FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.


Type-1 Handgun and Type-2 HandgunEdit

They're completely pointless, and will confuse readers. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 23:18, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - as nominator. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 23:18, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - no reason. Qw3rty! 23:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support -Per nomination --CodExpert 23:32, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per everyone. Beretta92FSSgt.Safe-Sex Wrap itbefore youtap it! 23:34, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support- Per everyone Nacht der Untoten Poster2Conqueror of all Zombies TalkNaziZombies 23:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Pages have been deleted because they have not been referenced in any CoD website. It seems to be original research. Darkman 4 04:01, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Robert BowlingEdit

I just don't think it's necessary. He's not a CoD character. There are two sides to the argument, keep him, like we keep the console pages, or delete, because he's irrelevant to the games themselves. I don't need him to play my games, but whatever.

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 1
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 4


Support - as nominator IcepacKs 22:51, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral/Comment - There are some wikis, such as the Half-Life Wiki which are full of "real-world" articles, which includes voice actors, production staff, etc., though I'm not sure exactly what the policy on that is here. That aside, the article could be a little better written. Also, if this article does end up staying, then we'll have to start making more real-world articles Ant423 04:00, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - As a notable staff member, information about him would be relevant to CoD. --Scottie theNerd 07:02, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - WoWWiki has articles for practically every important member of staff, so does Half-Life Wiki, and Halo Wiki. Fourzerotwo is the main source of news in terms of Infinity Ward happenings (Maybe Respawn Entertainment soon enough) and has a place on the wiki. Smuff 09:50, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I was just wondering, because the voice actors don't have pages. Neither do Treyarch people or any other IW people. IcepacKs 21:03, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Richard Kriegler is the only other employee of a game developer to have an article, as far as I know. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 01:08, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Although you may not need him while playing the games, he is a valuable source of information and relevant to Call of Duty. Keep the article. ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 18:42, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Scottie. RiotsheildMajor DuNn 18:46, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Perhaps I'm biased as I made the article, but I feel it should stay as he's a very important person regarding Infinity Ward's Call of Duty games, and well-known among the community (whether he's liked or not). The Halo Wiki has an article on their community manager as well, so I don't see a problem. Moozipan Cheese 15:40, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support - So we can have articles on real life PEOPLE but not real life info on guns that are in the game? Doltensig 20:53, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

The information presented in the article has everything to do with the games. It's not discussing his favourite colour or whether or not he likes Justin Bieber. --Scottie theNerd 11:47, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough, switched to Support. Doltensig 13:46, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Eh, you changed from Support to Support? --Scottie theNerd 14:58, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, Oppose, my bad. Doltensig 23:27, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - The reason why I say this is: It's like having a ZombieWiki, without an article on George Romero. Bowling is one of the masterminds behind the Modernwarfare series. Sure it's Meta-article (Meta, real, not in the game), but it's relevant. It could atleast be merged with "Respawn Entertainment", if you absolutely need it gone.PFC.Stockholm 15:14, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Over a month has passed and the Oppose votes outnumber the Support ones. Page will not be deleted. Darkman 4 16:41, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Australia Edit

The content of the article has nothing to do with Call of Duty. The article itself even states that Australia has on direct involvement in the Call of Duty series, therefore in accordance to our push for overhauling the wiki to contain only game-related information, I move that we delete this article. --Scottie theNerd 11:33, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 6
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 1
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 1



Support - Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity strikes again. This really brings up the question of in-universe related articles, as the only mention of Australia relating to Call of Duty is that some of the characters wear Australian flag patches. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 11:38, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Funny you mention this, I was going to bring it up today. Yeah it's pathetic we have this article based on the pretence it appears on a character's arm. Smuff 16:13, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Maybe if it was slightly more involved with the Call of Duty/Modern Warfare series, it could stay, but simply having the flag visible on a soldier's arm isn't really acceptable. Moozipan Cheese 16:32, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - A large number of the 141 soldiers are from the Australian SAS so it warrants a page, if a small one. things like 'kamikaze' have articles. there was hope - while CoD7 was hoped to be in Viet Nam that Australian forces would play a significant part, that there is still a chance they might Agent Tasmania 10:15, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

