User talk:Scottie theNerd

Re: Image
Sorry, I just realised that myself, I took the picture from a printscreen on YouTube - we needed an example. I could try and find a different picture if you want? - 13:13, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, I understand. How will we get one? - Scotlandthebestsig.png 15:32, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * What would be good, I reckon, would be examples of cover that can be penetrated. A screenshot of someone shooting through a wall (or shot at through a wall) is a perfect demonstration. --Scottie theNerd 15:50, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

1000 edits
You just broke 1000 edits. Nice one! 13:18, April 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * While that may be true, that old primary school saying "quality not quantity" does come in here. Because while your edits might not be in big in quantity, they sure are in big in quality. 15:26, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

So, I wuz just wundrin'
if I cood, liek, nominate u 4 admnshp ur sumtin...  Capt. Bord T C   E 18:22, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Signature
I noticed that, I'm not sure how to fix that. It stopped working when I put this moving Signature on my name. I'm just going to remove it. DjuNgleB http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100402220853/callofduty/images/5/52/Starcraft.gif 14:26, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Scottie
I was ahem just wondering if you forgive me for some of that rude shit I said. And well I'd love to be friends, and I was wondering if that Asian descent happened to be Chinese.  Darthkenobi0 Talk 05:07, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

D: How could you? haha.  Darthkenobi0 Talk 23:16, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for moving it back man i didnt know what i did

10:45, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Dear Scottie,
I've been reading quite a bit of your input in the multiple War Room discussions in which you are involved. I have noted the anger you feel at the lack of action of the administrators of this wiki, and I have to say that I agree in the fullest. Just today I mentioned to my father the fact that most admins seem content to sit on their computers, doing other things, until there's a vandal they can block, leaving other users to revert edits, sometimes good edits. The sysops of the Call of Duty wiki seem to be growing lazy as a whole, and I believe we need change.

You have said you do not wish to become an Admin, that an RfA would be out of anger. I disagree with your statements. Precisely because you do not desire power, yet are capable of using it, should you gain it. Precisely because you are angry at such flaws in the system should you be responsible enough to wield that power. You, Scottie theNerd are an articulate man, you have few edits, but a vast majority of those are not good, but great edits.

You are extremely intelligent, capable of instrumenting change because of that intelligent, and very wise in your actions towards that change. So I appeal to you, allow yourself to be elected Administrator if the wiki should decide, the era of the semi-active admins acting merely as enforcers, not true administrators should end, and I believe to that end you are best fit to end that era alongside several administrators already taking measures to effect change on this wiki, including Griever, Bord and WYK.

So, summarily, while there are several sysops that are willing to, capable of, and effecting such actions, nowhere near the number of these "administrators" are doing as such, and while I personally feel there are others that should someday be in the position to reform this wiki, contemporarily, you are the one candidate with any glimmer of a chance of achieving "victory" to the ends of change through the powers of a sysop. Please allow yourself to be nominated for adminship, and please accept that nomination, for I truly believe you are what we need, and I am sure that there are others that would concur. Sincerely,  Darthkenobi0 Talk 02:05, April 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * A response would be appreciated. air-force-logo.jpg Darthkenobi0 Talk 03:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Granularity discussion
Any plans on drafting the Granularity Policy changes yet? I'd be happy to lend a hand since the policy is in dire need of revision. 00:53, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Sigs
Hey, i got a new sig, it is 125px, but it is small is it ok?  T  C  E   B 00:34, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

UoTM
Sorry, the possibility of being UoTM got the better of me... I never get nominated for anything. I won't go around and do that. 17:56, April 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * What do you think? http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/UOTM#Nominations And what do I do with the current nominations? Just delete them? Imrlybord7 04:18, April 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * My only issue with that is that people will be getting nominated for the first 21 days of the month. People nominated early in the month will end up running against people nominated later in the month, meaning that even though candidate x was nominated for what he did in, say, March, candidate y was nominated for what he did in May. Although my idea delays winning by two months, this way means that users from different months will be running against each other. Do you think we should make it so that nominations can't be submitted before a certain date, either? Say, between the 19th and the 23rd of the month? Imrlybord7 11:25, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I must've been gone or something - where are these discussions at? Who passed them? And when? -- Emblem-burgertown.jpg EightOhEight Talk 18:30, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. Well, it's no damage done either way - they're both bound to get it at one time or another. Have you been UOTM yet? -- Emblem-burgertown.jpg EightOhEight Talk 07:39, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, JJR is active, I'm not sure about TNT. I agree about the proposed changes, though. -- Emblem-burgertown.jpg EightOhEight Talk 07:46, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, JJR is active, I'm not sure about TNT. I agree about the proposed changes, though. -- Emblem-burgertown.jpg EightOhEight Talk 07:46, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

I've added a bullet to the sitenotice. Imrlybord7 23:33, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: UotM
Damn! It's too bad we don't know someone fluent in the art of coding. Oh well. That whole comment thing after you vote still bugs me though. To me you should just vote and that's it...... there is no need to give your reason. If the candidate wants to know why you voted a certain way, let them discuss it on their talk page. Also, once you cast your vote it is final. Votes should be either yes or no, I don't need to know if a voter is neutral. if that voter is neutral then just stay out of the voting process, plain and simple. The simpler the better imho. Cheers!  Talk 20:14, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

Scottie thanks for your replies and all i can say is hallelujah for that. Peace Dude.  Talk 07:04, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Small World
Well, I was on Wikipedia, and I was looking at the archived discussion of the "Battle of Thermopylae" page. I saw a post with your signature on it, and I thought to myself, "it's a small world." 🇨🇩

Admin
You'd become a great admin because you participate in War Room topics, discusions and more. I know no-one is supposed to become an admin until COD: Black Ops is released. 08:20, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Would you like to officially join the RCP group? I'm going to try to rally the group for the Overhaul project, and having you would probably catalyze things, you've garnered a large amount of respect, and you're a great example of the group's goals.


 * Okay, thanks, it's not actually a very hard thing to do, as you know, but there don't seem to be many of the actual patrollers doing much.  Warpig  3|1|2 20:19, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

What's wrong with the voting template?
Imrlybord7 13:39, May 10, 2010 (UTC)