Crazy sam10 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Crazy sam10 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=== Comments/Questions === |
=== Comments/Questions === |
||
| − | Not that I'm against a merge or anything, but was this discussed before? I just feel like it was but can't place if/when it was. {{Signatures/Crazy sam10}} 16:47, January 15, 2016 (UTC) |
+ | Not that I'm against a merge or anything, but was this discussed before? I just feel like it was but can't place if/when it was. {{Signatures/Crazy sam10}} 16:47, January 15, 2016 (UTC) {{Clear}} <!--Remove this clear if you reply, it's just to separate my comments--> |
Also, duck test on [[COD:NAME]] states "''Article should invoke real-life when named to preserve consistency.''". So would we merge this on to EOTech sight as it is the IRL name, or put it on Holographic Sight as that's the more common name? If the latter, I'll edit COD:NAME to reflect that merges like this should use the more common name over IRL. {{Signatures/Crazy sam10}} 16:49, January 15, 2016 (UTC) |
Also, duck test on [[COD:NAME]] states "''Article should invoke real-life when named to preserve consistency.''". So would we merge this on to EOTech sight as it is the IRL name, or put it on Holographic Sight as that's the more common name? If the latter, I'll edit COD:NAME to reflect that merges like this should use the more common name over IRL. {{Signatures/Crazy sam10}} 16:49, January 15, 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:50, 15 January 2016
EOTech_Sight (history - links - logs)
The EOTech Sight is the Holographic Sight. The description says so, the MW2 and MW3 Holographic Sights show the name. It has the same reticle as CoD4's Holographic Sight. It's a Holographic Sight going by another name.
Delete
Keep
Split/Merge
Merge — As nominator. http://i.imgur.com/QVw9GKe.pngTimelessPeople 14:43, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
Merge — Same sight, per Timeless. 
16:32, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
Merge — Per all. I guess the only reason why it didn't get renamed in MW3 with the product placement deal is just tradition. Raven's wing Talk16:43, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
Comments/Questions
Not that I'm against a merge or anything, but was this discussed before? I just feel like it was but can't place if/when it was.
16:47, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
Also, duck test on COD:NAME states "Article should invoke real-life when named to preserve consistency.". So would we merge this on to EOTech sight as it is the IRL name, or put it on Holographic Sight as that's the more common name? If the latter, I'll edit COD:NAME to reflect that merges like this should use the more common name over IRL.
16:49, January 15, 2016 (UTC)