Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion/Archive 7

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

Slayback (Modern Warfare 2)

This is a very small article, and the character, while not randomly generated isn't significant. TheManOfIron 09:58, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Support — As nominator TheManOfIron

Oppose — CODwiki doesn't only keep articles for significant characters. Slayback has a definite appearance and is thus documented as such. The fact that he has two confirmed, consistent appearances is more than most minor characters. --Scottie theNerd 10:19, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Unless the Wiki plans on going through and deleting every single minor character, such as Barton, Arem, Lovejoy, West, Roycewicz, Wallcroft, Griffen, Keating, Massey and Volker, all of whom are less notable or just as notable as Slayback, I see no reason why this article should be deleted. TG (t c) 10:22, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Eating food with a M4A1 foregrip sticking out of your hand in a painful manner isn't notable... TheManOfIron

Comment — I think you should have noted that Slayback is from World at War, not MW2 TG (t c)

Oppose — The article length is irrelevant, if he appears in the game and isn't randomly generated then he gets his own article.      10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

• Comment — Pvt. Slayback is from MW2 you bumnugget. TheManOfIron
• Comment — Wow, magnitudes of maturity from you. I made a simple mistake TG (t c) 10:29, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — This falls under COD:G. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Um... Ukimies, at the moment everything falls under COD:G Dolten Lets Talk 22:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — What?. DevilWarrior112 11:56, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — COD:AGF & COD:G <choose><option>azuris_</option><option> Azuris^talk</option> 12:52, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Paulsen

This player is addressed once by name, and is otherwise just a dead character. I propose this for deletion. TheManOfIron 09:58, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Support — As nominator TheManOfIron

Oppose — Paulsen makes a clear and definite appearance in a mission, and is thus noteworthy. --Scottie theNerd 10:20, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Unless the Wiki plans on going through and deleting every single minor character, such as Barton, Arem, Lovejoy, West, Roycewicz, Wallcroft, Griffen, Keating, Massey and Volker, all of whom are less notable or just as notable as Paulsen, I see no reason why this article should be deleted. TG (t c) 10:22, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — He is still explicitly mentioned, and just because he's dead doesn't mean we can't have an article on him.      10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — This falls under COD:G. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 10:26, July 22, 2010 (UTC) Oppose — Per Ukimes.--Rampantlion513 Wanna Talk??File:Waffe.png 02:35, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Abbott

No content whatsoever. No evidence to suggest that he isn't a randomly generated character. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:17, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support — As nominator Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:08, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — COD:G Rampantlion513 Wanna Talk??File:Waffe.png 21:26, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — COD:G doesn't count for randomly generated characters. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk) 21:33, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Weak Oppose — I think - don't quote me on this - that Abbot always appears, at least once, in that level. On that basis alone, I think it might stay. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 03:15, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — But does he perform a specific task, like Roycewicz, West (USMC) or Wallcroft? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 05:01, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support — This guy is probably a randomly generated character Seijana 06:45, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — I'm with JJR, I believe he appears every time. Dolten Lets Talk 03:57, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Played through Ultimatum, not only did he not appear once but I think ALL the random SAS characters use an MP5SD. Seijana 06:57, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Played through Ultimatum, and Team Three comprised of Sergeants Grant, Pearce and Griffen. Not only did Abbott not appear, but there was not even a Private on the level. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:33, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Then I got to Gaz's station and was joined by Compton, Lewis, Roth and Rankin. No Abbott Toon Ganondorf (t c) 03:33, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Change to Support — - thanks for doing some work, Gandorf, and if that's true and Abbott didn't appear at all, a random name has no use on our wikia. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 01:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Nominated for speedy deletion Toon Ganondorf (t c) 11:29, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Stealth

A disambiguation page is unnecessary for this, and if people are interested in the killer challenges, the can just go look at the challenges page. Plus, stealth is much too general to warrant a page.

Support- As nominator Nlmgr 12:30, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Disambiguations are needed for articles with similar titles, this is the case, so there is no need for deletion.Talk?12:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- But it only links to one page.Nlmgr 12:37, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Check again, there's two links. Talk?12:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment- I didn't know that guides were considered official, or if they were just a blogging phenomenon.Nlmgr 12:42, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Is this the same as Call of Duty (Sledgehammer games)? If so, we should delete one of them. If not, forget this nomination.

