User talk:Peter Griffen Boy

Penis Vandal
I just dont get it, why would someone spend their time writing crap on a wiki. Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C   E 01:31, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Archive
Done.--WouldYouKindly 04:20, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

About Stuff
I'm not sure what I could do to help with that user. As for UotM, yeah it looks pretty unlikely, especially because I'm not sure who would nominate you. Besides, a nomination for you would probably be shot down in a second. Sorry your rep's so bad. Poketape 05:10, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Another weapon for the Gun Pimpers


Just a slightly modified ACR, nothing special, it's my first attempt at making something within the realms of reality. Nelo Angelo 97 19:09, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

I made this on gun pimpers.Cpl. Dunn 21:41, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

sryy for stupid question but how u do on the guns with pic?nicolasm 00:42, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, are you seriously leaving the wiki? I hope you come back once in a while to answer all our questions. Codfan 02:43, January 31, 2010 (UTC)Codfan

You leaving.
Ill tell you when people stop whining. It might be a while though. Slowrider7 02:50, January 31, 2010 (UTC) h

Re:
That's awfully nice of you. I understand you have other commitments and one must honor that. So I guess it's farewell. If only you knew what I had to go through... Anyway, I hope to see you around sometime. Good luck with anything and everything.

20:30, January 31, 2010 (UTC)


 * Alright, take it easy. See you 'round. 21:33, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Impersonal You
I see. I'll pitch in when I get time tomorrow. 22:31, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Whts up with this
What are these stories about and for what reason do you have them? They're pretty sweet. and how did john richardson live. he was shot in the spine. Is he paralyzed?

John Richardson's Story

Johnson in Colombia

Warpanda13 23:52, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Really good but whats the Kremlin. Don't know much bout the world and all of it's great places. And are there 2 people or is john short for johnson. you need to point that out if you don't want your readers to be confused.

Warpanda13 00:23, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Like the italy thing. and thanks for the kremlin. I knew I had kinda heard about it before. sliped my mind.

Here's a good Idea Make Richardson go on an assassination mission with Fraust after they blow the base. they get new supplies like snipers and silenced weapons and he and fraust are the only guys on the mission. Good imagination? right?

Warpanda13 00:32, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re: John Richardson
Not bad. Definitely needs a lot of work, but it's a good start. A couple inconsistencies and unlikely happenings, but it's a good foundation for a character. Interesting origin story, particularly. 00:09, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

User box
Thanks for telling me that, I had to increase the size to 300 put it still worked. Again, thanks. 00:28, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Editor
You know, if you want to go back to the old editor, just go to your preferences (under MORE in the upper right hand corner, click the "Editing" tab, and deselect "Enable Rich Text Editing". In case that's still a problem for you. 00:38, February 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * It should be in the very top corner of your screen, by the links to your user page, your talk, your home, your watchlist, and the Log out button. 01:22, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, what?
How could "I must say for all that I've done, I am truly sorry, to the following: Imrllybord7" possibly be a result of bad grammar? Even you have a better grasp of the English language than that. Apparently you're just a two-faced liar. And you don't just get to suddenly say that because it's "just a blog post" it somehow isn't real. Just stay the hell away from me. Imrlybord7 02:37, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

User of the Month
Well you got nominated, but by a user with barely any mainspace edits. Maybe you'll find somebody else.Poketape 04:49, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Now that it's outed that you're not a Marine...
... why don't you take the claim off your "real life" userpage and stop disrespecting those who serve. I'm not gonna cop a hostile attitude, I'm just saying that it's goddamn wrong to claim something like that that you don't rate. People sweat and bleed for that title, and they bleed and die for others that wear it. Do the responsible, respectful thing and take it down. -- Echo Four Delta 01:33, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Your Arrogance
Okay, I've always tried to be an indifferent and civil user on this wiki; but seriously, you have to be kidding.

I mean, first of all, you leave. That's fine with me, but you went and made not one, but two blogs about it.

Second, you stated on the UoTM page that you thought you deserved it, even though you 1) already left, and 2) pissed off a whole lot of people

Third, you go ahead and tell me that I should try again for adminship in mid-summer. Then you go even further, and tell Poketape exactly when he should become an admin.

And then fourth, you say that after all that you've done, you're going for admin again in early summer. The only reason you would even come close to making it is if you went and became a bit more serious; but no, you had to go and compare Imrlybord7 and Bovell. And if that wasn't enough, you also started again with stuff about cow udders and you making a flamethrower when you were 10 or some bullcrap that I don't even bother to read anymore.

--  T    C    E   07:56, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

No, you did say you thought you deserved it. Do you want me to pull up the history of the UoTM page?

And yeah, maybe you do have 450 mainspace edits. But unlike Bovell and Imrlybord, you never did any research on mechanics, sometimes your information was incorrect (the Museum fiasco). Yeah, a lot of people hate you.

Then, you made a blog comparing Imrlybord to Bovell. After you apologized and left, I thought you had changed. Then, as soon as you came back and did that, I realized that you didn't.

-- 17:27, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

I think I speak for half the wikia when I say you do not deserve the UoTM anytime soon. You're not famous, you're infamous.

I didn't say you were embarrassing them. You are putting people in an awkward situation by comparing them. And Chia ("the master of the site" as you so cleverly stated) is the one who "pure out fail" nominated me.

Bord did deserve it. He worked twice as hard as you, and previously never got into any fights.

As I said, you do not deserve UoTM

Oh! And now I caught this little gem. I have to say this goes over the top. Not only am I civil on blogs, my blog posts aren't nearly as high as yours, and your mainspace edits, to put it mildly are mediocre. And if that wasn't bad enough, you went ahead and called him a "stupid douche" in leetspeak.

--  T    C    E   02:45, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Communists
Yeah, that is something a disgusting Communist would do.

While I'm here, I'll go ahead and say that regardless of whether or not I believe you (I don't) or not, I don't want either of us to have to deal with any bullshit regarding hard feelings or incivility, so as I said, I'll continue to remain entirely to polite you, as well as apologize for my comments on your blog which were, to say the least, in bad taste. I think it's fair to say that you understand my feelings on the matter and the reasoning behind them, and I'm willing to leave it at that. -- Echo Four Delta 15:02, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Story
Liked it except for the whole Queen of England part. A bit random and it wouldn't be just a team of three after her and she wouldn't get to that Canadian hut without a fight. Same to the president (What country is he the president of?)AdvancedRookie 15:51, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

No idea. I am British. None of your 'American' history channel. How dare you insult our comedy. Watch Micheal McIntyre he is hilarious.AdvancedRookie 19:12, February 5, 20

Stupid and pointless huh? So is a lot of your media and traditions in your country. STOP TELLING ME TO WATCH THE HISTORY CHANNEL. You have a different channel. Our History Channel is made up of the Pyramids, The British Navy and World War 2.AdvancedRookie 19:39, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, things are pretty good.
New marking period just started, aced my midterm exams, won some awards at Academic Decathlon (competitive test taking), looking forward to college, watching mad Dexter (great show), playing MW2 and BC2 demo, getting BC2 in about a month. And I may be fairly argumentative, but believe it or not, I am quite compassionate when it comes to personal matters. Congrats on the pregnancy. Imrlybord7 17:25, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * The quality of your mainspace edits is extremely poor and you artificially inflate your edit count. Juan, Richtofen, and EightOhEight are all great users who you could never even dream of comparing to. I hope all of them become admins before the year is up. You regularly piss people off. Chia most definitely would never support you in an RfA. I don't know what makes you think you are useful to this site. We would get along fine without you. You pretended to leave like a complete drama queen and then came back. I have no problem with you being here and I don't really want to start a flame war, but learn your fucking place. You have no right to hold yourself in such high regard. Hell, even if you still do think you're all that, just keep it to yourself and everything will be dandy. Imrlybord7 17:46, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think October 21, 2009 qualifies as being around since the start of the wiki. Unless you've been lurking and being useless. And I still don't get why you think you are in any position to judge. I pour serious hours into this wiki and all of my edits are perfectly written, factually accurate, and extremely insightful. Imrlybord7 18:09, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, but I actually am one of the most important users on here. You're about as useful as a poopy flavored lollipop. Imrlybord7 22:58, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

UOTM
Thanks for voting for me. Doc.Richtofen 18:38, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Gewehr 43 Punctuation
Since my attempts to fix this have obviously failed, you can do it. The sentence "It is often compared to the M1 Garand" lacks a period at the end. -Nogert 19:46, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whenever I tried to just add a period, in added it to the M1 Garand link. So, I copy pasted another period from another part of the article to avoid this. I really have no idea why it kept adding/extending the second link. Is there a better way to do this? -Nogert 19:52, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool thanks! -Nogert 19:56, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks but is there a way of finding out how many? Is it the number at the top when you press My Home?AdvancedRookie 19:59, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah! 197 mainspace edits. I think. Thanks anyway.AdvancedRookie 20:08, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Update on Johnathan Richardson
I like the story, but honestly, I find the way you wrote it confusing and difficult to read. You refer to him as both Johnathan and Johnson, unless Johnson is another person. 23:01, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, really?
You're still bringing that shit up?

