User talk:Razgriez

RE: Requesting help with a Vandal...
Alright, thanks for the heads up. I'll issue a short block if he does anything else. 05:12, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Stfu and get out.
No, nowhere does it say POSSIBLE refrences. It always say "It is clearly a refrence" or something like that. Get your shit straight. --Slowrider7 02:59, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

RE: I see you noticed him too
Yeah I saw. It doesnt really need anything more than a revert at the moment, the edits seem to have been made in good faith so it wasn't vandalism or anything like that.--WouldYouKindly 22:19, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

RE: vandalism
Taken care of, thanks for the heads up--WouldYouKindly 00:57, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Model 1887 Mag Size
The Mag Size on the Model 1887 is 7, not 5. Look at the gun in a video or something. There are 7 shots, not 5. I'm not absolutely sure if it's you who did that, but get your facts straight.

O rly?
O rly? Well, everywhere I look there's 7 shells. Sorry, I guess. It doesn't really matter. :) CoD BEAST 13:31, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

RE: MP40 vandal
Yeah, taken care of. Gave him a week-long block the second I saw what he posted on Hobson's talk page.--WouldYouKindly 07:19, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

RE: Vandal found
Done and done, thanks.--WouldYouKindly 23:48, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Mobilized Page Edits
Hi there... uhm I want to clarify some things. So your sure you can not use sniper rifles in Multiplayer right? In addition, I really want to keep the triva about how the explosive tip crossbow thing... it's should be in the trivia section because it's a fact not many people knows about.

~Anonymous~

To clarify, here is what was removed, when I undid your edit

Changed back the spelling of Seconds, to the correct spelling ( you typed it as "secounds")

Removed the following

"* Surprisingly, you can no longer use sniper rifles in multilayer mode.
 * The "explosive crossbow arrow" can be found in many levels in one of the areas where the collectables is found. Think of it as a "hidden item"."

While the last one, about Explosive Crossbow was acceptable, you, you're self, had typed it as "Sniper Rifles can't be used multilayer(sic)" I wouldn't know for certain if that's true, since I don't play Mobilized. I removed it, because you had said, that Sniper rifles weren't in Multiplayer, so that leaves me to wonder, what are you asking then? Are you unsure your self about the info you typed? because the edit I did, makes it sound like you CAN use them.

If you want to put back in the Crossbow bit, that's fine. The other, please clarify more.

--Razgriez 04:52, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. :)
Thanks for the reply, I appreciate that. I'll double check if sniper rifles can not be used in multiplayer modes anymore, because when I played it with my friends, it didn't seem like I was able to use sniper rifles, and only those machine guns. ...wait, yes you can not use sniper rifles in multiplayer anymore. I just checked. You can only use machine guns, and the default pistols. :)

In addition, both "secounds" and "seconds" are correct. I forgot to tell you I'm Canadian, so I try to use Canadian spellings as much as possible since Canada kicks a##.XD LoL Well... it's true, since our country done lots of good stuff to the world, other then epic failing in the Kyoto Protocol just like US did. XD Education in Canada is top notch, and not to brag, but it's better than USA's for many reasons. For example, say you wanna be a doctor, and the fee in US is really high and the curriculum isn't the best, while Canada's fee is loooowwww... and our curriculum is awesome. That's why lots of people go to the universities Uhm srry for the off topic, but yes secounds is correct too. :) There are many other words that have the "ou" in it. Such as... -colour ... uhm forgot, lol.

...and the Canadian version of catalog which is catalogue... but I think that's french. O_O

~Anonymous~

Ah ok, yea typically, I use the U.S. spelling of words, sorry for the confusion there.--Razgriez 21:34, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thank you.
No problem. I can see you were getting pretty sick of the "noob gun" edits, as was I. 00:12, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Blog (No, I just have no idea what you left as your subject message)
Yeah, I kinda got that after I posted it. I take things pretty seriously, and there's the fact that two hours before that I created a blog titled "The Anti-Akimbo Model 1887 Group".

(Which was a joke, as well.)

Sorry for the misunderstanding --  T    C    E   01:43, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I'd just like to say Razgriez, that your posts in the 'You know when you play too much CoD when...' blog are pretty freaking funny. I was rereading some of them because I got bored and your's made me crack up. Plus I love your user page, especially the 'things I hate part'. Do you have PS3 or Xbox360 cause it'd be awsome if I could verse you some time. Cheers, Cpt. Carebear 2:54 AEST

Just a heads up
Based on your blog "post" about the 1887s, I already don't like you, so I really have no problem coming out and saying the following. A) You are one of the biggest elitists I have ever seen. Your list of "9 Circles of Hell" contains some legitimate points, but the fact that you are a total douche AND you address people like you in your own list of hellgoers is failtastic. B) You've got some rampant typos going on. That is all. Imrlybord7 17:00, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Considering that I used to be the "golden boy" editor here, I'll feel free to voice my opinion. And I never claimed to not be an elitist. I am very much an elitist. I have no problem with elitists, UNLESS they are elitists who explicitly say that they don't like elitists (YOU). And no, I did not fail to understand the satire. The satire was that you pretend to hate the 1887s when you obviously feel that they should NOT be nerfed. I disagree with this opinion, but normally I would just call you stupid over that. But no. You go on to insult people who complain about the 1887, when in fact the 1887 is the most overpowered gun I have ever seen in any game, and anyone who doesn't oppose its existence doesn't know shit and is in no position to be judging others. Obviously the 9 circles thing is from the Divine Comedy (I've never heard of CAD), but obviously you wrote it because those kinds of people piss you off, satire or not. Oh, and there was no internet fight going on at the time. I was just calling you out, and after noticing the incessant typos decided to point them out, too. I have no problem with hating on the vandals, but the way you talked about 1887 haters really rubbed me the wrong way, not to mention that you hate elitists from atop your high horse. Basically, the fact that you are judgmental in such idiotic ways moved me enough that I just had to call you out. That's a serious rarity. I mean sure, I'll call a million people idiots in a heartbeat, but to make me dislike you that much in such short order is a sign of true douchebaggery. Imrlybord7 20:14, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

