User talk:Crazy sam10

Can you get me a source for Soviet War in Afghanistan? Sorry, I'm new to the wiki and I don't know how to use everything yet. If I remake Angolan Civil War, can you get me a source for that too?

First :D
When will you come on chat? 16:43, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
JLTV (talk) 11:22, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I Just read your message you sent me. Letme review them first, Thanks for the notification BTW.

RE: License
So that was not licensed properly?

Used
You have not Used the videos yet?? I just posted them.TheCatFromMars (talk) 13:34, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

i
What can i do next time, to stop this from happening? I still don't get it. TheCatFromMars (talk) 13:54, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

No Problemo, i understand, to be honest the only reason i added it is because it looked like a bouncing betty. Shadowking58 (talk) 14:34, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

You have not Used the videos yet?? I just posted them.TheCatFromMars (talk) 13:34, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Message
Don't understand the "no real life info" thing; please explain? It seems contradictory to the majority of this wiki and thus somewhat nonsensical.

Alex

Signature
Can you make a custom signature? Cod Monan 11:17 AUGUST 10 2012

Signature discription.
Can my signature be related to the country Israel (I was born there) like have the israeli flag or the emblem of the israeli defence force, and maby have a picture of an Israeli gun like the Galil. Cod monan 15:58 August 10 2012

hello their, i see you have mistakenly banned me, (probably not), but i have read and researched and i believe their is no rule on posting "nonsense", but if their is infact a rule stating so please show me and if indeed their is i am terribly sorry for not heeding your warning, and i think a month is banning over the top seeing the "nonsense" rule is still a bit sketchy, i do not ask for an unbannment seeing that you are in fact...... crazy, farewell..... and may the force be with you........ sometimes. (epiic nate)

Unjust Ban
You banned me for no reason. You kept being obscure with your "warnings", and when I asked what you were talking about, you banned me without explaining yourself. If you are planning on banning someone for any amount of time, you should clearly state how that person is breaking rules and give them a clear warning. Instead, you said things like "You could at least apologize" without even hinting at what I did wrong. I then repeated that I sincerely did not know what you were talking about. And then instead of explaining yourself like a civil person, you just banned me right then and there. Did I upset you by calmly asking you to explain what you were talking about?

Furthermore, the ban's length is completely ludicrous. A month-long ban for something that you didn't even warn me about is completely unfair. I want an in-depth explanation of exactly why you banned me. I was doing nothing but discussing the current topic at hand, without disrupting anything. And then you arbitrarily decided that I was breaking some rule, demanding an apology, and then banned me before I could even realize what was going on. I want a screenshot of what I exactly said that broke the rules and resulted in a 30-day ban.

Please do not read this as rebelling against admin authority. If it turns out that I did break some heinous rule, then very well. I deserve it. But, I am upset that you gave NO real warning, and the only reason you said was "misbehaving in chat." Again, I want a screenshot of my ill behavior. I was doing NOTHING wrong at all. Nobody else in the chat seemed to have an issue with me, so honestly, what's going on?

Einsteinium99 (talk) 20:23, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry Sam, but I'm deleting incorrect information. I'm trying to help. Please stop stopping me from correcting a post, or people will just keep addinhg incorrect things to these posts and the people (like me) trying to fix them will get blocked by you! Take a look at the UMP45 thread, there isn't a UMP45 in Black Ops 2, its a picture of a Vector. Some person was incorrct and now he gets to tell everyone else wrong info.

i was "hardly serious" cause i didnt want u to think i was irratated or upset, but now that you have brought it up lets have a real conversation, u really think i care about being banned? was my nonsense really being that big of a disturbance to you?.... seriously? i mean no one was saying anything else if you seriously think me making random statements is spam then you need to reconsider your speculations of what spam really is. i am only responding to you cause i want you to really think about your monitering skills (nothing personal to you) chat isnt even a big deal..... it was made to talk about cod, not about brony or other stupid stuff.my tone is not blowing up to you..... i dont do that, but if my bannment is that big of a deal to you.... fine,if my presence is that great of a disturbance when i joke around... fine this is not a threat cause i know u dont care but i just wont go on chat anymore. (epiic nate)

just thought I should share this with you...
16:48, August 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * y u delete my spam  19:32, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Thanks for the sig!

