User talk:Darthkenobi0

Warning: This user has ideals that some users may consider offensive.

Archived
This talk page has been archived. To view the archive, see table at right. This has been done to separate time as a new editor and a more active editor. Thanks.  "Master Kenobi Good editing. 23:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I was joking too.
Also, your talk page was really short. If you archive it that often you will have a long archive list in no time. I wouldn't archive it until you have at least a hundred sections. Imrlybord7 23:53, March 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not exactly. I wouldn't do anything to reveal my existence to the world. Bad guys would be dying in accidents left and right, but I would never kill someone while they were on live TV or anything like that. And then when I did reveal myself I would do so utterly and completely instead of being anonymous. Light's problem was that he half-assed it. He revealed that he existed too early but never truly revealed himself to the world. Also, I would be far less willing to kill people like detectives and police officers just because they were hunting me down, but I would also kill people who weren't technically criminals like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, neo-Nazis, KKK members, etc. Imrlybord7 00:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * You left out Pelosi and John Edwards XP 🇨🇩

RE: Rollback
If a user edits a page multiple times in a row and their edits are the most recent ones to the page, rollback will automatically restore the page to its last revision before that person edited it. So basically if a single user commits vandalism or makes bad edits to an article over multiple edits, you can undo it all with the click of a button. Some users also use it to revert single edits since it is faster than using the "undo" button, but I don't like to do that because it generates and automatic edit summary and makes the last edit look like vandalism even if it was just a bad edit. You can ask Chia or Saint for rollback rights if you want. Even if they don't know you, just tell them that I said you deserve them and they should be more than happy to give them to you. Imrlybord7 00:08, March 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I certainly don't think that John McCain deserves to die. Not even close. But on topic, rollback rights aren't really a big deal, and you apologized for your outburst almost immediately. Any good user can ask for rollback rights. Trust me, there's no problem. Imrlybord7 00:13, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Rollback
I'd say you're deserving. You should see an option to revert the most recent edit(s) in the history page and difference between revisions. Be careful not to rollback quality edits though, or else you'll have to go back and revert yourself, no big deal. 00:58, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

RP
RAR so you want to work together on the roleplay? Sith-venator Wavingstrider  ( Commlink ) 00:56, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

From what I have Venator would be just as likely to find your squad. I mean whatever is good with you. I have it all set up for Venator to just randomly pop into the story and it be justifiable. Sith-venator Wavingstrider  ( Commlink ) 01:18, March 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, sure im just lazy. Well lets get to know each other, I have my own wiki, I am a Fandalorian, I am a Conservative, I failed 7th grade english, and am in love with Battle Rifles. Sith-venator Wavingstrider Fett helmet.jpg ( Commlink ) 01:25, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Spacing
Sounds good to me. I usually add those spaces when I edit, but I was never really bothered enough to go through and change them all. Imrlybord7 02:26, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

You sure?
I don't remember doing it, plus I don't know why I would put my own name there?Dolten 02:58, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, it was a Anon. At IP adress 194.66.185.53Dolten 03:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

It was on my User Page, I deleted it though, then stuck it on my Talk Page.Dolten 03:03, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Rollback
What's an RCP? (Registered command post?) It doesn't sound as cool as a VSTF, which has one more letter in its acronomical name. 04:27, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Could I forward your request to Saint? He hasn't gotten to do any user rights changing yet, and I assume he could use the practice. 07:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see you went to both of us. Well, nevermind, but there you go. 07:02, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

SAS Template, and Jaxon Mitchell.
Sorry, we have a template which is basically the same. Also, I'm not sure how to include the buttons into the menu.

As for Jaxon Mitchell, it doesn't really matter if he's just correcting grammar unless Resnov wanted it there. Either way, if you were unsure you should've contacted an admin or a senior user before confronting him.

Sorry for the late reply,

EightOhEight 20:10, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

?
What do you mean "harsh"? We do need to prove that we are against firearm ignorance... right?

