Forum:Personal Images

Notice I say ban from uploading not for having. Well like you see almost half of the wikia is just the "game" "pimpmygun", it's pretty much useless because the users can upload it to imageshack or else because it's personal images... You're probably asking why? It's taking up useless amount of Wikia space, which isn't much of a good things as you probably know. So I'd say ban new Pimpmygun (They can keep the ones that are existing...) Example: Dr. Feelgood uploaded tons of images of shitty (Why I say shitty is because it's pretty much useless) converts just to show (Srsly...). We could have saved a lot of space by just uploading them to imageshack (A image hoster, a host meant to host images on isn't it obvious?), proof of the crap: http://i.imgur.com/h2Pkl.png so yea, like I said we should ban these stupid images because what is the wikia about? Is it about helping the ones that needs help and providing information or it just a dump for all ideas? You decide. -- http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8379/14085287.png   21:43, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Talking about banning PMG pictures, basically means no personal images at all. So the images on your userpage would (sadly) have to go. Along with many other images people use to personalise there pages. -N7 (talk) 22:02, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ikin, there's no limit to the amount of space we can use. If people want to have PMG pics I see no valid reason why not. If we just get rid of unused pics every now and again, like WHISKEY did yesterday and the day before, we will have no problem. M1911 small.jpgYuri Kaslov M1911 small right.jpg 22:03, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * No. Just no. Hell no. Fuck no. No, no, no, no, no, no, no...           ... No. There is NO point in getting rid of them, maybe we want to show our pictures without having to say, "I made this awesome Barrett 2 million Cal rifle in Pimp My Gun, but i can't post it here, so I have to put a link." If wikia had a space limit, we would have run out of space a long time ago. And if it was on some stupid image website, it would waste precious time that could be spent doing something productive like eating a sandwich, pwning Qscopers on MW2, editing the wiki, or designing a nuke, or other innocent but cool actions like that. --Bumblebeeprime09(Talk) 22:13, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you guys like read what I say before posting? Do like I do upload it to imageshack, look at me all my images are hosted on my Imageshack account. -- http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8379/14085287.png   22:16, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, we can read, and we did (At least, I did anyway.). Your argument is STILL invalid. --Bumblebeeprime09(Talk) 22:21, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

--CEBot 22:28, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. I have found it hard to find images in the past, but it was more of the wiki's images of COD (ie. FP views of guns, stills from trailers, stuff like that) cluttering up the file search or whatever the hell it's called. --Bumblebeeprime09(Talk) 22:33, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. I estimate about 2000 of our images are PMGs - and most of them have names that make it hard to find the file you need. And I tried searching for a picture of the M4A1 when I was trying out Rich Text Editor again, about 30 files I saw were PMGs. --CEBot 22:37, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

They put so much work into them that it would be a shame to delete them.Cpl.Bohater 22:35, December 21, 2010 (UTC) It's not deleting them, it's replacing them with links to the same file on ImageShack or Photobucket. The PMGs would still appear. --CEBot 22:37, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * What would be the proper licensing for an image like that, then? Shadowalkers  ShadowEmblem.png  Speak.  22:53, December 21, 2010 (UTC)