Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles/Archive 3

Dogs
This is an okay article right now, but I'm working on a sort of revamp for it to make it even awesome...-er. This will simply just be a great FA by the time January hits.

Support - as nominator. 22:30, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Support - It looks pretty good and it blends MW2 and WAW. 03:05, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Support - Very good article. 03:15, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Lack of consistency in the first paragraph. It starts by talking about dogs as if they only appear in World at War, only to mention their first appearances in the second section. On top of that, grammar issues and a distinct lack of categories. 04:51, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Support I nominated this last month and still think it's a good article. I'll try to fix it.--Poketape 04:59, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
 * Change to Oppose I've noticed the errors with this article and have decided it needs too much work to be featured.--Poketape 05:42, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Some of the links and other text-related BBC-codesque things are off, like where it mentions game types under World at War. Other than that, it's a decent article, but the grammar is not up to par with what should be featured.

Oppose - Not a very remarkable article, and I don't really see why we would nominate an article on dogs. 18:33, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Like COD4 said, I don't see the article's importance. It still doesn't seem to be good enough.-User:Bignicky9 December 24, 2009

Oppose- As stated above, this article is not yet good enough to be a featured article. Doc.Richtofen 11:30, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

MacTavish
Support - I nominate Mactavish because it is a good, well rounded article that relates to the hot topic Modern Warfare 2. Doc.Richtofen 11:28, December 5, 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Don't put page breaks between nominations. Also, you use three equals signs for a new nomination, not three =, not three '. Thanks.--Poketape 21:38, December 5, 2009 (UTC) User doesn't have enough mainspace edits.--Poketape 21:42, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Helicopter
I nominate this article because I think it's interesting and needs a lot less work than Dogs.

Support As nominator.--Poketape 05:42, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Support Its a good article, good information and detail. 14:25, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Support A great article, but could do with a little improvement, adding more MW2 info etc. and images, but otherwise great

Support Added even more info - good article. 18:33, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose- Good article, but there are more articles that are more important and better written. Unsigned vote and user added two votes to the oppose counter.--Poketape 02:22, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - I've never liked this article. Like, ever. 04:20, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Support Great article. I'm going to find new images. Resnov1997 16.51, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - There are more articles that are better written and by FAR more important. Unsigned vote. 16:33, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - More important articles that are well written. Helicoptors have no real significance in the game, and as I said more important articles are better written. Oppose - There are simply not enough links on this page, although someone may fix this issue soon. If the lower portion of the article receives a major overhaul, I may change my mind. CoD addict 05:30, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

No Russian
I think this is a very good article because i think it's interesting and one of the most controversial level in gaming history.

Support As nominator.--Resnov199712:44, December 8, 2009 (UTC) User doesn't have enough mainspace edits.--Poketape 02:20, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

One Shot, One Kill
the article about this is good because its informative and because its great Article has already been featured.

Ultranationalist Party
Throwing this in rather late as an option. Anyway, it's a great article, good details, and it looks nice. So, yeah.

Support - As nominator. 23:44, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Support - Not bad at all. 10:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Opose - It isn't written well enough, more important articles.

Support - Good writing and good lists. I like it.

Support - Highly detailed. An excellent article. Ollie7475 21:48, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Support - It looks very organized, cool pics, a good article to have. User:Bignicky9 12:00, Dec, 24, 2009 (UTC)

Support - It looks great, little to no punctuation or grammar errors, and is an important part of the series that needs to be recognized. CoD addict 05:26, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Support - very good, but not a lot of images, there should be one or two for the Actions and tactics section. but apart from that its great.

Simon "Ghost" Riley
This could be an interesting article to feature, since Ghost was apparently voted as one of the most favourite characters in MW2 and he just simply looks awesome.

Support as Nominator or the person who put this article in the first place Shockeye7665sc 09:26, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Just had a MW2-related featured article. 10:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC) Nominator does not have required edit count. 18:16, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

MacTavish
Major character in both Modern Warfare games, and is also playable in both. Kills major villians in both games.

Support as Nominator Peter Griffen Boy 23:08, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Support-It's weird, I already nominated this but I didn't have enough edits. Good Article Doc.Richtofen 12:08, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Support - A great article, better than a lot of the above. good images, good information, a perfect article.

Support - I prefer Ultranationalist Party, but this is also a good article. 21:26, December 24, 2009 (UTC)