Xcalibur dush

untitled
IDK Im very busy, got myself a gf. Sith-venator Wavingstrider  ( Commlink ) 02:05, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * So ya you wanna get started on Nazi Zombies? I can ditch the Sarge dude, gonna get myself a RPD :0 Sith-venator Wavingstrider Fett helmet.jpg ( Commlink ) 02:17, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sounds good, but this wiki isn't corrupt so I dont care about the RFA. At least not yet. Sith-venator Wavingstrider Fett helmet.jpg ( Commlink ) 02:21, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh wow. Whatever...

lolz to you too.

Now, how do I get in that group????

Thanks for the compliment on Icepacks's RFA.
It means a lot. /mancry Oh, and when coming to admins about something, just ask one of them. I mean, if it's urgent and you've been waiting for a reply, then you should feel free to contact another one, but for something like Rollback you should have just contacted SoLA or Chia, not both. It's not a big deal or anything, nor am I lecturing you; just telling you to avoid any confusion for future reference. Imrlybord7 03:55, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Now, however, it is time for a slight lecture.
I am just going to copypaste what I put on Smuff's talk page. The parts in quotes are sections of Smuff's comment on Griever's RFA, and the parts that aren't are my responses to each section. Enjoy.

"Well to be honest PGB, I haven't seen you make any terribly significant edits that I see as notable."

So what? It doesn't mean his opinion is any less valid. This is Griever's RFA, not PGB's, and people are entitled to their opinions regardless of their editing abilities.

"Griever is known for reasons that are actually not just using phrases, poorly rewording whole sections of artcles and making small edits involving templates admins don't even bother touching (You used me as an example in your RFA, I l think I might as well return the favour)."

Excellent debate tactics, but once again, it was an unnecessary call-out that really doesn't even have any relevance to Griever's RFA.

"I may seem like I'm bitching here, but you're just back from your SECOND ban, don't immediatly come back looking like a jackass going against everyone else's opinion again."

He stated his opinion politely and reasonably. His ban history has no bearing on his right to comment (it was his third ban, btw), and he really wasn't looking like a jackass. People are allowed to disagree with the majority; that's the great thing about free will.

"Griever is more than fine, he has answered many queries about the army and has made countless good edits that I think could easily overshadow those "commets of very poor taste.""

I agree completely.

This may confuse you, but as always, you have actually boosted my confidence in you becoming an admin in the future. What this has shown me is that you are rough around the edges, but I am certain that those edges will be smoothed over as time goes on. It demonstrates a high level of intelligence and a strong sense of behavioral standards, but shows a lack of understanding of COD:AEAE and a very slight degree of viciousness (don't try to deny it, we recognize our own). Lastly, try to get the spelling and grammar perfect next time. If you had, I honestly would have thought that the comment was written by myself about a year ago. Imrlybord7 03:59, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Glad to see that you took the criticism with grace. And no, I don't view it as "ass-kiss-ish." And you don't actually have to change, but that's only if you either don't want to become an admin or are okay with a lower probability of an RFA succeeding. I don't mean that in a sarcastic sort of way; you can still be a widely respected and looked-up-to user without being an admin. Because of my behavior I was like that for a very long time, but eventually I realized that I could be much more useful to the wiki if I had sysop privileges, so I toned it down a bit and became an admin. Imrlybord7 04:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah. I've got mega experience in dealing with people who are just so stupid or unreasonable that I flip out on them. However, you will find that this only leads to annoying conflict. Admittedly, it can be hard or impossible to avoid at times, like when JouninOfDespair had his massive freak-out and I ripped him a new one, but generally you will find that letting things go and being the bigger man will lead to peaceful resolutions and keep community relations less tumultuous. From an instant gratification standpoint, "letting things go and being the bigger man" is not nearly as satisfying as dominating people who deserve it with your superior intellect and morals, but in the long run it is a much more satisfying alternative. But remember that you don't have to instantly transition into near-perfect behavior. It will feel a lot more natural/less forced (I couldn't decide which one to go with, so I used the "put both with a slash in the middle" approach) if you ease into it. And just observe how the admins behave. We strive to be somewhat aloof without being unfriendly, and authoritative without sounding overly condescending. Most of the time we all pull it off. Even if you just start out mimicking the behavior to keep up appearances, over time it will become very real. And yes, I am speaking from experience on that one. Imrlybord7 04:57, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

