Call of Duty Wiki

Welcome to the Call of Duty Wiki! Create an account and join the community.


Learn why you should create an account today!

READ MORE

Call of Duty Wiki
Call of Duty Wiki
Call of Duty Wiki
14,918
pages

Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles/Archive 7

< Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Featured Articles
Sign in to edit

January 2013[]

Kar98k[]

Another good article, lots of images, info and trivia, well organized and long but easy to understand... also, if i can add, my favourite WWII rifle.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 21:45, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Nom nom nom. Kylet357 (talk) 14:36, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I'd personally not have an article that has its subject so similar to the current one (as Kar98k is pretty much just a German equivalent of Springfield). --MLGisNot4Me talk 14:40, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Karma[]

An extremely well-organised article comprising abundant information. The plot section is well-filled and neat, the gallery has many detailed images and all other miscellanous information is covered thoroughly too.

  1. As nom. {  ParagonX7 跟我谈天 http://i.imgur.com/3hrm0HS.png 15:26, December 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I don't think anything from BOII should be nominated just yet, because the game just came out last month, and there is still a lot of information yet to be filled in a long time. Looking at the article as it is now, there isn't even its campaign picture. Plus who knows what other glitches or mishaps we can find in the game. EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 18:13, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

One month is more than enough time to find all the glitches. Also the BOII campaign missions don't really have images as the campaign menu isn't as 2D as the prior CoDs. 01:35, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Death Machine[]

A weapon that has become iconic with the Black Ops series, and its Black Ops 2 information is good quality. Lots of good images and extra content make this a worthy contender.

  1. As nominator 15:38, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
  2. It provides a lot of good information about its appearance in both Black Ops and Black Ops II. The images are nice and doesn't banter too much with useless trivia. --MLGisNot4Me talk 14:26, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Good article, per nom. Redskin-26 01:28, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per nom. Cooljoshua13 (talk) 23:13, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

USP .45[]

A weapon featured in all the Modern Warfare series, the "bread and butter" of the secondary weapons and pistols class. Article contains lots of information and pictures from each game's campaign, multiplayer, and its attachments, also contains useful and interesting trivia. Although it has gone through few changes with each title, it remains very much the same and an effective backup when you've run dry.

  1. Nominator EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 18:10, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Great article indeed. Per nom MarksmanFTW (talk) 01:26, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Definitely. Noob tub3r talk 22:00, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

February 2013[]

Barrett .50cal[]

Good article, well organized, it has lots of good images, lots of info for Barret in all games that it appears, good trivia.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 14:34, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nominator. The only problem I have with it is its camouflage gallery (although no one ever cares for them) which is lacking. Otherwise a very good article. --MLGisNot4Me talk 15:26, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. This article is good length, covers multiple games, and also provides good pictures. Definitely one of the better gun pages on this site. 15:35, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I second this. Also because it has become an iconic sniper rifle in the entire Modern Warfare series. It even makes a few appearances in BOII's campaign and its zombies. In Multiplayer, it can do some things that bolt-action rifles cannot. EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 17:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
People... please take a look what was FA in March 2009...I just saw that--Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 17:27, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Invalidated - Per comment above. --MLGisNot4Me talk 13:15, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

FIM-92 Stinger[]

Similar to the previously nomimted Barrett .50cal article, it makes appearances in all Modern Warfare games as well as Black Ops II. The article is well written, clearly explaining what changed over every game it was in. Good images also.

  1. As nominator 17:38, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per ze nominator. --MLGisNot4Me talk 13:15, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nominator. Gunman for real (talk) 17:47, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per nominator MarksmanFTW (talk) 22:34, January 25, 2013 (UTC)

M1A2 Abrams[]

Since Barret was already featured, here is another good article. This one is also good, good images and it is well described and organized

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 17:47, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Stoner63[]

Since the Barret .50 Cal was already featured, here is another great article. The Stoner63 appeared in Black Ops , The page is well described, and the page contains good clear photos of the weapon

  1. As nominator Morayius1 - Bring you Differences! from a Aussie (talk)

March 2013[]

UH-60 Blackhawk[]

