Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Smuff

Hi all, I'm going to nominate Smuff for adminship. Smuff has been a valued member of the community for over a year[ citation needed ] and is not afraid to help out the community. He has made it his natural habitat in the the forums (where he has many contributions and has established himself as a very intelligent user), the mainspace (where of which over 2/3 edits are to), and on blogs (where he usually provides news to the community). While Smuff only has an editcount of over 3000, over 2000 of those edits are to the main space. That's a considerable ratio between the two. And while Smuff has many fails, there is no doubt in my mind that he could handle the responsibilities of an administrator.
 * :D 00:00, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Support
-- 23:54, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

-- Senior Sammich Omnomnom  Kartoffeln?  23:58, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

 RC  ™   00:04, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Per CoD4.

00:19, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

 Diegox223  Talk  01:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC) User lacks required mainspace edits.


 * Thank you, but this is Smuff's RfA, not mine. -- 00:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you have been gravely mistaken. So much, that an invisible grave has popped up in the vicinity of your living quarters.Senior Sammich Omnomnom  Kartoffeln?  00:28, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

17:58, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

20:15, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral
-- 01:15, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * There is no "need" for administrators. There can be no limit to users who will benefit with these flags. -- 01:17, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * Per Azuris. Also, we haven't had a successful RfA since October, and since then, we lost about three active Sysops.

 Shotrocket6  Talk 19:28, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 Shotrocket6  Talk 11:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * Smuff didn't write this. 11:43, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * Firstly, the majority of those are from Forum:Blogging solutions back in September, which was 5 months ago. In my opinion only 2 of the above are actually relevant. Secondly, the majority of those comments are from a larger comment, while you seem to have just simply gone for a small section of it. When you put those quotes down you didn't mention the context of the quotation; "I don't think there's any editors out there who have the time or drive to do that." was in response to a forum suggesting we get the firing sounds of guns, which would take a fair amount of effort to get given the amount of people who play on console rather than PC, while, "Well Mason saying "I just keep hearing the fucking numbers!" does say a good deal about him," was in response to S.S. coming up with another more "descriptive" quote for Alex Mason in Forum:A note about quotations. 12:06, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh yes, "And although everyone is suggesting cleanups, we did two of those last year. They do nothing." was in part of a much larger comment when I stated afterward that the reason they don't work is because people will still add and re-add their own points, which we did see during the last cleanup. 12:19, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * It would've been a mess to include the entire comment in the quote, which is why I linked each quote to their respective articles: so the voters could themselves decide what to make of them.  Shotrocket6  Talk 19:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't say that was everybody's opinion. I was pointing out some of the flaws that all voters should be aware of when choosing their side.  Shotrocket6  Talk 19:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 12:33, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * He still has a considerable amount of mainspace edits compared to others who spend all day spamming blogs with dozens of useless comments. 18:03, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

 Shotrocket6  Talk 19:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)