User blog comment:Argorrath/Call of Duty: Ghosts reveals hidden camos in code/@comment-71.184.87.5-20140107112311/@comment-1187559-20140107235112

So, because he doesn't want to waste effort coming here himself, he just gets others to do it for him? There's nothing wrong with defending something, but only if it can't defend itself. In this case, Marvel is fully able to defend himself, but purely because he wants to be pessimistic and not do so, he's getting others to do it for him. As far as I'm concerned, that's just lazy and makes me think less of him. This whole discussion was brought up by one of his 'followers' making a sarcastic remark, which then lead to a full on debate regarding the person. If you do not believe in constriction, why do you also choose to blindly defend him? As I said, this is no better than a fanboy that defends their favourite brand. If Marvel himself doesn't want to get involved then he shouldn't have his legion of fans fight for him. Either he gets involved, or he doesn't. There's no need to trigger a debate over him just to try and prove some kind of point.