Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/MLGisNot4Me (5)

While I'm not really pumped up on making this RfA look like an attention grabber, I think another admin is extremely good to have. The reason should be pretty obvious if you've watched what has happened in the CoD universe lately.

So, the reveal trailer for Black Ops 2 came just out. What this means is tons of new people coming on to the wiki for maximum amount of information and knowledge in case we happened to know something they don't. With these people come vandals and trolls, and the amount of activity grows like mad. This makes another administrator mandatory, or if not at least very good to have to patrol the recent changes and take care of vandalism on pages (as well as things like "mason is alive") and trolling on blogs.

With high activity and amount of experience, living in the time zone where I count three admins actively watching the RC feed (which is not much for this much traffic) and handling things well, I could be able to help as much as I can with admin tools. While not that important, it's also worth mentioning that I could do maintenance as well in the image renaming project and all around much more, such as being able to edit blogs to replace the filename and deleting pages (double redirects, unused files/templates etc).

Vote however you want, but please do it maturely and with the current situation in mind. Thanks. 01:41, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) - I think you'd do a good admin. You're pretty active, you do generally good edits to the mainspace, yoy're quite civilized in blogs... Eh, pretty much everything that's already said the RfA itself. I think you'd do a good admin. Leon S. Kennedy AKA Shepard 01:50, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) While I think you're a good guy, I share some of the concerns that Azuris et al. voiced below. Sgt. S.S. 20:15, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Not yet(possibly) http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Barrett_.50cal?diff=prev&oldid=1453682 concerns me. I really wouldn't appreciate summaries like that from an admin. -- 01:49, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll just say to that that it was a one-timer... 01:53, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Not yet Can't ignore what giggle said; per Azuris. 01:51, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Your recent behavior concerns me, and per giggle. 01:52, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Recent behaviour? What happened? Leon S. Kennedy AKA Shepard 01:55, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to know what significant bad I've done recently. While I've made one kinda bad edit summary, is a one small thing really that bad? 02:01, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Nyx and Azuris. 01:59, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Sir Azuris, sometimes your behavior is a little...off. 02:00, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Not yet Maybe next time. 02:05, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Reasoning? Leon S. Kennedy AKA Shepard 02:08, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Care to provide any actual reasoning? 02:08, May 2, 2012 (UTC)