This has already been addressed in numerous discussions. There is not a "large" number of Australian solders in TF141, and those who are notable enough already have their own articles (see Task Force 141, Rook (Modern Warfare 2)). Having several support characters in a game does not mean that an article about the country they're from. If COD7 does feature Australian involvement, then we'll make an article about the specific Australian unit that is featured rather than the entire country. The history of Australia and the name of its Prime Minister is of no relevance to Call of Duty. --Scottie theNerd 12:06, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Scottie. ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 12:25, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - @Scottie theNerd Right, I guess the voting template is outdated. When does the new one come into play? ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 12:53, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Per Scottie. Doltensig 20:55, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - We do not just have it for a patch on a character's arm. There is a possibility that Australians will be in Black Ops and Rook and Worm from the 141 were also Australian. And while yes it says Australia does not have any direct involvement in the Call of Duty series that statement is mainly aimed at the games set in World War 2. It plays a small role in Modern Warfare 2 and so it is game related it seems hypocritical that Russia and America should still get a page when Australia should not. And I know somebody will say Russia and America play a bigger role in Call of Duty but it sounds like the granularity policy should be in effect execpt apply it to countrys. And yes the name of its prime minister and it's history are of no relevance to Call of Duty but that content can be deleted and we could only leave game related content. (I am going to try to do that within a day or two so hang on). In closing Australia deserves a page as much as Russia or America does.Foxtrot12 17:06, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Change to Neutral-I tried to add info but Scottie is right Australia did not do much for Call of Duty. However I think that we should wait to see if they play a role in Black Ops before it is deleted.Foxtrot12 18:39, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

That's easily a six month wait. While I doubt that Australia will have any significant role in upcoming COD games, we can always re-create the article if we find solid information at a later date. --Scottie theNerd 02:19, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Weak Support - Per all. Emblem-throwing-knife-soda-2-Sgt. Dunn 21:32, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Over a month has passed and page has enough "support" votes. 16:41, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

LuftwaffeEdit

Article has no use to the wiki, is not mentionned in game and barely acts as an enemy force in game. The entire page is history and does not mention the game at any point.

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 5


Support as nominator. Smuff 19:27, May 13, 2010 (UTC)


Strong Oppose - They are an enemy fought in Call of Duty: Finest Hour, and in Call of Duty: Big Red one as the forces that attack you from planes. They are featured in Call of Duty, so I don't agree with your reasons. Braden 0.0 19:33, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - So? We don't have ambulance articles, and you get shot by someone in one of those in No Russian. The article has NO information on this game, thus I see no need in it. Smuff 19:45, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comparing it to the Internal Troops would be a better analogy. The FSB only appears in two (or three if you count the Special Ops mission) levels while the Luftwaffe appears in numerous. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 04:20, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - While the current article doesn't have anything to do with the game, the Luftwaffe does have a significant presence in the Call of Duty series, including the first mission in the British campaign in Call of Duty: United Offensive, in which Doyle shoots down half of the Luftwaffe (or somewhere near there <_<). The article should be improved rather than deleted. --Scottie theNerd 07:28, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Sorry for disagreeing with you Scottie, but you save Hunter Three-One in Modern Warfare 2 and there is no article for that, I can't see why we have this article, if we got rid of Rommel it's only fitting this is removed as well. Tell me you see anything to do with the game listed in that article. Smuff 20:36, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Hunter Three-One is a specific unit that has no other notability in the game. The Luftwaffe is a major armed services branch that is present in every WW2 game and does have notable opposition to the player, in the same way we have articles on the United States Marine Corps, United States Army, German Military, Red Army and so on. --Scottie theNerd 01:44, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

VERY Strong Oppose - Per Branden. Doltensig 20:57, May 21, 2010 (UTC)


Oppose - I assume you've never played anything before Call of Duty 4? CoD:Big red one, you play in a B-17, fighting enemy luftwaffe units. Call of duty: Finest hour, you are a Russian tanker, assaulting a luftwaffe airforce. Call of duty: roads to victory, like BRO's level.PFC.Stockholm 15:08, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - Per Braden 0.0. PvtPvt. Dunn 00:06, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article did not have enough support votes to be deleted. Darkman 4 16:38, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Marines K.I.A. during Shock and AweEdit

Pictogram voting support Support 2
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 7

