FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

Player terms Edit

I think this is a pointless article since we already have a bigger glossary. I think it should be deleted.Dudebot121256 02:53, February 4, 2011 (UTC)dudebot121256

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator.Dudebot121256 02:01, February 5, 2011 (UTC)dudebot121256

Pictogram voting support Extremely Strong Support — covered in glossaryCoD1 Weapon PPShSignatureSpecialOpsGenralMinigunRay Gun 3rd person view WaW 02:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator. Cpl.Bohater

Closed - Seems to be a duplicate article. --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

Chickens Edit

Do we really need this? It's not at all notable, and really, chickens have absolutely nothing to do with Call of Duty.We do not have pages for the other animals in Call of Duty. I actually think it should be speedy deleted, to be perfectly honest.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 2:14, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Chickens actually are related to an achievement of COD:MW2. DarkLocustSlayer 10:21, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

So are monkeys in Black Ops, but we didn't make a page for them. And really, that should just be written in the article for the trophy/achievement Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 10:29, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
OK, never mind, we do have a page for monkeys.My point is we shouldn't. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 10:32, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — If anyone makes the statement "If someone doesn't know what a chicken is then they're retarted," I will destroy them. But seriously, this isn't notable. Shotrocket6 Talk 17:52, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — This is a very healthy article with plenty of information. This wiki is supposed to cover EVERYTHING about the Call of Duty series and this information is interesting to people. Also, There is a trophy and achievement related to chickens as well as an emblem and a few titles about them.Mamemamo1 19:09, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Like I have said, anything pertaining to the goddam trophy can be written in the goddam trophy's article. And how the fuck is this notable in any way? And not to mention there is hardly any information on this article. And your statement about everything being covered is wrong. That falls under COD:GRANULARITY, a policy retired for very good reasons. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:23, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose OpposeChickens are mother fucking badass. I jest. In all seriousness, this article actually has some potential but really needs to be cleaned up. Since it's probably going to end up getting deleted anyway, I've created a page in my userspace. Hud commando CoD addict - 04:14, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

These are notable animals, as they can be interacted with, and are seen multiple times in the series. I may not be able to vote, but they are also a power up in DOA, so therefore we should have a page for it, and maybe other info about chickens can be included. ForceRecon21 14:41, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — As somebody has mentioned they are a powerup in DAO and as with all other usable items, is notable. YuriKaslov 19:41, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - No consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Monkeys Edit

Same reason as chickens. Anything pertaining to the achievement/trophy can be written in the achievement/trophy's article.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 10:36, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per my vote on Chickens. Shotrocket6 Talk 17:54, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Very similar to the chicken situation apart from this article is poor, but it just needs improvement. Someone out there would find this information interesting you know.Mamemamo1 19:12, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Monke's are a enemy seen in the Zombie map Ascension. This article could provide a strategy to killing them. —Unsigned comment was added by John Lisco User lacks 50 mainspace edit requirement. Smuff[citation provided] 20:39, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

What the hell? I didn't write that. And I used to be Dragunov, Smuff, so I do have 50 mainspace edits, but who the hell wrote that in my name? Did someone hack my account? Nikolai Cannot Die 01:11, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
My bad, that was a mistake. Nikolai Cannot Die 06:28, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
Who would find this interesting? It's literally a bunch of monkeys locked in cages hopping around. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - discussion died down --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Reload Cancel Edit

Tactics page.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 08:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per my view on tactics. Shotrocket6 Talk 18:07, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It's not a tactic, the page isn't neccessarily written very well. It is relevant as it affects gameplay and the page is useful for letting our readers know what it is. It could also be improved with the addition of tables of each weapon and its reload cancel time compared to its reload animation time which would take some time but be very useful information. StB 19:34, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

The first sentence reads: "In Call of Duty, reload canceling is a tactic used to decrease reload time which buys precious seconds in intense firefights." Even the article calls it a tactic. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:18, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
That would be why I said it is badly written as an article. It just needs to be cleaned up, not deleted. -StB 14:44, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Bollocks, have an entry for it in the damn glossary. That's what it's there for. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 19:43, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — If it's a tactic just make it a COD:AAV article. Smuff [The cake is a lie.] 12:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Do we really do that to all tactics pages, because I have never seen your argument on any other tactics AFDs. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2
The idea just came to me there, I did it with Camping and it fit nicely. Smuff[citation provided] 14:24, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
Does that call for a redirect then? Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 20:05, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The article is as much about the game mechanic as it is about tactics. It has a lot of good content and has been of the better metagame articles on the wiki. There's no reason to get rid of all that for a super-Tactics page. Also, there's no validity in redirecting to COD:AAV: AAV is not considered the official source of guides, and putting it under AAV means restricting those who can edit the article, which goes against COD:AEAE. --Scottie theNerd 03:59, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Reload canceling refers to the amount of time it takes to reload. If we were to put the difference between actual reload times and animation times an a slot in the weapon infoboxes, and put the term in the glossary, this problem would not be evident. Shotrocket6 Talk 19:48, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment Comment — @YuriKaslov: The Glossary is meant as a quick-reference page that provides definitions. Where a topic has more depth, there's nothing wrong with having an article about it and linking it from the glossary if need be. --Scottie theNerd 03:59, January 10, 2011 (UTC)


Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It's more than just a tactic. --Shaniqua69 08:49, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

What else is it, then? I really like Smuff's idea of making it an AAV article, though. And if someone finds some important info, they can ask a AAV member to put it down in their name or something. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:13, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
Since when does AAV have a monopoly on editing certain articles? No, if we allow this, we set a poor precedent that violates COD:AEAE. --Scottie theNerd 06:40, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
Then don't make it an AAV article. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — To everyone who claims this isn't a tactic, can you please tell me exactly what it is? Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

You could argue that it's an action. In itself it isn't a tactic, but application of it may be tactical. Compare with sprinting, which is tactical but in itself is not a tactic. --Scottie theNerd 05:10, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
Well put. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 20:45, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - no consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan (Black Ops)Edit

Firstly, he's never seen nor heard of outside of the mention on the CIA database. Secondly, he is not notable. Thirdly, we do not have pages on Harris' and Brooks' wives or Weaver's sister, so why have an article on this one person? M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 03:05, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 03:05, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:44, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Extremely Strong Support — I'm getting so sick of having to revert the edits for people who want to think it is Price. Its not even a notable character. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 07:25, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Scratch that. Its not even a character, full stop Toon Ganondorf (t c)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination. elmo's Elmo 150px ramblings 16:14, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — No need to have this character. Only attracts speculators. Doctor Richtoffee Userpage · User Talk 19:32, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The way I see it is that he is the possible killer of the main characters. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 03:24, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Poketape. Cpl.Bohater Talk 00:47, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

We won't know that for a fact unless a sequel is released, though. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:00, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
Forget released, try confirmed or announced. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 12:28, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
Exactly. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 20:47, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - no consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Worlds Collide Edit

Has nothing to do with CoD. It is fan-made, badly writed and badly sung. It is not an "alternate" version of Lulluby for a Dead Man either.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator --Conqueror of all Zombies 00:35, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per COAZ, I cannot believe that we made a goddam page for that. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:44, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Extremely Strong Support — Has Nothing to do with wiki. DMK961 17:53, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - will be deleted if it hasn't been already. --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

GriefingEdit

Pointless Conqueror of all Zombies 00:48, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:48, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per COAZ, it's completely pointless. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC) 06:51, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Falls into the same category as tactics. Can be covered in glossary. LITE992 13:18, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Can be covered in the glossary. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 23:41, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — "Pointless" isn't a legitimate reason for deletion. However, the article should be deleted on the basis that it doesn't have sufficient content beyond the first paragraph, which is better off as a glossary index. A list of things that may or may not be considered griefing is unnecessary cruft -- griefing is simply intentionally ruining the game for others. --Scottie theNerd 03:53, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all technique pages. Cpl.Bohater Talk 17:04, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - passed --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Team KillingEdit

Same category as Griefing.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator LITE992 13:32, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It is a definite part of the game, unlike Griefing. What mystifies me is why you think you can delete both for the same reason.Seijana 23:36, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Can be covered in the glossary. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 23:40, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — This seems like deleting for the sake of it to me, it's a fairly well built up article. Smuff [The cake is a lie.] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Not a tactic. It's a definite part of the game as Seijana says, and there is no point in deleting a good article as Smuff says.  FANMADE_Animated_Derpy_Hooves_desktop_ponies_sprite.gif Sig1.png Sig2.png  14:38, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — A part of the game, especially in Hardcore. --Conqueror of all Zombies 02:09, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — While it is part of the game, the article doesn't provide much in terms of content. Most of the content talks about friendly fire settings. I'm not sure what "especially in Hardcore" has anything to do with whether or not it falls within notability guidelines. --Scottie theNerd 03:50, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - I withdraw, seeing the potential of the article to be written about friendly fire in general as well as team killing. LITE992 11:37, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Only admins can close AfDs. Users do not have ownership of a nominated article for deletion. --Scottie theNerd 10:46, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
My mistake, Scottie. LITE992 11:52, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - no consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

AsiaEdit

It's the most general article I've ever seen, there's nothing useful here whatsoever. Smuff [The cake is a lie.] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator - Smuff [The cake is a lie.] 01:20, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Changed to Pictogram voting support Support — Unnecessary.Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 01:34, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

We have pages for all those countries... Smuff[citation provided] 14:22, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
We do? Woops, you're right.

