Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion

Articles for Deletion is where anyone can nominate an article to be deleted for whatever reason, and everyone decides if it should. To bring the article up for deletion, add "" to the top of the respective article, and make a subsection on this page about it.

If the article qualifies for speedy deletion (see criteria for speedy deletion), use "" instead, and don't make a subsection here. An administrator will find it and take care of it.

Sniper Teams One and Two
Sniper Team One's information is all covered in the articles for Smith and Scully, whilst Sniper Team Two's information is covered in the articles for Archer and Toad. These articles are useless and repetitive.  Toon Ganondorf  (t   c)  11:43, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Chief z 22:49, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

01:15, September 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * The SAS is a regiment within the British military. It itself is not even one faction. 00:37, September 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Chief z 08:32, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 09:43, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

B-52 Stratofortress
This is Rolling Thunder. What's the point of having it as an article when the article Rolling Thunder already lists the name of the aircraft? They both are the same thing, but Rolling Thunder has less real life info. (Which is good.) Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:35, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:35, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Eltomo85 talk 18:43, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt.Frank Woods 19:38, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 19:50, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Smuff 19:53, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

No Scoping
Very small. Can easily be covered in Quick Scoping

As nominator--Super2k 22:20, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

- 22:24, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Per Scotland. Why don't we just delete every article detailing techniques in CoD? nlmgr

like what?--Super2k 22:31, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I agree to delete it. But we have to fuse it with quick scoping and call it "Scoping Techniques" GunsSwordsFlames 02:38, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

It's not like quick-scoping. Similar, but not. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 22:43, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I just think that they are each small enough that they warrant one all-encompassing article--Super2k 22:48, September 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's slightly irrelevant, as the Wiki has plenty of small articles, but because they pertain about different elements, they get their own article. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 22:54, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

23:05, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Merge into Quickscope. Both are terms that are heavily used and engrained in the COD community, regardless of what you may think of it. Not sure it's detailed enough to warrant its own article. Maybe even just a mention in a glossary or something.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:38, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

--Scottie theNerd 06:04, September 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * No scoping is as much as a technique as pushing the fire button. It's not a technique; it's a term. --Scottie theNerd 03:49, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Change to -  17:13, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  23:30, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Just merge it into Quickscope/Noscope like above. It'd help a bunch more to people too. YellowRiolu-Always on Xbox. 15:31, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

LITE992 16:01, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

New Idea: How about we delete Quick and No scoping and make an article called: Sniper Techniques I'm a bit new here. So when does voting end? --Super2k 17:59, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

CALL OF DUTY 4 MODERN WARFARE: STRATEGY GUIDE
Do we even need this? Its not even a strategy guide. It should be deleted. Eltomo85 talk 17:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * PS, doesn't this qualify for speedy deletion. ScavengePro1.pngEltomo85 talk 17:06, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a junk article. I don't see why it shouldn't be speedy-deleted. --Scottie theNerd 17:07, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination closed: Speedy-deleted. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  20:24, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Type 95 Scout Car
Just a background item. We don't have an article for Trees. Dolten  Let's Talk  23:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

23:39, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's used in a killstreak, this isn't used for anything. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

23:41, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

The Smuff 16:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've never seen it being drove, nor drivin it. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  18:29, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Quick Scoping
We shouldn't have a page for this. It falls under the same category as Mike Myers, but we refuse to make a page for that.

23:44, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten  Let's Talk  23:46, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

per no scoping --Super2k 01:00, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 03:53, October 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png Let's Talk  20:22, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

No Scoping
I think it should be deleted it is just like Quick Scoping just something you can do Nardei99 01:13, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

as nominator Nardei99 01:14, October 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Already nominated. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  01:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Randomly Generated Soldiers
We don't need a page for this everybody should know what they are i made the page and I feel that it should be deletedNardei99 01:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

- as nominator Nardei99 01:24, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

01:31, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

01:35, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

I was going crazy ignore my vote i really like generated soldiers Nardei99 01:39, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Strategy Pages _______________________

Think we don't need these like we have strategy guides for an entire game NOT NEEDED Nardei99 21:06, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Commander
I'm not even sure if this qualifies as a legitimate article, but just incase, I'll put it up here. It's a general term, has little to no reference to Call of Duty and is barely featured other than a multiplayer rank.

Smuff [The cake is a lie. ] 10:40, October 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nomination closed: Speedy deleted. Dolten 1164610-433px usmc logo svg large.png  Let's Talk  20:21, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Kelvin
All information was moved to another page and deleted from it, I don't know why it is still up. I wouldn't have added it but there is no admin on that will delete it. Dolten  Let's Talk  18:25, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Put sdelete on pages like those. They should be SPEEDY deleted. 13:24, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Speedy deleted. Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion should have sdelete added to them and not nominated here. 14:49, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hunter (H Company, 1 Bn. 75 Ranger Regiment)
Wrong format, no information and doesn't deserve a page. Dolten  Let's Talk  20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Completely broken page. Must be sdeleted. 13:24, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Speedy deleted. Pages that meet the criteria for speedy deletion should have sdelete added to them and not nominated here. 14:49, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support
This page is, IMO, an open invite for loads of people to come along and spam it with custom game modes that they made up. Sgt. S.S. 12:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 12:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

This page is like what Sgt. S.S. said spam and the article also has bad grammer and should be deleted and it also seems that a 5 year old wrote this article Sgt Sprinkles 13:10, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

16:40, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

YuriKaslov 16:55, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose
I think this page can become useful for users that want to learn some new games to play with their friends. I understand that a person or two might try to be cool and put some random thing on there, but if that random thing is something you can play, then its a Custom Game Mode. I guarentee you that this page can become one of the biggest pages on the wiki.  Diante  grassstain     13:24, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then post it as blog post. 13:33, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

We really should keep this. It could work if we really get tired of the game modes. GunsSwordsFlames 16:45, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comment
This article is not about real game modes just fanon if this deserves to be kept then so should no scoping and quick scoping and thats not going to happen.Sgt Sprinkles 13:28, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Custom game modes, quick scoping, and no scoping are seen in Call of Duty every day. So none of those articles should be deleted.   Diante  grassstain     13:32, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 13:40, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Screaming and all that stuff shouln't but Custom Game Modes, no scoping, and quick scoping should because they are played in the game. --  Diante  grassstain     13:51, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

May I remind you that this wiki is a canon site. Custom game modes are not canon. If people want to find custom game modes to play with their friends, there are sites on the Web who can tell them about these to much greater effect than us. Sgt. S.S. 15:32, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Sgt. S.S. 20:47, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Holy pistol
Can easily be covered in M1911. 00:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC) 00:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)