User blog comment:BGA/Anyone else play CoD4 more then MW2?/@comment-1079585-20100203043703

I almost completely agree with this blog. Especially these parts.

"MW2's Multiplayer just has....too much. Too much of everything. CoD4's Multiplayer was Classic, Simple (Compared to MW2), and fun."

"Sometimes, MW2's Multiplayer doesn't just feel right for me. I don't know what doesn't feel right about it though. The New Perk Layout doesn't feel right either."

"MW2's Multiplayer is just too different. World at War has the feeling of CoD4, I just don't know why MW2 doesnt."

"I also think that CoD4 had a much more "serious" feel to it then MW2. I like serious games."

However, I still think MW2 is a very good game. I'd say it goes something like CoD4>>>>>MW2>>>>>WaW. I love the silenced sniper rifles and the fact that there are lots of guns, but I wish they had just taken CoD4 and added that stuff in. I will give them credit in the originality department for actually changing things and making a new experience instead of just playing it safe and copying like WaW did. However, it was too much change. I wanted CoD4 with better graphics, more guns, and silenced sniper rifles. Also, why the hell can't we just always put two attachments on our guns? That would have been sick.