Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion

Articles for Deletion is where anyone can nominate an article to be deleted for whatever reason, and everyone decides if it should. To bring the article up for deletion, add "" or "" to the top of the respective article, and make a subsection on this page about it.

If the article qualifies for speedy deletion (see criteria for speedy deletion), use "" instead, and do not make a subsection here. An administrator will find it and take care of it.

Gas mask (weapon)
There are two articles about the same gas mask, this one and the one I created. I believe that we should delete this one, but add the information from this article to the one that I made, considering that it talks about the Gas Mask in general and not just when the player puts it on. The Gas Mask also is not a weapon, since it is never used to kill, but it is equipped by the player, so that means that the name of it will show up where the primary weapon's name is. -User:JerryWiffleWaffle 22:40, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Changed to Seijana 22:48, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

00:57, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah yeah, i know there's a page for it. I actually made one, but it got redirected to Syrette.


 * Jerry, I feel very sorry for you. None of these peons even read the reason WHY you want to delete the article. M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 16:15, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Per nomination. Yüri Kaslov  16:15, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 21:18, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 11:49, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Invalid votes hidden -- no explanation as to their vote. Yüri Kaslov  17:56, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 18:42, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

--Chily900 00:23, January 4, 2011 (UTC) Struck out double-vote. You get one vote, and one vote ONLY. Yüri Kaslov  17:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * You don't seem to grasp WHY this article is up for deletion. M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:31, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

--FyFyu 00:33, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh my fucking God, am I trying to reason with a bunch of toasters or what? At least Richtoffee demonstrates some sense; he states that the article up here is better than Jerry's. You two simply misunderstand WHY THIS ARTICLE WAS NOMINATED IN THE FIRST PLACE. M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:43, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

--Chily900 03:02, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you still on about it? Christ, I've told you to reread the damn AFD instead of assuming at first glance what Jerry meant. Lemme spell it out for you -- there are two, nigh-identicle articles which both concern the EXACT SAME THING. this one, and this one Now would you kindly strike out your oppose vote? M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 17:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

--Chily900 20:53, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that's a suggestion that actually makes sense. M1911 small.jpgYüri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 20:57, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

--Chily900 02:09, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Shotrocket6  Talk  16:10, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

AFD Closed - Problem Solved: Redirect. Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 19:20, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * While the solution may be suitable, only admins can formally close AfDs. --Scottie theNerd 05:14, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Formally closing AfD, will not be deleted. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge #A3A3A3; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:#4A4A4A;"> Sactage  (Talk)   05:43, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Grenade Mortaring
Tactics page, can be easily covered in the glossary.

Support
<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  23:58, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt.Sandwich | Talk shop | Combat record 00:00, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:02, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

00:17, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

LITE992 06:31, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

Thunder9092 02:17, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

I say we merge this with Grenade Launcher. In fact, why not merge all tactics pages with the article on their relevant aspect of the game, such as merging Quick Scoping with Sniper Rifle? Seijana 15:03, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * It could be mentioned on the Frag x3 and Primary Grenades x2 pages? - 19:29, January 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Let's not and say we did. (in case that wasn't clear, your suggestion is a HORRIBLE idea.) M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 19:30, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Reason, Kaslov? - 14:43, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think what he's trying to get at is that you don't want to be talking about quickscoping on every single article. Smuff [ The cake is a lie.  ] 15:00, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * . BobNewbie talk •  blog 20:14, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Per Nominator. Cpl.Bohater 03:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
Closed - Article Deleted 15:38, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Rebirth Island
It is a partial summary of Rebirth and the trivia can be completely covered in the trivia section of Rebirth. Serves about as big a part as Kowloon, which was also nominated for deletion.

