him over the name? And the reason I spoke to you was you deleted a whole comment thread on a whim because one offended you. Though I, obviously, vehemently disagree with the reasoning, I accept your reasoning for the deletion of the one comment, not of the whole thread. So basically, this problem wasn't limited to Raven and didn't only have to do with the subject of your comments. 06:50, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I wasn't trying to win, and I wasn't intending on apologizing. All I wanted to know was why delete a whole thread of comments, an answer to which I never got throughout this whole discussion. 06:56, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Seriously? Seriously man? You give me this whole speech about insults and hurting peoples feelings without intent and then leave it on that note? "Unless you're getting pleasure out of this." No, I don't get any pleasure out of this. I don't get pleasure out of confronting someone who I see as a friend with something that I see as wrong. I don't get pleasure out of having my words twisted in a way that compares me to the rude and homophobic remarks of another user. I don't get pleasure out of seeing an anon get bullied and pushed around for little to no reason, just to have the whole thing deleted. I don't get any pleasure out of this, and Im shocked you'd say something so degrading after all we just talked about in this thread. 07:07, February 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't want anything man. In all honesty, my above message was left before you apologized and I just didn't see it. I was just incredibly hurt that you would think I enjoy doing things like this. I don't man, I really don't and I hope you understand that. I've always considered you a friend. This whole fight, let's be honest that what it was, wasn't me trying to hurt you or paint you into a bad guy. I swear, by everything I can possibly swear behind, that it only started cause I wanted some reasoning for deletion of the whole thread, which I guess I have now. I don't like the reasoning, though I can't even tell if it's true or your just trying to get me off your back, but it is what it is.
 * For what it's worth, I'm sorry for pushing you the way I have tonight. Things just got pretty heated, and in all honesty they're still pretty hot, but I am sorry for pushing you as far as I did, man. 07:17, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Understood man, talk to you later. 07:22, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Why is viktor reznovs picture on call of duty ghosts/michael myers wiki?

A new category for Blogs
While the discussion between you and that guy about Opinion blogs was going on, I had an idea for adding a 'Satire' blog. It's just for blogs that are sarcastic, comedic, or parodical (such as the '100 things I hate about X' blogs). It's just a thought, and I think it would help decrease some of the drama caused by it by people who think these are serious. 17:41, February 16, 2014 (UTC)

Yes I was gonna put a Discussion together, but I wanted to see your thoughts first. I'm honestly surprised we don't have this, seeing as there have been quite a lot of satire blogs before. I'll get a forum together, though it'd be appreciated if you wanted to help me out in some way. 18:01, February 16, 2014 (UTC)

Some reasoning
I just wanted to explain why I have been on the defensive so much with you and the others. Before I came here a friend (who shall not be named) told me that he stopped editing here because his work was constantly reverted. I expected something would occur with me. Whilst I don't apologise for being defensive I do apologise for getting censor and censure mixed up. I meant censure. My bad... Now, I've tried to be respectable in my last update to the forum and I would like your input. I just ask you keep an open mind.--Hyperborrean22 (talk) 10:57, February 17, 2014 (UTC)

Vandal
The User at http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/2.124.71.29 vadalised the 'Free Fall' page. I think I undone it properly.

Vandal
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.163.19.101

Untitled
Why do you keep deleting my image? TerabyteTom (talk) 13:14, February 18, 2014 (UTC)Tom

Edits
I can understand why you reverted the trivial edit, but why the other on the page? You never gave a reason, so please indulge me, thank you. The kennynator 13:25, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

There was another edit by you on the page immediately after, and you did not give an edit summary, on the Maniac page, so please state why. The kennynator13:46, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Images
How were they badly named? What would be your suggestion of naming? I did notice the licensing now, previously I was doing some quick editing at that time. The kennynator 13:43, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about the recent image i posted on The Nightfall Program. I was unaware of your image policy. I was wondering if you could help my page bacuse it really does need the logo of the program which i couldn't find. Again sorry

TheAfterburner (talk) 23:15, February 19, 2014 (UTC) TheAfterburner

Fanfilm
Hey, my friends and I have started a series of COD fan films, so can we be on COD wiki? Visit our page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Call-of-Duty-NATO-operations-FAN-MADE/435746879860762

~LemmyKilmister~

Hyperborrean22
Dont worry about Hyper, ignore him. We dont condone his actions and he will be reprimanded. We had nothing to do with his unacceptable actions.-- 18:08, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I have never seen him discuss any of his actions. In any case we are deciding his punishment here here. 20:42 February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Wilco. Your free to join the discussion. As for pics, we could always use them for our map pages. -- 21:17, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

RE:
Okay AK-28 (Talk ★ Edits) 15:02, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

Signature Problems
Hey Sam. I recently created my signature. I posted it on my profile, and for whatever reason it turned the next section on it red, the same color as the font I used. Do you think you'd be able to fix it? I have no clue whether its a technical error or if I accidentally imputted the coding incorrectly. Thank you. Legos-Rule-15 (talk) 06:31, February 26, 2014 (UTC)


 * Never mind Sam. I figured out what I did wrong. But on another matter, there are two AFDs, the gas trap and death trap namely, which could be archived since the pages have already been deleted. Thanks. 15:33, February 26, 2014 (UTC)