I don't think it's necessary to have an article on every named Marine who got nuked. Sgt. S.S. 20:22, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 20:22, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support I suggest it should be merged with Shock and Awe, not deleted. Personally, I think, that with videogame wikis noting things that wouldn't normally be noted, that the amount of work put into this page is worth saving. Extremofire 00:44, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - There isn't an article on "every" named Marine. It's a list of Marines that were KIA as listed in a particular mission briefing scene -- a fact that does make it worthy of an article. The article is at least well-presented and does clarify that nature of the list, including several main characters. Merging would be inappropriate, as it would clutter the Shock and Awe article and would result in the articles being split anyway. --Scottie theNerd 01:59, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

'Opp'ose - Wouldn't merging this sort of defeat the purpose of making the Trivia pages? Smuff 14:00, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Merging would clutter the page to much, but we need the information. So just keep it as is. Doltensig 13:41, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Scottie, and merging the page would lead another user to making it a separate page anyway. -- CodExpert 15:10, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Scottie. ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 15:55, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - keep it as a memorial so to speak User didn't sign. --CodExpert 00:09, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I'm not saying we should merge the page, I'm saying we should delete it altogether. We don't base articles on how much effort went into them, we base them on how informative and useful they are. Sgt. S.S. 16:43, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - How is that page not informative? Doltensig 16:45, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I think it's very informative; it's also useful for say, a person that wants to see a list of Marines K.I.A during Shock and Awe. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 16:54, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Scottie. PvtPvt. Dunn 00:07, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose Per scottie, Plus I worked hard on that (100% beside the point i know) GenCain sig T C E B 01:22, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - It's very informative and would clutter the main S&A page if it were merged there. Darkman 4 01:35, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

STRONG OPPOSE my friends dad died in the marines. they have a memorial for him, why not these guys? IPs Cannot vote. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 00:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article has been merged with Shock and Awe. Doltensig 23:22, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

StalingradEdit

This page has little information pertaining to Call of Duty, I believe it should either be deleted or drastically cut-down, it is essentially written as if it were "The History of Stalingrad".

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 1
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 4


Support - as nominator. <Darthkenobi0><Talk>


Oppose- can be fixed to meet standardsTanknlmgrTank 01:19, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- It'll probably be purged once the new notability policy comes into effect. All links to that page can easily be changed to redirect to Wikipedia's Stalingrad article. Darkman 4 01:35, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose- Stalingrad is in a COD COD 2 Finest Hour and World At War, It's the site of the bloodiest battle in history and is featured in many of the WWII COD games, Its like we delete that we should delete Washington DC Because The Russo-American War was there. Gloss Grenade emblem MW2Squelliot Talk Edits. 23:06, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I have adding major information pertaining to Call of Duty, but it may qualify for the improvement drive. --CodExpert 03:31, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral - I really don't know. Emblem-throwing-knife-soda-2-Sgt. Dunn 21:35, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Are you kidding me? Stalingrad is extremely important in Call of Duty! 7th Body 01:29, June 9, 2010 (UTC)7th Body

Strongest oppose ever known to the world - WHY?! Stalingrad, is one of the most historical moments in CoD AND real life! Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity --TMOI 17:45, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - No, don't delete it. The city has important battles in the CoD series such as Vendetta and Comrade Sniper. It may have more, i just really never played the older CoDs. -SpetSnAZ CM

Comment - The RL project has cut it down to size now with only COD related content there is no point in deletion.Foxtrot12 16:50, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page has been reworked to fit the CoD series. Darkman 4 16:38, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

BulletsEdit

Must we have an article on this? I think that if one was a CoD fan, one would have a pretty clear idea of what bullets are, wouldn't you? Sgt. S.S. 17:19, June 8, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 17:19, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support: Agreed. It's not article worthy. Sig-Part1Sig-Part2Sig-Part3 17:27, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support- who would even make an article about bullets. if you play shooting game, and you don't know what bullets are, then you're screwed up. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 21:42, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Why the hell do we need it? 99% of the world's population already knows what a bullet is without playing CoD. And the article is terrible no mention of them in game one fucking sentence about Rojas and an empty placeholder. It made me ashamed to edit here.Foxtrot12 21:47, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article has been deleted. Mortar Icon WaWSgt. Dunn 23:17, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Italian WeaponsEdit