Pictogram voting support Support — This is a perfect example straight out the numerous Notability discussions. It's not directly relevant and is far too broad for it's actual content. There's nothing exclusively notable about Asia that warrant its own article; just as we don't have articles for Earth or the Universe. On a side-note, I've raised the issue of deleting country articles before, but with minimal community input and no opposition to my suggestion. However, no one has acted on my suggestion. The fact that country articles exist should not be a reason to create other regional articles. --Scottie theNerd 03:47, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Scottie. But wasnt it Toielt Bowl Soldier who suggested country articles be deleted? And why have they NOT been? Seijana 01:08, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Successful AfD, the page has been deleted. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 12:25, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Unknown ManEdit

Speculation. Everything on the page is already covered in various trivia articles.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 04:34, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per everything. M1911 Pickup CoD4 Pvt. Trueblood Hello? Hud aug 04:35, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It is important to Zombies and can't be found if it is deleted.Kratos2144 06:04, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Administrators can also undelete articles when required. Smuff[citation provided] 19:02, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Total speculation. bibliomaniac15 07:31, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Only speculation. Dinosaurfan1 00:14, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Really? "Unknown man"? Come on, not notable at all. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:15, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — What is the point of this? There's no point at all in keeping this and when he is revealed then we can include this unknown stuff Omnicube1 02:30, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — The first map pack comes out in 20 day's, so why not keep it?GhKJh.pngP90DeathmanuceaHlB.png00:18, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Unnecessary Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I say we wait until Ascension comes out, then make a decision.Seijana 00:50, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I say we do not. It's confirmed who the characters are, and there are not any new ones. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:04, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Conqueror, that doesn't mean there won't be information regarding this guy. Seijana 02:10, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — So? The entire article is speculation is covered in the Shi No Numa trivia section. The character is not notable at all. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:15, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — We don't know how much information will be provided on this guy in ASCENSION dammit! Why does no one listen to me!? Seijana 02:18, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Because, no offense, but you seem to have a bad grasp on "notability". Unknown man does't have a name, and the entire article is based on an empy picture frame in Kino der Toten (and if you look around the map, there is lots of these empty frames) and a small picture covered in leaves in the revamped (and non-canon) Black Ops version of Shi No Numa. Conqueror of all Zombies 02:24, January 19, 2011 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment Comment — WAit a minute! The writing in kino says 'Beware the 6'. There are 5 portraits on the wall: The four characters and this man. Also on the floor, there is another portrait, which makes 6... Anyway, he could be Gersh, Yuri, Maxis or one of the marines from verruckt for all we know.....Reznov115 16:20, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - article has been deleted --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

SarahEdit

Nobody ever confirmed if the picture is, in fact, of ms. Leary, and just like Lauren, Brooks' wife, and Weaver's sister, if it is not her I feel she is not notable. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:55, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Just delete the picture then. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:02, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

She still shouldn't be kept per COD:NOTABLE. Technically, she should be speedy-deleted. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 01:16, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per COAZ Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 05:51, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Both of your oppose votes are not valid until one of you can prove how she is notable in the least. That means you need to prove the NPC in the pic is her. If nobody can do that, I'll just get COD4 to speedy-delete it. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 22:03, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
Yuri, our oppose votes ARE valid. And untill you can prove that it isn't Sarah it can't be speedy-deleted. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:00, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
What kind of backwards bullshit is that? YOU have to prove that it IS Sarah because there is absolutely NO indication whatsoever that she is sarah. Her name is never shown, and for all we know that could just be some random pentagon woman. My evidence is the lack of evidence of her existence in game. Now prove to me that that is her. Not the other way around. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:52, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
Well your evidence is shit. Just because there is lack of evidence dosn't mean that she isn't in the game. Conqueror of all Zombies 20:42, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
And just because you speculate that she IS does NOT mean that she is. Go away, COAZ, your fucking backwards way of thinking is doing nothing but causing ambiguity where NONE exists. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 03:55, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
What the fuck Yuri? Don't you know how to fucking talk to people? Conqueror of all Zombies 19:18, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Yuri, parts of what you are saying are making my head hurt. I thunk you're the one with the backwards logic here. This conversation got really confusing really fast. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:07, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! Conqueror of all Zombies 01:15, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
Think of it this way. Let's say you told me that you discovered a new element. Now lets say, I can't see your evidence. Do you tell me to prove that it's NOT there, or do I tell you to prove that it is, since you made the claim that it is in the first place? BTW, Cod4 already deleted the page once. Some idiot restored it. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 01:18, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
I saw that someone did that. But the Element thing is different. I'm not saying it IS Sarah, I'm saying it COULD be. Neither of us have proof that it is or isn't her. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:26, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Worth noting. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 03:32, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Just like "Jonathan" Toon Ganondorf (t c) 06:49, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

If this is deleted then we should also delete Adrienne Smith as she is just as notable as Sarah. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2
Thank you for pointing that out, dragunov. I will add her to the AFD. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:43, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Three to two yet it still gets deleted? If that happens, then why are we even voting? -- P99 menu icon MW3Alex Martin Rider TalkWeapon p99

It was Sdeleted per COD:NOTABLE. YuriKaslov 18:25, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out Alex. Who deleted this page? And why? Conqueror of all Zombies 18:25, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - page has been deleted it seems --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

