User talk:Smuff

i love...
how you think that you can come in some random wiki,make 10 edits and then act like your an admin. you an asshole. everyone has used the call of duty talk page to talk and ask questions about the game. you have no right to stop that or even think about telling people to stop. maybe if you become an admin you can say that but you have absolutely no control over it as of now. havoc131

who ever said i want to be an admin? i come to this site for help with the call of duty games and honestly i dont give a shit about my use of language. i dont want to go to a site that i always go to and have some new guy come out of nowhere and say that people cant do what they have been doing for a long while. you might be a experienced wikian but all wikis are run differently and in this one people use the TALK page to TALK about the game. honestly it jut bugged me. im sorry i might come off rude, i have just had a crappy few days and didnt like that when i saw it. if you were an admin or you had an admin say that then it would of been different. havoc131

Secondary and Primary Weapon pages
I see that you've made 2 pages. I'll add as much information as I can and see if it'll look nicely as a widely viewed page. OmegaBlade 20:32, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Care Package
Could I have an example of the instance please. Doc.Richtofen 17:19, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Have a look what I said for the summary. Doc.Richtofen 17:34, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Check through the trivia, if it is not already there, yes you can. Doc.Richtofen 20:02, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hiding Places Deletion
Nice to meet you too, Smuff. You are a good user yourself. :D    Maj.Gage   Talk . 18:53, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your support.
It means a lot. Imrlybord7 20:44, February 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're welcome and he was blocked for a month a little under a week ago. Imrlybord7 05:17, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Erm...
Thanks for liking my story. I'll leave it at this: Yes, it's a fanfiction, meaning not real. The one real picture you see is a picture that was taken by my family in Mazatlan, Mexico. It's just a short piece of work compared to what I'm writing right now. But thanks for the review! :) Corporal Juan José Rodriguez   Reportin' for duty. 19:08, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

density of edits
sorry i was just removing videos that no longer played because the youtube user removed them. next time ill use the edit summary box.

Thank you...
... for helping me become an administrator on the Call of Duty wiki! Imrlybord7 20:06, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Well gosh. You've gone and made me feel all warm and fuzzy inside! But not in that way. Imrlybord7 20:49, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Dude, your edit count might not be that high, but your edits are always of the utmost quality. STOP DEGRADING YOURSELF NOW! THAT'S AN ORDER! Imrlybord7 21:47, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

I am always kind and polite to people unless they give me a reason not to be, and I always give credit where credit is due. My only issues were that when I did argue, I really got into it (debate team stays with you, trust me), and I have always been brutally honest. However, I don't think that those will be issues anymore, as becoming an admin has motivated me to be more neutral when I want to say something that some would consider mean. Imrlybord7 21:59, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stopping Power edit
You can't instantly ban someone for making one vandalisim edit unless it's VERY serious, per COD:BP Peter Griffen Boy 23:20, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stopping Power edit
I'm not the one who put the warning templete there in the first place. I just added the be warned, then blocked, so that it follows wiki policy. Peter Griffen Boy 23:30, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Actually...
you added the stub tag, not speedy delete. Since that article does not qualify for speedy deletion, I assume that your edit was correct while your edit summary was not. I'm not chastising you or anything like that, just trying to make sure that I know what's going on. Imrlybord7 16:19, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

WTF
WTF was that spam article??? 🇨🇩 22:55, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm assuming that wasn't you, someone else got access to your account and made it. 23:06, February 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sweet, we reached the same conclusion. Imrlybord7 23:08, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Spam pages
If you're creating nonsense pages to be funny, please stop, it isn't. If you're doing it to vandalize, I'm disappointed; you're actually a decent contributor, why stop now?--WouldYouKindly 23:07, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry about what happened, please allow me to explain. In an earlier post on Imrlybord's talk page, I explained I use Firefox, which also remembers Usernames and Passwords for easy login. Alas, I have a four year old brother named Elliott, who unfortunately, cannot type properly, but knows how to use a computer somehow. Anyways, he went onto MY laptop and opened Firefox, which was left open on this wiki. He then logged in and made that rediculous article about god knows what... Having discovered what he did at about 12am, I immediatly told him NEVER to touch my laptop ever again, and as a result, have cleared all passwords from the browser. I would like again apologise for this terrible mishap, and assure everyone it will never happen again. Also, I'd like to thank ALL admins for the short ban, I'm sure it stopped him doing any more damage. Btw, if it does happen again, please don't be afraid to issue another 2 hour ban... Thanks, Smuff 13:03, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I see then. It's okay, no harm done in that case.--WouldYouKindly 16:45, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that someone is somehow using your account or a friend is on your PC
So I blocked you for 2 hours. Hopefully we can get this sorted out. Imrlybord7 23:07, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