00:25, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

LITE992 06:31, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 17:38, January 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, but you have to admit, if this isn't deleted, it should be at least rewritten. It's not even a description of the island, just a summary of the beginning of Rebirth.  2:01, January 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * That calls for a rewrite, not a deletion. Smuff [ The cake is a lie.  ] 00:59, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I said At least. I also don't understand whats notable about it. Yes it is mentioned more than once, but taking up 30 minutes of the players life... ANY mission can take 30 minutes. That is not a legitimate reason. 02:34, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering the AfD mentions Kowloon, which wasn't deleted, that statement kind of supports my view rather than yours. COD:NOTABLE. Smuff [  The cake is a lie.  ] 20:07, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Understand that at the time this was nominated Kowloon was still nominated. 00:30, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 23:06, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Speaking of which, are we even going to come to a decision about the Kowloon page? Seijana 23:08, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * I have no idea... All I know is it's still there. 06:41, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 20:11, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why the hell did we oppose it? That was not notable in any way, and anyone who says it is referred to more than once, guess what, that maybe so, but the article still has no importance whatsoever. Speak up if you have a legitimate reason as to why this is important, then make pages for EVERY GODDAM LOCATION covered by the same guideline. 05:30, January 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Rebirth Island is also shown on a map in the Payback introduction. Smuff [ The cake is a lie.  ] 12:52, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Mongolia also turned up on a map at one point, but there's no article for Mongolia, is there? Sgt. S.S. 21:58, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  03:25, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 05:13, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Reznov115 21:25, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Boosting
Tactics page.

Support
LITE992 17:48, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

PEr LITE. Sniper team  82308  17:54, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

14:10, January 1, 2010

<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Shotrocket6  Talk  16:12, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

I've moved it to CoDSocial. Seijana 18:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Per nomination. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk  00:44, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
Closed - Deleted. 21:04, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Brazil
This page is just a mess. It should be either deleted or at least have a good editor take a look at it.

User:Pvt. Trueblood 19:00, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

If you look at the "Bad Cases" section of this page it says that pages that require cleanup have no need to be deleted. DarkLocustSlayer 10:19, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 17:49, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

An article being in bad shape is no reason to delete it. Put it up on the Improvement Drive. Sgt. S.S. 20:44, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

I'm gonna put on the Improvement Drive. User:Pvt. Trueblood 20:57, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

. --Scottie theNerd 09:52, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 02:13, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

DMK961 19:10, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Chickens
Do we really need this? It's not at all notable, and really, chickens have absolutely nothing to do with Call of Duty.We do not have pages for the other animals in Call of Duty. I actually think it should be speedy deleted, to be perfectly honest.

Support
2:14, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Chickens actually are related to an achievement of COD:MW2. DarkLocustSlayer 10:21, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * So are monkeys in Black Ops, but we didn't make a page for them. And really, that should just be written in the article for the trophy/achievement 10:29, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, never mind, we do have a page for monkeys.My point is we shouldn't. 10:32, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Shotrocket6  Talk  17:52, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
This is a very healthy article with plenty of information. This wiki is supposed to cover EVERYTHING about the Call of Duty series and this information is interesting to people. Also, There is a trophy and achievement related to chickens as well as an emblem and a few titles about them.Mamemamo1 19:09, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Like I have said, anything pertaining to the goddam trophy can be written in the goddam trophy's article. And how the fuck is this notable in any way? And not to mention there is hardly any information on this article. And your statement about everything being covered is wrong. That falls under COD:GRANULARITY, a policy retired for very good reasons. 05:23, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

04:14, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

These are notable animals, as they can be interacted with, and are seen multiple times in the series. I may not be able to vote, but they are also a power up in DOA, so therefore we should have a page for it, and maybe other info about chickens can be included. ForceRecon21 14:41, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

As somebody has mentioned they are a powerup in DAO and as with all other usable items, is notable. YuriKaslov 19:41, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Monkeys
Same reason as chickens. Anything pertaining to the achievement/trophy can be written in the achievement/trophy's article.

Support
10:36, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Shotrocket6  Talk  17:54, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
Very similar to the chicken situation apart from this article is poor, but it just needs improvement. Someone out there would find this information interesting you know.Mamemamo1 19:12, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Monke's are a enemy seen in the Zombie map Ascension. This article could provide a strategy to killing them. User lacks 50 mainspace edit requirement. 20:39, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * What the hell? I didn't write that. And I used to be Dragunov, Smuff, so I do have 50 mainspace edits, but who the hell wrote that in my name? Did someone hack my account? 01:11, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * My bad, that was a mistake. 06:28, January 31, 2011 (UTC)


 * Who would find this interesting? It's literally a bunch of monkeys locked in cages hopping around. 05:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

Reload Cancel
Tactics page.

08:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

<span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge maroon; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Shotrocket6  Talk  18:07, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

19:34, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * The first sentence reads: "In Call of Duty, reload canceling is a tactic used to decrease reload time which buys precious seconds in intense firefights." Even the article calls it a tactic. 05:18, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * That would be why I said it is badly written as an article. It just needs to be cleaned up, not deleted. - 14:44, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Bollocks, have an entry for it in the damn glossary. That's what it's there for. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  19:43, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 12:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do we really do that to all tactics pages, because I have never seen your argument on any other tactics AFDs.
 * The idea just came to me there, I did it with Camping and it fit nicely. 14:24, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does that call for a redirect then? 20:05, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 03:59, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * --Scottie theNerd 03:59, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

--Shaniqua69 08:49, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * What else is it, then? I really like Smuff's idea of making it an AAV article, though. And if someone finds some important info, they can ask a AAV member to put it down in their name or something. 06:13, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Since when does AAV have a monopoly on editing certain articles? No, if we allow this, we set a poor precedent that violates COD:AEAE. --Scottie theNerd 06:40, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then don't make it an AAV article. 05:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

05:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * You could argue that it's an action. In itself it isn't a tactic, but application of it may be tactical. Compare with sprinting, which is tactical but in itself is not a tactic. --Scottie theNerd 05:10, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well put. 20:45, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan (Black Ops)
Firstly, he's never seen nor heard of outside of the mention on the CIA database. Secondly, he is not notable. Thirdly, we do not have pages on Harris' and Brooks' wives or Weaver's sister, so why have an article on this one person? <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  03:05, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

As nominator. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  03:05, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

06:44, January 5, 2011 (UTC)



16:14, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 19:32, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  03:24, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Per Poketape. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk  00:47, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * We won't know that for a fact unless a sequel is released, though. 06:00, January 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Forget released, try confirmed or announced.  Toon Ganondorf    (t    c)  12:28, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Exactly. 20:47, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Worlds Collide
Has nothing to do with CoD. It is fan-made, badly writed and badly sung. It is not an "alternate" version of Lulluby for a Dead Man either.

Support
As nominator --Conqueror of all Zombies 00:35, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

06:44, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

DMK961 17:53, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Griefing
Pointless Conqueror of all Zombies 00:48, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:48, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

<tt> Cpt. Dragunov </tt> 06:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC) 06:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

LITE992 13:18, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Can be covered in the glossary. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  23:41, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 03:53, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Per all technique pages. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk 17:04, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Team Killing
Same category as Griefing.

LITE992 13:32, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 23:36, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Can be covered in the glossary. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  23:40, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

A part of the game, especially in Hardcore. --Conqueror of all Zombies 02:09, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 03:50, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - I withdraw, seeing the potential of the article to be written about friendly fire in general as well as team killing. LITE992 11:37, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Only admins can close AfDs. Users do not have ownership of a nominated article for deletion. --Scottie theNerd 10:46, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * My mistake, Scottie. LITE992 11:52, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Asia
It's the most general article I've ever seen, there's nothing useful here whatsoever. Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

- Smuff [ The cake is a lie. ] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Changed to 01:34, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * We have pages for all those countries... 14:22, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * We do? Woops, you're right.

--Scottie theNerd 03:47, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 01:08, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Successful AfD, the page has been deleted. -- 12:25, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Unknown Man
Speculation. Everything on the page is already covered in various trivia articles.