PS: For some reason the wiki thinks Call of Duty (Sledgehammer games) doesn't exist. It does as of now. Seijana 07:54, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

They are different games. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

There should not even be articles for them, there is no info whatsoever. We should delete them until info is released. Cpt. Riley^{Let's Talk} 08:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

There's info, look at the references for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 as well as Call of Duty (Sledgehammer Games). --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:50, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

It proves that they are in production. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 08:51, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — You obviously don't get it Ganondorf. I was nominating these in the event that they were about the same game. Since they are apparently not, we forget this nomination. Seijana 05:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — It shows that it is in production. No doubt that it will have content next year, so why delete it just to remake it? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 04:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

List of weapons by map

I don't really see a point in this article - by the time it's finished for every single game it will be HUGE. I don't understand why it's necessary.

Support — As nominator.      11:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — The point of this article is to provide a different organization of information. I started this page because I searched for such a list but didn't find one. The reason I wanted this info is that only some weapons are available to the give command for each map. When you use give all, you have to cycle through all weapons, which is very impractical. This list shows you which weapons are available, so you can pick the two weapons you want, rather than searching through the map for them.

If the article becomes too long, it could be split up into separate articles on a per-game basis.

If there isn't any other user who finds this remotely helpful, then go ahead and delete it.

Attys 16:32, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — We appreciate your help, but the list of weapons is truly unnecessary. If we included the MW2 weapons as well, the page would be massive. It's not necessary.      11:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support — There's a list of weapons found in each mission's infobox. This article really isn't needed. LITE992 20:09, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support — This is rather unneeded, if someone were to look for weapons, they could simple go to Category:Weapons or one of it's subcategories. --CodExpert 20:12, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Absolutely pointless. If somebody wantd to find a specific weapon, they could just search for it or look in the infobox. Cpl. Wilding 20:23, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support — If you couldn't find this information, then it should be put into the mission and weapon articles, instead of a whole new one. ^System_Operator Lord Aggregation Spam box! 09:16, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Consultants who wish to discover whether a weapon is available on a map should check the pages of the map or the weapon. This page is useless. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 10:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Weapons

We already have several other ways to find weapons. I think we should delete this, what do you all think ?

• Support — As nominator. General Cod1 ^Talk 7:58, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Page isn't needed when we have categories and templates for the same purpose. LITE992 19:45, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — What's wrong with having a universal weapons page?. Seijana 06:42, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — At the moment it seems to redirect to Category: Weapons --Scottie theNerd 03:12, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support — It's not needed, and all it does is redirect to Category: Weapons Dolten Lets Talk 22:20, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Since it's just a redirect, what'd be the point in deleting it? Seijana 03:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Its a damn redirect. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Strike (Single Player)

It is redundant now that this page exists. Also, this nomination for deletion is coming from the person who created the page. EON 8 03:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Weak Oppose — Just for the reason that I didn't exactly want to make the other page. But hey - I want to see what others think. If people want the individual pages or the one list, I'll be fine. Juan José Rodriguez reportin' for duty. 03:14, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Why should this page be deleted when we have other cut mission pages? LITE992 13:57, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support — It has practically no content, I think what info there is should be merged with another relevant article.Seijana 03:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Uhm. No. CoD:G. File:Coolest-handgun2.jpgTheManOfIron

Support — Minor scrapped Call of Duty 4 missions >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 11:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed. It was moved to a better page. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Category: Ranks

Contains only Real-Life information. The only element pertaining to COD is the list of characters of that particular rank, which is non-notable. Ranks alone are not important in the COD universe. --Scottie theNerd 11:31, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

I agree, it's basiclly useless. Dolten Lets Talk 15:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Are you suggesting deleting the category? Or all the articles in it as well? Seijana 04:00, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Both. --Scottie theNerd 13:12, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Passed.

White Tape Camouflage

Has been merged with FAMAS, it should have already been deleted. Dolten Lets Talk 17:11, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Support — I support, but there's still a lot of pages that link to it. It's gonna leave a lot of red links if deleted, so those will need to be cleared up. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk) 21:21, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — I thought I took care of most of them, seeing as I took it off the weapons template... Dolten Lets Talk 21:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — this lists the rest. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk)

Comment — I've gotten it down to this page, Docs page and the templates page. I honestly can't find it on the templates page, go ahead and delete it and it will be easier to find. Dolten Lets Talk 22:06, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Why has it been merged? The FAMAS and the camouflage are different things. Just because they camouflage is only seen on that weapon doesn't mean it should be merged. Doc. Richtofen 21:33, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — It's only seen on the FAMAS, which is good enough for me. But it also won't get seen as much as it's own page. Dolten Lets Talk 22:06, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed - Article will not be deleted, nor merged. Dolten Lets Talk 22:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Its been speedy deleted. Not sure when. Seijana 03:48, August 7, 2010 (UTC))

