User blog comment:Damac1214/Why Call of Duty is Call of Duty, Fallout is Fallout, Halo is Halo, and that they aren't going to be changing anytime soon/@comment-1854594-20130314080113

I find it odd that you are using Fallout as an example when the relationship between 3 and New Vegas is simply a repeat of the relationship between 1 and 2. Both same engines, the sequel essentially being more of the same just generally improved and in many eyes much better. Nothing new. And if you take the Fallout series as a whole, as in, 1, 2, Tactics, Brotherhood of Steel, 3, and New Vegas you got alot of changes, some good (Fallout: New Vegas yay) some crap (Brotherhood of Steel boo) but ultimately the series has been switching out alot and I feel by the time 4 comes out while it won't be a change on the level of 2 to 3 or even 2 to Tactics, it will have changed and evolved significantly.

Other then that this is a fine blog post I pretty much agree with. I see no reason for Halo to change the way it's currently going on it's personal evolutionary path, while I don't want more Call of Duty as it is I don't see a reason for it to change either other then a possible reboot, and as you said they'll be staying that way anyway whether we like it or not.