We don't have categories like this (American weapons, Japanese, etc.) --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 19:00, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 19:00, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I made a mistake, could someone remove the category I added? --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 19:01, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Nevermind. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 19:02, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support - No reason for it. Doltensig 20:53, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Has no need. The American weapons and German weapons ones have already been deleted, so it would be pointless to just keep this one. Mortar Icon WaWSgt. Dunn 23:17, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Article has been deleted. Darkman 4 16:38, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Crossbow BoltsEdit

As per the precedent set by deleting all the random individual cartridge pages on the grounds that individual types and calibers of ammunition have absolutely f***-all to do with Call of Duty, I'm proposing the deletion of the Crossbow Bolts page, given that that is whaat Crossbow Bolts are, an item of ammunition for a ballistic weapon. USMC-E3 Griever0311 United States Marine Corps 20:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0

Support - As nominator. -- USMC-E3 Griever0311 United States Marine Corps 20:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Page has been deleted. Doltensig 23:14, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

United States NavyEdit

It has absolutely no CoD related info, it's all RL info. I don't think there's room for improvement at this point anyway. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 23:35, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

I basically gutted the page so I could add two lines in, it was pretty drastic I know, but it's a start, now I just need to actually put something else in it! I need help... Smuff 23:45, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Request withdrawn - Has had all RL info removed, and has nad some CoD info added. Mortar Icon WaWSgt. Dunn 23:46, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

IraqEdit

I do not remember at any time throughout CoD4 that it is mentioned. I definitely do not remember that it was mentioned as the country with no name where half of the game is set in. Yesterday I started a discussion on the CoD talk page about it. I cannot see the point of it existing anymore, and maybe some others do too.

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - as nominator. Attack Rhino 23:57, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Not a notable country in the COD universe; also consider the Nation policy discussion. --Scottie theNerd 09:45, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I think the real reason why it has no relevance to this wiki the unnamed country that a coup d'état and then a military invasion occurs is unnamed. Also, Iraq could never be the country in CoD. Attack Rhino 01:41, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
Support - Per Scottie theNerd. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 13:52, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Emblems Edit

For one, we already have Callsigns/Emblems, and they have exactly the same content. Also, it's a little pointless to say Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 in the name since Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 was the only game emblems were featured in. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Support - Though I am not a fan of saying per someone yet I do it all the time, per Cpl. Dunn. 22px-1888721.png Azuristalk 21:36, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — This would qualify for speedy deletion   Hax 217    talk-page  

Support — Per all  Hax 217    talk-page  

Closed - page has been turned into a redirect. Darkman 4 16:43, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Prestige Rewards Edit

I don't really think you can put anything in a prestige rewards category, and the article it links to now makes no sense as to why it is linked there.

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 13:55, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I agree, nothing much could be added to it. It makes little sense to me. - Bignicky9 00:43 June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Closed Page has been deleted. Darkman 4 16:38, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

POWcamp Edit

"More of a complex duplicate than a straight-out AFD". This map is the same as [1], with basically lacking the same data as one another. I propose we delete this one.

Pictogram voting support Support 2
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0



Support - As nominator. - Bignicky9 00:43 June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Sounds good would probably qualify for speedy deletion.Foxtrot12 08:13, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - It qualifies for speedy deletion. 22px-1888721.png Azuristalk 08:19, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Support - wrong name. SiPlus 09:18, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page has been turned into a redirect. Darkman 4 16:38, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

President of the United States of AmericaEdit

No Significance to the Wiki.

Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support- as nominator. TaskForce141logo-1-Squelliot Talk EditsMw2 cia-1- 01:19, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I made the article to test the boundaries of Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity. As Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity is practically defunct and a new policy is in the works, the decision of this AfD will be noted in the policy. It does fulfil the original notability guidelines in Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity and the Character policy, although the president is never acknowledged as a significant character in COD. However, it is wrong to say that the article as no significance "to the wiki". --Scottie theNerd 07:30, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I put this up for AfD a while ago, for similar reasons to the OP. Sgt. S.S. 18:38, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Has very little significance to any Call of Duty game, other than the dialogue in MW2. Bignicky9 16:46 June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Weak Support - He is barely mentioned in MW2, but if the president has a more important role in a possible MW3, we should put back his page. Happy Boy |Talk17:34, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - What Happy Boy has proposed would work with me. Darkman 4 17:38, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted - Character is only mentioned in Modern Warfare 2 and does not make a direct appearance. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 16:13, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Moses AwaniEdit