"You explicitly said that you put up the RfA to get feedback. I gave you serious and friendly advice in the sincerest hope that you could become admin material, but I didn't hold back either because that would ruin the point of getting feedback. You committed a severe breach of the UTP, and Chia has already warned you about a possible month-long ban. However, you somehow have the nerve to ask Warpanda to confront not just me, but WYK, an admin? Look, I don't know what it's going to take to get you to understand this, but you were in the wrong. Like I just said, it was a serious offense. I stopped bugging you about it, but WYK, 808, and I all felt that it warranted being brought up in your freaking RFA, especially given that you were looking for feedback. You did see what Chia did to Cod4 during his RFB, didn't you? Cod4 is a MUCH better behaved user than you, and he still got called out on several things. I mean, what the hell did you expect? You are practically on behavioral probation and you asked people what they thought. Are we supposed to offer you advice without bringing up what you've done wrong? If this is how you behave when people try to help you, A) why should anyone help you and B) how can you ever expect to be worthy of an admin position? I'm sorry, but you are still completely rude and thoughtless. Imrlybord7 01:31, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Reread the above paragraph at least 999999999999999999999 times before sending me any more messages. Imrlybord7 06:55, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

And if you somehow missed this, here's another way of putting it, courtesy of WYK. "Comment: @Warpanda and PGB: I understand it's a touchy subject for both of you, but a major incident like that NEEDS to be brought up in something as important as an RFA. I'll be blunt: when something like that happens, it CAN'T simply be ignored. It is GOING to come up in an RFA one way or another, that's just how it is. I didn't bring it up to hurt, embarrass, or bring unwanted attention to either of you. I brought it up simply because it needed to be addressed.--WouldYouKindly 03:56, January 23, 2010 (UTC)" Imrlybord7 06:58, January 23, 2010 (UTC)" Imrlybord7 00:41, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * What have you ever done for the wiki that was even remotely meaningful, out of curiosity? Imrlybord7 00:45, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * And you honestly think that compares to the contributions of the great users I've been talking about? Whatever, that's fine. You'll be forced to realize it when almost everyone opposes any bid at UoTM or adminship you may put forth in the future. And somehow, you are still stupid enough to not understand a single thing about how I behaved during the Warpanda situation. In RfAs, any offenses, no matter how big or small, no matter if they have already been resolved or not, come up. Period. I didn't attack you. I just explained what happened because I had to, and every admin agreed with me. And are you going to deny that you said the following? "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all, or I'll M16 your face off, shove an M4 up your arse, plant a thorwing knife in your penis, and aim a Intervention at your heart, pull all triggers at once, and you'll be done for." "If you like a basturd, expect people to treat you like a arse." Imrlybord7 00:54, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * CoD4 is much more deserving of cratship than you are of adminship. Hell, I'm more deserving of cratship than you are of UoTM. Haha. Imrlybord7 00:57, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's incredible how someone so stupid can think that they are such a good liar. I'm on the motherfucking varsity debate team. You can't get away with twisting words against me. Here's what you just said that you said. "If you act like a basturd, expect to be treated like an arse." Here's what you actually said back then. "If you like a basturd, expect people to treat you like a arse." That meant you were saying that all Obama supporters deserve to be treated like "arses." You were clearly not talking about Obama the way you just said you were. But of course, like the two-faced phony little bitch that you are, you will try to hide behind your poor grasp of the written English language and say that it was a typo or some such bullshit. Why do you think that a piece of shit like you could ever hope to stand a chance against the likes of me? Imrlybord7 01:03, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Once a liar, always a liar, I suppose. Or maybe you're just so stupid that you don't even notice what I was pointing out. You, like the lying little bitch you are, added the word "act" into the original quote to make it look like you were talking about Obama, but when you actually said it the word "act" was not there, meaning that you were saying that all Obama supporters deserve to be treated like "arses." 01:10, February 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're still as cute as ever when you're mad, you know that, Master Gunnery Sergeant? I just want to pinch your little cheeks. My 11 year old brother is smarter, funnier, and more mature than you. Imrlybord7 01:11, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Actually...
The only thing you got right is that I learned to type extremely fast in computer class. My vocabulary? Reading from a young age and a borderline genius IQ. And have you ever noticed how few people I have flipped out on? That's because I only target people who are pieces of shit. And you seriously impersonated a member of the military. You really tried to pass yourself off. Don't give me that "I was obviously joking" bullshit. You are the lowest of the low. A despicable human being. Imrlybord7 01:40, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Getting Tired
I am getting tired of your crap. It seems to me that you consistently provoking users into flamewars over pretty stuff that should be dropped, like with imrlybord7. You need to shape up your attitude because I am sick and tired of all the problems you seem to be causing everytime I go here. If you continue having a bad attitude I will be more than happy to ban you if it keeps this wiki stable. Consider this a warning. Darkman 4 03:05, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: UotM
Congratulations! Poketape 06:15, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

On the child. Poketape 23:27, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Wow Twilight really? Poketape 20:20, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Final Word
I originally had no intention of arguing, but while I was on your talk page I saw 808's comments, which piqued my curiosity. Then when I looked at what you put on his talk page I almost threw up. Imrlybord7 18:37, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the useerbox
Thanks for making me the userbox. you were a great help. sharky boi 11:27, 7 January 2010 (EST).

Quotes
Use the base template, (ie "1"

- 2

--  T    C    E   00:35, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Little Story
My... little story? D: I thought mine was pretty well-detailed and thought out...

Anyways, I'm fine. I don't really have any other idea for a userpage, unless I became a staff member. Thanks for the offer.

Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 00:44, February 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Please don't assume that I'm an 'edit whore'. Well, you may have not assumed that, but naturally, that's what edit whores do. Mainly, I do it how any normal user might do - I revert vandalism, I refrain from massive blog post counts and etc, and I look for annoying RichText edits and spelling errors. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez  Reportin' for duty. 00:50, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hearing "Global Thermonuclear War"
Have you seen this thing on the page? It gives you the chills while listening to the Army theme. Slowrider7 01:02, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Seriously?
Alright, listen. I've really had enough with you pretending to be my friend, because evidently you don't have that high of an opinion on me. Judging by everything you said on 808's talk page, you seem to think that you're oh-so-mighty and deserve User-Of-The-Month over me... why? Because you're loosely famous? I don't appreciate how you've been treating basically anyone on this wikia lately. You've been blatantly rude and lied to countless users, and contrary to your belief, Doc.Richtofen has more mainspace edits than you. But I've worked so hard on my edits. Madre del diablo, I've reverted countless vandal after vandal, I've done my work as good as I can and I think I should be entitled to a small amount of respect. And honestly, is my name too difficult for you? Come on, you don't have to add the 'é' to José if you don't want to, but calling me that Spanish Guy and the Corporal-Whatever is frankly rude. I've seen your fights with Imrlybord, I know now your claims of being enlisted in the Marines and I've done my research about this wiki - I've worked hard, I've tried to be nice to everyone and I have a lot more mainspace edits than you. I'm entitled to some respect, man, but you're not giving me any. Finally, WHY do you think you deserve UOTM, heck, even adminship in the future is a really long shot. You're blatantly rude, your blog posts dwarf your number of mainspace edits and you've been in so many fights, it's hard to believe. I'm not trying to start a fight, but show me some respect. Not trying to be rude, but I think I deserve it. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:24, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

--

Wow, you sicken me. I may be mean; but rude? No. I have never insulted you; while you go around and call Bord a jackass, among other names. Now, you're starting a flame war with one of the most docile people (sorry, José) on the wikia. You lied about your age and your enlistment. Jose definitely deserves the UoTM more than anyone around here. --  T    C    E   20:33, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

If you wanted it to be private, you should've emailed him or got him on the IRC. It's a public website. You're talking about me. I have every right to "butt in".

And then THIS " Don't flatter yourself I'm not gay, but I here Michael Jackson is nearby. "

Are you kidding me? You're the most immature guy I've ever met.

--  T    C    E   20:54, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: We Cool?
You have done nothing towards me. Even though lying about certain things is not cool. Personally, if you want them to stop do the following: Apologise for what you have done, but mean it, and then move on, I'm sorry, but what you have done in the past cannot be undone. Also, put more perspective into things, flipping out will get you nowhere. There, follow that and your problems will stop.

As I have previously said, you have done nothing wrong towards me so, we are cool. Doc.Richtofen 21:27, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hey just asking for opinions
Hey I see you on the wiki a lot and just wanted your opinion on the new AK-47, because personally I hate it and just wanted to see if i'm alone on this. Thanks. Mikeyg36 21:36, February 7, 2010 (UTC) Mikeyg36

That's good because I feel the same way with the M16. Not trying to be nosy, but what happened to your MW2? Did you rage and snap it? Because I almost did that a couple of times. Such a frustrating game :) Mikeyg36Mikeyg36

Victor Zakaev
WHY do you keep removing Victor's info box? It's starting to make me wonder whether or not you are vandalizing the page! Also, the quote that you keep on using is already discussed in the Trivia section! --M.C.Tales 00:10, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Don't play with fire...
http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Callofduty4#Imrlybord7_lied Imrlybord7 00:16, February 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Unless someone is somehow using your account, the evidence is irrefutable. And I kind of doubt that's the case. It was in the edit history of my talk page as a contribution from one Peter Griffen Boy. Here's the link. http://callofduty.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AImrlybord7&diff=201027&oldid=201023 And here's the quote from the link. "Notice how I said it very obviously to people it was a joke, BEFORE Turk got involved. Then Turk jumps at it" Imrlybord7 01:16, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Okay enough...
Both of you, seriously. The only reason I didn't block you a couple weeks back (you know what I'm talking about) was because I thought getting you to admit guilt and apologize would change the way you act. Clearly I was wrong. I don't want to hear an excuse. I don't want to hear an apology. I don't want to hear you try to shrug the blame onto someone else. All I want is for you to stop starting flame wars, I'm getting sick and tired of seeing drama in the recent changes every time I log in. If you can't do that, I'd be quite happy to issue a block. --WouldYouKindly 00:45, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Sigh... you don't get it do you? The reason these flame wars start is because you react to any comment about your attitude the way you do. The insults, the flaming, the "poor me" responses, the stupid and insensitive jokes. Those don't help the situation at all.--WouldYouKindly 03:39, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

That's it.
PGB, the state of your reputation has not only damaged you, but it's damaged me, Imrlybord, 808, many other people and the wiki. I seriously cannot take your crap any longer. Either you shape up, or I WILL take action. If you come between me and the wiki being a nice, civilized place, I WILL take action. We've had enough of it. You've damaged your reputation, my reputation, and most importantly Imrlybord's reputation. It is a fact that you are responsible for the opposing vote. I can't believe that you say you are more deserving of UOTM than other editors. When basically all you do is create blog posts and start arguments. I've held back too god damned long. I've done TOO MUCH, gone through TOO MUCH and suffered TOO MUCH to watch my favorite wiki me and many other great editors work so hard on go up in smoke because of you.

Another thing which strikes me is this. Not only did you hurt people's feelings, you thought you were being funny but in fact you were being extremely rude and immature. I hope you are as ashamed as I am disbelieved.

Regarding Imrlybord7, you have constantly caused him and us pains. Not only do you go and start conflicts, you go on and say it's not your fault, when it bloody well is. He's done more for the wiki than you by a longshot. So don't go calling him a douche, when you're being one. Also, you went and called Chiafriend12, the most veteran editor here a "st00pid d0uche". Don't push your luck.

Then you go and lie that you are in the Marines. You're so not. It's sooo obvious. People like you are an insult to people like Griever. And regarding Turk, he might not be in the army but he's a lot better at arguing than you.

So there, I rest my case. You've done more bad than good. I really hope you shape up, because if you don't I will have to take emergency action. Another thing which strikes me is that new user look up to you. Not only should they look down on you, they actually ask you for help. Don't start an argument with me. Because you will end up in the deep end. I have the support of some of the most influential people on the wiki. I wouldn't take this as a joke. Oh, and congratulations on your wife's pregnancy, too bad I don't believe you. 17:51, February 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * I do know you don't intend to start flame wars, but your comments do incite them. I know your intentions are honorable but you really need to stop making inappropriate comments and jokes. 19:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

America Pwns?
Yeah right. Canada is way better than America!! Cpl. Dunn 23:24, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Would you
Hi I have made my own wikia called http://madeupcallofduty.wikia.com/wiki/MadeUpCallofDuty_Wiki if you would like to join just write on m talk page there and tell as many people as you can. You also can tell me your soldier name and you will be placed inside the story. Pvt.Peter Kendell 01:04, February 10, 2010 (UTC)User:Pvt.Peter Kendell

LOL
""The .44 Magnum, if it was scoped would be better then the M82. Always kills in two shots, not as loud and faster ROF and not as heavy, and not as easy to see. Geez, a pistol beats a sniper, how realistic"

— Me, not you making an idea"

"The .44 Magnum, if it was scoped, would suck. It kills in 3 shots at long range even with Stopping Power while the M82 can kill in one shot without Stopping Power. The M82 also gives full mobility. Geez, a sniper beats a pistol at long range. That's realistic."

- Me, not being an idiot Imrlybord7 01:28, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

IDIOT
Is this mrlybusy7 pissing you off too? I say we all report him. Not a lot of people like him.

RE
From what I've seen, you asked on your other account (yes, I know about your other account), you asked why Imrlybord doesn't like you. He gave you what I perceive to be an honest answer, for better or worse. You asked for an honest answer and got one, then he told you a little while later that he knew it was your account, and that he was willing to behave if you were, and he gets a sarcastic remark in reply. If you're going to start an alternate account, that's fine, but don't start making cover-blowing remarks to the people that you got into this crapstorm with in the first place. Failing that, don't send sarcastic remarks once people find out it's you. I'm starting to sincerely regret getting involved in this...--WouldYouKindly 23:29, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a private conversation on a wiki page, that's why I told you to watch what you say a while back. --WouldYouKindly 23:35, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

We do have the IRC channel if you absolutely have to hold private conversations, but I've never been on it so I don't have the link handy.--WouldYouKindly 23:45, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

The M16
fires at 925 RPM per burst with an overall RPM of 460 due to the delay between bursts. Imrlybord7 00:04, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

What I won was
your dignity. You have absolutely no respect left on this site. You're so stupid that you can't even do a single thing to make it not completely obvious that you're using an alternate account. You didn't fix your typos or change your written voice (if you even know what that is) at all, although I shouldn't be surprised by the fact that you are unable to change your written voice. You referred to me as Bord and EightOhEight as 808. You "randomly" commented on you getting absolutely wrecked on Cod4's talk page, even referring to PGB as a "fine user." You made the exact same style of stupid blog posts. You didn't gradually switch over to the alt. Instead, you just dropped PGB completely and picked up DAP. You gave all of that patriotic crap and talked about how you've played every CoD game. Every. Single. Thing. Gave. You. Away. It didn't take a genius to figure it out, but it sure took an idiot to get caught so easily. The saddest part is that you aren't even smart enough to see how funny your monumental stupidity is. And no. You don't get to insult me and then say that we leave each other alone. If it was up to 808, we would have been fucking around with you for months without revealing that we knew it was you, but no, I wanted to be nicer than that. My exact words were, "I'll shoot fish in a barrel, but I'm not going to light them on fire first." But of course, you never fail to disappoint. You'll always be the same jackass. Nobody even likes you. Just leave. Imrlybord7 00:11, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Good God...
Okay, you say you don't start flame wars on purpose, how do you explain this?--WouldYouKindly 00:45, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Justice is hereby served
I've blocked you for one month. Judging by your attitude you fully deserve this block and to be honest it should be longer. I've held back too long. Far too long. You've made a fool out of yourself, PGB and your reputation is ruined. Making an alt account will not work as I could find you out. Hopefully once your block is up you would have learnt how to behave and respect other users. I still have an inch of hope that you will recover from your mistakes, but I don't frankly expect you to. 17:51, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Is that a Die Hard refrence? Peter Griffen Boy 21:54, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

@ CallofDuty4:

When you use direct address, you put commas on both sides of the person(s) you are addressing, ie "...yourself, PGB and.." lolololol sry I just wanted to be a temporary Grammar Nazi 🇨🇩 19:26, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

I'm so dissappointed.
Sorry PGB. I just don't know what to say. You lie you make fun of people. you are the one who starts the freaking flame wars.Warpanda13 23:54, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Block
I'm answering you right here for now until I can find another place for our discussion, as people are starting to take notice on the other wiki.

I believe I've mentioned this before: When I told Bord to ignore you, he was perfectly willing to do so, in fact he mentioned it on both my talk page and DAP's talk page. However, when he said he knew it was you and said he was willing to ignore you if it meant keeping the peace, you responded with a sarcastic remark. That's what reignited the flame war. And the following events were what ultimately led up to the block. Bord isn't innocent, but as he isn't the one who restarted the flame war, he's not the one who deserves the block.--WouldYouKindly 00:34, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Still, he used a lot of curse words, when I didn't. He called me a bitch twice, and gets away with support form others, I call him a bitch one and I get blocked, thats taking sides. Let's say Bord steals two times and I steal one time, would it be fair for me to get a month in jail, but Bord get away because he's part of a gang? No, he deserves a block as well. Plus banning me for a month without a direct warning or a three day warning block is against COD:BP, plus I did not do a Major infraction, I did a Moderate Infraction. It's not right to ban others for arguing mister WYK. Peter Griffen Boy!

Arguing? You came onto his blog page that was completely unrelated to you and began to flame the hell out of him. That night you also made several inappropriate and offensive jokes and contradicted yourself multiple times. You started the flame war. You don't want to be banned? Ignore Bord and get on with your life. It takes two to argue, and you're not doing yourself any favours. Let's look at a quote, shall we? "I would be, but since this is your page, if I say one thing nice about it, you'll stalk me because you don't like my opinion, geez you are a bitch, now go cry to an admin." You could've left him alone. You could've ignored him after he did something bad to you... but instead, you chose to flame him for no reason. You then spent the rest of that night making uneducated and harsh replies that are easily seen as offensive. (Joke about Obama that grew a lot more offensive that it had to, threatening to kill him, even as a joke, and backlashing at Griever for for a harmless question. Added with all of your past reprimands, offensiveness and unnecessary rudeness, you were blocked. That makes sense to me. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez  Reportin' for duty. 21:15, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Greiver has made several posts about hating Obama, honestly this site doesn't really matter. No ones going to listen to me, no ones going to change their opinion. Several people have made even WORSE things then I have, and got smaller or even no bans at all. One month is a long time, and according to COD:BP, it's not righ to block someone for that long just for that. Honestly, I wish people would just leave me alone. Peter Griffen Boy 21:19, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hey you now II Superlative, he got into an arguement, a pretty stupid one, and Bord would not get out off his ass, guess who got banned. The one who started it got away, while Super who just defended himself got a 5 day block. Nelo Angel is very rude and is very mean in his blog posts, never got a block. I combine the two, with average edits, and a medium chunk of time on the wiki and get a 32 day block, 650% more then II Superlative. Honestly, that is not fair and is against COD:BP. Peter Griffen Boy 21:30, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

My username's spelled "Griever" and I merely stated my political views and expressed my extreme dislike for the man; don't bring my name up to justify your mistakes; I know this is just a wiki, but everything a man does belongs to him - you're responsible for every action you take. -- Echo Four Delta 21:45, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I don't care about your name or you. My "clone" even said he wouldn't do it in real life. How come people love coming into my ass, if you want I can get a picture of it for you. Well that help your disgusting, sexual desires Mister Echo Four Delta (I'm assuming thats your Marine callsighn)?

