FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.


Slayback (Modern Warfare 2)Edit

This is a very small article, and the character, while not randomly generated isn't significant. TheManOfIron 09:58, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator TheManOfIron

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — CODwiki doesn't only keep articles for significant characters. Slayback has a definite appearance and is thus documented as such. The fact that he has two confirmed, consistent appearances is more than most minor characters. --Scottie theNerd 10:19, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Unless the Wiki plans on going through and deleting every single minor character, such as Barton, Arem, Lovejoy, West, Roycewicz, Wallcroft, Griffen, Keating, Massey and Volker, all of whom are less notable or just as notable as Slayback, I see no reason why this article should be deleted. TG (t c) 10:22, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Eating food with a M4A1 foregrip sticking out of your hand in a painful manner isn't notable... TheManOfIron

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I think you should have noted that Slayback is from World at War, not MW2 TG (t c)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The article length is irrelevant, if he appears in the game and isn't randomly generated then he gets his own article.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment CommentPvt. Slayback is from MW2 you bumnugget. TheManOfIron
  • Pictogram voting comment Comment — Wow, magnitudes of maturity from you. I made a simple mistake TG (t c) 10:29, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — This falls under Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Um... Ukimies, at the moment everything falls under Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — What?. DevilWarrior112 11:56, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose OpposeCOD:AGF & Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity azuris_ 12:52, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

PaulsenEdit

This player is addressed once by name, and is otherwise just a dead character. I propose this for deletion. TheManOfIron 09:58, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator TheManOfIron

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Paulsen makes a clear and definite appearance in a mission, and is thus noteworthy. --Scottie theNerd 10:20, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Unless the Wiki plans on going through and deleting every single minor character, such as Barton, Arem, Lovejoy, West, Roycewicz, Wallcroft, Griffen, Keating, Massey and Volker, all of whom are less notable or just as notable as Paulsen, I see no reason why this article should be deleted. TG (t c) 10:22, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — He is still explicitly mentioned, and just because he's dead doesn't mean we can't have an article on him.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — This falls under Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC) Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Ukimes.--Ray Gun 3rd person view WaWRampantlion513 Monkey bomb Wanna Talk??Wunderwaffe DG-2 3rd Person WaW 02:35, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

AbbottEdit

No content whatsoever. No evidence to suggest that he isn't a randomly generated character. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:17, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity Ray Gun 3rd person view WaWRampantlion513 Monkey bomb Wanna Talk??Wunderwaffe DG-2 3rd Person WaW 21:26, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity doesn't count for randomly generated characters. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 21:33, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Weak Oppose — I think - don't quote me on this - that Abbot always appears, at least once, in that level. On that basis alone, I think it might stay. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 03:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — But does he perform a specific task, like Roycewicz, West (USMC) or Wallcroft? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 05:01, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — This guy is probably a randomly generated character Seijana 06:45, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I'm with JJR, I believe he appears every time. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 03:57, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Played through Ultimatum, not only did he not appear once but I think ALL the random SAS characters use an MP5SD. Seijana 06:57, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Played through Ultimatum, and Team Three comprised of Sergeants Grant, Pearce and Griffen. Not only did Abbott not appear, but there was not even a Private on the level. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:33, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Then I got to Gaz's station and was joined by Compton, Lewis, Roth and Rankin. No Abbott Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:33, August 8, 2010 (UTC)


Change to Pictogram voting support Support — - thanks for doing some work, Gandorf, and if that's true and Abbott didn't appear at all, a random name has no use on our wikia. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 01:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Nominated for speedy deletion Toon Ganondorf (t c) 11:29, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)


StealthEdit

A disambiguation page is unnecessary for this, and if people are interested in the killer challenges, the can just go look at the challenges page. Plus, stealth is much too general to warrant a page.

Support- As nominator Nlmgr 12:30, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Disambiguations are needed for articles with similar titles, this is the case, so there is no need for deletion.Lieutenant General Emblem MW2SkullRodFrostyTalk?12:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)


Comment- But it only links to one page.Nlmgr 12:37, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Check again, there's two links. Lieutenant General Emblem MW2SkullRodFrostyTalk?12:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comment- I didn't know that guides were considered official, or if they were just a blogging phenomenon.Nlmgr 12:42, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3Edit

Is this the same as Call of Duty (2014)? If so, we should delete one of them. If not, forget this nomination.