image removal
I was notified that an image I posted on a talk page had been removed. And while you did leave a notice on my page, you still failed to give me a specific reason for why it was removed. I read the image policy and didn't see why it was removed; it was a screencap from the multiplayer trailer of a new piece of equipment. If that still violated the policy in some way, then you need to tell me specifically why it did. OmgHAX! (talk) 00:43, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

"Unused" image removal
Your bot, Neo Metal Silver, deleted an "unused" image (Robert Bowling tweet timeline comparison.png) that was actually being used as a reference for the Robert Bowling article. I understand that direct linking to an image doesn't count as it being used, so if you can undelete it I'll add it to the gallery too. – Moozipan Cheese(talk page) 15:49, August 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for acting so fast. However, after the image was deleted, I checked his Twitter feed again and it turns out the tweet in the image wasn't deleted (I just had the "No replies" button checked without realising), so the image unfortunately isn't needed, and can be deleted again. Sorry if I appear to be wasting your time here! – Moozipan Cheese(talk page) 16:09, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Those comments where perfectly on topic (he mentioned breaking bad in the post), but do explain how birthdays are on topic that is not at all mentioned in the blog. Jill-Valentine&#61;A-Boss (talk) 00:32, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Message To Jill
I mention Breaking Bad in the Blog, so the comment is perfectly on topic. Weeds is another show with a similar theme. 00:42, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Call of Wikia
I believe you were the one I yelled at previously. Now then, I've been thinking I'd finally get around to posting the promised Multiplayer blog for Call of Wikia 2. Would that be considered a Roleplay? Because it's basically maps, factions, class set-ups, weapons, perks, blah blah blah. Call of Wikia 3 I've decided to just put on my Wiki, Nazi Zombies Plus, because I hate arguing with people when it's not face to face or at least voice to voice, plus Call of Wikia involved Nazi Zombies Plus community happenings just as much as it did this Wiki, but I would like it if I could at least keep the second half of Call of Wikia 2 on here.  Magma-Man  01:18, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Sig
It's saved in Template:Sig/Madnessfan34537 03:16, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

CoDference template
They are intentional, and are part of the functionality of the infobox template for CoDference times. There is probably a better way to do it, but I don't have any answers. 03:30, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Post deletion
So you deleted a _perfectly related_ joke post as "spam"?

Time to either remove half the comments on this wiki, as they're in a very similar tone, or just simply say that you hate me because I dared to disagree with you.

The level of double-standard bullshit you're reaching is starting to approach pretty extreme levels. TheLiberation (talk) 01:14, August 16, 2012 (UTC)

Confused
How am I still naming/licensing images incorrectly? I am going to name an image: Stealth Chopper Menu icon BOII.png. What is wrong with that? Also, when I upload images, I am sure to check the one under Copyrighted that says "Use this one for screenshots."

Lexapro (talk) 22:29, August 16, 2012 (UTC)

Death Machine.
I found some cool Black ops 2 death machine gameplay, could you make a blog about it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kThSsYIUDD8

Re:
Got it.  Registered Contributor  •talk• 20:42, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

No
Don't fucking leave, why would you do that? Yes, I read your whole thing, I don't see a single reason for you too leave, so why would you do it? No one want's you too leave. I'm not gonna go into details about all the stuff you said, the feelings of being ignored. All I'm going to say is you seriously shouldn't leave. 03:53, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Bye friend
I can see your reasons behind leaving, Hope you and James have a good life. Your Kiwi friend. 03:59, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

You're leaving? Awww...really going to miss you. Good luck to you my friend. Cheese Lord

Leaving
I read that whole thing, I must tell you. You sound upset. But we need admins like you! We just lost eltmo and we cannot lose you to. Every fucking time we lose a good user it takes a bashing blow to our morale. Just, please. Come back! 04:30, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Bye Sis'.