You assume correctly, BUT this is why you're blocked; you had no reason to say the things you just did. I have no idea why you're surpised that you were issued a block of that magnitude. And I'll do perfectly all right without a picture of your ass, I'm currently sticking it to a former lesbian from my last unit that I managed to turn straight - I'm pretty hetero. -- Echo Four Delta 22:16, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Your a lucky bitch. Peter Griffen Boy 22:18, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Careful
Your on thin ice. Did you see the blog about you. There was bad stuff on there.AdvancedRookie 21:20, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not on thin ice, I've been in the water for a month or so. Bord has taken me into a creative guy, into someone who seems to be a dick for the fun of it. I've you look at my mainspace and picture uploads most of them are pretty good. I'm the guy who came up with the other welcome templete ideas, yet no one wants to look at my good side. Peter Griffen Boy 21:24, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well I am sorry to hear that.AdvancedRookie 21:28, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not 100% innocent, but I don't think a 32 day block is fine, when someone else gets a 5 day block, I deserve a block, but not a full month, that is a VERY long time, and plus it does go against COD:BP. I just wish I could edit again, because it does seem somewhat unfair to me. Peter Griffen Boy 21:32, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

COD:BP - Major Infractions:


 * Multiple Major Personal attacks (check)


 * Racism (check)

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   00:09, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Nope, 808, once again you fail to realize most of the time people post first, and I am merely defending myself, and that would count as arguing. Ask II Superlative and anyone who gets in Bords way without admitting they're wrong (even if they're not, as this will say). Plus I wasn't racist, there's a fine difference between racisim and cracking jokes about a race. If I call someone a nigger and call someone a ghetto, there's a fine line between the two, as deemed by this good sir. Also on your adminship request, you said you created the toolbar and redid walkthroughs. The toolbar is nice, but it's nothing more then a google toolbar won't do, walkthroughs on here aren't that needed, I've only used one and that was on Call of Duty, the second level, going through those MG42s in a open field was nearly impossible. Thank you Captain Foley for being my bullet sponge! Anyway, if you dare so most of my edits are piss poor, look at the new welcome templete ideas, I came up off with a lot of those ideas. Peter Griffen Boy 21:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Uhhhh...... AdvancedRookie.... it's "YOU'RE!!" GODDAMN!!!!!! 🇨🇩 19:18, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

I may have a way to settle this amicably
If you wish, we can set up an IRC meeting with Chia, Joeyaa, possibly COD4 if he's on, and myself. You will be able to present your case (in a civil manner) in private with three or four different admins present, two of whom are much more experienced in these matters than I am. I doubt anything will be decided in that particular meeting, and we'll likely do the same with Imrlybord to get his side of the story, but I'm thinking this may be the best solution, I talked with Chia and Joey last night as well and they agreed to the IRC meeting as well. If you agree, we'll just need to set up a time+day that suits all of us.--WouldYouKindly 23:02, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll do good on Saterdays and Sundays. I got work during the week, from around 2 a.m to 12 p.m., and often times am very busy. Saturday, from around 12 a.m. to 8 p.m. would be the best time to find me, but honestly it's a BIG maybe. This wiki is not important enough to mess with my real life. Is it possible to also get one with me and Bord just alone? Really though, I don't like having admins deciding who wins. I hate it when arguements come, most admins just ban the person who is stupid and goes on with it. Peter Griffen Boy 21:22, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Well, Joey's going to be using the IRC channel for something else around that time this Saturday, so it may have to wait until next weekend if that's the case.--WouldYouKindly 22:48, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

PS: Don't worry about anything being decided right then by the way, all we want to do is to give both you and Bord a chance to present your cases with the admins involved (myself and COD4), along with two neutral admins (Joeyaa and Chia) present.--WouldYouKindly 22:57, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible for him to use another IRC channel and just use two other web browsers, such as one Internet Explorer has one chat, and one Internet Explorer has another chat on another wiki's IRC?

well interesting
So you really aren't with the marines.

thats what i told you, and what i knew since the first flame you gave me.

you sir are a disgrace for every american citizen serving at the marines/army/so on

M1 Garand
Yo PGB, thanks for the userbox! 🇨🇩 19:15, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Don't sweat it, they're not that hard to make once you get into the codes and crap like that.Peter Griffen Boy 22:51, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

A Message to Any Admin
Recently a flamer who was caught swearing,racisim,flaming,spamming,blanking, and many other warnings and vandalisim edits, he gets one month. I have been rude to Canada, but not racist, I've swore one time, never flames, just argued on my opinion, never vanadalised a page in my whole career has a wikia user, and get a one month ban, same as the one above me, am I the only one who sees this as unfair. It's like giving a murderer,bank robber, and jaywalker fifty years, while someone assaulted a man gets fifty years as well, clearly eithier he needs a longer ban or I need a shorter one. I'm set for a wiki disscussion on IRC (go to irc.wikia and type in /join ##Joeyaa to watch or to participate) on Fridatat about one p.m. (California time) may we discuss it there? Peter Griffen Boy 22:51, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

I'll cut you some slack
Hey PGB. Tell you what. If you promise, and I mean promise to stay out of any more trouble, and I mean any, I'll unblock you on saturday. That's nearly 2 weeks early. I'm willing to trust you, so don't mess it up. 22:57, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

''What if some bloody basturd comes and puts a flame message on my page? ''If you do so, please shorten it now, to about what time you think right (please before around 6 a.m. waking up early is my thing) so I don't have to wait for you to get up and get on to the computer, because on Saturdays everyone is a tad bit lethargic. Peter Griffen Boy 23:00, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

If someone starts flaming you on your talk page, you talk to an admin, you don't try to take matters into your own hands, that's one of many things that got you in trouble the first time.--WouldYouKindly 23:08, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

I remember getting a message from a very familair user saying I need to take matters into my own hands and stop going to an admin on my RFA, and so I got screwed with 'dat. I don't wanna make Callofduty4 my Vandal Whore like I used to, and really I get lazy remebering user names. Plus when admins get involved they don't really set it straight they just block and move on. It's like a kid doing something wrong, just beating their ass doesn't do anything, scolding them however does. Peter Griffen Boy 23:11, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

I think you've been misinformed. Why do you think I was doing everything in my power NOT to block you a while back? Blocking is nearly always a last resort in situations like this. In fact, I only blocked you when you started using a sock-puppet account as you may remember.--WouldYouKindly 23:15, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

You never blocked me, I think it was Callofduty4 who blocked me. Don't be a silly little truffle. Peter Griffen Boy 23:17, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Drunk American Patriot? No sense denying it anymore. Anyway, I have no wish to argue this any further, we can discuss this in the IRC meeting later this week.--WouldYouKindly 23:18, February 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * "I remember getting a message from a very familair user saying I need to take matters into my own hands and stop going to an admin on my RFA." That is an outright lie. I never said anything of the sort. Imrlybord7 00:26, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it was a message on my talk page, maybe it was on my blogs or something, I'm to lazy to remember it, as I really don't care. Peter Griffen Boy 14:56, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back, great to have you back on board. 18:11, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Sure.
I'm already on. Imrlybord7 19:21, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

About your findings
Just make sure to put them on both launcher pages, not just one. Imrlybord7 20:12, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Your voting in Devil's RFA
You don't get two votes. Pick one and sign it as PGB. Also, I won't do this if you have any serious objections, but I believe that both of your alts should receive extremely long blocks because they are, well, alts. Imrlybord7 21:05, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yo.
Hey PGB. Good to have you back. I added some new guns on my page. If you want, pick out a few and I will add them to the Gun Pimpers page. Slowrider7 21:36, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stopping Power edit
Hello there! I couldn't help but notice one of your edits said

''!-- WARNING - If anyone dares say that this perk is overused/overpowered, expect yourself to be warned and then blocked. --''

I'm not getting at ya here, but considering neither of us are admins, can I ask why you decided to add this, considering how you can't do either? Cause to me it just looks like you're boosting you're mainspace posts... Smuff 23:17, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Peter here's some friendly advice. you just got unblocked and if you keep doing this you will be again. please stop Warpanda13 23:19, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Warpanda, settle down, lead down the stream. It's one edit and it follows COD:BP now please leave me alone. Plus editing templetes like that does not boost your mainspace. Peter Griffen Boy 23:22, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but that's not a valid reason. I didn't even bring that up, I just asked why you put that down considering the fact it never mentioned blocking in the first place. Because only someone with actualy authorisation to block someone should to put that down, and also to me you're just edit boosting, considering it was such a minor edit that in no way effected the page quality in any way, shape or form, even if it doesn't affect your mainspace. Smuff 23:29, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

But it was perfectly implied wasn't it? You know that thing, "You get punished if you break the rules?" I am not getting at you at all, but where did you get the incentive to go into an article and add 3 words to a template that involves warning people that you can't even see without being in editor mode? Thats why I say I thought you were edit boosting, because it was such a basic and remedial edit that didn't affect the quality at all, maybe if next time you do that you improve spelling or something it'll look different, but that was just pointless. Smuff 08:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

User Block
I'm talking to saint about it before I do anything about Dempsey141 because I don't want to do anything bad for my first time doing this. Poketape 00:08, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

The problem with this, and no offense to you, is that a few other users also seem to flame you at various times, making this one seem a little less important than those, but I do see the problem with this and I think I might block him for a little time. When did this happen, because couldn't you have talked to any other admins? Poketape 00:15, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ugh...
That's different. You didn't show me any respect when referencing me and basically tossed aside all my contributions just to say "That Corporal-Whatever guy is less famous than me, so I deserve UoTM". You were immature, rude and obnoxious. It's not my responsibility to look at all your chats with the admins to find out the most recent news and your reasons. So, I've told you why I'm mad at you - you showed me no respect, you were offensive to Canadians, you made multiple accounts, you denied that you were, in fact, who you were, you lied about being in the military (Don't say that I've done the same, my story is easily fiction), you tried to evade your ban and your opinions are harsh and unjustified in certain occasions.

Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 00:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Don't put words in my mouth, I never supported Dempsey. Plus, I never said that COD: IAR doesn't support you, but I said that you should've just taken your ban normally and waited until it was over. Plus, IAR says "Do not, though, use this as an excuse to get your way if you're in an argument, or any other reason." I find that it's still kind of a shady move. So, if a user is good at making edits, but calls every other user on the wikia a "Mo******cker", then claims that he's helping the wikia, he can't get banned? Lots of the CoD Rules could be changed.

'Hiding under a mask' doesn't condole, nor make having multiple accounts, right. You've still yet to apologize to me/Canadians in general, but it's your decision.

