Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion

Articles for Deletion is where anyone can nominate an article to be deleted for whatever reason, and everyone decides if it should. To bring the article up for deletion, add "" or "" to the top of the respective article, and make a subsection on this page about it.

If the article qualifies for speedy deletion (see criteria for speedy deletion), use "" instead, and don't make a subsection here. An administrator will find it and take care of it.

Sniper Teams One and Two
Sniper Team One's information is all covered in the articles for Smith and Scully, whilst Sniper Team Two's information is covered in the articles for Archer and Toad. These articles are useless and repetitive.  Toon Ganondorf  (t   c)  11:43, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Chief z 22:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

01:15, September 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * The SAS is a regiment within the British military. It itself is not even one faction. 00:37, September 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Chief z 08:32, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 09:43, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - The articles will not be deleted. Sactage  Give me a ping, Vasily.  IRC  War Room 03:32, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

B-52 Stratofortress
This is Rolling Thunder. What's the point of having it as an article when the article Rolling Thunder already lists the name of the aircraft? They both are the same thing, but Rolling Thunder has less real life info. (Which is good.) Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:35, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:35, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Eltomo85 talk 18:43, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt.Frank Woods 19:38, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 19:50, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff 19:53, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Bravo Five-Nine  Talk 18:03, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

No Scoping
Very small. Can easily be covered in Quick Scoping

As nominator--Super2k 22:20, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

- 22:24, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Per Scotland. Why don't we just delete every article detailing techniques in CoD? nlmgr

like what?--Super2k 22:31, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I agree to delete it. But we have to fuse it with quick scoping and call it "Scoping Techniques" GunsSwordsFlames 02:38, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

It's not like quick-scoping. Similar, but not. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 22:43, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I just think that they are each small enough that they warrant one all-encompassing article--Super2k 22:48, September 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's slightly irrelevant, as the Wiki has plenty of small articles, but because they pertain about different elements, they get their own article. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 22:54, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

23:05, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Merge into Quickscope. Both are terms that are heavily used and engrained in the COD community, regardless of what you may think of it. Not sure it's detailed enough to warrant its own article. Maybe even just a mention in a glossary or something.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:38, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 06:04, September 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * No scoping is as much as a technique as pushing the fire button. It's not a technique; it's a term. --Scottie theNerd 03:49, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Change to -  17:13, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  23:30, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Just merge it into Quickscope/Noscope like above. It'd help a bunch more to people too. YellowRiolu-Always on Xbox. 15:31, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

LITE992 16:01, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

New Idea: How about we delete Quick and No scoping and make an article called: Sniper Techniques I'm a bit new here. So when does voting end? --Super2k 17:59, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

CALL OF DUTY 4 MODERN WARFARE: STRATEGY GUIDE
Do we even need this? Its not even a strategy guide. It should be deleted. Eltomo85 talk 17:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * PS, doesn't this qualify for speedy deletion. ScavengePro1.pngEltomo85 talk 17:06, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a junk article. I don't see why it shouldn't be speedy-deleted. --Scottie theNerd 17:07, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination closed: Speedy-deleted. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  20:24, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Type 95 Scout Car
Just a background item. We don't have an article for Trees. Dolten  Let's Talk  23:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

23:39, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's used in a killstreak, this isn't used for anything. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * The killstreak is used for the killstreak, the plane is used as a background element in Exodus. Shotrocket6sig.png 11:45, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

23:41, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

The Smuff 16:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've never seen it being drove, nor drivin it. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * {{Comment|So I should make articles for Trees, and Boonie Hat? Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  15:47, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

{{Support|This travesty of an article would have only been kept with COD:G. Notability applies.}} CoD addict - 21:30, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Quick Scoping
We shouldn't have a page for this. It falls under the same category as Mike Myers, but we refuse to make a page for that.