My intuition was pretty close to the money. I knew it wasn't you. Imrlybord7 13:13, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Relax. No admin would ever hold something like that against you. Actually, it's a pretty funny story. So seriously, don't be stressin', G. Imrlybord7 13:21, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and I just wanted to let you know that I am currently in a discussion (well, it hasn't really started yet) with Chia about possibly making it easier for obviously competent users to become administrators more easily. Bovell agrees with me. You were one of the users who motivated me to take up such a stance. Would I support you in an RFA now? Probably not. However, I think you are an obvious choice for a future admin position, but given how low your edit count is it would be quite some time before you could realistically stand a chance. I will hopefully be able to work to change that. Imrlybord7 13:33, February 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it, I knew it wasn't you. 17:30, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Elliot
That's cool, I have little demon brother problems too! I remember seeing your name at the end of a helpful post, so when I saw that you created the page I knew that something was up. 🇨🇩

RE: Protecting the FAL page
A series of poor edits to a single page is not uncommon, and unfortunately, is not grounds for page protection. I'm sorry. If the page was being vandalized excessively or was at risk for vandalism due to potentially high traffic it would be different, but that isn't the case. However, if you ever see a page being subjected to considerable amounts of vandalism, please don't hesitate to ask me to protect it. Once again, sorry that I can't help. Imrlybord7 20:20, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

RFA
Thank you for supporting me, it really means a lot.

RE: Revision of an edit I made
The SCAR-L uses an M16 Magazine as it fires 5.56mm rounds. If you look near the top of the article there's an image with both the SCAR-L and SCAR-H in. Sgt. Jon Rose 19:38, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Pictures
Could you sort out the pictures for: Compact, Complex and Storm. If there is only one picture, put it in the infobox. And make sure the infobox goes before any other pictures please. Thank you. Doc.  Richtofen  20:44, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Template
Pretty nice, might be useful to put on our userpages.--WouldYouKindly 21:22, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Wierd Admin Template thingy
Personally, I don't like it. The respective project page acts like a directory enough on its own and the other administrator template definitely does its job at notifying one user that another user is an admin when their page is visited, so I don't see much of a use for the template that doesn't end up involving glorification for the sysops listed. 22:47, March 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree that it's unnecessary, but I made a little change to it anyway. Imrlybord7 23:02, March 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * I like it, I'll add it to my page.  Javelin.png]] + Panzerschreck-1-.jpg]] =  Teh Pwnzerscreck   . 07:44, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

BigM
You asked who BigM was, I'll try to fill you in. I came after BigM, so I can't give the best explanation. Chia, CoD4 , Dark or Creepy would probably be the best people to ask.

So...BigM, also known as Rs4life , was a former administrator and bureaucrat who abused his powers on fellow users and administrator's alike. After losing his powers, he stopped editing here. Some rumours have been spread about his return, but he is currently inactive. He is one of the few administrators to ever be stripped of their powers, the other being User:Fedarated AK74-u. He has lost the respect of the community here and would have to work extremely hard to regain it.

That is all I know of the case. Fedarated's story is quite similar I think, but that is not what you asked. I hope this helps. Doc.  Richtofen  14:56, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

All it takes for someone's career to be interpreted as bad is one fatal mistake—it's the Nixon Clause. President Nixon did an okay job overall, but the Watergate scandal is the one thing that ended up defining his political career and life.

The following links should explain most of it on their own:


 * Callofduty4's third RfA
 * Callofduty4's talk page
 * Forum:De-sysoping Bigm

He said that he would try to win the trust of the community back again with time and try to run for administrator in the future, but he has since gone inactive.

