Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Sp3ctr3 130 Ki11er

I'm nominating Sp3ctr3 130 Ki11er for the position of admin. He may have a low edit count compared to other admins, but it's important to not judge a book by its cover, and instead delve deeper. Sp3ctr3 is an accomplished antivandal, he was recently made a senior member of the Recent Changes Patrollers, and he is a member of The Image Guardians, both of which are notable project usergroups, aimed at helping the wiki. He also has a clear will to help other users, something I've seen him do multiple times. He also has a very cool attitude, and is friendly with all users, no matter their experience or how they edit.

Sp3ctr3 would benefit himself and the wiki with the tools which come with being an admin. He is a dedicated antivandal, and he is dedicated to the maintenance tasks of the wiki. He would do himself and the wiki good with admin tools.

I hereby accept this nomination for adminship. 22:45, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Support
 Shotrocket6  Talk  19:49, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

 bibliomaniac 1  5  20:39, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not about being civil it's about using the tools right, CoD had to tell him that Rollback was just for vandalism and he still did it some times and rollback isn't given to everyone. --Personal_Cakemix_Signature.png 20:57, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

 Diegox223  Talk  22:50, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Well, Sp3ctr3 130 Ki11er has done considerable wiki work here, including significant anti-vandalism and is as CoD4 said, in two vital usergroups who greatly benefit this wiki, one of which he is a senior member. Although his editcount and experience may seem low, he has definately shown he is a considerate, hardworking and dedicated user. He doesn't get hot-headed and flame other users or troll around, and is always polite and understanding. Even though he maintains the status of having a hiatus, we all have our reasons in life where we may not have enough time between school/work and personal stuff to edit this wiki everyday. Also, although becoming active in December, Sp3ctr3 130 has shown he knows what he is doing and in my humble opinion, has the knowledge of a seasoned editor on a wiki. 03:26, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

 RC  ™   04:09, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
No-one can deny how helpful he is to the community, but he has only really been active since December (correct me if I'm wrong) and to me, that isn't a terribly long time. However, I am sure that in 3-6 moths he could give it another shot and I would gladly support him. 18:30, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * It is evident however that he does know what he's doing, even if he's only been active since October. --Callofduty4 18:44, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

I for once agree with Elmo, He's not ready yet. --Personal_Cakemix_Signature.png 19:41, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Per the other two. Personally, I've never seen him do anything notable, but the explanation that you give in his nomination sounds convincing. 19:50, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Not yet Sorry Sp3c, but you're still inexperienced and you were just inactive. I feel that you need to spend some more time. 23:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * So basically Not Yet? 23:52, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Not yet Fantastic user, and his antivandalism work and is outstanding, but to be honest, I don't think you are quite ready for the position. I agree with Eltomo, 3-6 months. 04:37, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
@Cpl.Bohater: For the reason I was inactive, it was personal reasons. We all have personal problems sometime. 23:11, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I got personal problems too? Doesn't mean that I got inactive. --Personal_Cakemix_Signature.png 23:14, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * @Cakemix Thats why you're a pro troller? (JK BTW).- Diegox223  Talk 23:17, March 16, 2011 (UTC)