User blog comment:Damac1214/Where should Call of Duty go next?/@comment-5968558-20130410233420

I disagree with WW1 making a bad CoD game, and if you would study your history more you would learn that there was a multitude of wepons and equiptment used in the war (there were so many nations involved each producing thier own wepons, maybe add new types of multiplayer combat like swords, trench knifes, bayonets, and poision gas would make for some interesting situations), and not all the war was in trench battles (most of the trench warefare was fought from 1916-1917 and primarly only on the western front between Germany and France). You could have the ground assaults (trench battles, enemy raids, fights over small towns), I like the idia of air combat, you could also add calvalry battles (still an important part of warfare in the time period), early types of moterized warfare (tanks and armored cars), and maybe some artillery combat. The locations where it was fought are numerous and range from europe to asia. The campain could have you play from the perspectives of soldiers on both sides during the war (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman empire, Italy, France, Britian, and America) Most people don't seem to realize that true modern warefare was developed in WW1. I think Activision should seriously consider making a WW1 game, if done correctly it could be a major succes.

I would also like to see a CoD: ZOMBIES game. Even if it is nothing like a traditional CoD game I don't see how it could go wrong since people like the gamemode so much.

(A WW1 Zombies map would also be interesting)