04:39, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Sam
I am always here. Monday at 11pm, I will be back home and be able to talk. 08:18, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Leaving
Sorry for my behalf on what has happened to you, and I understand you being really upset about it. Take it easy for some time, but don't leave completely. Please? (And I did read it all through btw.) --MLGisNot4Me talk 08:59, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Hey man...
I know where you are coming from with that leave notice. I just wanna let you know that I read it and I really care about what you had to say. I've always thought you where wanna the Wiki's best Admins and coolest characters, you've always had my utmost respect and I just really wanna see you come back. You've always been there to answer my questions and help me when I was in a tough spot and I always appreciated that. If you need to talk I'll be here. - Red 15:37, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, so..
I know you probably don't want to hear anything from me, but, I just want to say I read the entire thing and I'm really sorry. I really wish I knew you feel this way..but please, come back. 18:18, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation
Hello, most of the links on Richtofen's Grand Scheme lead to disambiguation pages, i am trying to fix the link but get a "action detected as harmful" error whenever i try to save the edit, i'd be very happy if you could reply with a solution. thanks. Shadowking58 (talk) 16:17, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Award

 * Congratulations, Sammy. You really deserve it! Thanks for all the support you gave to the chat. <3 22:29, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good job Sam! Congrats! 22:30, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Congrats Samaloo <3333333!   Pat   Hugz for GIR?   Vinyl Pat  The Mixmaster  22:32, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * YAY FOR SAM! Congrats dude :). 23:49, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * I have but one comment for you, Sammich. ಠ_ಠ. 11:31, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Nukapedia chat incident
Not sure where and when you decided we're no good anymore at Nukapedia, but although I'm hardly in chat, I think the admins and mods who are in there are doing a fair job. They're not randomly picked, but chosen by a community and I have faith in them. Sure, every once in a while something happens that's on the edge of what's allowed, but that's on all wikis. We're not lesser people than on any other wiki, and hearing you be so negative about our chat, reputation, policy and its people surprises and disappoints me. About that Halo chat incident, I've read the talkpages and some logs and think the Nukapedians got banned for no real reason. Things are going well with us, we've grown healty again after the split. I think our reputation is fine (though I'm not really preoccupied with that), its policies are good in my opinion and the image renaming it not really a priority. You can't force admins to do that, we're all on voluntary basis here after all and for a bit of fun too and social interaction. Now, you've disabled chat out of some spite, probably in combination with having a bad day, and that is a pretty serious breach of trust and abuse of power. It really pains me to say, because you remind of the good old times when I looked up to a few admins when I started out in 2010 and you were one of them, but I'm going to let Leon's block stay at 2 weeks. It's up to the community if they want a reconfirmation request. A pity it has come to this. Jspoel

Re: Chat moderator medal
I must decline any medal for Chat Moderator service, as since my resumed activity a few weeks ago, I have not carried out any of the prescribed duties of the position. There are others who have had much more "dedicated service to the chat," and I feel that in receiving recognition for exemplary actions that I cannot be attributed to, I diminish the intended prestige of such an award. 17:48, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * I would still decline. If not for being undeserving of the award, then out of protest for the low standards it sets. As it stands from your description, the award is a reaffirmation of something already expected of Chat Moderators. If someone is not striving to make Chat "an open and friendly environment," then odds are they should not be trusted with Chat Moderator rights. I would rather not see this award be something that Chat Moderators are expected to receive after a certain amount of time. 18:22, August 28, 2012 (UTC)

Digital Deluxe Edition of Black Ops II(PC Players only)
i decided to inform you about this since i haven't seen a news post about this yet, but a limited edition has been announced for the PC Version of Call of Duty: Black Ops II. Shadowking58 (talk) 19:40, August 28, 2012 (UTC) http://www.gaming-age.com/2012/08/call-of-duty-black-ops-ii-care-package-hardened-edition-digital-deluxe-edition-revealed/
 * PC gamers can get the Digital Deluxe Edition for $79.99, which includes:
 * Call of Duty: Black Ops II game
 * Bonus maps: Nuketown Zombies & Nuketown 2025
 * In-game items: weapon camo, two player card backgrounds
 * Game soundtrack by composer Jack Wall (includes Trent Reznor’s theme)
 * Call of Duty: World at War game (via downloadable token)

Tweet
There's also this tweet http://twitter.com/CallOfDutyElite/status/240545774046420994 Shadowking58 (talk) 23:34, August 28, 2012 (UTC)

