Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Redskin-26

Hello. I am here today to nominate Redskin-26 for sysop flags. over the course of red's time here he has been a good contributor, always helpful with new users, and in general, a nice guy all around. Here's a few reasons why i think he would be a good addition to the admin team.


 * He is very active.
 * You can see in his Contributions that he is on at least 5-6 hours a day, editing and improving articles non stop.


 * He has been trusted as a chat moderator, and has learned the ethic and reasoning behind banning people and such. an example:


 * His edits not only help the wiki, but are examples of dedication and high standard.
 * While on his edits, he has contributed alot to the file space. He has improved the weapon attachment pages significantly to say the least. a few examples:


 * He's friendly, and generally nice to people at all times.

Those are a few reasons why i think he would be make a great sysop, and continue to help the wiki more efficiently. thank you for considering. 11:43, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As nominator.  11:43, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) per nom  Hud fnfiveseven.png  Strike lll   butt_crisis   12:47, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1)  12:35, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1)  12:35, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) While Redskin has contributed much to mainspace and filespace, I would not be completely comfortable giving him administrator flags. On multiple occasions, I have seen Red visibly angry, a quality I do not wish to have in an administrator. Simply put, I would like to see Red carry more weight in community discussions and work a little more on his community involvement in general. Shotrocket6 11:47, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Not yet I am not convinced that Redskin needs admin tools at the moment. Also I still have slight concerns that Redskin can be quite... (no offence/hard feelings meant) ...mindless or confused about what he's doing. For example just yesterday he added Category:Task Force 141 to articles which were never intended to have it, and without asking anyone beforehand (which I felt was also very out of character - Redskin usually asks someone else for their opinion on something). At least some good can come out of that, it shows he's trying to help, which is all that we ask for. 13:02, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Not yet Per Cod4. 13:08, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments/Questions
While the nomination does certainly put Redskin in good light, it doesn't really tell us why we need another administrator. Picking a good candidate and advertising them isn't the full monty here, while it's important to do that, it's senseless without any reasoning as to why the wiki requires another administrator. Yeah, maybe it's true that "every little bit helps". But at least state that in the nomination! 13:09, January 27, 2012 (UTC)