User talk:Imrlybord7

my page is fine
look bord there is nothing wrong with my page.

1. Lady Gaga is a bad influence among young women and causes them to act well basically like sluts. to try and spread my dislike for her i came up with that theory to try and make people realise she's an idiot and a bad influence without sounding like a boring old fart

2.if you want to get technical the earth isn't 360 since it is more in the shape of a pear than an apple

3. you must not be British. in Britain we tend to make fun of Americans because we don't like the fact that they are now the world power and we are not.

4. it was actually a misunderstanding as the guy wasn't Brtish and he did not know that in britain we let ex-cons in the army so it wasn't a crappy edit

Archived
Just so people know why my talk page is blank. Imrlybord7 16:17, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Actually...
Hehe, sorry, I did mean to add the stub. I use firefox so you can quickly go through the edit summaries you've previously used and use them again, and I hit the speedy delete one instead of the stub one. It won't happen again sorry, but thanks for pointing that out to me =) Smuff 16:26, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Precordial Thump
Does it really need to be there, it's kind of like an article about blood. It doesn't have much significance in the games and seems out of place. (like my new signature?)

Yeah
It does need some re-working, there's no Gasp article, there's no Jump article, so it does need to be re-writen to be make it more clear. If it does come up, many people want the article Poland erased because it's not directly refrenced in COD3, but you and I both know it still needs to be on there as there are two missions as a Polish tanker. Peter Griffen Boy 16:34, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

My signature
Gage, Saint and I are trying to work with it, we're not that good with codes, so it'll have to do 'till we work it out. For your gamertag, you should try downloaded the McDonalds picture pack (it's free) and get the Sausage Biscut (closest thing to a burger). I go tthe McDonalds picture on mine. Peter Griffen Boy 16:44, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Extra edit buttons
You know when the new welcome templates were put into action, new edit buttons appeared at the top of the edit box? Do you want me to implement some for you which let you insert the Vandalism and Blocked template with a click of the mouse? I was thinking of doing this for all admins and several trusted users, but I want to see what you think. 17:13, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, try editing a page and see if a Black-on-Yellow V and a black-on-white B appear. Those are the Vandalism and Blocked templates respectively. If they do not show up, try refreshing the page several times. 17:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Another RFA
During mid-March, Im thinking about triyng for admin. I most likely won't get in, but I need some work to be done, and seme suggestions would be nice. Peter Griffen Boy 18:49, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff=Vandal
He created a page with the name of Fewrfew_fwerwwert_tt_5t_t_r_re_ret_iytr_y_tiy_65o9i7056_7_emum67_lol Fewrfew fwerwwert tt 5t t r re ret iytr y tiy 65o9i7056 7 emum67 lol. 🇨🇩 22:58, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've unblocked him because that's not something he would do. I think someone else did that on his account. For now let's give him the benefit of the doubt. Also, unrelated to Smuff, I've noticed you've only been handing out minor blocks. Do not be afraid to hand out the occasional 1 week/2 week block for someone who's vandalized more than 3 times in a row, or a particularly extreme/stupid/unfunny vandal. All new admins are reluctant to hand out long blocks at the start, I remember I was.23:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yep, you're one step ahead of me. I'll reinstate the block, sorry for that. 23:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry about what happened, please allow me to explain. In an earlier post on this talk page, I explained I use Firefox, which also remembers Usernames and Passwords for easy login. Alas, I have a four year old brother named Elliott, who unfortunately, cannot type properly, but knows how to use a computer somehow. Anyways, he went onto MY laptop and opened Firefox, which was left open on this wiki. He then logged in and made that rediculous article about god knows what... Having discovered what he did at about 12am, I immediatly told him NEVER to touch my laptop ever again, and as a result, have cleared all passwords from the browser. I would like again apologise for this terrible mishap, and assure you it will never happen again. Also, I'd like to thank you and COD4 for the short ban, I'm sure it stopped him doing any more damage. Btw, if it does happen again, please don't be afraid to issue another 2 hour ban... Smuff 12:50, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks for believing in me there, it means alot. But once again, sorry about that, I swear it shouldn't happen again. I love this wiki way too much to actually vandalise it, I do try improving it with small edits and grammar fixes, and if I got banned I wouldn't have anywhere else to go really... =/ Smuff 13:18, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks. I told you I knew you would be a good admin =) Smuff 13:25, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oh that's excellent! I might try for RFA after about 700-1000 edits maybe when I'm a properly experianced editor, but that may take a while... =D Anyways, let's hope that works out, you'd certainly get some better admins with that system =) Smuff 13:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Dang, boi
You edit VERY fast. Anyway, if you want to change your adminship picture I got the codes on how to do it.

Some Weapons
Slowrider7 would like if you could give some opinions on our weapons and the weapons on his page and hopefully create some of yours.

RE: Some things that could use more attention.
Actually, I don't like COD:G. It's vague, it was never even completed, and there's so many ways it could be [mis]interpreted. The general premise I'm a fan of.

With your "bottom line", does that also mean we won't have articles on the games either?

And don't worry, I'm quite aware of the thread. 06:31, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You said "Basically, my 'bottom line' opinion on the matter is that we shouldn't have any articles that might as well just be on Wikipedia", so I was sarcastically taking that in a literal context in that since there are Wikipedia articles on the games, we should just let them cover it. 08:46, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * If we had a battle on ice skates, I would win without a doubt! (I actually can't skate on ice for my life.) 08:49, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE:...
Why the manhug? (Not meant in offensive way) Doc.Richtofen 09:57, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

You really don't leave anything else to say. Have you checked my comment on DW112's RFA? Doc.Richtofen 09:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but I don't really now what to say in it. Doc.Richtofen 10:02, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Doc.Richtofen 10:06, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: The philosophy of adminship
I probably shouldn't be sticking my nose into someone else's discussion, but I would say in the case of a user like Scottie theNerd, COD:IAR would apply for nominating him for adminship. A large edit count is a great way to gauge experience, but if it is preventing a very competent user from being nominated, then that prerequisite should be ignored. 12:29, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I read the discussion on Chiafriend's page before you linked me to it. It's an interesting point; however, I think COD:AEAE holds greater weight in this scenario than COD:IAR. Waivering pre-requisites wouldn't be unusual, but I think we should stick to procedure as much as possible unless the situation requires additional admins at short-notice. All users should get a fair chance at going through the RFA process; else the wiki might get drawn into a cycle of picking favourites when there are plenty of editors who would equally be assets to the wiki. Basically, I don't think the demand is great enough at the moment to invoke IAR. I anticipate that the release of COD7 might trigger a need for more admins.
 * For the record, I'm not actively seeking an admin position. I feel that the wiki has plenty of competent admins and other candidates with more experience. I've had my share of admin duties elsewhere and I believe I can do just as well without admin tools on CODwiki. If in the future I feel otherwise, I'll put up an RFA. Thanks for engaging in this discourse. --Scottie theNerd 14:26, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah.
Once I looked over it again, I realized it was kind of a bad move in an RfA. Slowrider7 14:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Boosting
In response to your hypothetical Wikipedia scenario on Chiafriend's talk page, it's nearly impossible for information on Wikipedia to lead to developments in a current event. Wikipedia is a source of information that is taken from other sources. If someone was being searched for, Wikipedia would need another credible source to establish the information as fact. Any developments in the case would be recorded or otherwise influenced by first-party sources rather than Wikipedia. In other words, Wikipedia does not "know" the whereabouts of the person; it reports it very much like a newspaper would by relying on other sources.

In regards to boosting -- CODwiki doesn't provide any new information. It merely documents what is already established and well-known. While potentially harmful to the game, it is a common practice that should be documented, and it's not exactly difficult to ascertain how boosting is done.

In my experience as a GameFAQs moderator, topics that are considered taboo are mainly concerned with EULAs and developer stances. If a developer considers a particular practice to be illegitimate (e.g. 'duping' in Diablo; using third-party mods to alter the game), then it is our moral obligation to condemn the provision and discussion of such activities. In CODwiki practical terms, we shouldn't be providing information that is potentially illegal (e.g. hacks, cracks, etc.), but activities that are merely against the spirit of the game such as boosting have little reason to be smothered. Otherwise, we might as well get rid of camping and other "cheap" tactics! --Scottie theNerd 14:43, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Render
2 words: Copyright issues.