We don't need an article on this guy. He doesn't appear in MW2 once. I'm pretty sure this qualifies for speedy deletion, but I posted it here just in case. Sgt. S.S. 08:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 08:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Really trivial character. Unless he appears as the main character of Black Ops (or something along those lines), he is not notable enough for an article. --Scottie theNerd 09:23, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral leaning support - He never appears, but since he is mentioned in the game, according to Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity, we have to keep it. Emblem-throwing-knife-soda-2-Sgt. Dunn 21:36, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity Personal Delta 4-7 50px-USMC-E11Sgt.Maj.Delta 4-7USSOCOM 21:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Delta unless the Granularity policy has changed then it still gets a spot. And per granularity this argument should be closed.Foxtrot12 21:50, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Completely useless. He doesn't appear in any CoD game at all! 7th Body 01:31, June 9, 2010 (UTC)7th Body

Comment - Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity is practically defunct, although the new policy isn't yet out. A lot of actions in this interim will influence how the new policy will be effected. --Scottie theNerd 11:19, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

Support - If he never appeared in CoD it should be deleted. This is a Call of Duty wikia. Not completely history wikia.

Support Comment Consensus can and always will override policy. Now, give us a good reason why it should stay if you want to oppose. daveTalk 01:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

User lacks required mainspace edits to vote. 404 Error File Not Found Please Try Again 01:05, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
No need to strike out the entire thing, at least leave it as a comment. And I've been using Wikia for long enough to be contributing to discussions without being deemed completely unqualified because of a stupid policy, though I will make my edits over time I suppose, if not only to ensure that my opinions can be heard. (I've always believed that IP addresses up through bureaucrats have equal say in all matters not regarding requests for adminship, though I realize that few wikis other than the one I "grew up," using, if you will, see it that way, unfortunately.) It's unfortunate that simply because I choose to not be active in the mainspace of this wiki, I am deemed unqualified to vote. (as it is, extremely large contributions to an article done in one edit, and minor spelling fixes would be deemed equally as one edit- one reason why edit minimums are stupid.) But policies are policies no matter how irrational, I suppose, and when I'm out of my home wiki I guess I'll have to get used to the rules of other wikis. I apologize if this sounds ranty, but I've never been good at organizing thoughts. See you in another 40 edits. (incidentally, the amount of edits I've made will not have had a single darn effect on what I post or how I vote in discussions. Imagine that.) daveTalk 03:19, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted - Character is only mentioned in Modern Warfare 2 and does not make a direct appearance. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 16:21, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler Edit

I'm sure Darthkenobi0 has more to say about this than I do, but Hitler does not play a significant role throughout the Call of Duty games. If my memory serves me right, he is never mentioned by any of the characters directly in the script. The entire article is a history of the man, and the only items that have any relevance to Call of Duty are some trivia points. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 12:24, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support as nominator. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 12:24, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I posted it as an article for deletion because under current policy I believe it qualifies for speedy deletion, I'm not really sure though. <Darthkenobi0><Talk>

Support - I talked about this in the RL project he has no relevance to COD and hearing his speeches are not enough for an article.Foxtrot12 16:46, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support as discussed in Granularity thread. --Scottie theNerd 13:49, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Reznov said something about "destroying Hitler's forces," and that's about the only time I remember anything regarding the monster in the games. daveTalk 00:59, June 24, 2010 (UTC) User doesn't have 50 mainspace edits Random Man 0213 01:03, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted - Character is only mentioned in the Call of Duty games and does not make a direct appearance. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 16:27, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Frozen CrossingEdit

While this is a good article, I'm not sure that we should be covering fanmade stuff like videos on the wiki. I am against it because if we covered fanmade stuff, we'd have a ton of fluff articles.

Pictogram voting support Support 3
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - as nominator. Darkman 4 17:30, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support - I believe there is a fanon wiki Blinzy45 17:32, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - There is, but this is a bit different that a lame fan character. 17:34, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Not notable within the COD universe or context. --Scottie theNerd 16:34, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deleted - It was fanmade, an orphan page, and had little relevance to Call of Duty. Articles like that don't belong here. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 11:28, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Fuck everyone on this wikiEdit

It's spam, its flaming and I'm finished screwing around with it. (NB: Despite the red title, it still exists as of 1:48 PM UTC, 30 June, 2010).

