Forum:De-sysoping Bigm

Evidence:


 * User talk:Callofduty4/Archive 2, and the rest of the archive
 * User talk:Rs4life07#Callofduty4, and some following parts of the page
 * User talk:Darkman 4#Re, and some following parts of the page
 * Log for blocks made by Bigm
 * User talk:Creepydude#Re:
 * Fedarated AK74-u's edit to Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion

To be somewhat succinct, in the recent fiasco, Rs4life07, better known as "Bigm", blocked Callofduty4 for 'having not learnt the lessons of his last block'.

After dealing the block, Bigm bullied and harassed Callofduty4, and admitted "I'm egging him on".

When some IRC ("Internet Relay Chat"; more or less semi-public instant messaging) discussions went on between Darkman 4, Creepydude and myself on what to do with the situation, Bigm personally attacked Creepy.

Unrelated to the fiasco, after Fedarated AK74-u made an edit to the AfD on the blocking policy, Bigm blocked him permanently—twice.

While I really hate having to say this, what he did was a nearly textbook case of power abuse. This discussion is on whether or not he will keep his powers, how much of his power he will keep or lose, whether or not he receives a block, and whether or not he receives a political death sentence (a political death sentence is when a politician broke the law, and isn't allowed to have any federal position in that area ever again).

03:25, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Support removal of all sysop powers, neutral on block, oppose permanent block, and oppose political death sentence - Per the evidence provided above. By not having a political death sentence, Bigm will always be able to pass another RfA to get his currently enabled powers back. The key item here is that what he used to do most of what he did was his set of administrative powers. Removing them would prevent any future event like this, and it's not like somoene can have bureaucrat powers without the normal administrative powers. 03:25, September 19, 2009 (UTC)