Panzerfaust (history - links - logs)
I'm nominating the Panzerfaust for a split. This is because the WW2 variant and Ghosts varinat are drastically different. The WW2 variant is an Anti-tank grenade (essentially), while the Ghosts variant is based on the Panzerfaust 3, which is an Anti-tank rocket launcher. As such, they function drastically different, and per COD:NAME "If a weapon is named the same, looks the same, but functions in a drastically different way, split.".
09:08, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Delete
Keep
Keep — Unless the name is changed later, I think it's better to keep them on the same page. Mostly the same reasoning as keeping the BO and BO2 sections of the Crossbow in one page (despite being different), or the World at War and BO: Declassified sections of the .357 Magnum. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 17:17, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Split/Merge
Split - As nominator.
09:08, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Split - I also wish to cite the fact it does not really meet the "looks the same" requirement for sharing the page. Raven's wing Talk09:13, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Split - Right, per nom. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 17:22, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Split - Definitely needs to be 2 different pages. Per Nom. Redskin-26 17:41, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Split - -- laagone (talk) 17:25, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
Comments/Questions
Comment — If it gets split, since the menu description calls it a "Panzerfaust" then it would be wrong to call it a Panzerfaust 3 as the article name. However the names seen in-game aren't set in stone and in the CaC be called Panzerfaust 3. But with the info given already, not a lot, whould it be called Panzerfaust (Ghosts) then? 
Argorrath おしゃべり
16:02, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Most likely yes. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 17:22, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Likely better to give it its game name and give the other Panzerfaust a name such as "Panzerfaust (WW2)", just to keep the two separate. 17:52, August 18, 2013 (UTC)