North Africa

Geographical information; no content related to Call of Duty per COD:G and related discussion. --Scottie theNerd 13:11, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie. How many times have I said that recently? 20:54, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Could still be improved. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Ryan Lastimosa

I propose the deletion of this article as it has very little to do with the game, and as the character is mentioned in a newspaper, it shouldn't have its own page. -- Eltomo85 15:32, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Support — I agree, as I feel that it is just Valentina all over again. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 23:25, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Background mention. There are many characters who are mentioned in newspaper clippings in a one-off manner, and there is absolutely nothing we can write about them. --Scottie theNerd 05:46, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Pointless article. As if anyone is coming to the wiki wondering if we have information on Ryan Lastimosa. The vast majority of players wouldn't even give the newspapers a second glance, let alone a detailed study. Though I do believe that characters with major roles that were named in newspapers, such as SecDef Cullen and possibly Vorshevsky, deserve articles. SaintofLosAngelesXD(M) 20:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - passed. Worthless character. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Cook (Call of Duty 4)

He is a somewhat random character that deserves no article. Dolten Let's Talk 21:15, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Although not mentioned, Cook is important because he is an easter egg glitch character. People will have heard of Cook through talk in the community, and therefore we should have an article on him. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 21:37, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Actually, I've noticed that this page is an exact copy of Game Over alternate ending. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 00:05, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I moved it. Dolten Let's Talk 02:54, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed: Article has been moved. Dolten Let's Talk 02:55, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Dwight D. Eisenhower

Never seen nor mentioned in-game. If we have a page for him we may as well have a page on Joseph Bottorff. Dolten Let's Talk 22:03, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

• Support — I made the article to demonstrate the wide-reaching consequences of having the COD:G policy, which stated that as long as it is mentioned in the game, it has a place on the wiki. Eisenhower is indirectly referenced in Call of Duty when his Order of the Day is shown in the second campaign mission loading screen. In accordance to our policy discussion and pending COD:G removal, I believe this article should be deleted. --Scottie theNerd 03:00, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

• Support — Eisenhower has an article? Toon Ganondorf (t c) 06:42, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Support — Well, the COD:G no longer is used, so there really isn't that much purpose to keeping this article, is there? 20:55, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - passed.

Ilyushin IL-2

We don't make pages for every battle that's taken place, why have any? Dolten Let's Talk 03:02, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

It's a plane, not a battle—and we already cover plenty of aircraft. Sgt. Chiafriend^Rifleman 06:03, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

I was about to say the same thing earlier (somehow, my IP at work got blocked from July, even though I had been editing from it for weeks). I'm not sure what the nomination is about. --Scottie theNerd 07:06, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Wrong article. I think.... Dolten Let's Talk 21:02, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass. Darkman 4 15:21, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare_Achievements_walkthrough (history - links - logs)

There is not another achievement guide so why should this game have one. If people want a giude they can go to sites dedicated to guides, this one however, is not.

Support — As nominator Blinzy^[45] 07:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per above. 02:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — It's a broken link   Hax 217    talk-page  18:23, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Sgt. Chiafriend^Rifleman 22:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — So the justification for deleting it is that nothing like it exists? Well maybe you're looking at fixing the problem the wrong way. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 04:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Didn't pass, as Toon made a good point. Darkman 4 15:24, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Gary

It's a disambiguation for a Wikipedia article and Roach. A link for Mr. Oldman's article can be put on the Reznov page; no need to make a disambiguation for it.

Support — As nominator  Hax 217    talk-page  18:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Why do we have a disambig for a wikipedia article? Per Hax. Happy Boy ^{T M E} 18:34, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Redirect to Gary "Roach" Sanderson - Disambigging to articles on other sites just isn't practical or useful enough to be done. However, the page existing as a redirect to the only item left would be both practical and useful. Sgt. Chiafriend^Rifleman 18:59, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination Closed page has been turned into a redirect, per Chiafriend12.   Hax 217    talk-page  21:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Luftwaffe

I think it is irrelivant to the call of duty wiki. They are only seen in the background of most games. Dempsey115 17:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — They play a major part in the Bomber mission in United Offensive. Cpl. Wilding 18:05, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

They also play major roles in Liberators and Operation Little Satrun/Airfield Ambush. Not to mention they are additionally seen in Stalingrad, Not One Step Back, Breakdown/Into Red Square, A Desert Ride, Into the Heartland, We've Been Through Worse, Assault on Matmata, and Vendetta. Sgt. Chiafriend^Rifleman 20:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Machine Gun

Full of real-life information, with only a few paragraphs pertaining to Call of Duty. The Call of Duty information deals with tactics, which can also be found on the Light Machine Gun page and the machine guns' respective pages.