Amazing article, with lots of good images, every appearance in all games is well described, page is well organized and it has good amount of trivia.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 20:37, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom. I second this one, especially because it is a very iconic aircraft and has appeared in every MW title. EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 06:28, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Nom. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  20:48, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

David "Section" Mason[]

A very well written article with many great details. The early life section provides a lot of background information that even those who have played Black Ops II may not know about, and the rest of the article is very accurate. Also, the infobox is thorough and complete, the gallery is filled with plenty of great pictures, and the amount of trivia is fair. All in all, very deserving of featured article status. MarksmanFTW (talk) 22:57, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  1. As nominator MarksmanFTW (talk) 22:57, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom. Page looks great compared to other character pages, and seems to have all appropriate information in an orderly fashion. 23:03, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. 18:15, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I agree.  Mason is a badass.  Noob tub3r talk 21:59, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I thought about nominating this a month back, but didn't get to it. Ah well, a good article anyway. -- laagone (talk)  21:02, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comment — I don't agree with this one, because this is from a very recent title. Who knows what additional information we might find or come up with in the future. It's only been less than 3 months, BOII is still fairly new. Something I think we should consider when nominating an article. EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 06:27, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

3 months is waaaaaay more than enough time for the page to confirm any speculation it has. Moreover, unless there's going to be some sort of storyline expansion DLC (which there isn't), there isn't really much "additional information" to add at this point in time.   ParagonX7 跟我谈天 http://i.imgur.com/3hrm0HS.png 06:39, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
You can't use an article's age as an excuse for considering the possibility that more information can be discovered. EVERY article on this wikia theoretically can have new information added to it that no one previously knew about. Featured article is intended for any article that meets the qualifications, and this article is well qualified. Even if someone discovers some new information about this article, then person just has to add the information, and treat it like any other article. That being said, there is no reason to refuse this article its right to be nominated. MarksmanFTW (talk) 20:47, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
Per those two folks above, and if BO2 is so new, it's even a greater achievement that the page is already featured article material. -- laagone (talk)  21:02, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Die Rise[]

New map. Many people will need info and strategies. There's also a link to the easter eggs. —Unsigned comment was added by Zcheese

  1. —Unsigned comment was added by Zcheese

Invalidated - Invalid nomination, does not describe why the article is good other than why people would read it the sake of performing better in-game (which isn't a good reason). In addition, there shouldn't be any strategies there as per COD:NOT. Also, I put the vote for Zcheese, as it is mandatory to vote as the nominator. -- laagone (talk)  19:56, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[]

UH-60 Blackhawk[]

Like i said before, this article is good, well described, well organized and with good gallery.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 18:05, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. i liek, particularly the images. -- laagone (talk)  18:10, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom N7 TC 19:57, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I agree with MGLisNot4Me, the pictures are very good quality, Doublekill10 (talk) 21:05, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I agree with Slav(Delija), it has very good gallery with many good images that are well described,   Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png , 2:30 , March 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per all. Cooljoshua13 (talk) 03:31, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per all. Unrelatedly it's been 2+ years since any vehicle has been FA status. Jurassic park787 Ignite the Revolution! 02:51, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Kar98k[]

I'd like to nominate the Kar98k article. It's informative, accurate and has plenty good-quality images, with images for most (if not all) of the games it appears in.

  1. As the nominator AugFC Talk Page 18:30, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Task Force 141[]

This article is probably the best faction article I could find on this wiki. It gives short bios of notable members, good images, and excellent formatting for the amount of information contained in this article. This is a great article that I cannot find any reasons that it shouldn't be Featured Article.

  1. As nominator. Talk page 03:20, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. For reasons already stated by The Antibrony, this is indeed a complete, well-rounded article. Per nom. MarksmanFTW (talk) 21:30, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom justxjeff 14:46, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
  4. We don't get alot of those. Per nom. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  21:15, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per nom. Redskin-26 16:55, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Explains all the story related topic, plenty of pic, I don't see a reason why not. andrewp1017, 07:17, March 22, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Looks good TimelessPeople (talk) 14:39, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Great article Noob tub3r talk 13:37, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[]

USP .45[]

This article has lots of information and pictures, very well organized. The bread and butter of secondary weapons, you can find information on its appearances in campaign, its use in Multiplayer, even attachments on every MW title it has appeared on (so far all of them).