PS: For some reason the wiki thinks Call of Duty (2014) doesn't exist. It does as of now. Seijana 07:54, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

They are different games. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

There should not even be articles for them, there is no info whatsoever. We should delete them until info is released. Cpt. RileyLet's Talk 08:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

There's info, look at the references for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 as well as Call of Duty (2014). --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:50, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
It proves that they are in production. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:51, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — You obviously don't get it Ganondorf. I was nominating these in the event that they were about the same game. Since they are apparently not, we forget this nomination. Seijana 05:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It shows that it is in production. No doubt that it will have content next year, so why delete it just to remake it? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 04:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

List of weapons by mapEdit

I don't really see a point in this article - by the time it's finished for every single game it will be HUGE. I don't understand why it's necessary.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  11:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The point of this article is to provide a different organization of information. I started this page because I searched for such a list but didn't find one. The reason I wanted this info is that only some weapons are available to the give command for each map. When you use give all, you have to cycle through all weapons, which is very impractical. This list shows you which weapons are available, so you can pick the two weapons you want, rather than searching through the map for them.

If the article becomes too long, it could be split up into separate articles on a per-game basis.

If there isn't any other user who finds this remotely helpful, then go ahead and delete it.

Attys 16:32, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — We appreciate your help, but the list of weapons is truly unnecessary. If we included the MW2 weapons as well, the page would be massive. It's not necessary.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  11:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — There's a list of weapons found in each mission's infobox. This article really isn't needed. LITE992 20:09, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — This is rather unneeded, if someone were to look for weapons, they could simple go to :Category:Weapons or one of it's subcategories. --CodExpert 20:12, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Absolutely pointless. If somebody wantd to find a specific weapon, they could just search for it or look in the infobox. Cpl. Wilding 20:23, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — If you couldn't find this information, then it should be put into the mission and weapon articles, instead of a whole new one. SystemOperator Lord Aggregation Spam box! 09:16, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Consultants who wish to discover whether a weapon is available on a map should check the pages of the map or the weapon. This page is useless. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 10:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Weapons Edit

We already have several other ways to find weapons. I think we should delete this, what do you all think ?

  • Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. US Army OF-10 General Cod1 Talk 7:58, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Page isn't needed when we have categories and templates for the same purpose. LITE992 19:45, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — What's wrong with having a universal weapons page?. Seijana 06:42, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — At the moment it seems to redirect to :Category: Weapons --Scottie theNerd 03:12, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — It's not needed, and all it does is redirect to :Category: Weapons DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:20, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Since it's just a redirect, what'd be the point in deleting it? Seijana 03:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Its a damn redirect. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Strike (Single Player) Edit

It is redundant now that this page exists. Also, this nomination for deletion is coming from the person who created the page. EON 8 03:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting oppose Weak Oppose — Just for the reason that I didn't exactly want to make the other page. But hey - I want to see what others think. If people want the individual pages or the one list, I'll be fine. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 03:14, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Why should this page be deleted when we have other cut mission pages? LITE992 13:57, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — It has practically no content, I think what info there is should be merged with another relevant article.Seijana 03:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Uhm. No. Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity. Personal XxBESTxxSNIPER Coolest-handgun2TheManOfIronCoolhandgun2-right

Pictogram voting support SupportMinor scrapped Call of Duty 4 missions >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 11:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. It was moved to a better page. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Category: Ranks Edit

Contains only Real-Life information. The only element pertaining to COD is the list of characters of that particular rank, which is non-notable. Ranks alone are not important in the COD universe. --Scottie theNerd 11:31, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

I agree, it's basiclly useless. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 15:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Are you suggesting deleting the category? Or all the articles in it as well? Seijana 04:00, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Both. --Scottie theNerd 13:12, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed.

White Tape CamouflageEdit

Has been merged with FAMAS, it should have already been deleted. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 17:11, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — I support, but there's still a lot of pages that link to it. It's gonna leave a lot of red links if deleted, so those will need to be cleared up. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 21:21, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I thought I took care of most of them, seeing as I took it off the weapons template... DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 21:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Commentthis lists the rest. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I've gotten it down to this page, Docs page and the templates page. I honestly can't find it on the templates page, go ahead and delete it and it will be easier to find. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:06, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Why has it been merged? The FAMAS and the camouflage are different things. Just because they camouflage is only seen on that weapon doesn't mean it should be merged. NZ Richtofen Doc. Richtofen 21:33, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — It's only seen on the FAMAS, which is good enough for me. But it also won't get seen as much as it's own page. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:06, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Nomination closed - Article will not be deleted, nor merged. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Lets Talk 22:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Its been speedy deleted. Not sure when. Seijana 03:48, August 7, 2010 (UTC))