CH-47 ChinookEdit

Vehicle not in Black Ops (or any CoDs, to date), as carrier of packages (CP, SAM Turret, etc.) is a CH-46 Sea Knight. Also, information on the CH-46 Sea Knight page contains picture evidence that helo in BO is a CH-46 (told by similarities in cockpit and front rotor engine housing), and further evidence: here. Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator Emblem-pavelow-1-HeatedPete_ - 18:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — what about renaming it to CH-48 Sea Knight? DMK961 20:29, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Hold on. You oppose deleting the article you nominated for deletion? O.o Sgt. S.S. 20:32, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

I think this is what I was talking about a few days ago, Shotrocket!!! Toldya it happens! M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 20:40, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
I may have been in a rush at that point. Sorry. Changed it to support. Emblem-pavelow-1-HeatedPete_

Pictogram voting oppose OpposeCall of Duty Wiki:Naming policy. It's referred to as a Chinook in game, so it's a Chinook on the wiki. Smuff[citation provided] 18:06, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, your sig adds a lot of source coding. Secondly, I don't think it's ever actually referred to in-game. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 20:55, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, accidentally used the four tildes opposed to the special button which hides the code... Smuff[citation provided] 17:10, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
No, Smuff is right. It IS referred to in game. Go to layers on your playercard and their is an image of the Care Package deliverer and it is called Chinook. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:44, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
DILLIGAF if a freaking non-canon element of the game calls it a "Chinook"? Wow. Hud commando CoD addict - 00:54, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
Well when the game doesn't call it a CH-46 Sea Knight either, it's kind of the only thing we can go by. Smuff[citation provided] 17:10, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
If someone can get a link to that playercard stuff, then I'll feel free to remove the RfD (cannae do it meself, BO CD crashed while on a DOA game) Emblem-pavelow-1-HeatedPete_ - 18:09, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - dead discussion --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Ascension groupEdit

Can very easily be covered in trivia for Executive Order.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 04:16, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support SupportToon Ganondorf (t c) 06:47, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nom. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:52, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Extremely Strong Support — Per Nominator. DMK961 18:05, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - will be deleted if it hasn't been already --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sgt. WalkerEdit

Not notable, I do not remember any regular character called Walker, and you should not even include ranksin the article name.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator, Seijana 00:40, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - It was a glitch page, and irreproducible, as far as I can tell. Deleted. Sactage (Talk)   00:55, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Adrienne SmithEdit

should technically be speedy-deleted because she does not fall under COD:NOTABLE, but hey. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Pretty much the exact same situation as Jonathan. In my opinion, not so much Sarah as she is thought to be seen in more than one location, but really.Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD220:41, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Yuri. Cpl.Bohater

NeutralEdit

Pictogram voting wait Pending — Hmm, I'm not sure. It isn't exactly notable, but I'm not yet sure.Seijana 00:48, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

She's referred to in only one place, never makes an appearance, and bar-none has no real effect on the storyline. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 00:50, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Closed - Successful --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

John TrentEdit

As with the other two CIA termiinal articles, SHOULD be speedy-deleted. Completely unnotable, never makes any appearance in-game, only mentioned once, etc., etc., etc. Fuck, I'm getting tired of this whole process. It ought to just be speedy deleted!! M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 04:07, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 04:07, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — If the conjecture of his identity being that of Reznov is to be included, John Trent could have a claim to being notable. --Scottie theNerd 09:54, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Except that that would be speculation, which is not allowed per COD:NOT. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 16:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Who the fuck is John Trent? I have never seen that name before. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 10:20, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

That isn't a legitimate reason for deletion. --Scottie theNerd 10:45, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Excuse me, but yes it is. That implies that this person isn't notable, for if they were, I probably would have seen the name at some point. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 02:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
Ignorance is not a case for disproving notability. If I knew nothing about Modern Warfare 2 and Shepherd, it doesn't mean that they're not notable. Someone who hasn't played Zombies will not know about Tank Dempsey, but that doesn't mean he isn't notable. Just because you have come across John Trent doesn't automatically make him non-notable. While I do, in a way, understand what you are trying to convey, your rationale is illogical, and that is what I am trying to point out. Unless COD:NOTABLE has a new clause that state "Cpt. Dragunov most have seen it", it is not a legitimate reason. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
That sounds like a fantastic policy. I'm kidding. That was extremely well said, but in my opinion this person isn't notable at all. That was really what I was trying to get at. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 09:44, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

New Idea: How about we take all of they unnotable characters mentioned in the CIA data system and turned them into subpages right here? Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 02:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

A merger with the CIA Data System is the most appropriate option. --Scottie theNerd 03:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Can be covered under the CIA data system and Viktor Reznov. Seijana 12:28, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — Merge to CIA Data System per Scottie. bibliomaniac15 07:52, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Dead discussion --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Johnson (Black Ops)Edit