--  T    C    E   17:01, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oops
lol no, I forgot to put the "may" in there :0 🇨🇩 19:33, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

808 seduced me
In IRC he convinced me to do it to get some user opinions, I'm not planning on doing it seriously until around March. I hate how Juan brings up mainspace edits as mainspace edits themselves don't mean shit, unless they've done something.

Polnsky's quote
I don't remember him saying the Hard Landing quote ("SHIT! GRENADES!"). Was that his vopice or am I hearing wrong? Cpl. Wilding 20:47, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Here's my question:
How? The IRC? No-one's ever on our main channel. Forums? I don't see that much stuff. Frankly, I know I should get more involved, but it'd be a lot easier if people used the IRC official channel. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:56, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Name Change
Okay, I will ask 808 to modify it (again) to Lt. Dunn. Cpl.  Dunn  01:22, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

NTW-20
I really think they should have missions in Africa in Modern Warfare 3, Infinity Ward could do just as good if not better than Ubisoft's Far Cry 2. This gun should be in it. If you don't know what it is, Google it and you'll know why. In case you've seen it, this gun was used by the MNU officer near the beginning of District 9 to kill the Red-Shirt Prawn. It is also the inspiration for the Halo Sniper Rifle. 🇨🇩 03:10, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

IW doing Far Cry
No, you misunderstand, sorry I wasn't clear. No one can EVER do African landscape as well as Ubisoft, but IW can probably do the cities and small towns better. 🇨🇩 03:20, March 1, 2010 (UTC


 * Yeah. Have you ever tried to make it through the Desert? If you accept a buddy quest from the Arabian guy (forgot his name) then you get a quest that involves finding an Oasis. 🇨🇩 03:25, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, I made the same mistake again, I made two conflicting edits :) 🇨🇩

Far Cry
Did you ever do total stealth? One of my past loadouts was a MP5SD for my primary, IED's for support, and a Dart Rifle. I also had the Camo Suit (for no measly 40 diamonds). I would sneak up on an enemy camp, mark their ammo crates, vehicles, and .50 cal turrets (M249's aren't a problem), plant an IED on the ammo, leave, get to a ridge and scope in on someone who is alone with the Dart Rifle. I shoot, pull out the detonator, click 'BOOM', pick off more helpless enemies, and run before my position was compromised. I would then sneak around, kill anyone in my way with the MP5/Machete, plant another IED in their garage, yet another BOOM, and then bust out of the shade mowing down dazed survivors and throwing Molotovs everywhere. 🇨🇩 03:47, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I never usually planned that much either, but one of the most fun things I did in the game was use the AS50 as an Anti-Materiel Rifle. I would overlook the PetroSahel in the North from a cliff about 2/3 of a klick away, wait for a jeep to drive by, and BOOM! through the engine block, the jeep stops, followed by two dead motherfuckers. Hah, once I actually shot at the driver and got a collateral. As far as I know, the AS50 is the only gun that can stop a car with a few shots. Also, doesn't Far Cry 2 use actual bullets instead of Hitscans? It seems you have to lead targets past 100m. Also, lots of the guns don't have infinite range (a la MP5, MAC 10, any Pistol). There is also mild bullet drop (i think). Can you remember? If so, enlighten me. 🇨🇩 03:59, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, so no bullet drop. It seemed to me that the guns had rather realistic ballistics i.e. any 9mm > AK47 range > AR16 Range > G3A4 Range 🇨🇩 04:12, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

My three loadouts were the aforementioned stealth loadout, the AS50 + IED + M249 SAW (anti-material), the G3A4 + Silenced Makarov + Flamethrower (light assault), and the FAL + M79 + Mortar (heavy assault) 🇨🇩 04:29, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Heh?
Just because I don't know what you were trying to do here, could you enlighten me? 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: The philosophy of adminship
"Adminship is *not* a big deal."

- Jimbo Whales

In an ideal world, anyone who would cause only positive outcomes from gaining adminship would be given adminship, but as humans, we cannot know for sure who those people are, and no one will only cause positive things with their powers.

Because we cannot know who is the equivalent of Jesus incarnate when it comes to adminship stuff, we have RfAs, votes, discussions, and requirements. If we just went on whether or not someone was trustworthy and would do good, we could probably find a few hundred people who are established sysops on other large wikis that have never even been here and give them rights here as well.

While edits and editcounts aren't everything, they show that a said user is dedicated and devoted to the project, and as logic dictates, the more devoted they are, the less likely they would be to abuse their powers and go on a destruction spree.