YTPT
Hey Sam! Because of recent changes from the YouTube team, using the embed tool provided to us here at Wikia comes with the consequence of no longer being able to create compact video players. I noticed you were the one who added the YTPT at Nukapedia, but Wikia disabled that a while back. I was wondering, do you happen to know of any way to have this feature re-enabled? And if not, do you happen to know of any other options I could take advantage of? Thanks in advance! Looking forward to your response.  Some Assembly Required! 05:56, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

Unused file
The fact that it was unused was my fault, he used it as a reference picture for proving that the KSG-12 could work with slugs. So I removed that and just linked to the tweet. I forgot that I could now delete images, so, sorry. :/ 13:52, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

Ban
Can I please ask what I did to deserve a one month ban? Big-Macintosh (talk) 13:00, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

RE: I still think a one month ban is a bit extreme.

Content Collection 4: Final Assault Trailer released
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxr5KlRSvTA&feature=g-all-ualso includes first look at Gulch, Boardwalk, and Parish, the upcoming Call of Duty: Elite Maps. Shadowking58 (talk) 16:54, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Why did you extend my ban?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!

signature
Thank you my man, thank you. 22:33, September 3, 2012 (UTC)

How long am I banned for BIYATCH?

GRAMMER
Nice reason.... really nice.....your GRAMMER was off. umadbro?

Treyarch
Hey, check it out! Treyarch is teasing us again! Shadowking58 (talk) 23:10, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

This Interests me
Team logo replacement?

Shadowking58 (talk) 22:39, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

New Campaign gameplay for Black Ops II!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHeIwRC0INA&feature=player_embedded

QUICK, OTHERS MUST KNOW! (gameplay starts at 1:30 minute mark).

Shadowking58 (talk) 19:24, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

The Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Demo is now available on PSN, just incase you didn't know. Shadowking58 (talk) 18:15, September 16, 2012 (UTC)

i saw this article that says that activision is ceasing the sale of Call of Duty elite premium memberships for MW3

http://www.charlieintel.com/2012/09/18/activision-ceasing-sales-of-new-elite-premium-memberships-for-mw3/

Shadowking58 (talk) 09:34, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Re:A warning
Sorry, I lost my cool and snapped, I shouldn't of done it. Sorry again. 16:21, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

http://www.charlieintel.com/2012/09/18/no-option-for-ps3-hdd-install-for-black-ops-2/

Shadowking58 (talk) 22:01, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Multiplayer map images leaked
http://www.charlieintel.com/2012/09/20/first-images-of-black-ops-2-10-leaked-maps/ Shadowking58 (talk) 20:36, September 20, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!
Cheers for thinking little ole' me was deserving of an award. ^>^ 16:25, September 21, 2012 (UTC)

Another zombie sound effect has been released on the callofduty youtube channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZHi0z4g1zM&feature=youtu.be Shadowking58 (talk) 09:57, September 22, 2012 (UTC)

Transit
Thank you so much for deleting the Transit article I was working on. Worked hard at putting virtually no leaked info in it, so thank you sir. Better get to deleting some of the weapons, then, because a few have only been revelead in the leaked beta. Er1c1996 (talk) 21:26, September 22, 2012 (UTC)

what
you ban me for saying mod rights

Ezekyb (talk) 19:08, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

ban
i was putting that on private chat with my friend he wants it to

CoD Classic

 * 1) CoD Classic doesn't run in full HD at all, it's 720p on PS3.
 * 2) Even if it did, the original game can run at arbitrary resolutions, including 1920x1080 @ 60Hz, ie full HD, so this isn't actually a difference.
 * 3) "Upscaled" means it's generating a lower resolution image and scaling it up. "Upscaled to HD" means a program is not running in HD.
 * 4) Where's there any evidence that CoD1 doesn't "run smoothly" on a PC? What "glitches" are supposed to have been patched?

Evil Tim (talk) 22:48, September 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * You misunderstand. The game itself can be set to generate footage at arbitrary resolutions, higher than HD (and indeed if you have two monitors, bigger than either one can display). It's not a case of the display stretching the image to fit as on a TV, it's a case of the game generating the initial image at that size. CoD1, and indeed a lot of old PC games, can generate images at resolutions far higher than 1080p; even without hacking the config files, the default resolutions go up to 2048x1536. In other words, the original game can run in full HD or higher.
 * As for many user confirming glitches, what glitches? There's no list other than a useless, unreferenced claim that it runs "smoother."
 * But hey, thanks for reminding me why I gave up on this place, having good-faith edits reverted with no reason given by someone who has no idea what they're talking about is fun.Evil Tim (talk) 23:45, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually that's exactly what it means. The source just says it "features HD resolutions." HD resolution means either 720p (1280×720, which almost any old PC game can do) or 1080i or p (1920x1080, either interlaced or progressive scan). Your quote does not say the original was not capable of these resolutions, and it does not say it features high resolution textures (which is good, because it doesn't). If you want me to be nice, try meeting me halfway and listening to what I'm saying rather than looking for ways to contradict it. Evil Tim (talk) 00:12, September 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also I notice "source" is Wikipedia, which references that claim to an article by IGN, which does not include the words "HD resolutions" at all. So it doesn't exactly substantiate your claim anyway. Evil Tim (talk) 00:22, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

You're confusing screen resolution with texture resolution. If the game is making an image that does not have to be increased in size by the display, then that is the resolution. Even some versions of Quake can run at 1920x1080 and though the engine can't make that look particularly smooth, that's what's happening; it is not just upscaling the image. The fact that CoD classic can run in an HD resolution is not particularly exciting, and it doesn't have HD textures either. It might be advertised by saying it's HD, but that's just to excite console fanboys who have no idea it always was; it's salesmanship, and nothing more.

You're also misusing the term "aspect ratio;" aspect ratio is just the ratio of the length of one side of the display to the other. 1920x1080 and 1280x720 are both aspect ratios of 16:9, they are just different 16:9 resolutions.

I notice you also haven't provided any source or examples re: these glitches that were supposedly fixed. Evil Tim (talk) 00:45, September 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * And you have no proof of either of these assertions. Good show, really understanding how a wiki works there. Also, since when do games designed for CRT monitors have a native resolution? Evil Tim (talk) 00:49, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

hey i just got your message thank you for welcoming me to your call of duty wiki im kinda new i dont login to often im glad to be a part of the call of duty wiki and ill be sure to make edits where they may be needed

Raistlin10 (talk) 00:51, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

Sam, are you understanding what Tim is saying, though? The original Call of Duty for the PC was more than capable of being in HD, and that's a fact. Are you seeing what he's bringing up about what the claim of Call of Duty Classic being "upscaled" implies and how what it strongly hints at is incorrect? 01:10, September 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * Call of Duty Classic on PS3 and Xbox 360 is a game that is upscaled from native 720p to 1080p, just as most PS3/360 games are. 06:06, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

Hey look, it's CoD1 running in 1920x1080. Evil Tim (talk) 10:58, September 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and you'll notice it's clearly upscaled. Just for you, Here's a 853x480 version of the same image upscaled to 1920x1080. Notice how it isn't sharp as a razor like the real 1920x1080 image? Evil Tim (talk) 11:09, September 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * It doesn't look anything like as sharp as the image I posted (it's also got some really nasty compression artifacts, so isn't a good comparison). Like I said, if the first image were upscaled it would look like the second image; blurred because each pixel of the original image was taking up a little over two pixels in the upscaled image. It doesn't, the edges are sharply defined because it was rendered at an initial size of 1920x1080.
 * I don't know where you get the idea that old PC games designed for CRT monitors render at a fixed resolution; that's something that's only happened since the advent of flat panels which don't like displaying at anything but one fixed, "native" resolution. It never happened with old PC games, which would render at whatever resolution you told them to.
 * I'll drop this when I'm no longer right about it, thank you. Evil Tim (talk) 11:23, September 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't have a default resolution, like many old PC games it can run at any resolution you tell it to. If you have any actual proof to the contrary then show me. I've given you a 1920x1080 image and an upscaled 853x480 for comparison, you've given me a bunch of hot air and handwaving and a horribly compressed screenshot that looks significantly worse than the one I gave you. Oh, and a "last warning" for...What, exactly? Refusing to agree with you? Evil Tim (talk) 11:33, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