Pictogram voting support Support 1
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - as nominator. Seijana 1:48 PM UTC, 30 June, 2010

Comment- It already has the Speedy delete on the page. And it's a category. Not an article. Munchable901 |TALK? 14:08, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Actually it was an article, but yeah I guess I didn't need to nominate it. Besides, its already been deleted. Seijana, July 2, 07:09 (UTC)


Bridge Edit

This article doesn't state any references, or anything to prove that it was meant to exist. It even says that the map itself doesn't exist, so what's the point of an article on an unreferenced thought?

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator   Hax 217    talk-page  00:36, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — No proof it is to exist. 22px-1888721.png Azuristalk 00:38, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — There are other articles that need the help more. I'm pending on this one. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) - Sorry, confused this with the Improvement Drive. :P

Pictogram voting support SupportCpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting support Support — No sources that states it exists. MarathonProMunchable901|TaLk?SleightPro 02:16, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Fake I looked through the Variety Map Pack's files, and I found absolutely nothing that even makes any references to any map called "Bridge." EON 8 04:01, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Done Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 20:55, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Courtyards Edit

This is one of the most blatant lies I've seen on this wiki. First of all, for Courtyards to exist, its .ff file would have to exist. Its .ff file doesn't exist for several reasons: 1) it doesn't exist, period. mp_court.ff simply does not exist in the directory all other MP maps are in. No file called mp_court.ff even exists at all. 2) To include mp_court.ff ("mp_court" being the alleged codename of the map) would be irresponsible in terms of memory. .FF files are huge - most CoD4 maps are a hefty 30-40 megabytes, some more depending on how big the map is. It doesn't make sense to waste space with a map that isn't supposed to be in the game. 3) The screenshot in the article is a screenshot of Heat. You can get to that area by getting out of the boundaries of the map. 4) Two more "screenshots" that claim to prove Courtyards are just screenshots of Backlot and Showdown. EON 8 03:50, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I don't think it needs to be deleted. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 03:55, July 17, 2010 (UTC)

Change to Pictogram voting support Support — I have reviewed it, and it's fake. There is nothing on YouTube about it. Nothing at all. You'd think that if it existed, there would be some videos on YouTube of gameplay in it. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Done Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 20:55, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Henderson (Call of Duty 4)Edit

Randomly generated character, not under Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deleted. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 19:54, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Erwin Rommel and Assosciated PersonnelEdit

While this has come up before, tht was before the Real Life Project. Taking this into account, the amount of detail for the assosiated articles would be minimal, and going by the basis we don't have Hunter Two-Three, who is actually heard during gameplay in MW2, the articles no longer serve any purpose for the game, especially after the removal of many other similar articles.

Pictogram voting support Support 2
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 0


Support - As nominator. Smuff 02:26, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- It does mention "In Call of Duty 2: Big Red One, Rommel is referenced in the mission "The Desert Fox". Lots of IRL info though, but those can be taken out. MUNCHABLE901 [Talk?] 02:32, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Consensus during the Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity discussion leaned towards removing historical articles. --Scottie theNerd 10:47, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- That does not mean much really, we don't have articles for Magazines, something Foley gives you in MW2, and if we remove articles such as FluGruger, something we actually see in game, it is ridiculous this man has an article devoted to him. Even if we removed all info, the article would only be 2 lines long, qualifying as a stub. We don't need those, want those and are trying to expand or eradicate them. Smuff 19:16, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Support - If we remove all the Real Life info about him, what the hell kind of an article would be left eh? We should just delete it. Seijana 08:16, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted - Character does not make a direct appearance in any of the Call of Duty games. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 11:58, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

George S. Patton Edit

He was mentioned once in the game, and doesn't play a significant role. Basically the same reasons as Hitler, and that article was deleted. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting support Support22px-1888721.png Azuristalk 18:45, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Lol hitler TheManOfIron 09:55, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Please stop leaving irrelevant comments, it's stupid and unnecessary.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — If Hitler was deleted, this should too.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Same reasons as Hitler TG (t c) 11:29, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Support- Per All Nlmgr 12:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all Seijana 07:12, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article is deleted. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 03:15, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Maxwell and MurphyEdit