Stuff like that. 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: A moral issue
Well, you could: -- 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Outright delete it if you really wanted to (I can't guarantee there will be no negative reaction)
 * 2) Balance the information on stopping boosting with information on how to boost
 * 3) Make it more vague when it comes to parts on how to boost

RE: The Cleanup Template
You could make a subtemplate of it for the more serious cases you see, if you really want. 05:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Code Black
208.108.223.106 <--- dropped a tactical vandalism warhead on the Riot Shield page; I reverted to your last edit, but if you care to check it out, it was PRETTY flagrant. -- Echo Four Delta 16:58, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Not to play vandal's advocate here, but technically all 86.47.130.81 did was change "Riot Dick" back to "Riot Shield." It looks like that was his only edit. -- Echo Four Delta 17:03, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Congratulations Broseph! Enjoy it Brothertim 17:50, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Blocks
Hi Imrlybord. Good to see you're enforcing wiki law more harshly. Dempsey's block may have been a bit too harsh, but I trust you made a good decision. What's up with him? 20:03, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. He's 14, but he fails to behave like a 14 year old. -.- 20:41, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Making a new policy
"The Sigificant Voting Policty"- In order to vote you must have a significant reason to vote.

For example, this is not a good reason "No, Gaz can't be a Featured Article because he's in a recent game."

Really, though look at Captain Price, I'm getting no because he's from a recent game, that has 100% NOTHING to do with article qualitiy. Then look at Poketape's idea for Resnov, because he's not in MW2. Getting my drift. One time someone said, "I want to vote yes for Gaz 'cause he gives the lolz", but it was erased.

Would you support
Would you supprt my idea, some of Poketape's recent nominations and votes have just been "Yes, it's not in Modern Warfare 2" or "No, because it's in Modern Warfare 2" Kind of drags my chains.

That was a joke
It's fron the T.V. show Hogan's Heroes (old) where the main charachter would often seduce a Nazi Colonel's receptionist to get information or convince her to do stuff..

He did
He heavily said I should do it because I'd get lost's of ideas. I'm doing this to get some ideas. COD4 did this a lot and didn't get in until around try four or five.

Re
Yeah, I get what you mean - the people's reasons outweigh the numbers that voted? So if several people voted saying "I oppose because he sucks" or along the lines of such, but less people supported but with actual valid reasons, then the vote would go to the supporters? -ScotlandTheBest 00:37, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Dempsey141

hey, check Dempsey141's user page on the fanon wiki. he's making threats on the wiki and he says you banned him for no reason!

Price25

(Insert incredibly shocked phrase in caps lock here)
So, as I was looking over things, I read Dempsey's talk page, came across the "you sad dick" subsection, and you know what I saw? Well, those first two paragraphs were signed by you, even though Dempsey made the first. I was about to pretty much freak out here on your talk page about why you should never do that, but I looked in the history saw that he just didn't sign his post.

So, uh, it might help if you used   in a situation like this to prevent any further misinterpretations, heh. 06:12, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just be glad I decided to check the history to make sure my eyes weren't deceiving me. :P 06:26, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I just looked at that userpage you linked on Chia's talk page and... wow... I don't know what to say... will the Wiki-drama never cease? I don't even know why that guy thinks the PGB situation has anything whatsoever to do with him, and why he thinks he has the right to try to "force" us to perma-ban him...--WouldYouKindly 06:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I know he's just blowing smoke, but I'm just saying, what the f*** is he thinking?--WouldYouKindly 06:50, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

buttons
True, but I would like an automatic warning template button. would save me the trouble of warning vandals all the time and type... something to tell them to quit. TNT LotLP 14:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, they should work now. I had to manually insert your name instead of the 4 tildes. Sorry about that. 17:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Comment on Griever's page
Alright, I'm sorry. But he was treating me like I was retarded or something, and I wasn't going to take it lying down. To quote from General Shepherd, "I know you understand". Sgt. S.S. 18:53, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

New weapon page
Ocredan has created a page for the Suomi M31, a Finnish gun that doesn't appear anywhere in Call of Duty but is the inspiration for the Soviet PPSh-41. Since it doesn't appear in any CoD game, should we delete the article or let it stay? Cpl. Wilding 20:45, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Question.
Why do some people undo Unregistered edits, even if theyre perfectly fine? I know you cant answer, but its just something to think about. Edit farming? Not obeying the AGF rule? I dont know man... Slowrider7 20:56, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. I understand. But thats why I love the little page & magnifying glass.

BTW: Your making a very good use of your Admin powers. Kudos.

Slowrider7 21:01, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Well thats good. Dont you kinda think there are alot of RfA's right now? And most of them get approved? At this rate, almost everybody will be an admin by 2012. Seriously. Slowrider7 21:11, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

I know, a few people deserve it 100% and Im directly behind a few people, but dont you think everything is developing kinda fast? I mean, I know a bigger Wiki is a very much better Wiki, but all the big Wikis get more vandals. And just think, if one of those vandals get some hardcore hack or something? We could loose 30,000 men in the blink of an eye, and the world will just fuckin' watch. (ROFLCOPTER) Slowrider7 21:27, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I confuse myself most of the time. Rofl. But I meant this: More Admins -> More edits -> More vandals. Finish the ending yourself. Somebody would get/do something that could really ruin us. I dont like to make the internet very dramatic, but this is kinda serious. This is the only website I go to that is not for school.

RFA
Thank you for supporting me. It really means a lot.

I just hope the rest of the wikia is with you.

My powers move to you.
🇨🇩 is the place to go my friend. If you can stop a shitstorm, you better as hell do it.

My powers go to you
damn computer is so COD:IAR, if I can find a good use to them, I'm pretty sure that big brain of yours can do it as well.

My kewboard is missing up
Your talkpage is so big my computer messed up. I HAVE to go to leave new message to do talkpage. I don't and my keyboard messes up one me. Sorry for that stupid message. "Harry, use it well" Dumbledore said.

Don't got to
I used to have a really fast computer, but I downloaded Call of Duty 1 on it (did that bring back memories) and it crashed, it's my old slow computer that if the article is over maybe 100 lines or so it freezes up and messes up my keyboard.

Why ScottietheNerd should not be an admin
Don't take me wrong, he's a very smart guy, but he hasn't done much on the wiki side, and is to much centered on helping the "atmosphere" of this wiki. Thats one of the reasons I went nuetral on 808 (went to support to stop a shit storm), 'cause he hasn't done anything big but make userbars and the one task bar. Not saying they're bad users, but it's my opinion.

Thing is
I can't go directly to your talkpage and edit it all. That's why I gotta make a new section, or else it'll freeze.

Re:Your behavior in blog comments
Alright, I understand.

Callofduty4
While I well admit I was acting slightly childish, just because he and you have power that I do not have doesn't mean I will not give suggestions or grill you for questions. Just workin' out my freedom of speech.

Thats what I've learned.
Callofduty4 is one of the best editors I know (I heard God once tried to get mainspace,COD4 got more, but he was beat by Chuck Norris, who then lost to MacMillian), and he knows I don't mean to stir up stuff like I do. If anyone can take a rude joke, it's Callofduty4.

I'm going to log off now.
Damn work! Anyway, here's something you better enjoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxqKTEnfjMw

Re: Protected Template
All I did was revert an edit. If there was a protected template added to the page, it was already there. -Nogert 00:44, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Damn, you're fast
I didn't even know people read edit summaries. Oh, and for some reason, whenever I use my new sig, it puts the timestamp in a dotted box.

--

 T   C    E 

 '''EightOhEight T    C     E

05:28, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

How's BC2?

--

 T   C    E 

 '''EightOhEight   T     C     E 

06:31, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Signature
OK, then. DevilWarrior112 08:15, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

DevilWarrior
He's not sure about making the Sledgehammer Games page becasue you disagree with making it but i agree with making it. Should he be allowed to make it?

My reasoning: Our CoD6 page is basically "It is set in Vietnam and will be heavily plot-focused. The end". I don't see why we can't have a page on Sledgehammer Games that has minimal amounts of info like the CoD6 page does. Darkman 4 08:22, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re.Light Yagami
Nothing I just hate animi. Your old pic looked so much better.

Re:Hola
Me gusta esto, senor, prefiero hablar en espanol. Just kidding. Seriously though, I suppose I should, but I don't think I've made enough edits, and I never know what to say. I'm always worried I'll offend someone. Icepac K s 13:49, March 3, 2010 (UTC)