So, there you have it. THAT'S the reason why I'm mad at you. I've made it clear. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 00:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Block
Hey, your block is up! 🇨🇩 00:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Dempsey Block
He is now blocked for one day. I also deleted some blogs about you. Poketape 00:27, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

There is actually not that much admin work to be done. So far you're the only person who's asked me for any admin stuff. Poketape 03:53, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Signature
Yeah, I think I can work with those. As with Cpl. Dunn's case, do you want me to make you one? <font style="background:black">  Maj.Gage   Talk . 00:37, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you want a colored background? Any pics? Emblem-loadedfinger.jpg <font style="background:black">  Maj.Gage   Talk

. 00:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:My signature
I'm working on it, just give me a sec. 01:42, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, how does this look?

01:45, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Which part did you want smaller than Peter Griffen? And by the way, you use the signature by signing with.

01:49, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I blocked MM and DAP for 1 year.
Per this quote from Chia. "Alternate accounts get indefinitely blocked nearly immediately." I just wanted to let you know. Imrlybord7 03:02, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Chia told me that they are actually supposed to be blocked forever, but I decided that 990 years would suffice. If for any reason you ever want to leave this account and go with one of them, let me know and I will give this account a 990 year block and unblock whichever one you want, not that I think you would ever want to do that. Imrlybord7 03:27, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, yes and oh, yes.
From Dempsey141's talk page

''Really dude, calling someone those words all violate an important policy and therefore this may have to come into effect. Plus do not use this as an excuse. An administrator has told to cool it, it would not suprise me if you got yourself a short block. Peter Griffen Boy 23:37, February 26, 2010 (UTC)''

(Notice how I'm keeping my cool and you are not)

That is what you need to do. Play defensive. Whoever plays offensive will be the one who's blocked. If an argument breaks out, warn an admin. Any admin. They will take care of it. That statement you put above was perfect. It could have not been better. Please keep that up. Thanks! 10:13, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Voting
Thanks, that was my theory too. Although Juan has 6/0/0. Doc.Richtofen 16:04, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up.
I've gone ahead and deleted the article. Scottie theNerd and I are currently working towards getting the community to reform the ridiculous COD:G(ranularity) policy, which says to make articles for everything. However, as we don't have articles on breathing or walking, I don't think we should have articles on every little thing that CoD characters do. Imrlybord7 16:32, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and by the way, I think your sig is alright. I'm not a big fan of the colors of your name or the way "Boy" is bigger than the rest of it, especially since that makes the background color expand around it. But the radio operator part is cool. Imrlybord7 16:38, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Riot Shield
You were right to just remove that section. Maybe Riot Shield boosting deserves to be mentioned in the article, but we sure as shit didn't need a giant guide on how to stop boosters. Imrlybord7 16:47, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

You.
I saw what you put on Griever's talkpage; and I agree. Your jokes are now more obviously jokes, and they're not as offensive. Even Bord said you've matured. Let's hope it stays that way.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T    <font color="darkolivegreen"> C    <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   16:56, February 27, 2010 (UTC) Oh, and I hope that all of our past arguments are water under the bridge, as I'm going for sysop again soon and I don't want you to hold any hard feelings.

Oh, nevermind. Saw what you put on Jose's talk page.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   17:22, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I see. I'm sorry you still feel that way. You see, I'm aloof to the point of extremity concerning arguments on this wiki. If I opposed you once, it doesn't mean I wouldn't support you the next day.

I'm sorry to see you still hold a grudge.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T  <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   17:27, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, no, no, no, my friend. I was trying to get Bord to stop arguing with Superlative. I'm friends with all of them.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   17:31, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I like it.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   17:34, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: My signature (2)
Here, how does this look?

17:26, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Cool. 17:32, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Signature
Yeah dude, that sig is really cool. Did you make a short Signatures template? (He he, when I do mine all I have to type is 🇨🇩 ) 🇨🇩 17:37, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'll make it something easy, like . That way, when you're done with whatever you're typing you just type  and save the page. 🇨🇩 17:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * why the x2? 🇨🇩

mkay, I'm done, so now all you have to do when you want your sig is type. If you feel so inclined, you leave a timestamp like this: 5 tildes, or. 🇨🇩 17:50, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oops
No bro, I think you misunderstood -- when you do your signature, you have to type. The is just the optional Timestamp. Sry for confusion. 🇨🇩 that's how I do mine. 🇨🇩 17:54, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: RFA
I believe you are capable of becoming worthy of adminship, but it would take a very long time. There are two key things that you are lacking right now. Now, your edits and edit summaries have certainly become reasonably professional-sounding, but your mannerisms in conversation are not. That doesn't necessarily mean that you have to go read the dictionary and improve your vocabulary, but a certain amount of seriousness and grammatical perfection is required. Sure, you can still be funny and laid back during conversations with users that you know, but otherwise you need to be as formal as possible. The biggest thing preventing you from becoming an admin is the stigma that surrounds you after your past behavior. I have faith that you are a changed user, but others will probably consider it too big of a stain on your character for quite some time, which really isn't unreasonable of them. So for a while at least, don't bother with another RFA. Tough it out and keep up the hard work. It will take a lot of time and effort on your part, but you can get there eventually. Imrlybord7 19:10, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Constructive contribution to important community discussion (i.e. providing input on policies)
 * Professionalism

Funny
This is the BEST SONG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqXX6kuk_XQ&feature=related Warpanda13 00:57, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Response IDK
Oh cool thanks

story
I would be honored to join your story <font color="darkred" font size="4" font face="Neuropol">Lt. Col. Gen.Cain T C   E 01:51, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah bro me too. I have to get off of the computer and eat now, though. I'll be on in a little. 🇨🇩 01:52, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Me too plz but I wanna be in as either The Turtle 95 or Akimbo King

Pbre 01:54, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

K i guess that just sounds like AK 47 but okay and srry bout that I didnt understand what was going on i thought u wrote what happened next... Can u put Akimbo kind under like the General Cain person just so ppl know what AK stands for?... OR u could put my name as Ares (God or War)

Pbre 02:03, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Check out my new guns on my page.
Nukka. Slowrider7 02:32, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

You mean add them on the Gun Pimpers page? I know, I will. I just wanted a few little pre-rating things. Do you think you could get CoD4, WYK, Bord, and say 808 to look over the guns and tell us their opinion? Slowrider7 02:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Can cain just kill me like that

Your new sig
is way cooler than the old one. Nice. Imrlybord7 08:49, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Someone left this for you on your user page.
get back to me

there will be two matches of hardcore S&D

two matches of hardcore teamdeath match

and two matches of domination

clan name's

tf141 / us special forces [BOOM ]

spetsnaz/ militia [MOOB}

so get back to me soon as possible

dommo1@live.co.uk

you have to add me onliee ID osamabincamping

no capitals or spaces Imrlybord7 10:53, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Guns
By "guns" I assumed you meant the Pimp my Gun creations, I saw Slowrider's and yes they are very good. Where is your collection? I've seen some of yours around the place but do you have a place where all your creations are kept? I liked yours a lot too.

I've created some guns, check out my page. I'll add more when I make more. 11:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Uncalled For
Hey good song. ya it was better but calling me a dumbass. UNCALLED FOR Warpanda13 12:39, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well knowing u I shouldn't have taken it seriously. If it was someone else I probaly would have. I won't take it so bad next time. Warpanda13 18:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

....?
Okay, but you spelled Template wrong.

Also, it only works if you have gold.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   19:55, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it's FPS. No, it's not a rip off.

However, I don't recommend buying it if you don't have Live. It's 5X as much fun with someone else.

It has about 40-50 hours of gameplay, over 9,000,000 guns, and 10 hours of gameplay for each DLC. There's a DLC akin to Nazi Zombies.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   20:15, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Mainspace Edits
You hate how I brought up mainspace edits, because "they don't mean shit"? Yes, they do. They mean how much you've helped the wikia and actually edited pages, grammar and/or vandalism. Hate it or not, I had a valid point. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:13, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Listen - mainspace edits are still more important than anything else for requirement issues. Percentage does matter, because I can see that you've spent a lot more time, or, at least, a lot more edits on one thing than another. I can also see you've posted blogs and messages more than you've edited. Mainspace edits matter - be it spelling errors or a re-write, it still makes a difference.

Finally, saying "10,000 edits and has 1000 mainspace, they're just as good as 10 editor with 1 mainspace." is COMPLETELY wrong. Percentage-wise, they're the same, but it still shows who's spent a lot more time working hard on the wikia. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

People can check if someone else is edit whoring. All I'm saying is this: MAINSPACE EDITS matter more than BLOG COMMENTS. A mainspace edit, no matter how little, usually helps. Unless it's wrong or vandalism, because grammar mistakes can be fixed. Edit whoring is bad and irresponsible. The last part is... debatable. XD But come on, do you understand what I'm saying? I'm glad you're more mature, but there's still areas to improve on. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:30, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Double edit vandals? Dude, just ask to be a rollback if that's what you really want. They can revert multiple edits by someone, and they don't have to be an admin to do it. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 20:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE: 808
Oh well, I guess he and I just have different opinions as to how an unsuccessful RFA looks. As for Juan, he overemphasizes mainspace edits, especially percentages, but he means well. Imrlybord7 20:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I never "seduced" you. I never even mentioned you submitted another RFA so soon. -- 2nd_Lieutenant.png8oh8sig.png <font color="darkolivegreen"> T  <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   21:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Sure
Just post your gamertag into my Scenario Gaming blog, and keep an eye open for the one I'm putting up soon; it's going to have a section where everyone can pick and choose their teams, and it'll have a link to the original blogspace, so everyone knows which weapons to select from. -- Echo Four Delta 21:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

NTW 20
I really think they should have missions in Africa in Modern Warfare 3, Infinity Ward could do just as good if not better than Ubisoft's Far Cry 2. This gun should be in it. If you don't know what it is, Google it and you'll know why. In case you've seen it, this gun was used by the MNU officer near the beginning of District 9 to kill the Red-Shirt Prawn. It is also the inspiration for the Halo Sniper Rifle. 🇨🇩 03:15, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

The Black Devil
I have started a blog story and included you as a squad member. Please respond. 17:15, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Kinda bored at the moment wuu2 watched any Family Guy recently lol im a lover of it aswell got every season :D my ps3 is down so i cant play it :(.

