Changes: Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion/Treyarch/Call of Duty 3 employees

Revision as of 11:30, 9 January 2016

Treyarch/Call_of_Duty_3_employees (history - links - logs)

It's currently linked from Treyarch#Employees as a main article, but considering that CoD3 is nearly ten years old it's entirely possible that many employees have either retired, been fired, or new ones have joined. I don't think this page serves much purpose anymore, especially since the exact same information is available in the credits. If the page was to be kept we should either create new pages for other games or make a current list of all staff if possible.

Delete

Delete — As nominator. exacri 21:53, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

Delete — agreed RisingSun2024 ^{(Talk Page 🎌 Blog Posts 🎌 Contributions 🎌 Social Activity)} 22:14, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

Delete — Per nomination. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 09:17, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

Keep

Split/Merge

Comments/Questions

Question — Is this page basically the credits page for CoD3 or is it a list of employees at Treyarch? If it's a light copy of the credits for CoD3 then I don't see why it should be deleted. We should just have a page for every iteration of employees per game. KλT 23:19, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

The main issue I had with it is that it was representing the main article for the employees section on the Treyarch article, which is outdated for obvious reasons. A credits page for every game does sound like a good idea though.

exacri 23:52, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

I feel like that's a better course of action. It's useful information to have if someone needs it. Plus I can't remember anyone in recent memory who has wanted to watch the entirety of the credits after beating a game. KλT 00:15, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know, seems like a pretty pointless page to have IMO and I don't really see how it's all that useful, especially considering that only one page links to the article, which means that it's not like it's information that's really used elsewhere on the wiki. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 09:17, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

Why is it pointless? It's information. We're a wiki, that's the whole reason we're here man. If someone wants to know the exact team responsible for creating x game, I say hell yeah. More information available isn't something that should be deemed unworthy because it doesn't exist or because you personally don't find it useful. I say we make separate pages per game to make it useful. KλT 11:30, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

Question — ~~Who cares? Why is this so important?~~ AnotherCommie (talk) 23:11, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension KλT 23:42, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

pffffft ahahaha —Unsigned comment was added by AnotherCommie

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ::I feel like that's a better course of action. It's useful information to have if someone needs it. Plus I can't remember anyone in recent memory who has wanted to watch the entirety of the credits after beating a game. [[User:KATANAGOD|KλT]] 00:15, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
 ::I don't know, seems like a pretty pointless page to have IMO and I don't really see how it's all that useful, especially considering that only one page links to the article, which means that it's not like it's information that's really used elsewhere on the wiki. [[User:Conqueror of all Zombies|Conqueror of all Zombies]] ([[User talk:Conqueror of all Zombies|talk]]) 09:17, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
+:::Why is it pointless? It's information. We're a wiki, that's the whole reason we're here man. If someone wants to know the exact team responsible for creating x game, I say hell yeah. More information available isn't something that should be deemed unworthy because it doesn't exist or because you personally don't find it useful. I say we make separate pages per game to make it useful. [[User:KATANAGOD|KλT]] 11:30, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
 {{Question}}
 <s>Who cares?  Why is this so important?</s> [[User:AnotherCommie|AnotherCommie]] ([[User talk:AnotherCommie|talk]]) 23:11, January 8, 2016 (UTC)