User talk:JouninOfDespair

Nobody comments on my page, I have a right
A RIGHT TO EXERCISE PRIVACY, by putting in a rule which is "Do Not Delete Discussions (DDD)" NOBODY can have the right to privacy, that is the ultimate violation. Im sorry but I CANNOT let this go unanswered. If I must pay another week or however long for breaching the avoid ban thing because of something I am highly against then so be it...
 * comment. Darkman 4 16:47, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

You might want to stop deleting your talk page.
This wiki has a policy specifically about that, and it doesn't really matter what you think about the policy; if you don't like it, stop editing here. I did it once myself when it started getting cluttered before I knew it was against policy, but I fixed it; also, you DO have a "private" page - your User page. You can have anything you want on there - sandbox, tell about yourself, whatever, as long as you're not being a vitriolic, hateful bastard. Just cool down, and realize that nothing's really private here anyway. For example, as soon as I save this message, it's going to show that I made a comment on your talk page in the newsfeed, and anyone can see it. There's no such thing as "privacy" on the wiki with regards to talk pages, so just relax. --   Griever0311   15:21, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #9DC36B; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

It's the new recruit, sir.
Welcome to the Call of Duty Wiki, recruit! There's a lot to do around here, so here's the briefing on how you can help:


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.


 * Read our policies, if you haven't already. You'll be informed on the do's and do not's, as well as some guidelines when creating new articles.


 * The Sandbox is a great place to test things out if this is your first time editing wikis. It is advisable to know what is commonplace on the wiki, such as templates and categories, and how to use them.


 * Questions? You can ask at the Help desk, the "discussion" page associated with each article, or browse through the help directory. Feel free as well to ask on my talk page; we take care of our friends, recruit!


 * Have feedback? The War Room is used to discuss changes to wiki or other community related issues. You'll need 50 main space edits to vote, recruit, but your opinion is still appreciated!

I hope you enjoy editing on the wiki recruit! This is Bravo Six, out.


 * -- Imrlybord7 14:25, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * }

Your recent edits
They haven't been particularly well written and are all quite biased. Please read the Call of Duty Wiki:Manual of Style before editing again. Imrlybord7 14:25, February 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's pretty obnoxious when I have to go through all of your edits and undo most of them. Are you here to help or just give me more work? Imrlybord7 14:35, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

You insert baseless opinions into articles. And you shouldn't feel like you have the right to take an attitude with me when you are the one causing the problem. I will now provide some quotes that illustrate this.


 * "While the L86's penetration is moderately high, having full metal jacket will allow you to rip right through walls and even heavy cover and kill anybody behind walls or heavy cover with 3 or 4 shots without much trouble, this makes getting extended magazines for this weapon surprisingly easy because of its high rate of fire and high damage." - The L86 has the exact same penetration as every sniper, assault rifle, and LMG.


 * "The holographic sight is often overlooked, but can be a surprisingly effective attachment. While not useful for close range, it can really boost the MP5Ks overall effectiveness at medium or even long range, this is because for reasons unknown, it decreases by a considerable margin, meaning in short bursts, you could kill a target at medium to long range if you were a good enough shot, however you would have trouble dealing with powerful accurate weapons such as the SCAR-H, AK47, or TAR21." - The Holographic Sight does not reduce recoil (note that you didn't even remember to put in the world "recoil" when you wrote this). If it did, this would be an OK edit, but it doesn't, so no.


 * "The M9's extended mags gives you an extra 10 rounds per clip, depending on how good you are with the M9, this can either be a waste of an attachment, or can be a life saver. All sides considered, the extended mags can get at least 2-3 more kills before needing to reload." - This is completely biased, very poorly written, contains an impersonal "you," and is just stupid in every way. The only acceptable part of that was the section before the first comma, where all you did was state a fact.


 * "This gun is one of the few guns where you can or cannot use the gun with or without certain attachments. Some people like a red dot or holographic to assist in long range aiming, others prefer to go with the iron sights which are fairly easy to use and use either a silencer, FMJ or extended mags, turning the M93 Raffica into a mini M16 with a faster draw time, lower range, and somewhat lower damage." - This is a terrible edit. Just stupid all around. The paragraph you wrote under it, however, was decent, so I only deleted this part and reworked the good part.

I believe that I have made my point and provided sufficient evidence to defend my treatment of you. Keep in mind that these were your first four edits. I didn't have to look through all of your contributions to pick out problems. I just clicked one, two, three, four, and bam, I had all of this garbage. Also, on your user page, what the hell does "by NO means an admin" mean? Who the hell writes that? Imrlybord7 16:51, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

You come back and put it up, and I'll put it back down, NOW FUCK OFF.

It's really cute how you get so embarrassed by the poor quality of your work, but per COD:DDD (Don't Delete Discussion), you cannot delete these quotes, and even if you do I can easily restore them at any time. Imrlybord7 12:13, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Now you would dare MOCK me and render me obsolete... how... DARE YOU... DONT EVER COME BACK TO MY PAGE... EVER.