The 1887 one shots at a gamebreaking distance. I never said you can't voice your opinion, but I can give as much shit about it as I want. Normally I would have just called your lack of balance understanding stupid and navigated away, but the fact that you are so judgmental of other people while claiming to dislike judgmental people pisses me off. Also, I would have noticed the vandalism once I went to my user page, so it's not like I needed the help. Regardless, it is every editor's duty to remove all vandalism, and doing anything less qualifies you as a shitty editor, regardless of the page. Imrlybord7 21:53, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Yet again, when did I claim not to be an elitist? I'm an elitist who is fine with other elitists unless they hypocritically judge others for being elitists. Also, today I was one-shotted with the 1887s on Terminal. He was standing in the long hallway looking out the series of windows, I was on the inflatable emergency slide of the plane. That is some DISTANCE. Imrlybord7 05:19, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Fine then. I'll leave you with some information. SPAS-12: Max Damage: 200+. 8 pellets. Range: 35. Hip Spread: medium AA-12: Max Damage: 130. 8 pellets. Range: 26. Hip Spread: large Striker: Max Damage: 140. 6 pellets. Range: 30. Hip Spread: medium Ranger: Max Damage: 200+. 6 pellets. Range: 20. Hip Spread: medium M1014: Max Damage: 200+. 8 pellets. Range: 28. Hip Spread: medium Model 1887: Max Damage: 200+. 6 pellets. Range: 40. Hip Spread: small. Damage per pellet: 35. Nope, not 35-xx, just 35. That means 3 pellets to kill at any range before its pellets disappear, which is the highest range of any shotgun except the Masterkey, which does much less damage and cannot be Akimbo'd. Akimbo'd it can shoot 12 pellets at once. The only times Infinity Ward ever changed weapon balance post-release in CoD4 were: 1) fixing the 1.75x sprint multiplier that the M21 and P90 had, and 2) reducing the max ROF of semi-auto weapons to make modded controllers less effective. The former took months, the latter took over a year and a half. So other than fixing a programming error and making it harder to cheat, IW NEVER responded to any of the balance complaints. However, in this case, they have decided to rebalance a weapon within 2 months of the game's release. Doesn't that tell you something? Imrlybord7 05:49, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Requesting action against Imrlybord7
I've gone ahead and brought this to the attention of Chiafriend12, he's a much more experienced admin and he'll be able to better handle the situation.

You're going to hate to hear this, but you should know that Imrlybord is basically a good editor, he just has terrible people skills. And I mean really terrible. You probably caught him in a bad mood as well. And you guys' back and forth obviously didn't help either of your moods.

I'm sure that Chia will handle the situation fairly and maturely. He's our most experienced active editor, the situation is in good hands. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. 22:42, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Don't even try
Why waste your time posting on my page if you didn't accept my apology. Just because it wasn't "sincere" doesn't mean it's not an apology. And just so you know, what Imrlybord7 said to you was not right, and part of my job here is to sort out problems like this. What do you want me to do. 22:46, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Because I find your empty apology rather insulting, that's why.... --Razgriez 00:15, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Blog
I've been checking on your blog for a few days now, and it just gets more intense every time. I think it'd be reasonable for you to edit out your blog, and hide everyone's quotes. If you really want to get a message across, that's fine. But seriously, that blog generated more hate than a KKK convention in downtown New York. --  T    C    E   06:31, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

--

Okay, that's your decision, and I respect it. Good luck dealing with everyone that has taken offense. --  T    C    E   07:08, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

--

Definitely. --  T    C    E   16:42, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

--

Re:Apology
Thank you. Apology accepted, but I should be apologizing to you:

I'm sorry I didn't warn Imrlybord about what he said. My reason why is the same, because it is true. I did care about what he said, I know it is unacceptable. I do respect that what you wrote was satire, and what I put as a comment was ignorant of what you said and poorly written. I'm sorry about the foul language as well. If you want me to delete the blog I can, if that will make you feel better. Once again, I am sincerely sorry. 10:27, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Administrator help
Option C would probably be best.

Sorry, but I've been busy with things lately. Imrlybord's been blocked for a day-and-a-half and all else I can do is ask the two of you to get along in the future. 00:20, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

The Fuck!
WTF? why do you keep deleting my contributions, its for everyone to edit not just you and I changed it to its possible but highly unlikely. You are a prick

Re:Vandals
Thanks for the reports. I blocked one, warned the other and the last one wasn't really vandalism, but regardless thanks a lot. 20:48, December 21, 2009 (UTC)