RE: New policy
I would just implement a new rule on any pages involving voting saying that any votes which are not sufficiently explained will be strikethroughed and thrown out. But really, you should talk to Chia about this. Imrlybord7 22:27, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I would support exactly what I said right above this; a new rule that forces users to sufficiently explain their votes if they want them to be counted. Imrlybord7 22:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd just like to add that providing an explained vote is already in the RFA voting guidelines on the same page. However, we should also consider that explanation has never been a requirement of a voting process -- for example, the nominations for admins and stewards on Wikipedia. Well courteous, insightful and generally more helpful, making a comment mandatory might be stretching it, considering that most voters explain their decision already. --Scottie theNerd 22:51, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * What you're suggesting is not a change of policy but a change of culture. Nomination processes should be followed and passed based on the quality of the argument; not the number of votes. Number of votes is an indication of how much support the nominee has, but it can be discounted if there are valid reasons. I'm not certain whether we do follow a majority-rules only, but I do recall Chiafriend mentioning that a case with overwhelming support but with an illegitimate/illegal basis would still be chopped down. --Scottie theNerd 23:12, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

PGB, once again, you misunderstand people. Poketape's main reason for not supporting Soap as the featured article was because he was just featured 2 months ago, which I completely agree with. And he supported Reznov because he wants a departure from MW2 articles, which is also understandable. You need to stop misunderstanding people all the time, like when you said that 808 "seduced you." Imrlybord7 23:00, March 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I know that you didn't mean he literally used sexual appeal to get you to do something. I was saying that he did not tell you to RFA or say anything that would have led most people to post an RFA. Imrlybord7 23:04, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Dempsey's block
His behavior has been abominable. There is no way he is getting off early. Honestly, it would be kind of funny to pretend that I was going to shorten it and then retract the offer, but that would be un-adminly of me, so I'm just going to go ahead and say that there is no way in hell he will be editing anything but his own talk page until the end of March. Imrlybord7 22:30, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Making new user blog. Could use your help Mau5killer 22:42, March 1, 2010 (UTC)Mau5killer

Re:It really comes to this.
Alright, that makes sense. -ScotlandTheBest 23:25, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

My Signatures
Please stop messing with them.

-- <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E   23:56, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Dempsey's block
You were a constant annoyance to the wiki for a very long time and caused quite a bit more headaches than he did. Also, it is not your place to determine the length of another user's block, and you technically should have been punished further for using alt accounts, even if you used the second one in good faith. And why the hell would you post that on his talk page? Now I have to go ask Chia if I can break COD:DDD and delete that comment of yours from turning into a real shitstorm. You need some lessons in diplomacy, my friend. Yes, I am chastising you. No, I am not insulting you. Imrlybord7 21:36, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I realized that right after posting the above on your talk page. Check the edit summary for my last edit to Dempsey's talk page. I think you'll enjoy it. Imrlybord7 21:40, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, and just an FYI, IAR is supposed to be used to justify things like "jaywalking to save a baby in the street," to quote Chia. It isn't supposed to be used to justify robbery for the sake of feeding your children. Just for future reference. Imrlybord7 21:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: My talk page
Don't sweat it. Maybe I should archive it again. Although I did archive it less than a week ago. Imrlybord7 21:46, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. Also, it might help if you didn't make a new section for each message. You can just keep them in one section. Imrlybord7 21:55, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Scottie
He is the epitome of a perfect admin. His input in constructive community discussions is always valuable. He might be a bit strict in his judgments of other users, but he would never do anything to start a fight and his opinions are always understandable even when I don't agree with them. He is easily one of the most deserving users on the site. Imrlybord7 22:01, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, and it's fine if you need to make a new section each time. Imrlybord7 22:01, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

DIPLOMACY!!!
21:29, March 3, 2010 (UTC) What you said to Cod4 was not okay. I agree that he goes a bit overboard with his anti-IW sentiments, but I would never put it in the terms that you did, especially if I was just a regular user. You can't talk down to an admin like that, and you should just generally try to be more polite when confronting someone about something they do that you don't like. It's fine to tell him that you feel that way, but you were way too condescending, and you seemed to completely forget who you were talking to. Imrlybord7 22:12, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't mind what he said, I don't have anything against IW, I think this messup is why IW haven't really been connected with the fans. I like both companies, but Treyarch addressed errors in their game more quickly. 22:29, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

I can totally appreciate that, but exercising your freedom of speech and being insolent are two different things. It wasn't quite as bad as I made it out to be, but still, it could have been done better, which is exactly the kind of thing you have to work on. Saying the wrong thing to the wrong person can cause arguments or disagreements to spiral out of control rather quickly, which is a good thing to avoid. Imrlybord7 00:38, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Vandal and stuff
Part A - Yes you can have two extra editing buttons which let you insert the vandalism template and your signature without typing it, instead you'll click that button and it will automatically be inserted. It works like the welcome template buttons.

Part B - Sure, I have no problem with that. Run whenever you see fit.

21:29, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Skin
Yeah, it's happening to me too... I have nothing to do with it, it's just a glitch and should disappear in time. 22:06, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Requested featured articles
Did you mean to give 2 oppose votes to Reznov? 22:16, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Poketape, Stop Abbusing Your Power!
You can't block me because I opposed your little article. What you are doing is power abuse!


 * No, he cant. However, he CAN when you try to stuff the ballot box with multiple votes. Which you did. If I'd seen it first, I probably would have given you a week (which is still pretty lenient given your history). I suggest you quit while you're ahead.--WouldYouKindly 23:02, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

That isn't power abuse. You tried to oppose an article twice. I took away both votes because that's illegal. You then altered the page so it only showed one of your votes. This is illegal. If I unblock you, will you stop trying to vote on Reznov? Poketape Talk 23:01, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Peter, you shouldn't call me a pussy. If you simply stated that you weren't going to do anything about the Reznov vote then I would've cancelled the block. But now you're insulting me? That's not right. Poketape Talk 23:05, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, (let's notice the A inbetween the U and the L) not once did I call you a vandal. Poketape Talk 23:01, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

But how could it have been an accident? The two votes have people's votes inbetween them. How come neither of them are signed? Poketape Talk 23:06, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Actully
It is a valid reason, Imrlybord and Scottie theNerd do not have all the say. Obviously, opposing an article and saying "We shouldn't feature this article because CoD3 sucked and was really gay" wouldn't be a valid reason, but when the past...what is it, four? five? articles have been MW2 related it is important to have variety and switch things up a little bit. 23:08, March 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what I have to do with this. I'm for establishing comprehensive comments as common practice but against making it policy. --Scottie theNerd 05:43, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE: your message on MUC
I'm really not in the mood to argue right now. You try to pass it off as an accident, but this comment proves otherwise:

"I was hoping no one would notice. You get very dramatic at this. Also may I ask you to stop opposing articles just because they're new? It has nothing to do in what game they're in, it has to do with article quality. Any article can be featured if it's good, just because it's recent or not doesn't mean it's any better then the next."

You basically admitted in that quote that you intended to cheat the system, personally, if I'd been caught doing that and had both votes removed (which is perfectly reasonable in a situation like that), I'd be happy to get away without a block. But again, you let the situation escalate.--WouldYouKindly 23:15, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

1. First you say it's an accident, then you say it's a joke. Just own up to it, trying to make paper-thin excuses doesn't help your case any.

2. He was perfectly within his rights to erase your votes when you tried to "stuff the ballot box". You could have left it at that instead of making the situation escalate into a block.

3. That situation has absolutely nothing to do with the matter at hand. Don't try to change the subject.

4. I think, in this case, the fact that he reverted you several times counts as a warning.

5. Please stop messaging me on MUC, post your messages here if you must, but I'd prefer not to spam yet another wiki with this crap.--WouldYouKindly 23:33, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

You might like to know
Poketape and I have agreed to reinstate one of your oppose votes on the Featured Article voting page, however, the block still stands due to your tirade, as well as trying to cheat the voting system in the first place.--WouldYouKindly 03:11, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Unblocked
I've unblocked you because as far as I can see voting twice was only a joke. However, some people don't believe it. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I've told you to not make stupid and inappropriate jokes. Please don't start again. 17:44, March 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hopefully it won't affect your RFA/UOTM whatever, it won't for me anyway. Also, yes, everyone hates vandals. 21:51, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

I personally disagree with this unblock. I reduced your block from 7 days to 3, which I felt was reasonable. My support of your block had little to do with your second vote, rather, it was because of your despicable treatment of Poketape, who as an admin, deserves much more respect than you showed him. You have proven beyond a doubt that you lack the intellectual capacity and self control necessary to ever hold an administrative position, and I will not support you in any future RFAs. Many users will take the exact same stance as me, most notably just about every other admin, especially Chia. You are free to hold this against me, but I hope we can still be relatively friendly acquaintances. Imrlybord7 00:07, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

E-4, not E-3
I haven't been a lance corporal for a while, I'm a corporal (2 stripes up). -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   22:19, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, that's the correct one; thanks a lot. The dress stripes look like they have higher resolution than the service stripes I had before, too. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   22:20, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Archiving
You should really consider archiving your talk page. It's getting quite long.

Alright then.

Re: My edit
Gary Sanderson is just a redirect to Gary "Roach" Sanderson. And we name all applicable character pages like that. 22:52, March 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nope, it's definitely a redirect. And I can understand your argument, but all other TF 141 members are named by their callsign, even if we know what their real name is (ie. John "Soap" MacTavish and Simon "Ghost" Riley). 23:08, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

If you disagree, than bring it up in the War Room. I personally don't care one way or the other. 23:14, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Stop. Now.
Quit messing around with the signatures I make.