These two supposedly alternate as the SAS member who joins Price, Nikolai, Soap and Gaz in Hunted and Death From Above. I played the first level a little while ago, and was accompanied by Sergeant Stevenson, not Murphy or Maxwell. A YouTube channel walkthrough features Private Abbott, whilst another features Sergeant Henderson, and a third features Private Miller. Furthermore, the Hunted article itself says that the soldier is randomly generated, which appears to be the case and nullifies the need for either of these articles. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose- The fact that he has a set appearance when generated makes him important. Nlmgr 12:15, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — But that's my point. He doesn't have a set appearance. He's a randomly generated character who has been deemed to represent all randomly generated SAS troops in that level. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:17, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — If he is a randomly generated character, he doesn't get a page. Simple. Seijana 08:11, July 31, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting oppose OpposeCall of Duty Wiki:Granularity--WaW Pickup STG44Rampantlion513 WaW Pickup MG42Wanna Talk??M1919 hud icon WaWEditsSVT-40 pickup icon WaW 21:56, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Please read the arguments before simply saying Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity - the reason these two are up for deletion are because they are randomly generated characters, hence not deserving of an article. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:11, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Both are randomly generated characters.>==>Munchable901 <Contact> 03:13, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Randomly generated characters don't get articles. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 03:20, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Nominated both for speedy deletion. Seijana 07:07, August 7, 2010 (UTC)


ValentinaEdit

A name that is mentioned isn't enough reason for an article to be made. It could be a reference or similar. It could be added to the level's trivia section.

  • Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. LITE992 20:17, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Non-notable character. Makes no appearance in the game and is mentioned only once by a character who doesn't even have an article himself. --Scottie theNerd 10:10, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 10:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. Sgt. S.S. 11:46, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — This character is not notable enough to have her own article.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  11:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 11:56, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Per CoD4. Seijana 07:14, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed - Page has been deleted. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:18, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Carentan (Map) Edit

More of a complex duplicate than a straight-out AFD. We have two articles on Carentan: Carentan (Map) and Carentan, France. Currently, Carentan is a redirect. I propose that we merge both articles into Carentan. Previously, Chiafiend12 argued that "Carentan, France" should be the proper article name as it appears on the COD2 loading screen. However, it is universally referred to as plainly "Carentan" and the article title should reflect that. --Scottie theNerd 11:48, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

I never argued that it shouldn't be moved, for reference.
In Call of Duty 2, in all three of the three places where I found the map to be named (map select menu, loading screen and in-game score menu) it was always the full "Carentan, France", so it is not universally called "Carentan". US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 21:08, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
Unfortunately, at the moment I can't verify the name from COD1, which should take precedence. By "universal", I meant that all players refer to the map as Carentan, but that's not relevant anyway. --Scottie theNerd 09:34, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
I believe the article should be called Carentan, along with the redirects for both names. Doltensig 21:04, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Pages were merged. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 21:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

F CompanyEdit

Only mentioned once and no characters from CoD2 are confirmed to be in it. It isn't notable enough to have its own page.

Pictogram voting support Support 4
Pictogram voting neutral Neutral 0
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose 1


Support - as nominator. Darkman 4 00:15, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - There was a link from E company, and when it was removed, someone added again. Under the same nomination logic, E Company should be deleted also. Conqueror of all Zombies 00:32, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Background mention. With no specific characters or appearance in the game, there's nothing we can write about Fox Company. --Scottie theNerd 05:02, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Gloss Grenade emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Gloss Grenade emblem MW208:30, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Not in CoD? Shouldn't be in the Wiki. Faction USSR MWSgt. SpetSnAZ CM 02:47, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted - No significance to Call of Duty. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 21:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Smith (S.A.S.)Edit

The article itself notes that Smith is a randomly generated character. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 10:46, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Toon Ganondorf (t c) 10:46, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article qualifes for speedy deletion. It's gone. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 03:36, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Nuke LauncherEdit

It's a mod some hacker put into the game, not a hidden weapon like the Holy Pistol or BRAIINNSS...

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Chief z 04:30, August 13, 2010 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment Comment — You have proof? Bravoalphasix 12:27, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting comment Comment — Erhm... It's red link... Emilios1310 12:20, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Article qualified for speedy deletion. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 21:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.