Support — As nominator LITE992 16:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per LITE992. What with the volley guns and what not. This page was probably copied from Wikipedia anyways. Griffon26GRIFFON26 OMFG 21:30, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral — While the current article is loaded with RL information, could we perhaps adapt it for descriptions on stationary MGs found throughout the games --Scottie theNerd 01:26, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

In that case, it could be renamed "Mounted Machine Gun" to better fit the subject. LITE992 15:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn. I will suggest the idea of changing the page to focus on the mounted machine guns on the article's talk page. In the meantime, the article will be taken off AFD. LITE992 15:23, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Game Consoles

Per the no Real Life policy, these don't need to be on the wiki. They don't add anything relevant to the games, anyway. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Support — As nominator. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:06, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - They technically have to do with CoD. (I don't know how to add the symbols. Can some one do that for me? Conqueror of all Zombies 01:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Xbox Live, PSN, and the internet all connect players to multiplayer. Since they also have to do with Call of Duty, must we have articles on them too? Bovell ^{Talk | Contrib.} 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Why would you delete this stuff! This helps FNG pick a choice of having a ps3 or xbox360 with the COD games. My friend saw this wikia and check on which console he should choose for his new COD game. Just leave the console alone. Many FNG will find this site just to pick choices. GunsSwordsFlames

That honestly makes no sense to me. Wikipedia can do those articles better, so we don't need to have them.      12:25, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Done   Hax 217    talk-page  01:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

We're are a comprehensive wiki on the Call of Duty series, not consoles. Bovell ^{Talk | Contrib.} 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — What RL policy?  Hax 217    talk-page  01:14, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Don't we have a policy on the wiki excluding real life information? Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 01:16, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — I feel they should stay. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk)

Strong Oppose — I find them fairly important. And per all. File:Coolest-handgun2.jpgTheManOfIron 01:53, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Support — They may be important, but to who? The technical information and background of the consoles provide very little in relation to Call of Duty. They provide minimal information on the games released on the platforms -- review sites do a far better job at discussing differences between version. We can assume that readers know what an Xbox 360 is; we don't need an article about it or another other platform. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — That's what I was trying to say. Thanks for helping me clarify my position, Scottie. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 05:08, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

What if they don't know what a Wii or a PSP or a nintendo DS is? CoD:G... File:Coolest-handgun2.jpgTheManOfIron 11:27, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose — I find them too important for deletion. Some people know CoD wiki, but don't know wikipedia! Emilios1310 12:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — What? I'm sorry, but your argument makes no sense. Wikipedia is one of the largest and best-known sites on the internet. We are a medium-sized, at best, site covering one game series. There's no way anyone knows about us, but not Wikipedia. Hk37 Need help? Contact me here! 06:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

That is indeed a very bad misapplication of COD:G (which is about to be phased out anyway). If a reader doesn't know what a PSP, CODwiki isn't going to tell them much about it -- and really, Wikipedia wouldn't either. Hey, some users don't know what intelligence is, but we're not going to start writing articles about etiquette, politics and insults. --Scottie theNerd 10:09, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

I think there are inportant. Per all oppose Dempsey115 19:18, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Unless you can elaborate on how they are important, that argument as no ground. --Scottie theNerd 06:43, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Scottie has made the most logical argument here, so I'm agreeing with him on this one. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:58, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — I think they're good articles and help people choose the best console to get CoD games with, they don't hurt anything either. Don't delete them. Didn't know this was a serious decision either, I thought it was just disgruntled vandalism at first. ArcboundMyr 16:29, August 16, 2010 (UTC)killerface45 18:23, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

How do the articles help people choose the best console? --Scottie theNerd 03:34, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Once again, I have to agree with Scottie. Consoles are not what the COD Wiki is about, I'm sure Wikipedia or even a Wikia dedicated to consoles is a better alternative. 01:27, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Support — They are not related to Call of Duty, nor are they mentioned in any game. Therefore, they should be deleted. YuriKaslov 03:44, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support — COD:NO - Wikipedia. And, consoles are not related to games stories. >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 10:58, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support — Per Scottie, they do nothing for the wiki.Dolten Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Support — Per all supporting, especially Scottie's point above. LITE992 18:01, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Support — This is a Call of Duty website. Game console pages are irrealevant. File:Shotrocket6sig.png 18:03, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — I believe that we should provide the pages with basic information on what games are featured for each, possibly as redirects to categories? The relevance is obvious, but whether it's our job to cover consoles or the multiplayer networks is debatable. Personally I think we should do as we've done with weapons, link to the Wikipedia article and contain all the relevant information, primarily the games supported/released. --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:35, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie's point above. Eltomo85 08:39, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

i don't like em killerface45 18:23, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — Without Game Consoles, how would we play CoD? Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:40, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