As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 04:34, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 04:35, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Kratos2144 06:04, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Administrators can also undelete articles when required. 19:02, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Total speculation.  bibliomaniac 1  5  07:31, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Only speculation. Dinosaurfan1 00:14, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Really? "Unknown man"? Come on, not notable at all. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  00:15, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

What is the point of this? There's no point at all in keeping this and when he is revealed then we can include this unknown stuff Omnicube1 02:30, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

00:18, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

05:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 00:50, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

I say we do not. It's confirmed who the characters are, and there are not any new ones. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:04, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 02:10, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

So? The entire article is speculation is covered in the Shi No Numa trivia section. The character is not notable at all. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:15, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 02:18, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Because, no offense, but you seem to have a bad grasp on "notability". Unknown man does't have a name, and the entire article is based on an empy picture frame in Kino der Toten (and if you look around the map, there is lots of these empty frames) and a small picture covered in leaves in the revamped (and non-canon) Black Ops version of Shi No Numa. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:24, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Sarah
Nobody ever confirmed if the picture is, in fact, of ms. Leary, and just like Lauren, Brooks' wife, and Weaver's sister, if it is not her I feel she is not notable. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  00:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

As nominator. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  00:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Just delete the picture then. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:02, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * She still shouldn't be kept per COD:NOTABLE. Technically, she should be speedy-deleted. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 01:16, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

05:51, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Both of your oppose votes are not valid until one of you can prove how she is notable in the least. That means you need to prove the NPC in the pic is her. If nobody can do that, I'll just get COD4 to speedy-delete it. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 22:03, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yuri, our oppose votes ARE valid. And untill you can prove that it isn't Sarah it can't be speedy-deleted. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:00, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * What kind of backwards bullshit is that? YOU have to prove that it IS Sarah because there is absolutely NO indication whatsoever that she is sarah. Her name is never shown, and for all we know that could just be some random pentagon woman. My evidence is the lack of evidence of her existence in game. Now prove to me that that is her. Not the other way around. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:52, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well your evidence is shit. Just because there is lack of evidence dosn't mean that she isn't in the game. Conqueror of all Zombies 20:42, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * And just because you speculate that she IS does NOT mean that she is. Go away, COAZ, your fucking backwards way of thinking is doing nothing but causing ambiguity where NONE exists. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 03:55, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * What the fuck Yuri? Don't you know how to fucking talk to people? Conqueror of all Zombies 19:18, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yuri, parts of what you are saying are making my head hurt. I thunk you're the one with the backwards logic here. This conversation got really confusing really fast. 06:07, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Conqueror of all Zombies 01:15, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Think of it this way. Let's say you told me that you discovered a new element. Now lets say, I can't see your evidence. Do you tell me to prove that it's NOT there, or do I tell you to prove that it is, since you made the claim that it is in the first place? BTW, Cod4 already deleted the page once. Some idiot restored it. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 01:18, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw that someone did that. But the Element thing is different. I'm not saying it IS Sarah, I'm saying it COULD be. Neither of us have proof that it is or isn't her. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:26, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

<font style="background:silver"> Poketape Talk  03:32, January 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * If this is deleted then we should also delete Adrienne Smith as she is just as notable as Sarah.
 * Thank you for pointing that out, dragunov. I will add her to the AFD. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:43, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

CH-47 Chinook
Vehicle not in Black Ops (or any CoDs, to date), as carrier of packages (CP, SAM Turret, etc.) is a CH-46 Sea Knight. Also, information on the CH-46 Sea Knight page contains picture evidence that helo in BO is a CH-46 (told by similarities in cockpit and front rotor engine housing), and further evidence: here. - 18:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

DMK961 20:29, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Hold on. You oppose deleting the article you nominated for deletion? O.o Sgt. S.S. 20:32, January 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think this is what I was talking about a few days ago, Shotrocket!!! Toldya it happens! M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 20:40, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I may have been in a rush at that point. Sorry. Changed it to support.

18:06, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Firstly, your sig adds a lot of source coding. Secondly, I don't think it's ever actually referred to in-game. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 20:55, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, accidentally used the four tildes opposed to the special button which hides the code... 17:10, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, Smuff is right. It IS referred to in game. Go to layers on your playercard and their is an image of the Care Package deliverer and it is called Chinook. 06:44, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * DILLIGAF if a freaking non-canon element of the game calls it a "Chinook"? Wow.  00:54, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well when the game doesn't call it a CH-46 Sea Knight either, it's kind of the only thing we can go by. 17:10, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * If someone can get a link to that playercard stuff, then I'll feel free to remove the RfD (cannae do it meself, BO CD crashed while on a DOA game) - 18:09, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Ascension group
Can very easily be covered in trivia for Executive Order.