Next time, I'm just going to request a block.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     22:37, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

You think I'm stupid?

When someone joins the wikia, their signature is automatically set to SUBST:Signatures/. Whenever they type four tildes, their template signature will appear.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     22:41, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

I get that you're trying to help, yet nobody requested it, and as I just said, typing four tildes will give the same effect.

If they request, then I will do it.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     22:44, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

That's because you haven't set the checkbox [x] Custom Signature

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     22:50, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

I made it; you had no part in it, and doing that is considered light vandalism. If Dark wants to move it, that's fine. But doing it without someone requesting it isn't.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     23:00, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

If you're talking about the game, I've got a special reference to you.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     00:22, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Sad, but true. --  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E    <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight    T     C     E     00:27, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Okay...
I didn't know you didn't like archives. Calm down tho. Darkman 4 00:04, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. I mean it's usually standard that a talk page gets archived after 50 or so different discussions, but its your talk page. Darkman 4 00:08, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Nazi Zombies edit on my talk page...
With all due respect, what the hell are you talking about? -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   01:53, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

What does that have to do with me?
AS per above. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   02:21, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, okay.
Very well. Oh yeah, thanks again for the Corporal chevron. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   02:24, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: The thing is
While I agree that "He's not in MW2" may not be the most comprehensive reason, it's still a valid comment. This sort of comment is actually encouraged in other wikis, notably Wikipedia, as it is considered undesirable if a particular topic, theme or series gets more FA time than others.

What does need changing for the FA process is that we need to establish a backlog of FA-vetted articles. FA isn't like UotM -- articles aren't trying to compete for single spot for the month. Rather, all articles should be looked at individually rather than comparing them in quality and theme to other articles. Many people are voting against articles because of comparisons to each other (and, as you highlighted, "because he is/is not in this game"). If we kept a list of a FA-approved articles, we can just comment on whether or not the article is good enough to be featured and the admins can select from a range of different games at their discretion; thus invalidating the problematic votes that you have highlighted. --Scottie theNerd 04:08, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

I think it could be like a daily FA where an FA will just be posted every day from a group of FAs that won their votes. Poketape Talk 04:53, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Miller
I understand that, but in some game video it said that he was Miller... so I'm going to let it stay for the time being. So yes, it was a stupid Treyarch mistake I guess. 10:33, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Videos
I know.....I'm "Batman Rider" You know, the guy who has been here for over a year.....I know exactly how to do it. You should have just put it under the picture gallery. -- Alex Martin Rider 17:54, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Videos
Because I made a freaking mistake. Settle down. I'm sorry if it makes you mad. Just forget it and move on.... -- Alex Martin Rider 19:19, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

I agree
I agree with you about that pc damage crap. I think it's a whole load of bull shit. BTW I think you would make a good admin. Your not an ass hole.MdDy x GMON3Y 05:25, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Gun Pimpers
I want to join the gun pimpers. I have made 3 guns. 16:34, March 7, 2010 (UTC+7)

Re:It's a massacre
I would hold back the attacks :P. We will be back from the front lines of the Battlefield Wiki in due course, don't worry. The Battlefield wiki needs a lot of help, and already it is looking 5 times better. You're doing a fine job without us, so you should have no reason to worry. 09:50, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

My Signature
How do I do that?

I would really appreciate it
if you came to understand that I am a human being, and as such I often have other things to do. I have had at least 1000 (three zeros) edits in the past month and a half; I obviously have no intention of deserting this wiki. Just because I am relatively inactive for several days after being on 24/7 for a few weeks does not mean that I am guilty of dereliction of duty. Imrlybord7 19:43, March 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, my apologies. If you have any IP addresses or affected articles to report, please post them on my talk page. Imrlybord7 23:10, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: My blocks
I carefully weigh the severity of the vandalism and the potential impact that allowing such a vandal to stay on the site could have when choosing my blocks. I don't really care about the vandal's rights, I just work to protect the wiki. None of the blocks would qualify as "cruel or unusual punishment," so I don't see a problem. Also, no, I did not get the sexy vandal. Darkman already got him before I was online. Imrlybord7 21:24, March 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * COD:BP is shit. Literally. No admin even pretends that that policy means anything. Also, I honestly couldn't care less about a bad user editing from an otherwise good IP. Unlike Smuff, who is an excellent contributor, anonymous IPs have no reputation and are therefore judged purely on first impressions. My goal is damage control. If an anon is in a position where a bad editor can edit from their IP, they deserve to be blocked anyway. I have no sympathy towards the issue. Imrlybord7 21:37, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

srs bsns = serious business Imrlybord7 21:38, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

My issue is with
the bad behavior afterwards, not the original problem. Also, the way that you just shrug off your attitude towards Poketape as if it was nothing is the troublesome issue that I was pointing out with that comment. Imrlybord7 21:44, March 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * The fact of the matter is that you flipped the fuck out in a bad way. Also, Smuff didn't "get away with it." His offense was not as bad as yours (although both were very minor) and Poketape overreacted to yours, whereas I was more reasonable with Smuff. Also, please don't pretend that this site doesn't mean a lot to you. It is painfully obvious that you care dearly about the Wiki and love being here. You're allowed to admit to that without being a loser. Imrlybord7 21:53, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Two things
First of all, I noticed you edited Pup's user page to fit the redlink. That leads me to ask you, do you think we should create a template to throw on blank userpages to prevent redlinks? Also, I would like to entreat you to amend the quote on your userpage that a Vietnamese soldier says in We Were Soldiers. I don't think it's right that you refer to him as an "Asian douche", even something like "Asian guy" would suffice thoroughly. Oh, and I'm Asian if you were wondering, so it kind of hits personal. Nothing against you though, just asking. Cheers, <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 22:47, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see, well couldn't you have just put something like "Unmerciful VietCong douche" or something like that? Don't mean to sound quarrelsome or anything, but just wondering. Also, what do you think of my userpage box idea? <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 00:16, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant the having of a template specifically for that purpose that you could use. And no, but you generally just call someone a "douche", without bringing their race into it. I'm just requesting a small change, I don't think that's too much trouble. Just my humble opinion however, nothing on you. <font face="Segoe Print">Icepac <font face="Segoe UI">K <font face="Segoe Script">s 00:27, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Say what now? Pup42512n 00:31, March 9, 2010 (UTC)pup42512n

Ah, thanks for the page fix, neighbor. Appreciate it. Pup42512n 00:36, March 9, 2010 (UTC)pup42512n

Firearms lesson #2 for the day is in session.
"In real life I own a Desert Eagle with two full clips. Ammo is very expensive, and I prefer my pellet shotgun"

The Desert Eagle Pistol fires from 7-, 8-, and 9-round MAGAZINES, not clips. And it should be understood that a shotgun fires pellets - more accurately referred to as shot, but that's splitting hairs. Now you can give that lesson you were talking about in your Banana Magazine edit. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   00:57, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Not slamming you, but if you're going to be snarky about something (and I'm all about some snark) make sure that you're not a culprit of what you're ripping on. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   00:58, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oh yeah, you said you don't fire it much, so I have a piece of advice for you from one owner to another: if you keep the DEP loaded, make sure to unload the magazines every now and then and get the tension off the springs, and conduct basic magazine cleaning and maintenance regularly. It shouldn't be too bad of a probem, but in the time since I purchased mine, I've noticed some definite fatigue in the .50AE magazines that I kept loaded for long periods, more so than most handgun magazines. -- <font style="background:gold"> Griever0311   21:31, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

The Westboro Baptist Church
should be exterminated. I have hated them more than any other group in the world since I first heard of them a few years ago. But since you didn't touch upon it at all in your message, I have to ask, do you know why they do what they do? Imrlybord7 21:26, March 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow. You really never fail to disappoint. You talk about hating them for what they do but you have no idea what they believe in. I mean, I hate EVERYTHING about them, but still, your ignorance is astonishing. Imrlybord7 21:31, March 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, it really isn't. Imrlybord7 21:35, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

That PETA site was shut down for copyright infringement. And hopefully you can figure out what ideals the WBC stands for based on the NAME OF THEIR FUCKING WEBSITE. Imrlybord7 21:40, March 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay. So why did you mention Don't Ask, Don't Tell (stupidest policy ever, BTW)? I mean sure, that has something to do with gay people, but when I asked I don't understand why you didn't just respond, "They hate gay people." Imrlybord7 21:50, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I seriously can't handle you right now. Leave me alone for a bit. Imrlybord7 21:51, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, WHAT? You say that gays can be useful but you support DADT? Do you even understand how contradictory that is? Imrlybord7 21:54, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oh. My. God (not that I believe in one). DADT means that gays get kicked out of the military if they openly admit to being gay. That's it. It doesn't "prevent the military from not letting them serve." Also, you're a fucking bigot. Imrlybord7 22:03, March 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * That is a part of the policy. The biggest part of the policy is that people who are openly gay cannot join the military, or they get kicked out of the military if they come out while they are in the military. Imrlybord7 22:08, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Your comments on that blog
Dude, you're just an idiot. I don't even know what else to say. Imrlybord7 21:57, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the archive links.
Don't know why I never thought to do that. Imrlybord7 01:29, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * When have I said anything about you not contributing to the wiki (excluding pre-block)? Imrlybord7 01:50, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Due to your oversensitivity, I guess we'll have to clear some things up.
1. I do not, and probably never will, hate or dislike you.