23:44, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  23:46, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

per no scoping. --Super2k 01:00, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 03:53, October 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png Let's Talk  20:22, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

DoomGoober 06:45, December 3, 2010 (UTC)

No Scoping
I think it should be deleted it is just like Quick Scoping just something you can do Nardei99 01:13, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

as nominator Nardei99 01:14, October 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Already nominated. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  01:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Randomly Generated Soldiers
We don't need a page for this everybody should know what they are i made the page and I feel that it should be deletedNardei99 01:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

- as nominator Nardei99 01:24, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

01:31, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

01:35, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

I was going crazy ignore my vote i really like generated soldiers Nardei99 01:39, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Strategy Page
Think we don't need these like we have strategy guides for an entire game NOT NEEDED Nardei99 21:06, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Commander
I'm not even sure if this qualifies as a legitimate article, but just incase, I'll put it up here. It's a general term, has little to no reference to Call of Duty and is barely featured other than a multiplayer rank.

Smuff [The cake is a lie. ] 10:40, October 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nomination closed: Speedy deleted. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  20:21, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Kelvin
All information was moved to another page and deleted from it, I don't know why it is still up. I wouldn't have added it but there is no admin on that will delete it. Dolten  Let's Talk  18:25, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Put sdelete on pages like those. They should be SPEEDY deleted. 13:24, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Speedy deleted. Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion should have sdelete added to them and not nominated here. 14:49, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hunter (H Company, 1 Bn. 75 Ranger Regiment)
Wrong format, no information and doesn't deserve a page. Dolten  Let's Talk  20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Completely broken page. Must be sdeleted. 13:24, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Speedy deleted. Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion should have sdelete added to them and not nominated here. 14:49, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support
This page is, IMO, an open invite for loads of people to come along and spam it with custom game modes that they made up. Sgt. S.S. 12:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 12:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

This page is like what Sgt. S.S. said spam and the article also has bad grammer and should be deleted and it also seems that a 5 year old wrote this article Sgt Sprinkles 13:10, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

16:40, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 16:55, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  04:44, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

17:05, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

LITE992 19:41, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose
I think this page can become useful for users that want to learn some new games to play with their friends. I understand that a person or two might try to be cool and put some random thing on there, but if that random thing is something you can play, then its a Custom Game Mode. I guarentee you that this page can become one of the biggest pages on the wiki.  Diante  grassstain     13:24, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then post it as blog post. 13:33, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

We really should keep this. It could work if we really get tired of the game modes. GunsSwordsFlames 16:45, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Same as the first one Nextinline 19:56, November 1, 2010 (UTC) 3:56PM EST 11-1-10

- its a very good page and could be a great page and if someone puts sommething stupid on o my god you have to press a undo botton /loud scream/ plus if this was to be made a blog the admins would delete it i guarentee that 20:11, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment
This article is not about real game modes just fanon if this deserves to be kept then so should no scoping and quick scoping and thats not going to happen.Sgt Sprinkles 13:28, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Custom game modes, quick scoping, and no scoping are seen in Call of Duty every day. So none of those articles should be deleted.   Diante  grassstain     13:32, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 13:40, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Screaming and all that stuff shouln't but Custom Game Modes, no scoping, and quick scoping should because they are played in the game. --  Diante  grassstain     13:51, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

May I remind you that this wiki is a canon site. Custom game modes are not canon. If people want to find custom game modes to play with their friends, there are sites on the Web who can tell them about these to much greater effect than us. Sgt. S.S. 15:32, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 20:47, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 18:13, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - AfD Successful Sactage   Give me a ping, Vasily.  IRC  Policies   War Room 00:08, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Holy pistol
Can easily be covered in M1911. 00:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

00:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Eltomo85 talk 14:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  04:41, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * The only reason it exists in game is because of the corrisponding Death Card, meaning it's only a different weapon for the sake of Co-op. Either the page for that Death Card or the M1911 page could cover it in about two sentences. Plus, where did "Holy Pistol" come from anyway? Shotrocket6sig.png 01:33, October 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * However, you can get it through 'give all' therefore it is it's own weapon.AdvancedRookie 21:07, October 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * There are at least three M1911s that are exactly the same, but are aquired through "give all". Should we have pages for those too? Shotrocket6sig.png 21:11, October 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Different Weapon, different page.AdvancedRookie 21:13, October 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Uhhh Yuri, your link to M4 is a redirect. Shotrocket6sig.png 23:48, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, M4 Carbine and M4A1. YuriKaslov 03:40, December 5, 2010 (UTC)