CoD ELITE
the redesigned Call of Duty elite website has been launched. Shadowking58 (talk) 20:45, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

edit was an accident 23:14, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

hello samHarkat (talk) 07:41, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Ban
No warnings, no kicks, no nothing? A BAN for kinda spoilers? wot    15:24, October 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
yeah i could do that easily! --KλT 03:32, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

IMAGE
So tell me, how you would have named this picture as example. in the proper way Maxwell123 (talk) 18:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Legitcodguy's talk
I was under the impression that as long as the message/warning/template thing wasn't spam or unconstructive, it still shouldn't be deleted all together, even if it was a duplicate, and slightly and unintentionally rude. --MLGisNot4Me talk 18:47, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * But the second warning is still there; instead of deleting it, it could be left in a comment, as I reasoned in the edit summary. --MLGisNot4Me talk 19:08, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

i told you so you commieHarkat (talk) 21:09, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Don't miss the Zombie Bus.

http://tinyurl.com/9vqhddo

Shadowking58 (talk) 22:30, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Revert
Two or three users is not a consensus. It was agreed upon during the forum that there was no actual consensus and that it should not have been removed. -- 00:44, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

"Frankly, I find the fact that this was all ignored because "that wasn't the purpose of the forum" to be grasping at straws."

- MediaWiki talk:Emoticons

"The emoticon had no consensus at all to be removed."

- MediaWiki talk:Emoticons

"If it's not obvious, Sam removed it. However, I am curious as to the consensus mentioned in the edit summary as I don't know what this refers to, whether it was a logged discussion on-site or just a few PMs exchanged between a few people."

- Forum:Clearing out the Emotes page

That does not allow you to completely disregard the discussion that took place involving it. It was discussed no matter what, and you even gave input about it. Whether you wanted it to take place or not, it still happened. Since this is about the emote, I suggest you give input on MediaWiki talk:Emoticons (linked again), and not keep edit warring over it. -- 00:58, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

A 5 minute "public" vote in the middle of chat is not a consensus, especially when almost nobody even commented on it. It takes longer than a few minutes to achieve an agreement, and it should definitely not have been done in the middle of an active chat, but instead should have been done on the appropriate talk page linked above. There was no actual discussion among everybody to remove it, and it has been heavily questioned ever since. It turned into an edit war when my re-addition was undone without any summary (I believe I only got one summary, and that was less than an hour ago) and no comment on MediaWiki talk:Emoticons. -- 01:22, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

You sent the merge message? I will merge but... there's not much on it so... I don't know. I even made pages for that but people deleted it so what will you merge and how did you find the Wiki? Since I can't even find it without going to my favorite Wiki's. Daniel123Shaw123 (talk) 17:26, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Re:
Yeah, i know, i put it on both. I just don't have anything else to put on my User Page but if I need to take it off, then let me know.

Sgt. Preston 22:19, October 12, 2012 (UTC)

Dude I just found the emotes and I was playing around. Either way I don't see what you guys' problems are. Jayzus. That's heaps unfair that you can get to ban me, and AndImBatman used them the exact way I did, and yet he still gets to go on the chat! Telepathesis (talk) 16:25, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

I was testing them out. And I was using them properly once I'd had my fun. But then you all ganged up on me and oppressed me. Do I get banned forever, or do I just have to wait it out for a couple of days because none of you have any measure of a sense of humour? Telepathesis (talk) 16:35, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Can you please make me a new signature because I've had this one for quite a while and I'd like something new, also if you would'nt mind I'd like this one to be Black ops 2 related, so in black and orange. Thanks! October 15 2012

Re: Vandalism
Are you saying that I'm the one that edited the page with saying "Meow"? Incorrect. I was the one who reverted it. X29 07:59, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

And that's why I hate this sitie. I try to make an "Undo", and then I wanna make an "Edit Summary", but it just has to make me automatically in the editing panel, which sometimes causes me to edit the page with things I didn't wanna edit. This time, however, unlike past times, I didn't notice. Hope you discuss this with the other admins, sir, since I went through this too many times already. X29 08:08, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, it's your fault for setting this automatic entry to the Editing Panel. I'm pretty sure others went through the same problem. X29 08:26, October 17, 2012 (UTC)