Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put Request for Improvement on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications
Article must have some problems such as:
 * Article written in first person and/or biased.
 * Article doesn't contain any images.
 * Article is short.
 * Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
 * Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Voter qualifications

 * Voter must be a registered user who has either accumulated 50 edits on this wiki, or has proven that they otherwise know what they are doing, per COD:IAR.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

 * Theater
 * Sicily 1
 * Trenches (United Offensive)
 * Paris
 * North African Campaign
 * Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript
 * Carnival
 * Damage Multiplier
 * Hill 400
 * GRU

Requests for Improvement Drive Status
Please post all nominations below.

Battle of Kursk
The Battle of Kursk plays a big role in the in the Russian Campaign of COD:UO. While COD:UO itself has not been placed on ID, a lot of people have agreed that a large amount of COD:UO articles need improvement. I noticed that this one in particular, for the role it plays in the Russian Campaign, is very sloppy, needs some good images and has very little information, that is way I nominate it for Improvement Drive Status. 22:58, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As the nominator. 22:58, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I think the nomination says it all. Poor article, and it really needs some beefing up.  20:48, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Agreed, Per nom.  00:13, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose
'''This nomination is frozen for now. Please nominate articles for removal.''' 04:14, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think with now that a few articles have been removed we can unfreeze this. 19:29, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * There are few articles left. I support unfreezing this article but we now have to wait for Poketape to approve. 20:39, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well I really wanted more articles nominated for removal, but I guess we got a few removed so voting can resume. 00:13, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Remove Mission Mode
I did a huge amount of fixes, and the only thing it might be lagging is tips, but those aren't necessary. I feel it can be removed from the ID. 00:19, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Support
As nominator 00:19, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Per nomination, minus the tips. Conqueror of all Zombies 19:48, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Per Nom. 07:49, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose
07:54, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

07:58, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

19:29, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

22:05, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

22:12, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

15:15, April 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you 23:28, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination Fails, Article will be kept in the ID. 00:13, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Closing In
This is a mission in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Mobilized, that only seems to appear with only one line of information, only saying "Its the eight campaign mission". Its a very sloppy page that needs more info immediatly.

Support
As Nom. 02:15, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

09:34, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Super mega ultra duper Support &mdash; One of the worst articles on this wiki for sure. It's a very bad stub and could do with a full-blown upgrade like most of the other Modern Warfare Mobilized articles, but one at a time! 17:14, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

18:47, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

00:13, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

00:31, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Removing Mission Mode (2)
As I got the majority of mission info and images and ParagonX7 wrote a few as well, I think this article doesn't lack anything anymore and can be safely taken off (finally).

Support
08:08, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

09:30, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

09:34, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

18:47, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Thank you guys 00:09, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

per all 00:13, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

00:30, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose
Article will be removed from ID 14:52, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of Carnival
I put in a large block of text for the overview of the map, put in a few pictures and stuff, and added a little trivia. Hopefully this article doesn't lack anything else, and that it's enough to allow this page to leave Improvement Drive.

Support
As nominator. 08:48, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Per nom. 08:53, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

per om nom nom 14:18, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Per the nominator. 14:23, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

14:48, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Shi No Numa
This definetly needs fixing. The bullets are all messed up, there is a tips section, and there are many other sections that should not be in the article. WhinoTheRhino 03:15, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) The article is good and doesn't need it at all.03:24, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I've just taken one look at the article and there is certainly no need for this page to be in the Improvement Drive. This page has a hefty amount of information, good quality images, and I certainly don't see the problem with a tips section or any other sections for that matter. Finally, I don't see any discrepancies in the formatting of the sections. Improvement drive articles are only those that are in need of info and pics. If you wish to, you can clean up the article by yourself.  04:46, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Its a perfectly fine article actually.  14:23, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

09:54, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Ridley
This article is a Playable Character that only has ONE line to give who this person is, and it only says hes a S.F.S.G and nothing more, this is a perfect example on an article that needs information immediately.03:57, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Support
As Nom 03:57, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

14:53, April 7, 2012 (UTC)