16:40, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Kino der Untoten
Its leaked footage. Nothing more. --Soldier 12:04, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Speedy deleted. Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion should have sdelete added to them and not nominated here. 14:49, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support
--Soldier 12:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Demonic Announcer
Little to be said about such an unseen "character." We do not have pages for other faction announcers; I do not understand why this is the exception. 19:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Support
19:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Eltomo85 <span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 8pt;">talk 19:17, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose
Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 20:09, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  04:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  22:40, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

--  Bravo Five-Nine   15:22, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Major enough role+ coming back in Black Ops (and your citation [] )

Why deleting it? I think it is an important "character" RC95 19:24, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
21:23, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I don't see what is wrong with having to delete two other pages if this one needs to go. Remember that our Granularity Policy no longer exists (and a notability policy is currently being decided upon), so we are not obligated to cover everything in the Call of Duty series. 21:26, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yet we have a page for Unnamed Radio Operator, a character with no name. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  11:23, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. And in my opinion we need to keep Overlord because he is actually a fairly major character. -- CoD addict (talk · edits) 02:49, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also note that the character is now named Crosby -- CoD addict (talk · edits) 01:39, November 24, 2010 (UTC)

New Black Ops zombie
Nomination Closed: Speedy deleted. Dolten  Let's Talk  15:43, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Modern Warfare 2 Kilstreaks
It's badly written (including the title) and full of superfluous information, which probably doesn't warrant its own page. However, the user does seem to have good intent, and perhaps others might disagree on its lack of necessity. It didn't seem to fit any of the criteria for speedy deletion either. GothicEmperor 17:09, October 25, 2010 (UTC)

There's already a killstreak page too, shoul qualify for speedy deletion Nextinline 20:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nomination closed: Article qualifies for speedy deletion. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  22:45, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Carnival (unit)
I've never heard of this before. User:X29 notified me of this.

<span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">Eltomo85 <span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 8pt;">talk 13:45, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

--  Bravo Five-Nine   14:14, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  11:20, November 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * US Army OF-4.png Bravo Five-Nine  Talk 20:02, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - AfD successful Sactage   Give me a ping, Vasily.  IRC  Policies   War Room 00:04, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Slaughterhouse
For those that don't know, it was renamed to Crash Site, which is a separate article. Slaughterhouse should be deleted, and a trivia point can be made in Crash Site about its former name.

19:27, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

- correct it should good find 19:30, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Darkraider09 19:39, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 19:40, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Already done, should be closedNextinline 20:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page has been moved to appropriate name. Sactage  Give me a ping, Vasily.  IRC  Policies   War Room 00:00, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Reaper Two
Article is only mentioned once, and is merely a background unit. It should be deleted as it was only included under COD:G.

<span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">Eltomo85 <span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 8pt;">talk 16:48, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

 <font color="#000080">T <font color="#0b0076">H <font color="#15006c">I <font color="#200062">E <font color="#2b0059">F 00:06, November 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, we do. 00:42, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * And it's the fact that that sort of article is allowed to exist that I oppose. YuriKaslov 00:44, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 21:04, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Groves (Black Ops)
Randomly generated character, appeared as Private Allen for me. Would tag it for speedy deletion, but Omnicube insists on discussing it.

Oilrig
I think this article should be deleted because it describes fake info:
 * 1) No loadscreen can be found in game files - however, there is loadscreen on image.
 * 2) No fastfile of map can be found in game, so, map is unplayable because there is no map itself.