  1. Nominator: EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 07:31, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom. Excellent article. MarksmanFTW (talk) 19:33, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Great article. Redskin-26 01:19, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

UH-60 Blackhawk[]

Okay, good article, good amount of information, good length, well organized, good trivia and good gallery.

  1. As Nom --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 12:39, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png 3:04, April 4th, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Been nominated far too long, I think it finally deserves it. Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  01:11, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I go for this one  http://i.imgur.com/QVw9GKe.pngTimelessPeople  22:01, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Batman. -- laagone (talk)  11:27, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Page has an excellent infobox, lists where the vehicle appears in each game, and has good images to show what the article is about. None of the article rambles on about pointless features, and it seems like a perfect length for what it is. Gets my vote. Talk page 12:06, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Nom fur User:RatchetMaster great article

June 2013[]

Zombies (mode)[]

This page is complete, with good summaries and photos, great information and sources. It's photos have good resolution and it has links to the correct pages.

  1. As nom  http://i.imgur.com/QVw9GKe.pngTimelessPeople  22:28, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Page has large amounts of information consolidated into a decently large and informative article. Provides proper links where necessary and covers three games of content. Also has a good gallery and overall formatting could not be better. Gets my vote. Talk page 03:11, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Hey i wanted to nominate this! :D Per nom.--Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 10:02, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per nom N7 TC 10:15, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Although USP .45 has a great article and no doubt deserves to be featured, I'm more fond of this one. Per nom. -- laagone (talk)  11:40, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Anti --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  18:41, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Long overdue for this award. Zombie DropperTalk 18:48, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Agreed. The page is pretty much complete, I think it deserves to be featured. Pinkiepiejump.gif FireBird-Pinkie Pie!  00:28, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  9. DEAR GOD A MILLINON TIMES YES per nom http://i.imgur.com/KUDLq.png 00:31, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  10. Zombies is good. feargm 00:42, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

USP .45[]

Been up for nomination for a few months, and was close last month. As said before in other nominations, staple sidearm for the Modern Warfare series, great pictures, trivia, and info

  1. As nom Jurassic park787 i rz teh elphanetz ceelz 03:02, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Yeah, I've been trying to get this up for a while. This article has my approved vote. EvErLoyaLEagLE Talk 04:15, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Je suis d'accord (I agree :] ). Double kill! 17:57, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Sure, why not? Noob tub3r talk 19:40, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per nom MarksmanFTW (talk) 22:18, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Sandman (character)[]

This page is well written and complete with excellent pictures.

  1. As nom Double kill! 18:28, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
  2. per nomN7 TC 20:27, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. per n0m --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 21:07, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
  4. per nom Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png 19:00, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Nom 132527029757.gifArgorrath おしゃべり%E7%95%B0%E8%AD%B0%E3%81%82%E3%82%8A.jpg23:46, May 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comment — Re reading the article and there is no where near enough info in the biography section. It doesnt even mention what Sandman did in France etc.N7 TC 21:15, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comment — What kind of stuff should be added? (apart from Hamburg, France etc)--Double kill! 18:31, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

I don't personally think much more should be added, since Nub7 basically re-wrote the bio. -- laagone (talk)  19:00, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
Yep I've fixed it now, so I'll vote for this article lol. N7 TC 19:12, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[]

Sandman (character)[]

Almost won last month. Nevermind, great article, good images, good trivia and well organized.

  1. As nom. --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 14:25, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Nom nom. -- laagone (talk)  14:28, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom. Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png 22:16, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Om Nom User:RatchetMaster

Raul Menendez[]

This has to be one of the best character articles on the wiki that I can find. It goes into detail on every game/media he was in, has a good gallery showing his many appearances, and is a fully complete article. It also shows near perfect examples of good infoboxes and outcome possibilities, and I see no reason this article shouldn't be featured.

