Forum:Changing UOTM/FU rules

The last time it was brought up about changing the rules of UOTM/FU it was thrown out. However this month we had no UOTM/FU with the only nomination not being legible for the award, along with the reasoning "I didn't know who else to vote for". Frankly the lack of a user, as well as the reasoning shows that the current system does need reworking to ensure not only we are giving the award to someone that deserves it, not just "someone to vote for". The last time it was brought up the biggest fear was that the award would be bias towards older users, to resolve this there is the following solution: New users and users being re-voted will have separate voting sections, this will mean in a month where we lack any users to achieve the needed edits to get the award, we award a user that already has the award and has had a good month, or if there is a user that has done well as well as a pre-existing user that had a good month, then both can receive the award without fear of losing out on votes. I feel this new system will allow us to carry on the UOTM/FU system and award users that deserve the award instead of us going though a month trying to force a user to get an award.