North Africa Edit

Geographical information; no content related to Call of Duty per Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity and related discussion. --Scottie theNerd 13:11, August 7, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. How many times have I said that recently? Blast Shield Emblem MW2Vinnv226JuggTitle2Blast Shield Emblem MW2 20:54, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Could still be improved. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)


Ryan LastimosaEdit

I propose the deletion of this article as it has very little to do with the game, and as the character is mentioned in a newspaper, it shouldn't have its own page. -- Eltomo85 15:32, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — I agree, as I feel that it is just Valentina all over again. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 23:25, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Background mention. There are many characters who are mentioned in newspaper clippings in a one-off manner, and there is absolutely nothing we can write about them. --Scottie theNerd 05:46, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Pointless article. As if anyone is coming to the wiki wondering if we have information on Ryan Lastimosa. The vast majority of players wouldn't even give the newspapers a second glance, let alone a detailed study. Though I do believe that characters with major roles that were named in newspapers, such as SecDef Cullen and possibly Vorshevsky, deserve articles. SaintofLosAngelesXD(M) 20:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - passed. Worthless character. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Cook (Call of Duty 4)Edit

He is a somewhat random character that deserves no article. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 21:15, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Although not mentioned, Cook is important because he is an easter egg glitch character. People will have heard of Cook through talk in the community, and therefore we should have an article on him. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 21:37, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Actually, I've noticed that this page is an exact copy of Game Over alternate ending. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 00:05, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I moved it. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 02:54, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed: Article has been moved. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 02:55, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Dwight D. EisenhowerEdit

Never seen nor mentioned in-game. If we have a page for him we may as well have a page on Joseph Bottorff. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 22:03, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting support Support — I made the article to demonstrate the wide-reaching consequences of having the Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity policy, which stated that as long as it is mentioned in the game, it has a place on the wiki. Eisenhower is indirectly referenced in Call of Duty when his Order of the Day is shown in the second campaign mission loading screen. In accordance to our policy discussion and pending Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity removal, I believe this article should be deleted. --Scottie theNerd 03:00, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Eisenhower has an article? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 06:42, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting support Support — Well, the Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity no longer is used, so there really isn't that much purpose to keeping this article, is there? Blast Shield Emblem MW2Vinnv226JuggTitle2Blast Shield Emblem MW2 20:55, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - passed.

Ilyushin IL-2Edit

We don't make pages for every battle that's taken place, why have any? DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 03:02, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

It's a plane, not a battle—and we already cover plenty of aircraft. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 06:03, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
I was about to say the same thing earlier (somehow, my IP at work got blocked from July, even though I had been editing from it for weeks). I'm not sure what the nomination is about. --Scottie theNerd 07:06, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
Wrong article. I think.... DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 21:02, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare_Achievements_walkthrough (history - links - logs)Edit

There is not another achievement guide so why should this game have one. If people want a giude they can go to sites dedicated to guides, this one however, is not.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Blinzy[45] 07:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per above. Blast Shield Emblem MW2Vinnv226JuggTitle2Blast Shield Emblem MW2 02:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — It's a broken link   Hax 217    talk-page  18:23, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 22:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — So the justification for deleting it is that nothing like it exists? Well maybe you're looking at fixing the problem the wrong way. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 04:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass, as Toon made a good point. Darkman 4 15:24, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

GaryEdit

It's a disambiguation for a Wikipedia article and Roach. A link for Mr. Oldman's article can be put on the Reznov page; no need to make a disambiguation for it.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator  Hax 217    talk-page  18:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Why do we have a disambig for a wikipedia article? Per Hax. Happy Boy BasketballHappy Boy T M E 18:34, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Redirect to Gary "Roach" Sanderson - Disambigging to articles on other sites just isn't practical or useful enough to be done. However, the page existing as a redirect to the only item left would be both practical and useful. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 18:59, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Closed page has been turned into a redirect, per Chiafriend12.   Hax 217    talk-page  21:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

LuftwaffeEdit

I think it is irrelivant to the call of duty wiki. They are only seen in the background of most games.NZ Dempsey Dempsey115 17:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — They play a major part in the Bomber mission in United Offensive. Cpl. Wilding 18:05, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

They also play major roles in Liberators and Operation Little Satrun/Airfield Ambush. Not to mention they are additionally seen in Stalingrad, Not One Step Back, Breakdown/Into Red Square, A Desert Ride, Into the Heartland, We've Been Through Worse, Assault on Matmata, and Vendetta. US Army WWII MSGTSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 20:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Machine GunEdit