11:01, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

11:34, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 21:05, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17:21, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * None of the other canceled maps are canon. Why keep them? Not because they're canonical, because they're real, something this map is not.}} hud commando.png CoD addict - 21:55, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

{{Oppose| I agree with the smuff AngryWalrus

{{Template:Support Seijana 08:53, November 27, 2010 (UTC) }}
 * By the sound of it this map is about as real as Courtyards. If it is fake it shouldn't be there.

{{Oppose|The Fast File doesn't necessarily have to be in the game for the map's loadscreen to be displayed. The loadscreen image files are kept separate from the FastFiles; they are instead kept in the IWI files.

Furthermore, the maps are referenced in the game's code. Using the available Fast File Viewer program, one can view the updated MP Fast Files that came with the Stimulus Package and view the code that references Oil Rig (as well as Vertigo and Gulag).

I also recall seeing the game fail to load the map when the player tries to play on the map, giving the player an error message saying "mp_oilrig.ff cannot be found" (or something to that extent).}} EON 8 22:30, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * {{Comment|There are no even loadscreen and compass map. {{=P}}

Yes, the maps are referenced in game code, but nothing more than reference can be found in game.}} 18:38, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Closing
AFD closed by opener and false information removed. 18:38, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Prefire
OK this article is just the idea of walking around a corner shooting. I'm not sure its even a tactic!

--Super2k 14:40, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

-- GothicEmperor   Talk Contribs 21:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

11:44, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

--DoomGoober 00:07, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

CoD addict - 21:53, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thunder9092 03:16, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Camping
Per all other technique pages.

16:39, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

--Super2k 00:11, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

--Super2k 13:15, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

Cpt. Dragunov 1:14, November 27, 2010
 * While the point is a good one, this wiki is cannon only. Shotrocket6sig.png 16:55, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Ghosting Advice
Another technique page.

Thunder9092 02:06, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

16:55, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Drop Shot
Per all other technique pages.

18:14, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

--Super2k 13:15, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

--DoomGoober 00:07, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * While yur point is valid, this wiki is cannon only. Sorry. Shotrocket6sig.png 16:55, December 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thunder9092 03:14, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

CoD addict - 21:34, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 21:40, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thunder9092 03:14, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

First-Person Shooter
Not particularly relevant to Call of Duty; fairly vague article and mostly IRL info. not necessary as most people who play CoD will know what an FPS is. Suggest having a link the wikipedia article on the Call of Duty series page, but deleting the FPS page itself. YuriKaslov 18:17, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 19:30, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

18:19, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

It tells what the wiki explorer what maybe what type of game Call of Duty is Crazyman121 12:01, December 4, 2010 (UTC)Crazyman121 LOLROFLOMGLAMO

YuriKaslov 19:30, December 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is very disrespectful, and not the type of attitude you should have when contributing to an encyclopedia. Shotrocket6sig.png 16:55, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Disrespectful to WHO? It's true. And you know that I don't treat other editors with such heated words. YuriKaslov 17:05, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's disrespectful to the hypothetical people that don't know what a first person shooter is. And it doesn't matter if it's "true", when editing an encyclopedia you are to assume that the reader knows nothing about the subject, so as to include all important information. Shotrocket6sig.png 17:34, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty Black Ops:Zombie Weapons
The information can be found on "Five" and Kino der Toten. No need for it.

<span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 12pt;">Eltomo85 <span style="color: blue; font-family: Halo3,Papyrus; font-size: 8pt;">talk 07:44, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  01:45, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Kowloon
Most information here can be found in Numbers. it lacks content and is basically pointless.

Seijana 08:26, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

User:Cpt. Dragunov 12:58 Novevember 27, 2010

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  03:20, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 19:54, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Per Smuff Cpl.Bohater 02:19, December 8, 2010 (UTC)

So, in your opinion, we need to give a page to say Fire Base Phoenix for MW2??? ONE five minute mission is played there. It's no different. Hudson goes to Kowloon one time, and, really, this mission could have been set anywhere and it really wouldn't have made a difference other than theatrics.User:Cpt. Dragunov 11:05 December 7, 2010

Young Marine
He is a part of the mission, his name is randomly generated. This could easily be covered in Crash Site.