We also can't play CoD without electricity, oxygen, food, microprocessors and thumbs. Please elaborate on your reason. --Scottie theNerd 04:42, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — we need these pages Nardei99 01:04, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Reasons please? Dolten Let's Talk 01:06, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose — I think there needs to be something on the wiki which clearly shows which games are on which consoles/platforms -File:Stbaksig.png 16:11, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Isn't that what Wikipedia is for? File:Emblem-pirateflag-1.jpg The Smuff 16:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

How about we just make categories such as "List of Call of Duty Games for the Wii" and delete the console pages?gamemasta424 ^Talk 16:34, October 3, 2010 (UTC) Neutral — On the one hand, I agree that this is what Wikipedia's for, but on the other hand, I also agree that they're of some slight importance. Sgt. S.S. 19:59, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

In what way is an article about a console important to Call of Duty? --Scottie theNerd 22:15, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Changing to Strong Oppose. Having read the Wii page, I can see how information on the consoles is useful and relevant to the Wiki. You see, Wikipedia is not a magical place where everything you can possibly need to know on a topic is listed - none of the information listed on the console pages will be listed on Wikipedia, which is what some people here are suggesting. I feel that the pages should stay. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 09:55, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

None of the information will be listed on Wikipedia because most of the information isn't to do with the console, but with the games on the console (and until recently, it was mainly World at War). You won't find that information on any other console article. --Scottie theNerd 11:47, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page deleted. Bovell ^{Talk | Contrib.} 00:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Capture of Alejandro Rojas

The article's subject is already covered here and here. Another article is redundant. Sgt. S.S. 13:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support — as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 13:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Redundant article. The information is covered identically and more concisely in the other articles. --Scottie theNerd 15:24, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — What about articles like Invasion of Virginia? They are of the same type as this one, so why not take them out as well?      15:29, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment — Well, the invasion of Virginia was a whole fictional battle in itself, so I'd say it's article-worthy. Capture of Alejandro Rojas, however, was just that - the capture of Alejandro Rojas. We've already had an article on the execution of Yasir Al-Fulani, and this article should be deleted on the same grounds as that. Sgt. S.S. 17:58, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Besides the fact that its useless, its not even accurate - claims that 13 Task Force 141 members were killed, but Royce, Meat and Driver equals three, not thirteen. However, I do agree with Sgt. S.S. about the invasion of Virginia. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:48, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Sgt. S.S. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk)

Support — It's part of conflict, not conflict itself. >SiPlus -talk -contributions_ 10:59, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Covered information.Dolten Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per All. ----Morgan-- 08:24, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed, article has been deleted. Dolten Let's Talk 23:37, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Camp Toccoa(Place)

Barely any actual information pertaining to Call of Duty. Could be merged with Camp Toccoa (Level).

Support — as nominator. Bovell ^{Talk | Contrib.} 20:37, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Mostly RL info. Probably would be best to merge.      12:53, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Support — On the basis it is merged. Dolten Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Not really much to merge over anyway. bibliomaniac15 06:40, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Merge what little there is to be merged, create redirects if necessary --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:32, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per everyone. Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:42, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Page deleted. Bovell ^{Talk | Contrib.} 00:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

4677 Brookmere Road

well there isn't much to say its about a house that most players only spend a few minuets in.

Support — as nominator.--Super2k 14:21, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Non-notable location. Player spends only a limited time there and the events are better covered in other articles. --Scottie theNerd 14:42, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support — It would be better off expanded upon in the Exodus article. -- Chief z 15:07, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie. Cpl. Dunn^(Talk) 16:26, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per all. DevilWarrior112^{Talk Edits} 10:53, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie. Dolten Let's Talk 11:22, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie --Morgan-- 08:25, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Only thing need to know is that the HVI is there ☆xNi ght mare ^(Talk)☆ 01:32, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Support — It's non-notable, if it's okay with everyone I'll just redirect the page to Exodus (Modern Warfare 2), since it is relevant, just not notable enough for its own page. --Good editing! Darthkenobi0(talk) 01:37, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Support — Per Scottie. Sgt. SpetSnAZ CM 17:38, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Nomination closed. Page merged with Exodus (Modern Warfare 2). Dolten Let's Talk 23:33, September 30, 2010 (UTC)