Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put Request for Improvement on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications
Article must have some problems such as:
 * Article written in first person and/or biased.
 * Article doesn't contain any images.
 * Article is short.
 * Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
 * Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

 * Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript
 * Damage Multiplier
 * GRU
 * Battle of Kursk
 * Closing In
 * Ridley
 * Jonathon Shephard
 * Beachhead Studios

Requests for Improvement Drive Status
Please post all nominations below.

PM63/Attachments
It really needs to be completed. One picture makes it a stub and in need of ID tbh.

Support

 * 1) As nominator. 16:13, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) As stated by DM and I, many of the "X/Attachments" pages are in such condition, and in personal eye, is redundant as if that page is page, many of the same pages should be on ID then. 00:50, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Stub ≠ ID. 01:23, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Argorrath's votes and our comments below. DarkMetroid567Talk 02:16, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
Comment - Many of the attachment pages are in need of pictures such as the Uzi/Attachments and MAC11/Attachments...etc 20:11, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Argorrath. There are many, many pages exactly like this one. It seems to be too much of a waste to put all these pages into the ID (and I'm not exactly sure why these pages exist in the first place). DarkMetroid567Talk 21:43, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Remove Ridley
Although it doesn't seem like the best article, the character only appears playable and only is shown in 1 mission. Although it may not look the best, it is the best we can do with so limited information.

Support

 * 1) As Nom 21:00, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I supplied a lot of information for that article (I've supplied a good bit for the whole game actually), an if I come across anything else I'll add it, but the character is extremely flat, as the nom said, only appears in one level. Most of the player characters are never developed or fleshed out in MW3 for the DS, and Ridley is actually the best looking one of them all at the moment.  21:33, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) The page seems to be doing quite well, and kudos to Nitz X for supplying the information we could get. Per all. DarkMetroid567Talk 21:35, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Adding Battle of Stalingrad
The article consists only of IRL information and requires extensive writing of the events that have occurred in and around Stalingrad, preferably on a larger scale and more in-depth than on the Stalingrad page; with additional images needed as well. As an alternative, anybody have any thoughts about merging the two articles?

Support

 * 1) As nominator. 01:21, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Nom, the page also has a redlink, and about 2 lines of info. 01:25, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) These are the type of pages that need help through the ID. Per nomination and Argo's vote. DarkMetroid567Talk 02:17, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Remove GRU (2)
As previously stated last time, although the article doesn't seem good enough to be taken out of the ID, but as I see, GRU has very limited information that is given and used in the article. It may not look good but its the best we can do for now until it either comes into another game of CoD, or BO:D intel sheds more light on them.

Support

 * 1) As Nom. 18:36, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I didn't catch the last nomination, and I fully agree with Argorrath. I don't see much more catching up on information that isn't there. DarkMetroid567Talk 02:27, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I honestly can't think of anything else that can be added to that article. Per nominator and DM. 16:32, August 29, 2012 (UTC)