I keep forgetting to tell you this, but
delete your "talk page rules" and forget that they ever existed. Thanks. Imrlybord7 05:14, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

ok
ok dude, sorry

Welcoming
Please remember that welcoming people is done on their talk pages not their user pages. Thanks. Poketape Talk 18:02, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your Poll
you

CheezyDerek
Although I obviously view what he said to you as unacceptable, hence his week-long block, there is some blame on your side of the table. You came on very strong when trying to help him out, which most people would have found obnoxious and annoying (obviously he fell into that category). Instead of just repeating things and firing off a ton of pieces of advice in a row, take it slow and make sure to explain each one. For example, instead of saying "Don't respond to messages on your own talk page," which sounds like a command and doesn't make much sense by itself, say "Respond to messages on the other user's talk page so that they get a new message notification when you post it." Ya feel me, dawg? Imrlybord7 19:44, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the greeting. Also, What the IRC channel? I'm too lazy to look it up ;) Sactage 19:45, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Yo
Yo! I thought we were pals and had made up. Didn't you hated me for some reason.

You see why I got mad
He insulted me, when Devil and I were trying to make a point, and drew everything off topic, and I just merely defended my honor (or what is left of it), and now it's a Peter-Slam festival. I've asked User:Bovell to remove the blog, or hide comments and/or block offending people. You can see how this time he started it by insulting me, when that was entirely uncalled for.

He still has no right
He still has no right to get into my buisness and to insult me, when it was completely uncalled for. He shouldn't be able to start a flame war, and then shift the blame over to me, when all I do is defend myself. Was that blog the "INsult PGB Blog" or was it the "The Administrator's Appeal Blog". He has no right to go ruin a blog to just insult me. The sad thing is, I got more mainspace edits then most of the basturds.

I guess he cna get away
Watch it. I've vandalised only once when I was drunk, and never again before have I even dared to be a vandal or to be a edit-whore, I think you're confusing mainspace and blog posts.

Okay
Mainspace is pages such as M1 Garand or John Price, blog posts are pages that go like User blog:DevilWarrior112/The Administrators Appeal. Most of my "DAMN YOU PGB" are from blog edits, not mainsapce edits.

It's not an insult
Cheap and decent does not equal trolling and vandalsim, and you said I vandalise the mainspace and that is dead wrong. I don't see how everyone can slam me and insult me on a blog, when Griever sucker-punched me from nowhere. Isn't it true when doing something to start people to argue calling flamebaiting, then Griever is definitely guilty.

That doesn't mean he's free to do whatever he wants
So I guess changing a blog about people who wish to be admins and might, into a anti-PGB party can get away with insulting me and changing words I say, and being mean to me, he can do whatever he wants because he's a good editor. That's wrong. He's a Modern Warfare fan, not a Call of Duty fan. If this was the gun wiki, he'd by the head editor, but this is Call of Duty, not Gun World. But he's insulting me and making me feel bad, and letting others and even an admin is supporting it, doesn't anyone see that allowing others to pick on someone is wrong? I never insulted Griever, so he's allowed to insult me if he can make a good edit or two? That's communisim taking over, the person with the biggest gun can do whatever they want.

Listen, you're getting to be a bitch.
Okay, this is what people are saying to me, so I'm going to say to you.

1: Look at the title.

2. You're a fucking dumbass

3. You got a big fat fucking vigana

4. I can do whatever I want to you.

Now you're not a bitch, but that is waht people are saying to me. Griever turned a nice little blog into a slamfest and gets away with it PERIOD!' That was rude, uncalled for, and childish.

