Forum:Suggestion: CoD Wiki Constitution (Of sorts)

After reading some of the recent comments of the "How to get rid of dumb blogs" forum, I have come up with an idea. What if we, the community (OR the admins and a selected group of non-admins), came together on a special project, to create a CoD Wiki Constitution? We've always had problems with what's acceptable and what's not, so why not define those things now? Imagine: Each section would be a subpage of the main article, which has an introduction. Each section would cover a certain area, much like the current policies. However, these pages could go much deeper; There could be subsections to each policy, further lengthening the understanding of each topic. For instance, COD:IAR states "If there is any rule(s) that is inhibiting from making this wiki a better and/or more descriptive site, ignore it." I personally find this very unspecific and can lead to much contraversy. This constitution proposal, while not inducing any form of government, could specify exactly what qualifies for this policy in it, rather than having to host heated discussions on each occasion. To avoid any confusion: This is not a suggestion for radical change to existing policies, it is simply a suggestion to make them easier to understand and edit by. Thoughts? Shotrocket6 02:36, July 27, 2010 (UTC)