As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 04:16, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

06:52, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

DMK961 18:05, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Sgt. Walker
Not notable, I do not remember any regular character called Walker, and you should not even include ranksin the article name.

As nominator, Seijana 00:40, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - It was a glitch page, and irreproducible, as far as I can tell. Deleted. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge #A3A3A3; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:#4A4A4A;"> Sactage  (Talk)   00:55, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Adrienne Smith
should technically be speedy-deleted because she does not fall under COD:NOTABLE, but hey. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  00:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Support
As nominator. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  00:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

20:41, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Per Yuri.

Neutral
Seijana 00:48, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * She's referred to in only one place, never makes an appearance, and bar-none has no real effect on the storyline. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 00:50, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

John Trent
As with the other two CIA termiinal articles, SHOULD be speedy-deleted. Completely unnotable, never makes any appearance in-game, only mentioned once, etc., etc., etc. Fuck, I'm getting tired of this whole process. It ought to just be speedy deleted!! <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  04:07, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

As nominator. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  04:07, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 09:54, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Except that that would be speculation, which is not allowed per COD:NOT. M1911 small.jpg<font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 16:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

10:20, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * That isn't a legitimate reason for deletion. --Scottie theNerd 10:45, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, but yes it is. That implies that this person isn't notable, for if they were, I probably would have seen the name at some point. 02:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ignorance is not a case for disproving notability. If I knew nothing about Modern Warfare 2 and Shepherd, it doesn't mean that they're not notable. Someone who hasn't played Zombies will not know about Tank Dempsey, but that doesn't mean he isn't notable. Just because you have come across John Trent doesn't automatically make him non-notable. While I do, in a way, understand what you are trying to convey, your rationale is illogical, and that is what I am trying to point out. Unless COD:NOTABLE has a new clause that state "Cpt. Dragunov most have seen it", it is not a legitimate reason. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a fantastic policy . I'm kidding. That was extremely well said, but in my opinion this person isn't notable at all. That was really what I was trying to get at. 09:44, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

New Idea: How about we take all of they unnotable characters mentioned in the CIA data system and turned them into subpages right here? 02:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * A merger with the CIA Data System is the most appropriate option. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

 bibliomaniac 1  5  07:52, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Johnson (Black Ops)
This character never speaks a word, and he is a randomly generated character. He plays not much of a role in the mission.

Support
D octor R ichtoffee T alk 19:14, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
He has a fixed name and rank, and is directly mentioned in-game. That's reason enough to keep him for me. Sgt. S.S. 20:29, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Per Sgt.S.S. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk  21:53, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

DMK961 22:13, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 03:07, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

20:59, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Per all opposing. YuriKaslov 19:38, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Rogue Colonel
Pointless, mentioned only in intel, and is full of speculation.

Support
01:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Per nominator. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk  02:02, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

''"Trivia" is defined as things that are unimportant or inconsequential. For this article, the movie reference is central to the topic, and therefore cannot be considered trivia ''I'm quoting Scottie there, and if a movie reference is the central topic of the article, it should be speedly deleted, due to the fact that it is based on a movie and has very little to do with Black Ops. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:49, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

@Scottie: But Ryan made an appearance in game, while the Rogue Colonel did not. He was only talked about in an intel document and has nothing to do with the events of Black Ops. He is not notable at all. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:13, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

06:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 06:44, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral
--Scottie theNerd 04:17, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * @Conquerer of all Zombies: You could say the same for Ryan, who makes a single appearance in a mission with the sole person of being saved to get a trophy named after a Spielberg movie. It's fair to presume that Treyarch writers intentionally put the Rogue Colonel as a reference to contemporary Vietnam War-themed films, just as Payback is based on The Deer Hunter. That the Rogue Colonel has no other role in the game is not grounds for speedy deletion. --Scottie theNerd 05:01, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Abracadavre
We do not know if this is going to be the song, and until then it should be deleted. Conqueror of all Zombies 00:04, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Support
As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:04, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Per nominator. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk 01:10, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Per nominator. 07:07, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
The song is up now so the page should stay.

The song was posted how can anyone deny that the song isnt legit it sounds just like a zombie easter egg.

