Call of Duty Wiki
Advertisement
Call of Duty Wiki

RPG-22 (history - links - logs)

I am nominating the RPG-22 article for deletion. It is not notable, as it is only used as an aesthetic to the Ultranationalists' character models (this is also the case for some other weapons and NPCs). If it was used as an actual weapon in any COD then it would have been okay to keep it (as well as keeping the info about the unusable RPG-22s). But not only it is not usable in any COD game, but even the NPCs do not use it, and the RPG-22 doesn't either have any game weapon files.

Delete

Pictogram voting delete Delete — As nominator. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 10:52, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete Delete — Not very notable to have a page for a weapon that is literally not once used. -- laagone (talk)  11:12, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Pictogram voting delete Delete — Per MLG. --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 21:00, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Keep

Pictogram voting keep Keep — it still deserves to have a page. its still there, even if its appearance is minor. RisingSun2013 (talk) 22:40, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting keep Keep — It is notable enough to keep. http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2013/276/1/2/bionicle__unity_duty_destiny_by_cyberpictures-d6p3li2.pngLegos-Rule-15 Talk 01:35, March 20, 2014 (UTC)

Split/Merge

Comments/Questions

  • Another thing: there is a similar case, which is the Type 93 Flamethrower/Type 100 Flamethrower. Not only they are not used at all, but also the presence of the two flamethrowers in-game isn't even confirmed, due to the lack of any image. (By the way are they even BOTH present in-game?) Moreover, there aren't any game files for them. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 20:02, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement