Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/N7

I, YellowRiolu, nominate N7 for adminship as he is an honest member, he's honestly devoted to this wiki and basically Call of Duty, he seems to know the tools already and has good thoughts of how he can improve. He can also improve the blogs and this will make a massive impact to the wiki. This may well be the most important RfA this year as a result. YellowRiolu Leave a message! 15:39, April 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would like to thank YellowRiolu for the nomination, and I gratefully accept. — 19:40, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Support
As nominator (stupid me forgot!) YellowRiolu Leave a message! 15:52, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

15:53, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

16:03, April 29, 2011 (UTC) {{Template:Extremely Strong Support N7 is a great member an even me, the n00b can respect what he has done for the wiki {{Template:Extremely Strong Support|N7 definitely deserves the rights. He has the traits which most admins need, which are:

In addition to these, there are some unoffical points: {{Sig/Maj. Blackout}}16:12, April 29, 2011 (UTC)}}
 * 1) He's well known by the community
 * 2) He's Respected and liked
 * 3) He has knowledge of coding
 * 4) He has very high quality edits
 * 5) He is very active
 * 1) He is a Narb
 * 2) He is nearly always the first to post important news.
 * 3) He accidentally The Game.

Friendly, Very good user. Per everybody else on support. Very deserving of the position. Reznov115 {{sup| Talk }}   19:06, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Per Reznov115 Carbonite 0 20:43, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

{{Support|Great friendly user who will definitely benefit from these tools.}} {{Sig/Nikolai Cannot Die}} 07:04, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

{{Extremely Strong Support|He's a great user and I'm sure the wiki will benefit with him also as an Admin as well.}}} JerryWiffleWaffle 17:00, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

--   CoaZ Talk    19:29, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

N7 Has many of the traits that an admin should have. He knows the wiki well and other users respect him. He is very friendly and will help others out with no hesitation 11:48, May 1, 2011 (UTC) User lacks mainspace edit count. 12:26, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

In all my time on the wiki, I have only ever known N7 as a friendly, mature, and respectable user. His maturity and willingness to help others and the wiki is a textbook example of ideal sysop material. Sgt. S.S. 14:45, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Senior Sammich Omnomnom  Azuris is a nub  18:49, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

hey what can i say he's a great user cheytac 18:53, May 1, 2011 (UTC) User lacks mainspace edits. — 19:05, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Per all. 02:01, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Per Callofduty4. --AJ.Bialke 09:41, May 6, 2011 (UTC

Neutral

 * I'd like to stress that there is no maximum to the amount of administrators we can have. The more, the better the wiki will be. RSWiki has about 75, and they run just fine. 07:55, May 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * Let's not forget that over 50 of those don't edit much. -- 07:59, May 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * And on this wiki only about 10 sysops and bureaucrats have edited regularly and recently. — 09:22, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

After our convo just now, I think you can be mature, but it could be at a higher level. 16:56, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose
Need to mature, and too many admins at this time. Sorry. Reznov115 Talk   17:10, April 29, 2011 (UTC) Changing vote, Can someone strike this trough please? Reznov115 Talk   19:04, April 29, 2011 (UTC)Done 19:11, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Note to Smuff: I did this one without reading the nomination. 20:23, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

-- 20:34, April 29, 2011 (UTC) The points above are somewhat valid (other than the blogs contributions), so I'll remain neutral on this RfA. -- 20:46, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

20:57, April 29, 2011 (UTC)




 * Yes, I was assuming it, not saying it was definitely ranting. 21:05, April 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * So are these the logs of me and Sp3c telling you to stop trolling everyone? — 07:34, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * No..... that never happened...........o.O 16:50, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Uhhh... can you like... show us the logs? 16:54, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

08:18, May 6, 2011 (UTC) Coming to look at it, user is short 1 mainspace edit. Get it and it will be unstriked Flag_of_Nazi_Germany_(1933-1945).svg  Blackout   Spreichen Seite   09:05, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * None of us are saying it's an award- and it's not only the blogs and news he excels at. Read my reasons for supporting to see why some of us think he deserves it. 09:02, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments/Questions
16:37, April 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's a good trait to have. 16:46, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Not really. 19:51, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

'' I know but N7 will be good anyway, I just know this. YellowRiolu Leave a message! 16:42, April 29, 2011 (UTC)''

OK, let me introduce myself first. I'm Xd, a guy who hangs out too much in yer IRC channel and consequently I see N7 almost daily. I have no experience of N7's wiki behavior, but I've seen him reporting vandals and stuff in IRC&mdash;which indeed is a good thing. However, I've also seen some immaturity like mentioned above. I'm sorry to say, but I don't think he would be a good IRC operator&mdash;at least not now. However, he is a nice guy overall. Just my two cents. Xd1358 19:13, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

The amount of times I've had to quiet N7 on IRC is probably more than anyone else... 19:51, April 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah but I say something about PS3 and "You are quieted on #wikia-cod". :3 — 19:57, April 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nice try, but /nick nou when the channel is muted doesn't help your cause :P 20:06, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

I strongly stress that adminship is not an award. When i look at all the support votes they say that ooh hes a good user and he puts up news fast and he deserves it. But this only deserves an award not adminship 08:23, May 6, 2011 (UTC)