This character never speaks a word, and he is a randomly generated character. He plays not much of a role in the mission.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As Nominator Doctor Richtoffee Talk 19:14, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — He has a fixed name and rank, and is directly mentioned in-game. That's reason enough to keep him for me. Sgt. S.S. 20:29, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Sgt.S.S. Cpl.Bohater Talk 21:53, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — Per Sgt SS. DMK961 22:13, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — He's evidently not a randomly-generated character. --Scottie theNerd 03:07, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — He definitely plays a big part in Victor Charlie. Without him, Mason wouldn't have gotten the M202 Flash, the ZSU wouldn't have blown up, and the Marines wouldn't have landed, which could have resulted in the SOG unit's death. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 20:59, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — Per all opposing. YuriKaslov 19:38, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - No consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Rogue ColonelEdit

Pointless, mentioned only in intel, and is full of speculation.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Flag of East GermanySp3cSprechenFlag of East Germany 01:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator. Cpl.Bohater Talk 02:02, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support"Trivia" is defined as things that are unimportant or inconsequential. For this article, the movie reference is central to the topic, and therefore cannot be considered trivia I'm quoting Scottie there, and if a movie reference is the central topic of the article, it should be speedly deleted, due to the fact that it is based on a movie and has very little to do with Black Ops. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:49, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

@Scottie: But Ryan made an appearance in game, while the Rogue Colonel did not. He was only talked about in an intel document and has nothing to do with the events of Black Ops. He is not notable at all. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:13, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — This character does not deserve a page in any way. If he is a reference to Apacolypse Now, just say so in Crash Site's trivia. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 06:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Information in the article is covered in Crash Site --Scottie theNerd 06:44, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Pictogram voting comment Comment — While the Colonel makes no appearance beyond the Intel mention, it seems that he is a fairly clear reference to Apocalypse Now. This does deserve a mention somewhere, whether as its own article or on some other page. --Scottie theNerd 04:17, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

@Conquerer of all Zombies: You could say the same for Ryan, who makes a single appearance in a mission with the sole person of being saved to get a trophy named after a Spielberg movie. It's fair to presume that Treyarch writers intentionally put the Rogue Colonel as a reference to contemporary Vietnam War-themed films, just as Payback is based on The Deer Hunter. That the Rogue Colonel has no other role in the game is not grounds for speedy deletion. --Scottie theNerd 05:01, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Closed - successful --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

AbracadavreEdit

We do not know if this is going to be the song, and until then it should be deleted. Conqueror of all Zombies 00:04, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:04, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator. Cpl.Bohater Talk 01:10, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 07:07, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

The song is up now so the page should stay.

The song was posted how can anyone deny that the song isnt legit it sounds just like a zombie easter egg.

-The Guy Who's Amazing at Zombies but Lags out

CommentEdit

QuestionEdit

Closed - Won't be deleted, the info is now confirmed. -- sactage (talk) 16:29, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Infinity Ward TimesEdit

Not notable at all. It's just a newspaper that is barely seen in the game.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 00:50, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Shouldn't this be speedy deleted? Cpl.Bohater Talk 01:07, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Non-notable background reference. --Scottie theNerd 11:29, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Pointless and unnecessary, we might as well make an article for houses. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 07:14, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

CommentEdit

Closed - -- sactage (talk) 18:28, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

All prestige gamemodesEdit

Nothing stands out in any of these lists, they can just be merged with their respective normal counterparts.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. - Smuff[citation provided] 12:26, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Smuff. Cpl.Bohater Talk 21:02, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination Conqueror of all Zombies 01:20, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 02:20, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator. Dragunov Menu Icon Black OpsCpt. DragunovWMD2 07:14, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

CommentsEdit

Closed - all will be deleted ( :S ) --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

BlundellEdit

Like the Adrienne Smith article, this involves a charachter that barely is mentioned at all, doesn't affect the story line at all, and has no picture.

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. - SCAR-H PicSergeant Price25M1911 menu icon CoD4 05:27, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — He is completely non-notable and never appears in-game, even briefly. Sgt. S.S. 21:52, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination YuriKaslov 01:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination Nikolai Cannot Die 01:20, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Pointless and utterly unnecessary. At least Adrienne Smith has some influence on the story as Mason's psychiatrist, which is more than can be said for Blundell. Seijana 17:38, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

NeutralEdit

CommentsEdit

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I don't think a lack of images is a reasonable ground for deletion... Sgt. S.S. 21:52, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

It adds to the case, particularly for characters who may or may not even be in-game, just conjecture. YuriKaslov 01:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - will be deleted --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Call of duty world at war collectors editionEdit

I made this on my old account, but i just saw that it is on the main COD WAW page. If it is on the main page, Why do we need this page? Reznov115 21:31, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

SupportEdit

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Redirect to Call of Duty: World at War --Scottie theNerd 01:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Make a section for it in Call of Duty: World at War. Cpl.Bohater

FamasEdit

Should be merged with FAMAS. Sgt. S.S. 22:04, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 22:04, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support SupportPer nomination. Cpl.Bohater Talk 22:12, January 27, 2011 (UTC) Withdrawing Vote. Cpl.Bohater

Pictogram voting support Support — If this weapon had its name altered simply by capitalising all the letters, it would be part of the FAMAS article. They are the same goddamn gun with the same goddamn name. This policy on names is starting to drive me nuts. Seijana 03:06, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

