Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put Request for Improvement on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications
Article must have some problems such as:
 * Article written in first person and/or biased.
 * Article doesn't contain any images.
 * Article is short.
 * Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
 * Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Voter qualifications

 * Voter must be a registered user who has either accumulated 50 mainspace edits on this wiki, or has proven that they otherwise know what they are doing, per COD:IAR.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

 * Theater
 * Paris
 * Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript
 * Damage Multiplier
 * GRU
 * Battle of Kursk
 * Closing In
 * Ridley
 * Road to Remagen
 * Jonathon Shephard
 * Sentry Grenade Launcher

Requests for Improvement Drive Status
Please post all nominations below.

Remove Road to Remagen
The article has been given a lot of progression, It has been given a Gallery, Plot (or mission summary), Weapon Loadout, and a Characters list. It has improved greatly and is on par with many other campaign articles so I say it is good enough to be taken off ID.04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As Nominator. 04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Nom. 01:40, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Nominator. 18:22, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  18:19, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per nom  19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Per nomination. The page looks great.  01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of GRU
All though GRU isn't the best article out there, it seems hard to edit the article due to the article seemingly out of info. The faction is briefly mentioned and other than nthat seems that we have used all the info we can giv out unless it is intertwined with a further CD game, and I think its time to get it out of the ID.07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As Nom 07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per nomination.  01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Since it's not done it shouldn't be removed. 19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) It seems to miss out the info it needs. --MLGisNot4Me talk 19:39, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per TWC and MLG.  21:47, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Per TWC and MLG -- 23:34, June 25, 2012 (UTC)