Any further comments will be deleted without hesitation, do not come back.


 * Unless I block you and don't allow you to edit your own talk page. Now to restore the things that you deleted. Imrlybord7 16:52, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

You, my good sir, are QUITE out of your mind.
Seriously. There is something wrong with you. The reason I delete what you put on the EBR page is because you always write it poorly and because we already provide weapon stats for a reason. I am fully aware of the one-shot-kill capacity of a 70 damage gun with a 1.5 multiplier to the head, 1.1 multipliers to the neck and chest, 1.0 multipliers to the stomach and limbs, and a damage reduction of 20 when silenced, all while Stopping Power multiplies damage by 1.4. Even if you did manage to write it well, the information would still be overkill; the stats are already on the page. So calm down. Imrlybord7 12:09, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, because you are obviously in a position to be giving commands. I mean, holy shit, do you see what you've been saying to me? I honestly believe that you would try to murder me if I was in front of you. This is a video game wiki that you have 43 edits on. Please take a step back and prioritize your life. Thank you. Imrlybord7 12:15, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

I have a life, I am at college right now, BUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU ANGER ME, when I try to make the wiki a better place but a..... PIG, like you comes in and fucking deletes it and puts me back at square one, you've some fucking nerve, AND WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO QUESTION MY MOTIVES!

I'm an admin.
In case you didn't notice, I have almost 100 times as many edits as you, all of which are of an exponentially higher quality. I work to ensure that this wiki is a well written and unbiased source of information. Now please, enjoy your week off. Imrlybord7 12:20, March 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, and I will keep a backup of this page so that I can restore it instantly if you try to remove anything after your block is up. If you continue to delete it, I will block you again and restore it. This process will be repeated as necessary. Imrlybord7 17:15, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Calm down
You're going crazy over what is essentially a minor part of a page. You really need to rethink your attitude. If you really can't stand that your edits can be reverted, then I don't think editing wikis is right for you. Darkman 4 17:21, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Imrlybord7
He should truly NOT be a admin. Sure he has many good edits but he has NO respect.Dolten 23:38, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Well then.
Editing any page on the wiki other than your own talk page during a block constitutes ban dodging, even if it is not technically an alt "account." Anyway, I never said or quoted anything resembling "pulling the first punch." I only said that I was not the instigator. The simple fact is that you overreacted. A fitting analogy would be that you accidentally kicked a small stone at me while walking, I casually tossed it back, and you responded by trying to gut me on the spot. Please keep in mind that there are a lot of bad editors on this wiki, and all too often I find that I am constantly going through and reverting well-intentioned edits that are lacking in quality. To me, you were simply one name on a list of many, and I only bothered addressing you personally because your name appeared on that list so many times. Also, why should I care so much about this? I will apologize for being a bit more dismissive of you than I should have been, but you have failed to demonstrate that you can be an asset to the editing team or even a functioning member of the community. Also, I have checked through the history of your talk page. Just to clarify, this wiki does not mean enough to me for me to "suffer" from anything that occurs here, nor are you capable of causing substantial damage to this wiki. We have an "A-Team" of admins and experienced users who are more than capable of dealing with whatever anyone may throw our way. Imrlybord7 15:42, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Deleting your talk page
You do not have the right to privacy on a PUBLIC talk page. I will not make exceptions to the rules because you are shy and/or have anger issues. Imrlybord7 15:44, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hey there
Hello there Jounin. I'm another administrator on this wiki. I'd like to point out that while you make some pretty bad edits, you have been admittedly poorly treated. I'm sorry about that. However, that doesn't give you reason to have a go at anybody. Doing so only got you into more trouble. I'm always open to apologies, so if you are willing to apologize, feel free to do so, and I'll take it into account. Please refrain from calling all our admins "Fascist Pigs" because believe me we are only trying to do our job. If that involves removing a potential threat by blocking him it must be done and honoured. So, as I said, feel free to apologize on here, and I will read it and evaluate it. I highly suggest you apologize directly to Darkman 4 and Imrlybord7. If you do so, I'm sure they will forgive you too. I'm ready to forgive you, even though I was not involved. With regards, 21:44, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll accept an apology. I was trying to be helpful to you (reduce your block from a year to a month) because I though Bord was going over the line with you, but instead you exploded on me as well because of a comment I made on one of your IPs. Darkman 4 21:51, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

I IS CHANGING
Didnt think I could change huh? WRONG. I'm one of the good guys now - and I plan to keep that way - but ALL of you must do your part, make sure I ain't made angry in any way shape or form, most of that will be done on my part - I am just waiting on yours. In the mean time - I got Wiking to do... Have fun.

Your talk page...
had me lmgdmfatfoofk