Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles

Qualifications

 * Article must be written in 3rd person and must be completely unbiased.
 * Article must contain at least one picture.
 * Article must be no shorter than 5 paragraphs in length
 * Article must be categorized and sourced

Voter Qualifications

 * Voter must be a registered user who has been registered for longer than one week.
 * Voter must have 1 major edit (this does not include spelling/grammar corrections).

Requests for Featured Status
Please post below this line

Hunted
Support-I nominate "Hunted" because, one, it has not to my recollection not been featured, and two, the article to me is not really outstanding, to me it is remarkable and well put. Agree? Obi-Wan Kenobody 05:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Support -I agree with Obi-Wan Kenobody, great article and really deserving of a feature. Great tips, walkthrough with photos and in depth guide on harder parts of the level. Xulton 02:52, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Great article. I love the picture walkthroughs.-- 12:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - per above. This is just as good as the Crew Expendable page, which is the featured article at the moment. BTW, please do not let anyone nominate the Shi No Numa page, it requires a lot of work. Thanks, Callofduty4     Ask me anything!  13:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Generally well written among all other things associated with being featured. 20:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - I think there are more deserving articles. Kill kenny97 22:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Has a very detailed walkthorugh and nice pictures. The "tips" area needs to be cleaned up a bit, but I think that can be excused. Darkman 4 02:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose We just had A Call Of Duty 4 SAS mission (Crew Expendable) as featured article.Kevinsux909 09:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose I agree with kevinsux enought with the call of duty 4 missions. BR Ninja15 18:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Support -I honestly agree with everbody here who said that they support this article, it truly is a good article. CoDFan3

United States Marine Corps
Support- I nominate "United States Marine Corps" because, one, the article to me is not really outstanding, to me it is remarkable and well put. Agree? Cod1 20:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose- I felt the article was a little too short in some areas and topics and that there are more deserving articles. Xulton 02:57, 19 June, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Lacking in pictures and quality content.-- 12:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Has a great history about the Corps. What do you mean there are like no pictures? Didn't you see the bottom of the page? 18:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - This article is very well put together, and there are lots of pictures on the bottom. Kill kenny97 22:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - There isn't enough COD-specific info to make it worthy to be a featured article. Darkman 4 02:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - This is a very good article and it has plenty of "COD-specific" info. User:Zacharyk88 5:08 26 June 2009 UTC

Support - I agree with the guy above me Kevinsux909 16:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - This is a great page and is worthy of featured status. BR Ninja15 5:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Although an informative article, it lacks on the CoD side- and after all this wiki is about CoD. I much prefer the article above. Callofduty4 |    What you after?  09:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Mills Bomb
Support - I nominate "Mills Bomb" becuase it has never been featured and it is a great article. Agree? Chilly 900 1:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Errr...no. That article is 1 sentence long and it cannot be a featured article.-- 17:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Nomination Closed due to a lack of qualifications