Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Carbonite 0

I would like to nominate Carbonite 0 for adminship as I believe that although he has only been editing since March of this year, he shows pure dedication to the wiki and only wants to improve it. He has done plenty of antivandal work, and has helped to tidy up the wiki by ensuring that unnecessary and duplicate images are speedy deleted and that pages are correctly categorised. He's also very helpful towards other users if they need help or are doing something incorrectly. He has been trusted enough to be given chatmoderator status on Special:Chat, where he regularly bans disruptive users and tries to keep the peace. He also received UOTM this month for his hard work. I believe he has the maturity to handle and would benefit greatly from the use of admin tools.

Carb also shows great examples of policy use including DDD where he regularly undoes deleting edits. He also messages many users to let them know they don't have voice, why he undid thir edit or why he banned a user from chat. He also regularly reports vandalism and bad edits to me and other administrators on IRC while also undoing the bad edits or vandalism. Carbo also used good judgement when he succsessfully rooted out a sockpuppet. 11:28, August 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * I appreciate and accept the nomination. Carbonite 0 16:05, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Support
As nominator. 11:28, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Dedicated user who would be a great asset to the wiki as an admin. Carbonite 0 has a clear will to help and shows good judgment in what he does. 11:34, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Don't think I've ever seen him put a foot wrong. 11:35, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

Excellent user, and while I haven't seen much of him in in the War Room, I have seen him on IRC reporting vandalism on many occasions. Being a chat moderator shows just how dedicated he is to the wiki. 12:59, August 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Should really join the Wikia staff." O_o 15:18, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Being an admin doesn't make you a Wikia staff member... BOofficialicon.jpg Poketape  Talk 20:07, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he might have been referring to our administration team as "staff", but I'm not Yellow, I can't be sure. 23:37, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

18:24, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

22:09, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

 Talk 00:33, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

--   AJ.Bialke Talk! 06:34, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Excellent contributor, with a great understanding of how the wiki works. Sgt. S.S. 17:13, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

SwissArmy2010 17:25, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

{{Support|Why the hell not? He's a great user, and I realize now he would truly benefit from these tools. He has accomplished much in his time at the wiki, and I know he would put these tools to good use. {{Sig/Nikolai Cannot Die}} 07:53, August 5, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral
07:07, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
While he has made a great start, great participation in the community, and overall great helpfulness here on the wiki. He only started editing about four months ago, and I personally feel four months is not a long time to be here. But I will strongly support if you post another RfA, in say, a few months. Well done Carbonite, but I just feel you haven't been here long. -- 11:38, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would just like to point out he's accomplished more in four months than I have in near-on two years. 11:39, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do know that. It is good that he shows full-commitment to the wiki. I just feel that four months is still quite a short time. -- 11:44, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sp3c was made admin after a similar time on the wiki. 12:52, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Carbonite has been here 4 months, Sp3c became an admin after about 9 months.-- 15:27, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * But he had only been active for five months. 15:30, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would of opposed to that too, had I been editing then. -- 15:38, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Time editing the wiki has nothing to do with getting sysop. It more depends on if you can be trusted and need the tools. 15:39, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I feel that time gives experience, and people learn faster than others, an example is Carbonite himself, a fast learner. But despite learning at a fast rate, I still think he needs some more time here on the wiki. -- 16:16, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * So you said Carb is a fast learner but he still needs more time?
 * http://i.imgur.com/Q3Kn9.png
 * 16:29, August 1, 2011 (UTC)

We don't really need another admin here, so soon after Elmo becoming an admin.18:44, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no limit to the amount of admins. The more with the tools the better. 18:49, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then nominate me for admin xD18:59, August 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Only good users get made admin. 19:04, August 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * There's no actual "need" of an admin unless every single admin has either left or just started hating on people. The basis of this vote is that having Carbonite be an admin right after Eltomo just because his was made before his, which is ridiculous and an illogical vote. The higher the numnber of admins we have, the more beneficial we are to the wiki and the faster we can get things done. (dont go using that as an excuse with your rfa, noobs :P) 18:14, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Not yet Per Drk, after Elmo becoming admin, wait a few months then try again. Reznov115 Talk   18:02, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would it be fair of us to force Carb to wait months on the basis of Eltomo having an RfA three weeks before this one ends? 18:03, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not like Eltomo (or anyone else) becoming admin forms a magical barrier around Special:UserRights that prevents us from making another admin for a "few months". 03:10, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Just not ready yet. CoaZ Talk   02:21, August 3, 2011 (UTC)