Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship

Give a good reason and request for adminship in the bottom subsection if you wish to become an administrator, or bureaucrat.

Requirements for adminship
To qualify to be an administrator, you must meet a set of requirements.

You must
 * Have been here for at least a month.
 * Have edited at least a few hundred times.
 * Be civil.
 * Have no record of serious offenses (E.g. vandalism, personal attacks).
 * Be known and trusted by others.

Regulations for voting

 * Keep your cool. RfAs have been known to host some nasty flame wars. If another user disagrees with you and gives you trouble, just keep your cool and don't fight back. That may sound "cowardly", but if you fight back, you could receive a block, and/or make the flame war escalate.
 * New users can't vote. Sorry, but that's the way it is. Someone can easily make a bunch of dummy accounts, all vote for their friend to be an admin, and unfairly turn the tide of the vote. For this reason, new users cannot vote for the possibility of being a sockpuppet. Anyone trying to use sockpuppets will be blocked.
 * Be descriptive. Though you don't have to, it's a lot easier for a discussion if you say why you're voting what you're voting. If you just say "Support - --Example 06:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)", you're not really saying why the candidate should be an admin, and your vote may be excluded and strikethrough ed. It's not just for supports, but for all votes.

Glossary of vote titles
Not just the standard "Support" and "Oppose"s are used in RfAs. This subsections lists mosts vote types.
 * Support - A positive vote.
 * Strong Support - A very positive vote.
 * Weak Support - A positive vote, but the voter is bound to change their vote.
 * Neutral - A vote saying that the voter is unsure about the nominee/between supporting and opposing.
 * Neutral leaning towards Support - A neutral vote, but closer to support than oppose.
 * Neutral leaning towards Oppose - A neutral vote, but closer to oppose than support.
 * Oppose - A negative vote.
 * Pending - Vote not yet decided.
 * Comment - A comment.
 * Not yet - A negative vote saying that the nominee has not been around long enough, but would be admin material if they had been around for a longer time.
 * Question - A sort of comment that asks a question. (Ex. What would you do with your tools)

Requests
If you feel you are up to the job, make a subsection for your request, and the community will discuss it.

Imrlybord7 needs your vote!
I guess this has sort of maybe been a long time in the making, possibly. For anyone who doesn't know, I was the driving force behind getting the correct stats for the guns, perks, etc. of CoD4 and CoDWaW put onto the wiki. I have also contributed more to the Modern Warfare 2 page than anyone else, including much of the weapon list, perk list, attachment list, and equipment list. So if you agree that I would be a good addition to the admin team, gimme some support! If not, no hard feelings, just explain why you feel how you do. Thanks! Imrlybord7 21:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * To put it bluntly, I am the reason this wiki receives so much traffic. People come here for MW2. Imrlybord7 16:43, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - No offense but you hardly participate in community discussions and there is no anti vandal work on your part. I think rollback should be given and you should focus on vandalism some more first-- 21:10, October 9, 2009 (UTC)


 * Changing to extreme oppose per this-- 21:21, October 9, 2009 (UTC)


 * If someone continually makes an incorrect edit despite the complaints of other users, I'm not going to be nice to them. Imrlybord7 21:27, October 9, 2009 (UTC)


 * COD:AGF-- 21:32, October 9, 2009 (UTC)


 * Just in case anyone is curious about how that ended... http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Patrickd13 Imrlybord7 16:49, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Support - He was instrumental in making the CoD: MW2 page what it is now. Plus I told him I would support him and I'm not one to go back on my word. But Bigm's right, Imrlybord. You're going to need to tone it down a bit with the way you talk to users, even if they're being complete idiots. I understand how you feel, there are times when I just want to unleash a storm of names and swears, but I always keep a halfway pleasant attitude, at least in what I'm typing. If you do continue with your current attitude towards idiots you'll find yourself in a situation just like Bigm was, and nobody wants another one of those. But anyway, as long as you control yourself I think you'd make a great addition to the admins. 02:18, October 10, 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, to tell you the truth I've been thinking the same thing. Thanks for the support and the honesty. Imrlybord7 02:41, October 10, 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem, anytime. 02:46, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Extreme Oppose - You have had several minor pa's on the MW2 talk article. Although not that serious, it doesnt give a good impression of you. Not to be a dick (although I know I am going to sound like one) but I have double the editcount you have, and therefore more experienced. (this is an assumption - I might not be correct). I think you deserve rollback. You have been the greatest help with MW2 by a long way.08:37, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Comment One of the more serious ones was directed at me. From MW2 talk Archive 1

"This might be a bit out of line, but I just have to respond to whoever wrote the above paragraph. You are an idiot. An absolute idiot. Portal? And FYI all bullets move at an infinite velocity in Call of Duty (because there aren't any bullets, just numbers being instantly projected from the gun onto wherever the shooter is aiming), so there would never be a perk for "faster bullets." Your ideas are incredibly stupid and I hope you never edit here again. Imrlybord7 07:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)"

Tbh I wasn't very happy about that, and that has scarred your reputation (from my viewpoint at least). 08:42, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Comment directed towards SaintoflosangelesXD(m)

Bigm didn't deserve the situation we forced him into. 08:44, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

You seriously suggested that a portal gun or the ability to fly would be perks in MW2. And Bigm has done far more to you than I have, but for some reason you worship the guy. Imrlybord7 16:36, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Comment Is there any way we can actually get this some publicity? Only 3 people have voted. Imrlybord7 16:53, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Comment I don't worship Rs4ife. don't be stupid. 17:14, October 10, 2009 (UTC)