User talk:Raven's wing

Archives:1, 2

'''The current page size in bytes is ! Archive when it reaches at least 55,000 bytes in size.'''

Squeaky Clean Talk...
...has been ruined. 21:54, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Um No. Have I done something wrong?

Haha someone's stingy about education. I mean everything I added has been confirmed through research and exeperience. Fine if you want to leave people with the same mediocre information they could come up on their own, that's not my problem, but can't say I didn't try. No wonder COD fans can never learn anything useful, with people like you hiding it from them apparrently. 66.182.193.204The only guy to add anything useful to the Gun Camouflage section in months. Were you the same guy trying to delete that section on the Unique ACR Camo I made a while back?

Frost
This kinda contradicts it. 13:54, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, those two other "contributions" were accidents. Sorry about that.

Thank you my friend
It is good to be here I may have a little trouble but I have just learn English

Soviet Soldier 20:18, January 11, 2012 (UTC)Soviet SoldierSoviet Soldier 20:18, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Home of CoD
How come we're not allowed to say that all CoD games are made in the US?

Can't we just state that the CoD games are produced in the US?

A Favor, from Richgar319
Hey if you see this, can you keep an eye out for Trixnine on the Black Ops Tomahawk page? He overwrited my video and kept his video under my name and caption, which was an inaccurate disaster. I posted on his page telling him to add his video under his own name and caption next to mine, instead of simply replacing mine. He also attempted to post his accomplishments under the tomahawk's multiplayer section, which was undone. I'm afraid he might turn the tomahawk wiki page into a tomahawk fame page. Can you make sure to undo if he decides to replace my video with his montage again, or if he decides to do anything else unrelevant?

Edit: btw I usually don't go on here, so I'm not used to the formatting very well... I didn't know how to sign a signature with four tildes, so my post got merged up above... really confuses me.. When I try to delete it, it says it's a violation of the rules, so idk, maybe you can fix it... sorry if it becomes a problem :/

Edit 2: Nvm, it seems that the merge up above was deleted successfully.

Thanks,

Richgar319 19:26, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

WRONG! believe me i'm Vietnamese and my Dad (who was in the Vietnam War) told me that Viet Cong is North and I even did a report on the Vietnam War. Look it up on Wikipedia!!

Are really this stupid or are you doing this just to annoy me?

Let me say this calmly so you can understand.

North Vietnam was at war with South Vietnam. Viet Cong was part of the Communist Force. USA was allied with the South. Allies of the Viet Cong were North Vietnam, Russia and I think China.... Just because you're smart doesn't mean you know EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not every Wikipedia user is right.

"Don't believe everything you read"

- Captain Price

South and US were opponents, lad..

Ask someone who was a Vietnam War Veteran for crying out loud!!

My Gosh! >:-(

South and U.S were allies!

SOPA blog
Is it fine if I remove all the new-coming CoD-SOPA quotes? They're getting kinda annoying... 22:35, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

World War III
can we edit World War III please i want to change the dates on the page back to the Days. callofdutyman1 10:11, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

editing World War III
when can we edit World War III. callofdutyman1 10:33, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

why did you undo my ksg 12 pump cancel section?

ksg
why did you undo my ksg 12 pump cancel section?

Call of Duty Elite descriptions.
Should we include them in the game? Me and Damac are discussing if they should or not. I've put a few on the Assault rifles, SMGS, LMGs, and the Barret. Qw3rty! 23:41, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

About your deletion of Naas...
He actually isn't randomly generated. He appears in the same spot every time, with the same name and rank, just like Kelly and Grant. He's at least as notable as them, too. With those points in mind, could you possibly see your way towards restoring the page, plz? Sgt. S.S. 20:31, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * ^ I myself have also seen Naas ingame, if that helps prove he isn't randomly generated at all... k bai :3

20:34, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

ban
please dont ban i feel ugly when no one looking at me ill remove if u message me back

Your Current Avatar
Everytime I glance over it I keep thinking I saw a large round white face with small purple eyes and a large purple mouth... it kinda creeps me out...  Magma-Man  05:03, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Call of Wikia Survival
You are going to be one of the characters appearing in survival mode. Each character gets their own special ability. Mine is Spartan shielding, which gives me shields like a spartan from Halo. What do you want yours to be? Nothing overpowered. Just a small boost to use occasionally, like a special limited use melee attack or the ability to drain nearby enemies' health for a small amount of time.  Magma-Man  11:25, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Price Royal Marine Commandos?
So the scene in which the knife is stabbed in the wall and Soaps dog tags are hanging from them is obiously their 'safehouse'. Therefore the only people there are Price, Soap. It can not be Nikolai's or Yuri's as they are Russian, it isn't Soaps because Soap was a para. Leaving only Price, this is likely the case as there is no other evidence that he is in anything else...

But the thing that don't make sense is that, yes that is the Royal Marine Commando's slogan 'Per Mare Per Terram' but that is not their knife.A BL1ND K1D 21:27, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Im unclear on what you mean by 'the presence of an engraving like that on a combat knife is another matter altogether'A BL1ND K1D 21:36, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

World War 3
can i edit world war 3 User:Maniac1993 1:38, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

do u know when we can edit world war 3 User:Maniac1993 2:28, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks i didn't need that stuiped page anyway and can someone help me clean off the spam on my talk page because i know alreadly that i learned my lesson now will it kill them just to clean up my talk page a bit thanks.

Too much useless stuff
My talkpage needs cleaned up okay...): (Dan67 15:50, February 6, 2012 (UTC))

sorry for that
im very sorry for that,and am ready to accept any conscquences that i deserve

so,so,sorry fotr that.

all the best, L96A1 NO SCOP3 00:43, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

RE: GIGN
Sorry about that, my mistake lol. I don't pay much attention to MW3 btw what anime is that? 02:29, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Question
Quick question: Exactly how does one become an admin? Are they just selected by other admins? Novafan365, master of scrap 06:51, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, whats up?
Hey whats up? Names KyxricXIII, I made a wikia account a whilw back but I'm still new to all this. anyway just wanted to let you know that your avatar pic is awesome! kingdom hearts is one of my favorite games and Xion is one of my favorite characters. also noticed the song that played when I came to your page was xion's theme. nice choice.

Just a quick point
It is clearly Craig doing the voice acting, and it is 141 doing the raid so the most likely assumption is that it is ghost considering Gaz is dead at this point. It doesn't state it, but piece it all together and it is pretty safe to say that is the truth Nism100 18:34, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Use your noggin
At the time of MW1 it was just a bonus mission (It was origionally in the plot but they just put it as a bonus when it was cut. look up the page for more info) and it was probably meant to be Gaz but considering the journal (Written by Infinity Ward) states it was 141 that did the raid, and it was between MW1 and 2 and Craig is heard talking, it is almost 100% certain it is Ghost. Think about it. It is slightly more than speculation of everything points towards it. Put it this way, have you got anything that goes against what I have said on here or on the contribution?

What are you on about??
It was carried out by 141 squadron which Walcroft wasnt in. Also I wasnt saying it think this prove me wrong at all. I have said my evidence which goes against it being Gaz and Walcroft too and why it would be Ghost if you have bothered reading it so i havent failed at anything at all but trying to get you to read what i am saying. My point is I have stuff pointing towards my point, do you have anything going against it and reading my god damn comments would of clearly shown I am going beyond "I think this."

I could have been anyone but if we thinnk about who is in 141 and who there is voiced by Craig we can pretty much say, until knew info says otherwise it is Ghost. Lets count up my points 1) Soaps journal says this takes place after MW1 2) Craig does the voice acting for this guy 3) Ghost is the only 141 member who sounds like ghost and the only one that would have been present at the time. Thats 3 that are pretty much plausable enough so I a not assuming or thinking what it could mean, I have used evidence enough and I really don't see yoiur problem with it. Saying I AM assuming or just saying this is what I think is complete bull, as I have pretty much told you I have done more than that. I would of thought you would be smart enough to figure that out.Nism100 19:31, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

What bit am I not getting? Even if they recycled his voice, IW still wanted Gaz present and thats how they presented the level. When it came to Soaps jopurnal they set it with 141 and it would make sense for it to be Ghost not Gaz or Walcroft what part of ANYTHING I have said do YOU not understand I have given valid Info why is that so hard for you to understand? Nism100 19:56, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

re:
w/e. Wikian200 21:13, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

why didnt they mention him? because it doesnt take a genius to figure out who he is. It isnt confirmed by it is pretty obvious it is him. I can find quite a few examples of exactly what I have done on other pages but are happily there and have been there for a while yet when I try and do it it is all of a sudden wrong. Please explain that one to me

Dont need to cool off at all I just fail to see how i cannot post simple enough stuff with enough support yet It gets removed yet I see allot of the same sort of thing all over this wikia. Failing to see how thats fair to be honest and considering how many people view some pages which are apparently full of speculation if mine counts as such yet NO ONE seems to have a problem with it. I just dont get how that can work. I have explained why it would be him and I have enough evidence yet it still counts as speculation, I can accept that if its the rules but it isnt one others seem to regard so why am I being harrased for a simple edit over it? Nism100 21:47, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

You seem reluctant to accept the fact that in my case it is wrong, but in every other case it is right. Why not take that into consideration? Can you seriously blame me for continuing this conversation if I am being penalised for something that happens all the time? yet I am still wrong and when I point out all I get is "Its speculation. '''END OF DISCUSION." '''What is that saying about your role in this wikia if you arent going to attempt to end the conversation when your argument is one gone against ALL THE TIME? not much. How did you even get to your position with that attitude?

Well thats one way of putting it lol. you still havent answered why it is fair however. As an Admin you should be able to answer that question on why a rule NO ONE ELSE KEEPS TO is one i SHOULD keep to. that isnt claiming to know any better than any other person. I will happily accept I am wrong if you give me a valid reason instead of dodging the question on hwo this is fair on me when I am just doing what any other person tries to do? Why is that so hard for you to answer? Also if I am doing what everyone else does how am I claiming to know better than everyone else? It seems YOUR the one dissagreeing with them in that case. Your really showing great support to the wiki community well done (if you detect the sarcasm there) Nism100 22:09, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

NOW WE ARE GETTING SOMEWHERE! Take a little look around certain characters pages. The page for Mile high club for instance the top one says about the character your rescuing being Kriegler but that was actually cut from the game and we have no idea if he is actually Kriegler. Richtofan has apparently met Hitler last time I looked thats what he said but it isnt confirmed. Nikolia is apparently in the WaW campaign getting on the train but that isnt confirmed its him yet its still there. It really isnt that hard if you look around.

Also just checked apparently Richtofan is related to the Red Baron these days nice to know this community is good at speculation. Getting my point yet? Why am I being penalised for this when the same thing is happening all the time? I just dont get how thats fair

I never said it was a conspiracy simply that it isn't fair to be jumped on about stuff that everyone does all the time. It isnt really jumping under the radar if everything seems to go at free will. I am not saying its a conspiracy i just don't like getting penalised over something everyone seems to think is okay. I can accept it if mine dissobeys the rules, but I cannot if I see the exact same sort of things happening everywhere with no complaint. You get what I am saying yet? Nism100 22:32, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Well now we are actually getting somewhere. It is clear you dont think it is right but I fail to see how people seem to have that much of a problem with it on any other occasion. thats all i am saying in future i won't post stuff that isn't proven correct but I would also like it if other edits like mine get treated the same because, at the moment, they don't seem to be Nism100 22:45, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Re
Kk, I was under the impression that when referring to the Biography section such as "So-and-so was a soldier" it was fine, but when referring to them as playable characters I thought it should have been "So-and-so is the playable character in blah blah blah" because even though they had died, they are still the character for the level. Thanks for clearing that up :). 02:21, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Need help ):
Sorry about my behavior, but can you help me on a blog called the online dilema. Because before mean actions I wanted to know there were hackers or actually people playing the game and yet I,m still worried about my friend complaining about hackers in MW3. --Dan67 12:48, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

If it SOMEHOW doesn't go on the Treyarch page, then where does it go? I can't edit the CoD9 page...