Re: Regarding PGB
Extended to 2 weeks after taking his previous offenses into deeper consideration. If you want, I can add the contents of your talk page currently to your archive so you don't have to look at what he wrote every time someone leaves you a message. 21:55, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry?
Sorry I don't quite understand what you mean? "Constructed as Unconstructive" ? II  Helljumper   II  22:21, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ok I'll keep that in mind, Thanks  II   Helljumper   II  22:30, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know...
We have these fancy things called usergroups, and if you wanted to, you could make usergroups for RCPs and NUWs.

-- EightOhEight  22:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Is this allowed?
Hi you welcomed me to cod wiki and I didnt know how to send you a message so I thought I'd post it on here, just saying thanks for the welcome,

Re: Admin Appeal
Like I'm gonna make it that far. But thanks anyway. 22:36, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Lol
My google Chrome Spell checker isn't working (as you can probably tell) at the moment :/  II   Helljumper   II  22:39, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Yeh I'll keep that in mind. Personally I don't like Firefox or IE as they clog up my system. I'm only on a netbook y'see. :P  II   Helljumper   II  22:45, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll give safari a try, thanks kenobi :D Emblem-eagle.jpg II   Helljumper   II  22:50, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

untitled
Haha, will do, I think I'll watch you :), thanks for improving the edit I did on the infinity ward article ;). Jimquixy 22:47, March 27, 2010 (UTC)not sussed this signature lark!

Haha, ok, do you game on PC if you do, add my steam ID if you want:jim_quixy Jimquixy 22:54, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

I've tried IRC here...
...and I couldn't get it to work for my browser; I could try some workarounds. --   Griever0311   23:13, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Shame

 * ( Shame, I would've enjoyed playing with you.Jimquixy 23:24, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
Sorry I never answered your messages on IRC a little bit ago, I was doing stuff in other tabs and channels when I noticed you'd been trying to send me messages.--WouldYouKindly 23:46, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

OMG
The oppose vote I gave on Griever's RFA had nothing to do with you. I do realize he called you a bitch and a "fat vagina" but it seems you guys started it by intimidating him. 01:37, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Do think again
When I sent you the message, did you bother to read the bottom of it? No you did not.

It said you werent a bitch, but that is what people have said to me before today, and today in that little blog post, read the bottom, you'll see that I just wanted to see how you'd feel in the situation. Do notice I also have 808's support on this situation as well as Cod4's support.

"Callofduty4 will be the twice the admin you'll ever be"

- A witty Call of Duty 3 refrence. Do notice most of my quotes do have them.

Stop tellign lies.
Okay, tell me how I'm insulting ANYONE in this couple of sentences.

It's because I have a bad keyboard that ruins my spelling. My keys are small, do I can hit two or three by accident, and a t might register as a y and such like that. My connection isn't the best, so it lags up on me sometimes.

Please do note that a trusted admin (808), found this sentence harmful, and that I didn't 'cause it, so he erased it. You need to stop trying to block me, people who overeact like you get the block normally. Anyway, now you know what it feels to be in the hatred spotlight.

Stop It.
I'm not going to admit you're innocent, when you've found yourself trapped. Stop teling lies now, and I'll ask COD4 to go easy on you. You now know what it's like to be in the spotlight, hell, ewhat you've said to me, what rumor you;ve spread, hell you might even be blocked now.

Don't worry.
I'll take care of it. Imrlybord7 02:15, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

PGB
PGB clearly went over the line with his insults. I'll see what Bord will do before I do anything. Darkman 4

RE:
Yes, I've noticed, and yes, I think it's completely ridiculous. He deserved his block, I think just about everyone except PGB and COD4 can agree on that one. The fact that a block was revoked based on the word (read: manipulative sob-story) of a user who has been KNOWN to lie when it suits him, and has a long history of similar offenses absolutely disgusts me.--WouldYouKindly 02:21, March 28, 2010 (UTC)