-The Guy Who's Amazing at Zombies but Lags out

Question
Closed - Won't be deleted, the info is now confirmed. 16:29, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Infinity Ward Times
Not notable at all. It's just a newspaper that is barely seen in the game.

Support
As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:50, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be speedy deleted? <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk 01:07, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 11:29, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

07:14, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Comment
Closed - 18:28, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

All prestige gamemodes
Nothing stands out in any of these lists, they can just be merged with their respective normal counterparts.

Support
- 12:26, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Per Smuff. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge yellow; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:black"> Cpl.Bohater  Talk  21:02, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Per nomination Conqueror of all Zombies 01:20, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Per nomination. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  02:20, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Per nominator. 07:14, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Blundell
Like the Adrienne Smith article, this involves a charachter that barely is mentioned at all, doesn't affect the story line at all, and has no picture.

Support
- 05:27, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 21:52, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 01:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
Sgt. S.S. 21:52, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * It adds to the case, particularly for characters who may or may not even be in-game, just conjecture. YuriKaslov 01:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Call of duty world at war collectors edition
I made this on my old account, but i just saw that it is on the main COD WAW page. If it is on the main page, Why do we need this page? Reznov115 21:31, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
--Scottie theNerd 01:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Make a section for it in Call of Duty: World at War.

Famas
Should be merged with FAMAS. Sgt. S.S. 22:04, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Support
as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 22:04, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Per nomination. <span style="-moz-border-radius-topleft:15px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:15px; border:4px ridge white; background-image:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, right top, from(yellow), to(black)); ;background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(left, yellow, black); -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; box-shadow: 0 0 0.6em black; background-color:red"> Cpl.Bohater Talk '' 22:12, January 27, 2011 (UTC) Withdrawing Vote. ''

Seijana 03:06, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral
--Scottie theNerd 01:18, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
22:16, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Really? There's an ongoing discussion about this sort of thing. Think merging Masterkey and Shotgun (Attachment); or M16 with M16A1 and M16A4. They don't perform the same, nor are they of the same model. <font color="#666600" size="2px">Yüri <font color="#666600" size="2px">Kaslov  22:21, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

01:08, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Never. We should NEVER do this. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:20, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Alright I thought about this for a long time. The Famas in BO is the F1 Felin version while the one in MW2 is the standard version.

Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 03:09, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant make a seperate page for each Spas 12. The firing mode, name, and model are different. [[image:MW_Pickup_Colt45.png|30px]]Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 03:03, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant make a seperate page for each Spas 12. The firing mode, name, and model are different. [[image:MW_Pickup_Colt45.png|30px]]Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 03:03, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Then we're going to have to merge M16 with M16A4, and while we're at it M60->M60E4, and many many more. I think we should keep at what we're doing right now. Major<font color="black" size="2px"> Blackout<font color="green" size="2px">  02:41, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Famas retains its article. --Callofduty4 18:28, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
The fact that the FAMAS in BO is the G2 Felin instead of the F1 is completely irrelevant. No IRL info, remember? Sgt. S.S. 18:16, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thick-skulled much? Christ, the reason why it matters is because they're different models, different purposes, different damage, EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT ABOUT THEM. YuriKaslov 19:37, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yuri, what the hell was that about? Go back and carefully re-read what I said before coming at me with that again. Sgt. S.S. 21:42, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * What was it about? If you can't figure that out, maybe you're the one who needs to re-read, eh? The basis for their separation wasn't like the M60 or M16 pages, where they're nigh-identical in terms of purpose and performance; the Famas and FAMAS are completely different in every way possible. YuriKaslov 02:44, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * They are different models thats like saying the M40A1 is the same as M40A3.
 * Sgt SS, read what Yuri wrote. THEY ARE DIFFERENT. IN EVERY WAY. Hell, they don't even look similar. 09:50, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Kowloon, Hong Kong
It's pointless, the original AFD nomination never finished and was only opposed on the grounds of COD:NOTABLE as opposed to common sense.

Seijana 02:12, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

I suggest merging it with Kowloon. YuriKaslov 02:19, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

First strike gametype
Badly written. No point. Bioniclepluslotr 02:23, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Seijana 02:27, February 3, 2011 (UTC)