Changes: Call of Duty Wiki:Articles for Deletion/X-Ray Scope

Latest revision as of 17:32, 8 December 2012

X-Ray_Scope (history - links - logs)

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

The "X-ray" scope is not an attachment, but is rather built in to the Storm PSR, and it is not available as an attachment on any other weapon, thus, this article is non-relevant and incorrect.

Delete

Delete — As nominator. PwnY x SN1P3R (talk) 05:08, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. It does not say X-ray scope after the gun's name, so it is not an attachment. Think of the scope as "iron sights", as in they are not an attachment. The Antibrony (talk) 05:10, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Weird, considering Iron Sights have their own article anyway. http://i.imgur.com/KUDLq.png 05:13, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Well, that's because irons sights are a mechanic in the game, the x-ray scope is only present on this specific gun, and isn't even an attachment. The Sniper Scope page is about the ATTACHMENT, and not the built-in aesthetic on the gun. I say delete or merge, but not keep. PwnY x SN1P3R (talk) 19:21, November 29, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — Per nominator. Joseph Tan ^{l talk l edit count l contribs l} 06:10, December 1, 2012 (UTC)

Delete — It's not a separate attachment, and shouldn't be viewed as such. We don't even know if that's the real name. Bioniclepluslotr 17:32, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Keep

Split/Merge

Merge — Somewhat agreeing with what another person said, this scope is automatically attached to the Storm PSR, thus making it a default Sniper Scope. It should be included in the Sniper Scope page. 72.211.190.34 01:56, November 28, 2012 (UTC)

Merge — Merge for the reasons provided by the Anon above.

Vera ^{Talk to me.}

14:28, November 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments/Questions

Comment — At Damac's comment, that brings up another point. It is obviously a scope, and snipers such as the L118A are not listed as having an attachment. There is a page for Sniper Scope, so I think now that we should keep this page. Would be useful to know if the X-ray scope is coded the same way as the sniper scope. The Antibrony (talk) 05:20, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comment — Regarding my "merge or keep comment", I say delete. It would be pointless to merge. PwnY x SN1P3R (talk) 02:38, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Page has been merged with Storm PSR.

Crazy sam10 • Talk

14:56, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== {{AfDinfo/Archived|X-Ray_Scope}} ==
-== {{AfDinfo|NAMEOFPAGE}} <!--Use underscores instead of spaces for the page name--> ==
+{{Archive}}
-<!--Nomination here-->
+The "X-ray" scope is not an attachment, but is rather built in to the Storm PSR, and it is not available as an attachment on any other weapon, thus, this article is non-relevant and incorrect.
 === Delete ===
-{{DeleteArticle}} As nominator. The "X-ray" scope is not an attachment, but is rather built in to the Storm PSR, and it is not available as an attachment on any other weapon, thus, this article is non-relevant and incorrect. [[User:PwnY x SN1P3R|PwnY x SN1P3R]] ([[User talk:PwnY x SN1P3R|talk]]) 05:08, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} As nominator. [[User:PwnY x SN1P3R|PwnY x SN1P3R]] ([[User talk:PwnY x SN1P3R|talk]]) 05:08, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 Agreed. It does not say X-ray scope after the gun's name, so it is not an attachment. Think of the scope as "iron sights", as in they are not an attachment. [[User:The Antibrony|The Antibrony]] ([[User talk:The Antibrony|talk]]) 05:10, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
+:Weird, considering [[Iron Sights]] have their own article anyway. {{Signatures/Damac1214}} 05:13, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
+Well, that's because irons sights are a mechanic in the game, the x-ray scope is only present on this specific gun, and isn't even an attachment. The [[Sniper Scope]] page is about the ATTACHMENT, and not the built-in aesthetic on the gun. I say delete or merge, but not keep. [[User:PwnY x SN1P3R|PwnY x SN1P3R]] ([[User talk:PwnY x SN1P3R|talk]]) 19:21, November 29, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} Per nominator. {{Signatures/Joseph Tan}} 06:10, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
+{{DeleteArticle}} It's not a separate attachment, and shouldn't be viewed as such. We don't even know if that's the real name. <font style="papyrus">[[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<font color="gray">'''Bioniclepluslotr'''</font>]]</font> 17:32, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 === Keep ===
 === Split/Merge ===
+{{MergeArticle|Somewhat agreeing with what another person said, this scope is automatically attached to the Storm PSR, thus making it a default Sniper Scope. It should be included in the Sniper Scope page.}} [[Special:Contributions/72.211.190.34|72.211.190.34]] 01:56, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
+{{MergeArticle}} Merge for the reasons provided by the Anon above. {{Signatures/JPanzerj}} ''14:28, November 29, 2012 (UTC)''
 === Comments/Questions ===
 [[Category:Nominations for deletion|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+{{Comment}} At Damac's comment, that brings up another point. It is obviously a scope, and snipers such as the [[L118A]] are not listed as having an attachment. There is a page for [[Sniper Scope]], so I think now that we should keep this page. Would be useful to know if the X-ray scope is coded the same way as the sniper scope. [[User:The Antibrony|The Antibrony]] ([[User talk:The Antibrony|talk]]) 05:20, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
+{{Comment}} Regarding my "merge or keep comment", I say delete. It would be pointless to merge. [[User:PwnY x SN1P3R|PwnY x SN1P3R]] ([[User talk:PwnY x SN1P3R|talk]]) 02:38, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
+'''Closed''' - Page has been merged with [[Storm PSR]]. {{Signatures/Crazy sam10}} 14:56, December 4, 2012 (UTC)