2. I sometimes like you and sometimes find you too annoying to like, but never annoying enough to dislike.

3. I will always consider you to be an extremely stupid individual.

4. You have terrible people and communication skills.

Hopefully that clears up any misconceptions. Imrlybord7 01:56, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * You can call me arrogant, ugly, unathletic, and brutally honest, but you sure as hell can't call me stupid. Imrlybord7 02:01, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, so technically you can call me stupid. However, you, along with over 99% of the world population, cannot authoritatively say that I am stupid. And please, don't make some stupid pun out of that like you just did. Imrlybord7 02:06, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

What's your opinion on the Bible verses on the ACOGs?
Just curious. Imrlybord7 01:57, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

As both an atheist and a believer in equality I am absolutely disgusted by it. Imrlybord7 02:02, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, really (about what you just posted on JJR's talk page)?
I already pointed that out in the blog comments politely. You seem to be looking for a fight. Stop. This behavior could very easily escalate at the slightest reciprocation of provocation by another user (I honestly couldn't think of a better way to say that, sorry for the Englishyness). Imrlybord7 02:33, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hey
Well, that depends on what's in the supply drop, and that means that for your strategy to work, you have to have a buddy who uses C4 and Care Package. What if there's... oh, I don't know... something GOOD in the care package? There's nothing I'll ever pass up in a Care Package except for Ammo Crates. Finally, if I have a TACTICAL INSERTION in SEARCH AND DESTROY, its use is completely negated. I don't want to use it for bait, I want to use my equipment as actual goods. Heck, a better way to make that thing work is just have your own C4 and place it on the air package crate, kill them if they grab it. However, that idea also is pretty rare, because you might get something that the enemy will actually use and get equal/more kills than you would have (You kill him once with the C4, he uses YOUR Pave Low and kills 7 people). Finally, I extremely doubt that you've counted 189 successes with that strategy. You mean to tell me you've called in 189 care packages and not tried to take them?

Even so, if you waited until your TI was destroyed, the strategy would still work terribly if you didn't have communication with your friend and/or a constant eye on your care package. Added with the fact that in Search and Destroy, it refrains from the actual objective of the game mode, it's somewhat difficult to get a care package and pass it up/risk it, and the TIs are limited to one thing. Thus, the strategy fails. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 02:33, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

No offense, but how the hell did you mess up 'bomb site' with 'supply drop'? Anyways, then in that case, C4 would just work a lot better, and certain enemies might not even destroy the TI.

Alright, but there's no way you can convince me that a Tactical Insertion has any good use in Search and Destroy. Imrlybord gave me advice, and I'm going to listen to it. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 02:37, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * A better way to refer to them would be as "Objectives," not "Supply Drops." Imrlybord7 02:38, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yo, two things. Number one - this isn't only your discussion. Imrlybord can join if he sees it fit and I have no problem with it. Number two - I'm not talking about the SPAS or sniping, Mini-Uzis or 1887s, I'm talking about how that strategy sounds unnecessary, could simply be done with a single C4 and is really odd. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 02:42, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, that was very douchey of you. I was only trying to help, and as an administrator I can post wherever I want. I also demand much more respect than you have been showing me. A 36-hour cooldown block is looking more attractive by the minute. Please don't make me do that. Imrlybord7 02:57, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Let's see... or, you could plant a C4 on one bomb site (and possibly get a friend/teammate to plant a C4 at the other) and detonate it as soon as you hear "The bomb has been planted!" No unnecessary TIs, and with a friend, it's always a GUARANTEED kill. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 02:49, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

I never freaking insulted you! Plus, you could simply put it somewhere where they wouldn't see it... a bush, a ceiling, underneath the bomb...

you know what? I'm done with this. I'm really sick of trying to explain this to you, so I won't. Corporal Juan José Rodriguez  Reportin' for duty. 02:52, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Respect
I couldn't care less about whether or not you respect me, but you will still speak to me and any other administrator in a respectful way. And no. I would not block you for "disrespect." I would block you for misbehaving if you continue down the path that you seem so ready to repeat. Imrlybord7 03:01, March 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow. I didn't even read that last comment on JJR's talk page. Bad move. Imrlybord7 03:04, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

1. You can place C4 inside a bush. 2. You can place C4 directly under a bomb. Go prone, face the bomb site, throw C4 at the bottom. 3. I never insulted you. Once. But now, I'm kind of wishing I had. 4. You didn't WIN. This wasn't a fight. 5. I'm a close-minded twit? Oh, well what do you know. Isn't that just an opinion? 6. I never said anything about claymores.

Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and say please do yourself a favour and learn to make some coherency, because you are acting like a two-year-old who is yelling at a teenager because the teenager can't prove that the moon isn't made out of cotton candy... please, leave me alone unless you have something to say that is:

a) Mature and coherent b) Logical and/or able to prove a point.

Corporal Juan José Rodriguez Reportin' for duty. 03:05, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Message reply
It's a type of thing where it's either definitely removed or it stays, so removing it temporarily wouldn't be a great move. Could you give me some links as examples? 04:23, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

RFA
At the rate you're going at, you'll never become an admin.

I thought you had changed - but now you started an argument with Poketape, Bord, and José. All on separate counts.

You also managed to get blocked again.

Just wanted to let you know - you might want to consider just editing without talking to them.

--  <font color="darkolivegreen"> T   <font color="darkolivegreen"> C   <font color="darkolivegreen"> E     <font style="background:black"> '''EightOhEight   T    C     E    05:48, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Stop it.
I was nice until you started acting like a total jackass to people. YOU'RE the one who acts however he wants to people, not me. So I am more than happy to do this.

All I said was that I didn't think that Assassin's Creed II was very good. I didn't insult you in the slightest. I only used your post as a springboard because you dissed Battlefield. I did not "poke you out" or "crawl into your ass." Imrlybord7 21:49, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

I am 5'7" and weigh 112 pounds. Yes. Quite fat. Also, that other part is obviously a lie, as Chia and I have been working very well together. Back to your old ways, big surprise. This only reinforces the fact that you deserve this block. Imrlybord7 21:54, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Let's see what Bord had done wrong
Has multiple times stated that I'm a bitch and jackass, just look at my earlier page. Never had and most likely never will stop bashing stupid IP adresses, and has done a lot of stuff. I say Bord has gone corrupt and no one has ever listened to my side. Really, you're just going to trust Bord on everything. Bord bashes someone he gets 36 hours, I bash someone I get a month, a week and then two weeks. Really, where is the justice? Has the wiki gone corrupt, yes it offically has. Bord has turned this into his wiki and will ban anyone who dare opposes him.
 * Show me where Bord has bashed IPs. Darkman 4 23:33, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

You know what i mean, new users and IPs, if they make one wrong edit or are uneducated he will not it go.
 * I said show me. Darkman 4 06:17, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty 3 character's birth dates
Dear Comrade Peter Griffin Boy, I wish to confront you about the birth dates of few Call of Duty 3 character's birth dates, you see those birth dates that I am trying to edit are legitimate to their age from finding their in-game profiles on Call of Duty 3 for the Wii, and those birth years you keep trying to put back were ones that I had put on those pages in the first place!, but I had misstaken their ages so thats why I was trying to edit their pages back not put false information or to make you or any other editor of this web site mad, so I do hope that you take in consideration of letting me edit those pages freely without me having to fear you changing those pages, I hope for you to leave me a message about this subject and talk about it. Sinsearely, Soviet1945 23:03, March 11, 2010 (UTC)Soviet1945

Since I was wrongly blocked for not liking Battlefield, I must say we get our information from the Collector's Edition of Call of Duty 3, the Wii version must be wrong, as we get it from another official source.

Don't even start this crap (again). You were not blocked for not liking Battlefield, you were blocked (again) for starting flame wars (again).--WouldYouKindly 23:09, March 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Imrlybord7 23:09, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Don't listen to them, I was merely stating my opinion and got blocked for clalign Bord a bitch (once). Bitch has called me a jackass (once) a fucking idoit (one) and a bitch (twice) yet somehow gets away. I'm a vitctim, Bord just admit it, you can't stand that I'm a victim of you bitches.

You never showed Darkman where he called you that, show me. And don't give me the same "you know what I mean" brush-off you gave him.--WouldYouKindly 23:25, March 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * You weren't blocked for disliking BF; if that were the case, I'd be blocked too. You were blocked because you were beinge an ass. Period. don't try to play victim here. Darkman 4 23:31, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

(to the tune of Weird Al's "Anakin Guy") A long, long time ago, before I had even started my RFA... yeah, screw the song. He had been lying about all sorts of things and making things up about me, and I did call him a "bitch" once or twice, but the only time it ever happened was within a single message on his talk page. Please keep in mind that one of these lies included him claiming to be a U.S. Marine. Imrlybord7 23:36, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

You want to know why you were blocked? Well, then, listen up bro:

1) You just called all of us (or at least multiple users, such as WYK and Bord) bitches.

2) You referred to Bord as 'the bitch going into my ass'.

3) You accused him of 'crawling into your ass' here.

4) You called Bord a bitch, again, here.

5) You called me a close-minded twit, told me to 'suck it', that I was an insulter (which I clearly never insulted you), and completely went uncalled for, immature and rude against me.

6) You told Bord to 'Shut [his] hole'.

Do I really have to continue? Actually, yes, I do.

7) You have gotten into a disputation over putting 'some Asian douche' on your profile, and even though it offended someone, you did not remove it even though he asked.

Now I'm going to get into reasons that aren't WHY you were blocked, but support it.

8) You practically vandalized an official template here, even if it was for the 'lulz'.

9) You overreacted a lot after Imrlybord simply mad an exaggeration and funny comment, lashing out at him unnecessarily.

Now here's a very small reason, concerning the past.

10) You just recently came off of a ban regarding you massively overreacting, insulting and failing to take heed from an administrator, and possibly trying to cheat the system and double-oppose an article. I don't really want to hear about any excuses, because this still is a valid point.

11) You JUST came off of an INCREDIBLY recent ban that was shortened because you got into one too many fights and personal altercations.

Now, here's where I sum it all up.

12) You are rude, obnoxious, and have really quite simply broken the rules of this wikia without caring for the feelings of others, caring of offending other people and harshly getting into arguments.

Corporal Juan José Rodriguez  Reportin' for duty. 23:37, March 11, 2010 (UTC)