Fedarated, however, had his powers removed for completely different reasons. He has never actually asked for them back, so I don't know if he wants them back, and he has been like that since. 22:07, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * He made an edit not too long ago. In his edit summary he said he might be back if he had the time. Don't take him as a bad person, he's a nice guy and willing to help out, but yes as Chiafriend says, all it takes is once scandal to ruin a career. 22:58, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Crimson Eagle
sure, I'll try to fit you in. Doc.  Richtofen  18:46, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

My RFA
It's not official yet, but he wouldn't of contacted me at that stage for no reason, I think. Doc.  Richtofen  19:42, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Doc.  Richtofen  19:48, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed. Doc.  Richtofen  19:55, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

I hope so too. But I haven't started yet, so please don't praise me on something that has not been done please. Doc.  Richtofen  20:10, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

UotM
I noticed you added two votes to Eight's nomination. Try not to do that next time. -- Poketape Talk 00:03, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Clan
Sure, you can join the Wiki Clan. I'll add your name to the list. But I need to know your platform and online name. Doc.  Richtofen  12:03, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

I'll add you to the list. Doc.  Richtofen  12:21, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Your comments on Cod4's RFA
have strongly boosted my confidence in you (it was already pretty strong). I would say that if you stay on this wiki long enough, you are absolutely going to become an admin. Imrlybord7 18:50, March 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying your time here so much. I'm always worried about good editors with low edit counts abandoning the wiki before they get a chance to RFA, but now you've given me one less "pro-newb" to worry about. Imrlybord7 22:33, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Comment
That comment made perfect sense. I'm going with you - I'll close my current RFB and re-open it in a few weeks. Thanks. 20:42, March 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * That was a much appreciated comment. Thank you, and I'll keep that in mind. :) 21:19, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Singleplayer
An article is unnecessary. It would just be an example of COD:G spitting in our faces. Imrlybord7 18:55, March 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * COD:G ran over my dog and slept with my sister. So no, I'm not a fan (note that I have never had a dog or a sister). Imrlybord7 19:11, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

I both condone and condemn your most recent comment on Griever's RFA.
"Well to be honest PGB, I haven't seen you make any terribly significant edits that I see as notable."

So what? It doesn't mean his opinion is any less valid. This is Griever's RFA, not PGB's, and people are entitled to their opinions regardless of their editing abilities.

"Griever is known for reasons that are actually not just using phrases, poorly rewording whole sections of artcles and making small edits involving templates admins don't even bother touching (You used me as an example in your RFA, I l think I might as well return the favour)."

Excellent debate tactics, but once again, it was an unnecessary call-out that really doesn't even have any relevance to Griever's RFA.

"I may seem like I'm bitching here, but you're just back from your SECOND ban, don't immediatly come back looking like a jackass going against everyone else's opinion again."

He stated his opinion politely and reasonably. His ban history has no bearing on his right to comment (it was his third ban, btw), and he really wasn't looking like a jackass. People are allowed to disagree with the majority; that's the great thing about free will.

"Griever is more than fine, he has answered many queries about the army and has made countless good edits that I think could easily overshadow those "commets of very poor taste.""

I agree completely.

This may confuse you, but as always, you have actually boosted my confidence in you becoming an admin in the future. What this has shown me is that you are rough around the edges, but I am certain that those edges will be smoothed over as time goes on. It demonstrates a high level of intelligence and a strong sense of behavioral standards, but shows a lack of understanding of COD:AEAE and a very slight degree of viciousness (don't try to deny it, we recognize our own). Lastly, try to get the spelling and grammar perfect next time. If you had, I honestly would have thought that the comment was written by myself about a year ago. Imrlybord7 04:37, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

First of all, Griever is not in the army, he is in the United States Marine Corps, and second of all, it's my third block,not my second.

Stuff your sorry's in a sack...
...there's no trouble, bro. Hey man, I'm glad my advice helped you out, and I hope it works out for youse guys. As I said, that's how I got mine. Anywho, my name's Matthew (one of my middle names, but my friends call me Matt). A lot of people say that the whole "friend zone" girlfriends don't work out, but the ones that start off like that can be the most successful, because you've already got a lot in common, and usually know the other person as well as their family does, so keep at it, man. Good luck, dude, and hang on to what you got. --   Griever0311   00:39, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

It's all good.
I hope you're enjoying yourself. And don't worry, I wasn't having abandonment issues or anything.

/tries not to cry


 * P Imrlybord7 14:37, March 31, 2010 (UTC)