Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles

This page is for requesting a featured article. To nominate an article for featured status put   on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it make good featured article status below the line on this page.

Previously featured articles

 * November 2008 - Call of Duty: World at War
 * December 2008 - Mile High Club
 * January 2009 - German Military
 * February 2009 - Nacht der Untoten
 * March 2009 - Barrett .50 Cal
 * April 2009 - One Shot, One Kill
 * May 2009 - Verrückt
 * June 2009 - Crew Expendable
 * July 2009 - Hunted
 * August 2009 - Shi No Numa
 * September 2009 - STG-44
 * October 2009 - Edward Richtofen
 * November 2009 - USMC
 * December 2009 - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

Qualifications

 * Article must be written in third person and must be completely unbiased.
 * Article must contain at least one image.
 * Article must be no shorter than five paragraphs in length, preferably longer.
 * Article must be categorized and sourced where needed.
 * Article cannot have been featured previously.

Voter qualifications

 * Voter must be a registered user who has either accumulated 50 edits on this wiki, or has proven that they otherwise know what they are doing, per COD:IAR (policy pending).

Requests for Featured Status
When voting, bear in mind that an article with Featured status will have to be protected so that only Administrators may edit the page.

Please post all nominations below this line.

Dogs
This is an okay article right now, but I'm working on a sort of revamp for it to make it even awesome...-er. This will simply just be a great FA by the time January hits.

Support - as nominator. 22:30, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Support - It looks pretty good and it blends MW2 and WAW. 03:05, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Support - Very good article. 03:15, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Lack of consistency in the first paragraph. It starts by talking about dogs as if they only appear in World at War, only to mention their first appearances in the second section. On top of that, grammar issues and a distinct lack of categories. 04:51, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Support I nominated this last month and still think it's a good article. I'll try to fix it.--Poketape 04:59, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to Oppose I've noticed the errors with this article and have decided it needs too much work to be featured.--Poketape 05:42, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Some of the links and other text-related BBC-codesque things are off, like where it mentions game types under World at War. Other than that, it's a decent article, but the grammar is not up to par with what should be featured.

Oppose - Not a very remarkable article, and I don't really see why we would nominate an article on dogs. 18:33, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

MacTavish
Support - I nominate Mactavish because it is a good, well rounded article that relates to the hot topic Modern Warfare 2. Doc.Richtofen 11:28, December 5, 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Don't put page breaks between nominations. Also, you use three equals signs for a new nomination, not three =, not three '. Thanks.--Poketape 21:38, December 5, 2009 (UTC) User doesn't have enough mainspace edits.--Poketape 21:42, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Helicopter
I nominate this article because I think it's interesting and needs a lot less work than Dogs.

Support As nominator.--Poketape 05:42, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Support Its a good article, good information and detail. 14:25, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Support A great article, but could do with a little improvement, adding more MW2 info etc. and images, but otherwise great

Support Added even more info - good article. 18:33, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose- Good article, but there are more articles that are more important and better written. Unsigned vote and user added two votes to the oppose counter.--Poketape 02:22, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - I've never liked this article. Like, ever. 04:20, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Support Great article. I'm going to find new images. Resnov1997 16.51, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

No Russian
I think this is a very good article because i think it's interesting and one of the most controversial level in gaming history.

Support As nominator.--Resnov199712:44, December 8, 2009 (UTC) User doesn't have enough mainspace edits.--Poketape 02:20, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

one shot, one kill
the article about this is good because its informative and because its great Article has already been featured.

Ultranationalist Party
Throwing this in rather late as an option. Anyway, it's a great article, good details, and it looks nice. So, yeah.

Support - As nominator. 23:44, December 17, 2009 (UTC) Support - Not bad at all. 10:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Simon "Ghost" Riley
This could be an interesting article to feature, since Ghost was apparently voted as one of the most favourite characters in MW2 and he just simply looks awesome.

""Support"" as Nominator or the person who put this article in the first place Shockeye7665sc 09:26, December 19, 2009 (UTC) Oppose - Just had a MW2-related featured article. 10:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC)