Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put Request for Improvement on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications
Article must have some problems such as:
 * Article written in first person and/or biased.
 * Article doesn't contain any images.
 * Article is short.
 * Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
 * Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

 * Theater
 * Paris
 * Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript
 * Damage Multiplier
 * GRU
 * Battle of Kursk
 * Closing In
 * Ridley
 * Jonathon Shephard
 * Sentry Grenade Launcher

Requests for Improvement Drive Status
Please post all nominations below.

Lookout
this page really need to fix or need improved because i was just looking on this page and still nothing was improvement.No gameplay picture and lack of information.

Support

 * 1) As Nominator

Neutral
Although not the best, it doesn't need much besides acouple lines of info, but doesn't need a full motioned drive for it. 18:19, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) It barely needs help, a few images could do it, but that doesn't mean in needs a full improvement drive.  18:13, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Lookout is a decent, healthy article. We shouldn't put decent articles in the ID.  03:24, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Beachhead Studios
I know that I don't have fifty mainspace edits but I know that this article must be improved. I was surfing the wiki when I came across this one-sentence, imageless aritcle that had to be improved. It has been abandoned for over 6 months. 17:39, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As Nominator XJoonblitz (talk) 14:13, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  23:24, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 02:37, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) perperprpereppreal --KλT 00:08, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 02:37, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) perperprpereppreal --KλT 00:08, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) perperprpereppreal --KλT 00:08, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) perperprpereppreal --KλT 00:08, August 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
You can still nominate/vote even without 50 mainspace edits, the requirement was removed a while ago. --MLGisNot4Me talk 14:15, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it because of COD:IAR ? XJoonblitz (talk) 14:24, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, we decided to remove the whole voting requirement (other than having an account) some time ago here. --MLGisNot4Me talk 14:28, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination successful - Article added. --MLGisNot4Me talk 07:03, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Sentry Grenade Launcher
Added some photos to the gallery. I think that's all we can do for this article.

Support

 * 1) As nom.  16:09, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per nom. --MLGisNot4Me talk 16:12, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Its the best we can for it. 16:15, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) We have worked enough on it. 18:09, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) It is a strong article and doesn't have much more info to it due to it's limited appearance. 20:16, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Paris
Now has a large amount of information and pictures. I don't see anything more to improve.

Support

 * 1) As nominator. --MLGisNot4Me talk 16:34, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Best we can do.16:54, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) A good article that's reached it's full potential. 20:19, August 4, 2012 (UTC)