Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Shotrocket6 (3)

While I'm not an advocate of trying to butter users up last-minute for something like this, I'm sure providing no reasoning will do more harm than not.

The primary reasons I feel an RfA necessary at this time are as follows:
 * We don't have a lot of time to prepare for MW3. It's imperative we make sure our templates and the like are as understandable as possible for new users; that includes grammar and structure. Nobody wants misinformed users wandering about as a result of bad template execution.
 * Should there be users that do not understand, I am supremely qualified to render assistance.
 * Categories. Since spending loads of time in the inner workings of Crysis Wiki recently, I have realized just how tedious categories are. To properly categorize pages is extremely difficult, especially when so few are already. There are many a duplicate category and some need be deleted entirely.

My secondary reasons for requesting adminship at this time are as follows:
 * I have been here for ages and have without a doubt learned how things go around here. I am more than able to utilize my knowlege and experience to aid users, whatever their ailment be.
 * I haven't been blocked, though I know what it's like to come close to it; For those of you that don't know, I was involved in a rather controversial dispute with a one TMOI which, truthfully, shed a lot of light on people's reasoning for certain outbursts. I'm not criticizing any of the admins, but I feel a personal connection and understanding of those subject to a block may tip the scales in the favor of a reasonable outcome.
 * I am very active. I know my way around the large majority of tools on wikia and my username is one users can [hopefully] associate with trust, etc. as a result of being active in the community.
 * Such activity has provided many an opportunity to express valiant opinions in rational terms (Examples: (1) (2) (3))
 * I feel my frequent collaboration with other administrators shows a desire to come to reasonable comprimises and demonstrates an appropriate level of teamwork.

Though your decision need not be made so immediately, MW3 approaches nonetheless and the faster we can optimize prior, the better. Thanks for considering. Shotrocket6 01:07, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  01:09, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Philly. Great behaviour and great work around wiki.  01:11, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Cod4
 * 4)  01:27, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Sunglasses Hitler.pngSammich  Need help? Deal-with-it-Shepard.jpg  01:29, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6)  01:52, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7)  02:05, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8)   02:37, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9)  07:22, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10)  Full Support Per all -- http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111029135658/callofduty/images/e/ed/Big_bloomin_jack.gif Guitar t-bone  talkhttp://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111029135658/callofduty/images/e/ed/Big_bloomin_jack.gif 08:39, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) 22:37, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if you come a little late. 22:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It matters to me :( --22:44, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  07:22, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Full Support Per all -- http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111029135658/callofduty/images/e/ed/Big_bloomin_jack.gif Guitar t-bone  talkhttp://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111029135658/callofduty/images/e/ed/Big_bloomin_jack.gif 08:39, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) 22:37, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if you come a little late. 22:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It matters to me :( --22:44, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if you come a little late. 22:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It matters to me :( --22:44, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1)  Ireland_flag.gif  CoaZ Talk Ireland_flag.gif   01:57, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  Ireland_flag.gif  CoaZ Talk Ireland_flag.gif   01:57, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)   01:19, October 31, 2011 (UTC) Fuck it, change of heart.  01:25, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Understandable, but Crysis Wiki is in no way active whatsoever and the most amount of time I spend on it is a few minutes a day to just check up on things. This is my primary wiki. Shotrocket6 01:21, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Not yet SR6 is a good user, but I honestly don't see the need for another user getting sysop rights ATM, especially since Sac was made a 'crat not too long ago. Sgt. S.S. 11:47, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter that Sactage was made a bureaucrat. He already had admin rights before. 13:32, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Not seeing a need for sysop tools is different from 'crat tools. The only thing a bureaucrat differs from a sysop is the ability to grant and revoke user rights. The sysop tools are a different thing. The user gains access to much more tools, and the more we have active sysops to maintain the wiki with the better. Also, N7 is being semi-active atm, and Eltomo85 also said he'll likely to become too in the near future, so I only have one thing to say: your argument is invalid. 15:48, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Comments/Questions
Shotrocket6 02:20, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

In all honesty i'm not sure. I struck it out though, didn't ad to or detract from my point.