Changes: Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion/NATO

Latest revision as of 20:33, 7 February 2012

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

NATO (history - links - logs)

There's two lines of content.

Delete

Delete — As nominator. Smuff^{[citation provided]} 14:08, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Falls under COD:SPEEDY. Isn't notable at all. elmo's ramblings 14:11, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Per Elmo. - MLGISNOT4ME ^[Talk] - 15:36, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Per Elmo. REDSKIN-26 21:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Never actually mentioned; it's just IRL info. Lyra_(SPNKR)^{& Bon Bon forever <3} 21:24, January 22, 2012 (UTC)

It was very briefly mentioned at some point. Still doesn't have a huge role though. -

MLGISNOT4ME ^[Talk] - 11:16, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Agreed. Shotrocket6 11:19, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Per nom. Mr. Mittens 12:30, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Has little to no info on it http://i.imgur.com/KUDLq.png 12:34, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Per all The Wikia Contributor ^T ^| ^C ^| ^E ^| ^Q 01:50, January 26, 2012 (UTC)

Seriously? — and awkward moment when Eltomo doesn't speedy it himself, lazy boy. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK 13:13, January 28, 2012 (UTC)

Keep

Split/Merge

Comments/Questions

Comment — Just as an FYI, "it hasn't got much info" isn't a valid reason to delete an article. Sgt. S.S. 20:35, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

It still is never mentioned in game. REDSKIN-26 20:37, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

I know that. I'm not saying the article should stay, I'm just pointing out that it's an invalid reason. Sgt. S.S. 21:05, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

^ -

MLGISNOT4ME ^[Talk] - 17:55, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Archive}}
-== {{AfDinfo|NATO}} <!--Use underscores instead of spaces for the page name--> ==
+== {{AfDinfo/Archived|NATO}} <!--Use underscores instead of spaces for the page name--> ==
 There's two lines of content.
@@ Line 6: / Line 7: @@
 {{DeleteArticle}} Falls under [[COD:SPEEDY]]. Isn't notable at all. {{Signature/Eltomo85}} ''14:11, January 22, 2012 (UTC)''
+{{DeleteArticle}} Per Elmo. {{Signatures/MLGisNot4Me}} ''15:36, January 22, 2012 (UTC)''
+{{DeleteArticle}} Per Elmo. {{Signatures/Redskin-26}} 21:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} Never actually mentioned; it's just IRL info. {{Template:Signatures/1337 SPNKR}} 21:24, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
+:It was very briefly mentioned at some point. Still doesn't have a huge role though. {{Signatures/MLGisNot4Me}} ''11:16, January 24, 2012 (UTC)''
+{{DeleteArticle}} Agreed. [[User:Shotrocket6|Shotrocket6]] 11:19, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} Per nom. [[User:Mr. Mittens|Mr. Mittens]] 12:30, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} Has little to no info on it {{Signatures/Damac1214}} 12:34, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} Per all {{Sig/TWC}} 01:50, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle-notext}} '''Seriously?''' &mdash; and awkward moment when Eltomo doesn't speedy it himself, lazy boy. {{Signatures/YellowRiolu}} 13:13, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
 === Keep ===
@@ Line 12: / Line 30: @@
 === Comments/Questions ===
+{{Comment}} Just as an FYI, "it hasn't got much info" isn't a valid reason to delete an article. [[User:Sgt. S.S.|Sgt. S.S.]] 20:35, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
 [[Category:Nominations for deletion|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+:It still is never mentioned in game. {{Signatures/Redskin-26}} 20:37, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
+::I know that. I'm not saying the article should stay, I'm just pointing out that it's an invalid reason. [[User:Sgt. S.S.|Sgt. S.S.]] 21:05, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
+:::^ {{Signatures/MLGisNot4Me}} ''17:55, January 25, 2012 (UTC)''