Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Crazy sam10 (3)

Hello I am applying for a position of Bureaucrat. I have been a fully active user for close to, if not over, a year now, and in that time I have amassed a multitude of contributions towards the wiki. These contributions being divided between modding the chat function, uploading and maintaining images, editing articles, adding my input into the WR and dealing with nuisance users to the best of my administrative powers.

I feel I can use these rights to greater help the wiki by aiding our current bureaucratic team as the current team seems to find itself busy much of the time, both on wiki and with real life affairs, I myself am active most of the day, and free for most of it, or at least in a position where I can stop what I’m doing to deal with a more important issue. I feel I can deal with users for extended periods of time rather effectively, so I can aid the current team by being able to be communitarian with any issues any users may have, as well as dealing with any altercations that may arise between users. I’m also never too frightened to ask for help from other users over issues I feel I can’t deal with myself. I also feel I can help as I am commonly checking pages many users may otherwise miss, such as the recently revamped MW2 challenges page, and the images on the MW2 emblems page, and will soon start with the titles. As well as mainspace pages I also commonly check on user group pages to check if users have posted any requests, such as The Image Guardians, where I accepted one of the applications as it had been unnoticed for such a large amount of time.

I understand there are some pre-existing issues I have, such as I understand I can get quite heated in WR discussions (most people do in all honesty), and I know I can work on something like this to better suit my rights. I am also aware I can often be quite pessimistic at times, this is something of a personal gripe, however this is also a flaw I can work on to improve my disposition. I feel by understanding these flaws aids me in overcoming them, as well as being in a position to better understand opposes.

In closing, I feel that my communitarian stand point, freedom and flexibility, input into the wiki and desire to help on older and unnoticed pages makes me a good candidate to join our current team and be a valuable asset to the Wiki in the future. 17:46, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

(Also had to add the (RfB) as it was the only way to create the page, a rename or something may fix this.)

Support
18:50, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Sam's always been a great fellow to interact with, be it asking for help, dealing with an issue or disagreeing with something. Aside from that, I see him really up for the job considering the bureaucrats seem to be busy a lot, he deals with user right related stuff and he has had a hefty amount of experience as an admin; not only has he been one for almost a year, but he's one of the most active users I see as well. I see no harm in making Sam becoming a bureaucrat, and instead he will make a good service to the wiki. --MLGisNot4Me talk 20:22, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

I don't really see why you need B'crat tools, but we don't have many anymore and are a good, active user who has done this wiki good. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 21:43, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Sam and I are constantly on different ends of debates and I know we have different opinions on how to deal with certain situations. Nevertheless, Sam is hugely dedicated to this wiki and he is a very effective admin and editor both on Wiki and in the Chat. I 100% trust that the wiki and it's community would only benefit if Sam was given Crat rights. 22:36, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

"Weak" only because I feel this nomination does not say why you should be a bureaucrat at all (nor do I really see the support section saying much either). However, since apparently there is only two active crats at the moment, I guess we could use another one - and you seem the most experienced and therefore up to the job. -- 23:34, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose
Your attitude with some people strikes me as one that is not suited towards being a oreocrat, sorry. 19:06, January 5, 2013 (UTC)