Full of real-life information, with only a few paragraphs pertaining to Call of Duty. The Call of Duty information deals with tactics, which can also be found on the Light Machine Gun page and the machine guns' respective pages.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator LITE992 16:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per LITE992. What with the volley guns and what not. This page was probably copied from Wikipedia anyways. Griffon26GRIFFON26 OMFG 21:30, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — While the current article is loaded with RL information, could we perhaps adapt it for descriptions on stationary MGs found throughout the games --Scottie theNerd 01:26, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

In that case, it could be renamed "Mounted Machine Gun" to better fit the subject. LITE992 15:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. I will suggest the idea of changing the page to focus on the mounted machine guns on the article's talk page. In the meantime, the article will be taken off AFD. LITE992 15:23, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Game ConsolesEdit

Per the no Real Life policy, these don't need to be on the wiki. They don't add anything relevant to the games, anyway. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting opposeOppose - They technically have to do with CoD. (I don't know how to add the symbols. Can some one do that for me? Conqueror of all Zombies 01:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Xbox Live, PSN, and the internet all connect players to multiplayer. Since they also have to do with Call of Duty, must we have articles on them too? Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting opposeOppose - Why would you delete this stuff! This helps FNG pick a choice of having a ps3 or xbox360 with the COD games. My friend saw this wikia and check on which console he should choose for his new COD game. Just leave the console alone. Many FNG will find this site just to pick choices. GunsSwordsFlames

That honestly makes no sense to me. Wikipedia can do those articles better, so we don't need to have them.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  12:25, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Done   Hax 217    talk-page  01:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
We're are a comprehensive wiki on the Call of Duty series, not consoles. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — What RL policy?  Hax 217    talk-page  01:14, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Don't we have a policy on the wiki excluding real life information? Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:16, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I feel they should stay. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — I find them fairly important. And per all. Personal XxBESTxxSNIPER Coolest-handgun2TheManOfIronCoolhandgun2-right 01:53, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — They may be important, but to who? The technical information and background of the consoles provide very little in relation to Call of Duty. They provide minimal information on the games released on the platforms -- review sites do a far better job at discussing differences between version. We can assume that readers know what an Xbox 360 is; we don't need an article about it or another other platform. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — That's what I was trying to say. Thanks for helping me clarify my position, Scottie. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 05:08, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

What if they don't know what a Wii or a PSP or a nintendo DS is? Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity... Personal XxBESTxxSNIPER Coolest-handgun2TheManOfIronCoolhandgun2-right 11:27, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — I find them too important for deletion. Some people know CoD wiki, but don't know wikipedia! Emilios1310 12:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — What? I'm sorry, but your argument makes no sense. Wikipedia is one of the largest and best-known sites on the internet. We are a medium-sized, at best, site covering one game series. There's no way anyone knows about us, but not Wikipedia. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 06:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
That is indeed a very bad misapplication of Call of Duty Wiki:Granularity (which is about to be phased out anyway). If a reader doesn't know what a PSP, CODwiki isn't going to tell them much about it -- and really, Wikipedia wouldn't either. Hey, some users don't know what intelligence is, but we're not going to start writing articles about etiquette, politics and insults. --Scottie theNerd 10:09, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
I think there are inportant. Per all oppose NZ Dempsey Dempsey115 19:18, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Unless you can elaborate on how they are important, that argument as no ground. --Scottie theNerd 06:43, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Scottie has made the most logical argument here, so I'm agreeing with him on this one. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:58, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I think they're good articles and help people choose the best console to get CoD games with, they don't hurt anything either. Don't delete them. Didn't know this was a serious decision either, I thought it was just disgruntled vandalism at first. ArcboundMyr 16:29, August 16, 2010 (UTC)killerface45 18:23, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

How do the articles help people choose the best console? --Scottie theNerd 03:34, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Once again, I have to agree with Scottie. Consoles are not what the COD Wiki is about, I'm sure Wikipedia or even a Wikia dedicated to consoles is a better alternative. Blast Shield Emblem MW2Vinnv226JuggTitle2Blast Shield Emblem MW2 01:27, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — They are not related to Call of Duty, nor are they mentioned in any game. Therefore, they should be deleted. YuriKaslov 03:44, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — COD:NO - Wikipedia. And, consoles are not related to games stories. >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 10:58, September 2, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting support Strong Support — Per Scottie, they do nothing for the wiki.DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — Per all supporting, especially Scottie's point above. LITE992 18:01, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — This is a Call of Duty website. Game console pages are irrealevant. Personal Joe Copp sig 18:03, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I believe that we should provide the pages with basic information on what games are featured for each, possibly as redirects to categories? The relevance is obvious, but whether it's our job to cover consoles or the multiplayer networks is debatable. Personally I think we should do as we've done with weapons, link to the Wikipedia article and contain all the relevant information, primarily the games supported/released. --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:35, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie's point above. Eltomo85 08:39, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

i don't like em killerface45 18:23, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Without Game Consoles, how would we play CoD? Faction USSR MWSgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:40, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

