Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles/Archive 4

Nikolai
We'll, the article is Big, its filled up to the top with information, and shows the best the wiki has to offer.

Support-As nominator.  Rampantlion513  21:46, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose- Page doesn't exsist Good artical, but there is some contradictions and spelling errors on the page. A better one can be found. Conqueror of all Zombies 21:49, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comment-I fixed it, it was spelled wrong.  Rampantlion513  21:52, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per CoaZ. Doc.  Richtofen  17:22, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - There are better articles. 22:25, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

'''Support- Great article! SpetSnAZ CM 03:15, July 14, 2010 (UTC)SpetSnAZ CM ''' User lacks mainspace edits --Soldier 01:46, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Its better than most articles, it includes all his quotes and describes his appearence very well-dizziedylan

Support - It's good, it presents before-game data, and has most of his quotes - User lacks mainspace edits Cpl. Wilding 20:42, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Support - It is a very good article and he is an important character in the MW series Pillsbury810   22:05, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

RPD
Great article on an important weapon in the Modern Warfare series.

Support as nominator  Poketape Talk  02:59, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Very well done, although almost all of the MW2 weapons are done as good. None the less, it may as well be this one. And I agree, it's a very important weapon indeed. 03:03, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per all. Doc.  Richtofen  17:23, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Very excellant article. 17:40, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per all. -- 06:31, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I agree. Per all. 06:58, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support - This article is well written and is also a great weapon. --Soldier 11:57, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support - This article is very well written for both games and shows the true ability of this community at it's best. Cpl.  Ross  22:18, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support - The article is quite well written.

Neautral - I think we should have a less known weapon, such as the MG4 or L86, for the featured article. Bioniclepluslotr 22:37, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support- Per all. Excelent article and very informative.  Munchable901 |TaLk?   23:37, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- @Bioniclepluslotr. We shouldn't have the MG4 or the L86 LSW as a featured article. Its not as good as the RPD article if you ask me. --Soldier 10:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Damn good article, and there hasn't been a weapon in a few months. 23:38, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per All Nlmgr 17:16, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

17:28, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per all Conqueror of all Zombies 01:22, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Great article,great explanation about the weapon, and the weapon plays a huge part in the modern warfare series-dizziedylan

TheManOfIron 08:57, July 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - That is not a good reason to oppose. Someone strike-through the above vote. Rambo362 20:23, July 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Done 8-bit_price_r.jpg Poketape Talk 8-bit_price.jpg 04:43, July 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment What is ugly about them? And not all pictures have to be the same size because that would waste space. This seems like just a bad reason that you came up with to remain opposing. 8-bit_price_r.jpg Poketape Talk 8-bit_price.jpg 20:00, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per all. 16:29, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

Support - A very informative, well written article. A Lonely Nomad 21:38, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Vladimir Makarov
Very laid out and a character with many trivia sections on.

Support - As nominator. 08:06, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

16:38, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

16:43, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

-- 17:15, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Ukimies Nlmgr 17:17, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Well writen, but trivia isn't the greatest and there is little of an intro. RPD is a better artical. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:19, July 20, 2010 (UTC)