How are they different? The two have completely different stats, appearance and name. Smuff[citation provided] 15:20, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — This is a tough one, and it may challenge our current concept of article naming conventions and merging similar articles. On one hand, the FAMAS and Famas are the same weapon. However, given the time frame of the games, one is of a different model to the other. My instinct is to merge the pages, but we do have separate pages for the M16 rifles and all their variants. I believe under current convention, it's better to keep separate for the sake of clarity and simplicity. --Scottie theNerd 01:18, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — They both had different firing modes so they are technicaly 2 different guns.Dudebot121256 02:39, February 3, 2011 (UTC)dudebot121256

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Although this may sound stupid at first, they do have different fire modes, models, capitalization and fire sounds. If we have pages for weapons as similar as the M16 and M16A4 over names, then in fairness this does have just as good an argument. Smuff[citation provided] 22:16, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Vehement Oppose — Really? There's an ongoing discussion about this sort of thing. Think merging Masterkey and Shotgun (Attachment); or M16 with M16A1 and M16A4. They don't perform the same, nor are they of the same model. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 22:21, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — No. Just no. And per Yuri and Smuff as well Nikolai Cannot Die 01:08, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Never. We should NEVER do this. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:20, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Alright I thought about this for a long time. The Famas in BO is the F1 Felin version while the one in MW2 is the standard version. Cpl.Bohater

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It matters. Do this for Spas-12 and SPAS-12 as well. And btw the Famas in Black Ops is the G2 Felin, not the F1.M1911 Pickup CoD4Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 03:09, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Uh, Spas-12 and SPAS-12 are the same page... --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 18:07, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
I meant make a seperate page for each Spas 12. The firing mode, name, and model are different. M1911 Pickup CoD4Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 03:03, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Vehement Oppose — Then we're going to have to merge M16 with M16A4, and while we're at it M60->M60E4, and many many more. I think we should keep at what we're doing right now. Major Blackout 02:41, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Famas retains its article. --Callofduty4 18:28, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Pictogram voting comment Comment — The fact that the FAMAS in BO is the G2 Felin instead of the F1 is completely irrelevant. No IRL info, remember? Sgt. S.S. 18:16, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Thick-skulled much? Christ, the reason why it matters is because they're different models, different purposes, different damage, EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT ABOUT THEM. YuriKaslov 19:37, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
Yuri, what the hell was that about? Go back and carefully re-read what I said before coming at me with that again. Sgt. S.S. 21:42, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
What was it about? If you can't figure that out, maybe you're the one who needs to re-read, eh? The basis for their separation wasn't like the M60 or M16 pages, where they're nigh-identical in terms of purpose and performance; the Famas and FAMAS are completely different in every way possible. YuriKaslov 02:44, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
They are different models thats like saying the M40A1 is the same as M40A3. Cpl.Bohater
Sgt SS, read what Yuri wrote. THEY ARE DIFFERENT. IN EVERY WAY. Hell, they don't even look similar. Nikolai Cannot Die 09:50, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Kowloon, Hong Kong Edit

It's pointless, the original AFD nomination never finished and was only opposed on the grounds of COD:NOTABLE as opposed to common sense.

Pictogram voting support Support — As Nominator. Seijana 02:12, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — It isn't needed.Dudebot121256 02:34, February 3, 2011 (UTC)dudebot121256

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I suggest merging it with Kowloon. YuriKaslov 02:19, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I would agree Yuri, except that it's already the case, It's all covered in Numbers and the multiplayer map. Nothing left to merge. Seijana 02:29, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Yuri's idea. Or maybe a merger with Numbers(?). I'm not quite sure, but we definitely don't need that article. Nikolai Cannot Die 01:22, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The plotline that takes place here is different than what happened in real life, thus it covers what wikipedia doesn't. Smuff[citation provided] 15:30, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — The events which took place in The Pentagon are different from what happened in reality, but we don't have an article on that. Seijana 11:54, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — The article is already a 100% overlap with Numbers. While the location is outside of RL information, because it is inconsequential to the game, it doesn't have a sufficient claim to notability. --Scottie theNerd 20:33, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - will be deleted --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

First strike gametype Edit

Badly written. No point. Bioniclepluslotr 02:23, February 3, 2011 (UTC)Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator

Pictogram voting support Support — I was just starting to wonder what was going to happen regarding this page.Seijana 02:27, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Misspelled words, no images, no video's and no detail. Worthless article.Dudebot121256 02:32, February 3, 2011 (UTC)dudebot121256

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all. Shotrocket6 Talk 19:38, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - will be deleted --Callofduty4 19:42, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Pvt. pepper Edit

Chances are he's randomly generated, ranks should not even be included in the article name. This probably qualifies for La Speedy Delete.