Darkraider09 21:38, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Unspecified United States General
He only has two lines, I think, and doesn't play a significant role in the story. Since we don't have Granularity anymore, this page should be deleted. [

Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! My edits 15:53, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Bravo Five-Nine  Talk 23:16, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sleeping VC
They would only be incorporated under COD:G, and have no recorded lines, just two sleeping soldiers.

Bravo Five-Nine Talk 19:37, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

CoD addict - 21:32, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

The sleeping VC play a significantly more important role than two random Wermacht guards or executed POWs. Their appearance never changes, they are unique in that few characters are ever seen sleeping in the game, and the player can determine their fates. I say, keep them. LyHungViet - 21:37, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

They are interacted with. You put your hand over their mouths and stab them to death! These two characters play a part in the mission's storyline, therefore they are important enough characters in the game. Furthermore, Castro's mistress doesn't have a fixed name in game and only plays a part in one mission, yet still has her own article.

Bravo Five-Nine Talk 22:03, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually LyHyungViet is right, they ARE stabbed. Thrusting the "pointy" end of the knife into anything is, by default "stabbing". Slitting would be dragging the blade-side of the knife across. And mason does the former, not the latter. YuriKaslov 22:05, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * The way he says it though sounds like to put a knife in them repeated times. US Army OF-4.png Bravo Five-Nine  Talk 22:08, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * LyHungViet

Deleting the damn oppose things that are all from the same user, use the comment template next time!!! Godd in Himmel! Bravo Five-Nine Talk 22:20, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

22:35, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

 bibliomaniac 1  5  08:06, December 8, 2010 (UTC)

I can see that this article will most likely be deleted. Therefore, I will be nominating Castro's Mistress, German Prisoner (World at War) and German Senties for deletion as well, since they are just about as important in their various games as the VC guards. I hope all you people lobbying for the deletion of this article will support me in getting rid of these ones as well, since they too are granularity articles and are not notable enough to have their own pages. -LyHungViet

{{Support|Lets go ahead and make pages for every soldier that's doing a "new unique thing." How about the soldiers watching Soyuz 1 launch in Executive Order? These characters are really no different. -User: Cpt. Dragunov

United States air force
A useless article. Not really a factio in-game. --Conqueror of all Zombies 00:12, December 7, 2010 (UTC) --Conqueror of all Zombies 00:12, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

--Sgt.Sandwich | Talk shop | Combat record  00:20, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

Castro's Mistress
The notablility policy on this wiki states that a character must play an important role in several missions/ have a fixed name in order to make it notable. Castro's mistress only appears in game for about five seconds, says almost nothing, and is basically just another NPC. Everything in her article can be added to the Triva section of Operation 40.

- LyHungViet

Bravo Five-Nine Talk 15:47, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 17:43, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

LyHungViet

LyHungViet

LyHungViet

German Sentries
Just two random NPCs in the game that are killed off in a matter of seconds. They to not fit the criteria of the notability policy which states that characters must have fixed names/ play an important part in a mission/missions to deserve their own article. Everything on their page can be added to the Trivia seciton of the mission they appear in.

- LyHungViet

 bibliomaniac 1  5  21:42, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

German Prisoner (World at War)
Plays almost no part in the mission, and does not fit the notablility policy for this wiki, which states that characters must have fixed names/ play an important role in a mission/missions in order to have their own article. Anything interesting in this article can be added to the Trivia section of the mission he appears in.

- LyHungViet

-User:Cpt. Dragunov

Zampella, Zampella (Call of Duty), and Zampella (Call of Duty 2)
It is claimed that Zampella did so-and-so in certain battles, when in fact I have demonstrated by going through the game files in Randomly generated soldiers that Zampella is actually a randomly assigned name (#125 in COD1, #40 in COD2).  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:03, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

 bibliomaniac 1  5  03:03, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Note, if not a delete, then at least a redirect to Randomly generated soldiers.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:03, December 9, 2010 (UTC)