We also can't play CoD without electricity, oxygen, food, microprocessors and thumbs. Please elaborate on your reason. --Scottie theNerd 04:42, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — we need these pages Nardei99 01:04, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment — Reasons please? DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 01:06, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I think there needs to be something on the wiki which clearly shows which games are on which consoles/platforms -Personal StB sig StB Flag 16:11, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Isn't that what Wikipedia is for? Pirateflag emblem MW2 The Smuff 16:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

How about we just make categories such as "List of Call of Duty Games for the Wii" and delete the console pages?M249 menu icon CoD4gamemasta424 TalkM249 menu icon CoD4 16:34, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — On the one hand, I agree that this is what Wikipedia's for, but on the other hand, I also agree that they're of some slight importance. Sgt. S.S. 19:59, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

In what way is an article about a console important to Call of Duty? --Scottie theNerd 22:15, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Changing to Strong Oppose. Having read the Wii page, I can see how information on the consoles is useful and relevant to the Wiki. You see, Wikipedia is not a magical place where everything you can possibly need to know on a topic is listed - none of the information listed on the console pages will be listed on Wikipedia, which is what some people here are suggesting. I feel that the pages should stay. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 09:55, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

None of the information will be listed on Wikipedia because most of the information isn't to do with the console, but with the games on the console (and until recently, it was mainly World at War). You won't find that information on any other console article. --Scottie theNerd 11:47, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page deleted. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 00:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Capture of Alejandro RojasEdit

The article's subject is already covered here and here. Another article is redundant. Sgt. S.S. 13:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 13:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Redundant article. The information is covered identically and more concisely in the other articles. --Scottie theNerd 15:24, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — What about articles like Invasion of Virginia? They are of the same type as this one, so why not take them out as well?  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  15:29, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Well, the invasion of Virginia was a whole fictional battle in itself, so I'd say it's article-worthy. Capture of Alejandro Rojas, however, was just that - the capture of Alejandro Rojas. We've already had an article on the execution of Yasir Al-Fulani, and this article should be deleted on the same grounds as that. Sgt. S.S. 17:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Besides the fact that its useless, its not even accurate - claims that 13 Task Force 141 members were killed, but Royce, Meat and Driver equals three, not thirteen. However, I do agree with Sgt. S.S. about the invasion of Virginia. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:48, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Sgt. S.S. Cpl. Dunn(Talk)

Pictogram voting support Support — It's part of conflict, not conflict itself. >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 10:59, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Covered information.DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per All. ----Morgan-- 08:24, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed, article has been deleted. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 23:37, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Camp Toccoa(Place) Edit

Barely any actual information pertaining to Call of Duty. Could be merged with Camp Toccoa (Level).

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 20:37, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Mostly RL info. Probably would be best to merge.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  12:53, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — On the basis it is merged. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Not really much to merge over anyway. bibliomaniac15 06:40, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Merge what little there is to be merged, create redirects if necessary --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:32, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per everyone. Faction USSR MWSgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:42, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page deleted. Semtex HUD icon MW2 Bovell Talk | Contrib. 00:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

4677 Brookmere Road Edit

well there isn't much to say its about a house that most players only spend a few minuets in.

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator.--Super2k 14:21, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Non-notable location. Player spends only a limited time there and the events are better covered in other articles. --Scottie theNerd 14:42, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — It would be better off expanded upon in the Exodus article. -- Chief z 15:07, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 16:26, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all. Gold emblem MW2DevilWarrior112Talk Edits 10:53, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie --Morgan-- 08:25, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Only thing need to know is that the HVI is there ☆xNi ght mare (Talk)☆ 01:32, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — It's non-notable, if it's okay with everyone I'll just redirect the page to Exodus (Modern Warfare 2), since it is relevant, just not notable enough for its own page. --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:37, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. Faction USSR MWSgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:38, September 18, 2010 (UTC)


Nomination closed. Page merged with Exodus (Modern Warfare 2). DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 23:33, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.