Pictogram voting support Support — As Nominator. Seijana 23:26, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Never have I seen such awful grammar. Ugh, it pains me to look at it. And on top of that, he's probably randomly generated. God, it looks like a second grader wrote that. Nikolai Cannot Die 01:26, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Extremely Strong Support — Page is messy, has appalling grammar, is not laid out properly, was obviously written by someone who doesn't have a clue about the MoS, and to cap it all, it's about a randomly generated character. Just put it out of its misery. Sgt. S.S. 22:34, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted --Callofduty4 22:37, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yuri Shulvolski Edit

Never actually makes an appearance, doesn't really affect the story and is partially speculation. Basically falls under COD:NOTABLE.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator.

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Yuri may have more of an important character later in Nazi Zombies. If this can get deleted why wouldn't Sophia get deleted, she is only mentioned, and is only an assistance! Killoren13 01:38, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Then Sophia, Dr. Maxis, Samantha Maxis, Demonic Announcer and Gersch should all be deleted too. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:31, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Changed to Pictogram voting support Support — Not the correct name. Conqueror of all Zombies 04:35, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Is Yuri Kravcheski the correct name?Senior Sammich Omnomnom Kartoffeln? 20:36, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
Yes it is. Conqueror of all Zombies 01:17, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 movie references Edit

It's pointless.

Pictogram voting support Support — As Nominator. Seijana 13:44, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Merge with Modern Warfare 2 or something. M1911 Pickup CoD4Pvt. Trueblood Hello? 15:18, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — "Pointless" is your best argument? They are very interesting, and movie references play a suprisingly large role in the game for what they are. We already have trivia for movie references in their respective articles, but having them so scattered with no direction makes it a burdon to find them all. Having a page for them makes sense. Shotrocket6 Talk 20:41, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I still don't see why it warrants a page of it's own. Can be easily covered in the main MW2 page. Seijana 20:07, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — I suggest making the page a subpage of the MW2 page. YuriKaslov 20:51, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I've made it into a subpage --Callofduty4 21:10, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per the above. Smuff[citation provided] 15:17, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — I'm generally against any pop-culture references in articles. Per all supporting. Sgt. S.S. 20:41, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - no consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Oper­ation CharybdisEdit

Just a lot of nonsense, not relevant to the game or Wiki. This is not the operation that was metioned in-game. All it has wrote on it is 'Woods has a small dic'.Reznov115 15:14, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. Smuff[citation provided] 15:18, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
I already deleted it. Why would you put a notice up on this page for something which obviously doesn't need a vote? Closed --Callofduty4 15:19, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

What's Operation Charybdis? Seijana 23:39, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Nuketown 24/7Edit

This is a fan-made game mode and is only really on the PC. I say that this article should just go. It may even qualify for speedy-deletion, I don't know.

Pictogram voting support Support — As NominatorYellowRiolu Leave a message! 18:57, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

Closed- I'm playing it on the PS3 at the moment. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 18:59, February 5, 2011 (UTC)

Ninja DefuseEdit

A tactics page that is not actually an integral part of any game; it is effectively a colloquialism of a normal defuse, with the one difference of being undetected. YuriKaslov 23:30, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. YuriKaslov 23:30, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Yuri. Conqueror of all Zombies 23:32, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nominator, plus it's mentioned in the XP article. US Army OR-1 Trueblood talk 23:36, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It's an integral part of MW2, It unlocks text on the screen that says "ninja defuse sneaky sneaky" It also gives you a bonus. Look it up on youtube for proof. Shaniqua69 00:22, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

That's what's called a "challenge", and it goes on the "challenges" page. We don't have pages for Omnicide, Dropping Crates, or Goodbye, do we? No. This is no different. (that last one redirects to the challenges page) YuriKaslov 01:26, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
It's not a challenge though. It's not listed under the challenges section, and you get no title or xp upon doing it. You just get extra match points when it occurs. Shaniqua69 08:45, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
We also don't have any page on Skewer, Backstabber, Hijacker, longshot, Execution etc. All of which fall under the same category. YuriKaslov 13:41, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
Just delete it already! PLEASE! It's mentioned in XP, so there's no point of having a page. US Army OR-1 Trueblood talk 01:13, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Backstabber is a challenge, and the others can be summed up in a single sentence. Ninja defuses can't really be explained that easily. Maybe a little longer entry in the XP article? That would be fine with me. Are we allowed to lobby for our own AFD's like this? Shaniqua69 19:38, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
I can explain it in a single sentence: "A ninja defuse is a type of bomb defusal in Modern Warfare 2 where one person defuses the bomb in Search and Destroy, within close proximity to the enemy who planted the bomb." And yes, you are allowed to "lobby" your own idea. YuriKaslov 19:41, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
It's also in sabotage and Demolition. And that sentence is missing a lot, the article expands on it a lot more than a simple definition would. I don't understand why you oppose this article so much, its nothing like skewer, hijacker, longshot, etc. Those are simply in-game bonuses that can be summed up in a single sentence. Now I'm sure you're going to say that ninja defuse is just like those, but its not, some people will play SnD purely for ninja defuses. It's a method of gameplay, the others are just free bonuses. The article also has good information pertaining to what you can do when your the last one alive in SnD. Shaniqua69 14:38, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Shaniqua69. Shotrocket6 Talk 00:23, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It's a decent article and it provides decent information. Smuff[citation provided] 20:12, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

