Forum:World at War Attachment Pages

Is it really necessary for each weapon in World at War to have its own attachment subpage? The M1897, for example, has just three images of two attachments. I personally think that isn't enough to necessitate its own gallery and not only looks a bit stubby but very empty. It looked a hell of a lot better on the main article as a subsubheading. I can see why a separate page is needed for some weapons, but for others it just looks ridiculous.

In a sleep drived induced attempt to be smarmy, as the Opel Blitz has three separate paint jobs in Call of Duty 2, I expect a camouflage page before Friday.

Danke 02:26, June 12, 2012 (UTC)