This afd is not about its quality. As I stated above, there are no articles for the other, near-identical things like skewer, longshot, bullseye, etc., and therefore this would be a hypocritical exception to the precedent rule. If I had taken issue with the quality, I would've put it in the improvement drive or whatever. YuriKaslov 20:29, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
And? Skewering is like firing a gun, it's not that similar, and bullseye refers to a way of killing people, not a tactic. And to clarify, I don't care if it's a tactic since it isn't done in any other games I've come across. Smuff[citation provided] 21:06, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Hmm, I can't really explain why but I feel we should keep this. Seijana 23:36, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - No consensus --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

MannequinsEdit

Appear in one map. The only thing it provides to gameplay is a song that is almost never played. Not needed at all.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator Conqueror of all Zombies 03:16, February 8, 2011 (UTC).

Pictogram voting support Support — Non-notable background scenery. Sgt. S.S. 22:19, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per Sgt. S.S Cpl.Bohater

Pictogram voting support Support — Per S.S. Shotrocket6 Talk 19:35, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Yet another one per Sgt. S.S. Seijana 20:04, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — They are directly interacted with to provide an easter egg. Definitely notable. --Callofduty4 13:37, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — They're an easter egg and are found in two seperate games. That's worth an article in my opinion, so I'll mention COD:NOTABLE as usual, based on the "Anything that the player has distinct access to is covered." section. Smuff[citation provided] 14:06, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — If we took that in its most absolute sense, we would have articles on tables, couches, dining chairs, walls, bricks, houses, beds, etc etc. YuriKaslov 17:21, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Eh? --Callofduty4 17:40, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah but a table isn't an easter egg, if you shoot a table does it blow up and kill everyone? No. That's not notable, tables don't contribute in Call of Duty to anything other than camping. Smuff[citation provided] 17:46, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per nomination. YuriKaslov 17:21, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — To the opposition, we can easily cover everything about mannequins and the easter egg in Nuketown, y'know. Sgt. S.S. 18:25, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Yep, why not throw in everything about Black Ops into Call of Duty: Black Ops for good measure? --Callofduty4 19:07, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
That's not what I meant and well you know it... Sgt. S.S. 22:03, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Mannequins actually appear throughout the Call of Duty series (which means the page is incomplete), such as Call of Duty 2, where you must hit the mannequin with the butt of your rifle. As mannequins make a definite appearance throughout these games, they should be deemed notable as a part of gameplay and an easter egg. -- 22px-1888721.png Azuristalk 19:05, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Besides the easter egg, they offer nothing to gameplay. Just because you melee one, doesn't mean it has gameplay value. Under that logic, practice targets should have an article too. Conquerer of all Zombies Talk 19:09, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

They're in other games too --Callofduty4 19:16, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
So are buildings. The player uses them for cover, but we don't have a page for that. Conquerer of all Zombies Talk 19:19, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - no consensus (+ flawed arguments by the proposition) --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Paige (Call of duty 4), Paige (Call of duty:World at War), Paige (Call of duty 2)Edit

A NPC who doesn't play a major in the game. The article is short and badly writen too..Just the same article three times over.


Pictogram voting support Support — As Nominator. Conquerer of all Zombies Talk 03:13, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — I'm not so sure about this one. YuriKaslov 05:35, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I don't know anything about the character from COD4 or WAW, but I can attest to COD2 that there is no randomly generated soldier with the name of "Paige." At the same time, even if they were a scripted character, they might not have done or said anything major. bibliomaniac15 06:24, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Then they should be deleted per COD:NOTABLE. Conquerer of all Zombies Talk 18:32, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — The problem isn't the lack of content, it's the fact none of us can figure out who they are to actually put any input into the article to begin with. If nobody can do that when we can't do anything with the article to begin with other than delete it. Smuff[citation provided] 00:10, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

KristinaEdit

Not a notable character. Per the deletion grounds for Sarah.


SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. Conquerer of all Zombies Talk 05:08, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per COD:NOTABLE. YuriKaslov 05:34, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all Cpl.Bohater

Closed - will be deleted --Callofduty4 19:36, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

OpposeEdit

GoldenEyeEdit

If we are to create a page for every game which has influenced the CoD series, we'd have loads of pages like this. As far as I am concerned, James Bond has nothing notable to do with the series.

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator. Seijana 08:46, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — I'm fairly certain this qualifies for speedy deletion. Sgt. S.S. 10:20, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Pretty poor article all told; while there are some things you could say Goldeneye influenced in CoD1 (the Dam, Frigate / Tirpitz), by the time you get to the modern games it's basically getting to "hey, check out how many vague similarities I can spot" and seems largely here to advertise the Goldeneye wiki. Also quite a few of them are flat-out wrong; the Eurocopter hasn't been stolen yet on Frigate and you don't try to retrieve it, for example. Evil Tim 10:51, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Deleted --Callofduty4 13:40, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.