  1. As nom. AntiScootaTwo (talk) 13:45, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom  http://i.imgur.com/QVw9GKe.pngTimelessPeople  22:01, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Great article. Redskin-26 22:04, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Very well made article. Per nom MarksmanFTW (talk) 17:26, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per nom Recon Unit-52 (talk) 15:04, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Lev Kravchenko[]

Most in depth character page on the wiki. It has a really long info page, with all his info from BO1, BO2, and MW3. Lots of pictures and trivia as well. I really question how hw hasn't won FA status yet. 

1. AS Nom Jurassic park787 If the enemy is in range, so are you 23:44, June 25, 2013 (UTC) 17:10, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[]

Modern Warfare (series)[]

I am nominating Modern Warfare series because page is long, it is very good organized, describes every game in the series, has good gallery and trivia.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 09:51, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nom  http://i.imgur.com/QVw9GKe.pngTimelessPeople  02:01, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png 20:16, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per nom, plus the MW series is over, nothing major will be added again Jurassic park787 If the enemy is in range, so are you 03:56, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. yep and its written from an inuniverse perspective which is always nice N7 TC 20:23, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't really see how fictional events could have been written from the real life perspective. Otherwise, true. -- laagone (talk)  00:00, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
  6. I second that. EvErLoyaLEagLE (talk) 18:00, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per nom. Zombie DropperTalk 08:26, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Yuri (Modern Warfare 3)[]

This page is good and well written, and has a good gallery showing several pictures of Yuri's appearance, and he is an important main character in Modern Warfare 3. This article deserves to be featured.

  1. As nominator --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 17:11, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comment — "and he is an important main character in Modern Warfare 3" - This is a null point, voting is done on the quality of the page.

10:39, July 6, 2013 (UTC)

Mob of the Dead[]

After massive amounts of editing, I finally think this page is worthy of being Featured Article. The page is properly set up with good length, mentions all aspects of the map along with visual images, and useful sub-pages. Transcript is perfectly accurate and trivia is correct, so I see no reason for it not to receive to be featured.

  1. As nominator. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwotalk  00:45, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Anti. feargm 01:00, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Good article, and although this has nothing to do with it, I wub the map :3 -- laagone (talk)  02:03, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I couldn't agree more. Great page. MakeoutOne (talk) 08:36, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I agree with nomination. Digitized since 95 Pcthomas2 23:11, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Great map, outstanding article, 5 out of 5. StarComradeMark (talk) 17:49, July 9, 2013 (UTC)StarComradeMark
  7. I agree with nomination. Muser38 (talk) 20:13, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Per nom. Redskin-26 03:04, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Per nom MarksmanFTW (talk) 15:23, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

September 2013[]

Modern Warfare (series)[]

Okay, here we go again. Page is good, well written and organized, damn long, every game in the series is well descibed, has good gallery and trivia. Worth to be Featured Article.

  1. As nom --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 20:31, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per nominator.  http://i.imgur.com/GYKM9PK.jpg feargmtalk  17:00, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I agree. Capt. Soap MacTavish (talk) 07:10, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

MP5[]

The longest page I could find (bar other nomination) that hasn't been featured. Very well written for all versions of the weapon, nice pics, and quite a bit of trivia. Now I realize this is a completely invalid point, but somebody would have done this anyways, but it is a good gun.

  1. As nom Jurassic park787 If the enemy is in range, so are you 02:38, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Agreed Noob tub3r talk 16:29, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. It is a good gun. A nice article with good info and pics. -- laagone (talk)  16:51, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I agree with nomination Muser38 (talk) 20:12, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per MLG Redskin-26 15:29, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
  6. It isn't that good of a gun. Article is well written, makes good use of templates and categories, and has quality images. Also one of the longer and more in-depth gun articles on the wiki. I approve. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwotalk  17:09, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
  7. I agree. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 18:00, August 24, 2013 (UTC)

Zombie[]

This is a good page, full of information about the zombie creation itself, the nationalities and types of zombies amongst other things, and it has a good gallery, full of highh quality images.

  1. As nom Burgf001

October 2013[]

Yuri (Modern Warfare 3)[]

This page is well written and is well organised, and it has a good gallery and trivia.

  1. As nominator --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 12:43, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Great article --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 17:42, September 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Good article and an amazing character-- Weejoh-_- 20:42, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Very nice article MarksmanFTW (talk) 02:13, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Awesome MLPSucks (talk) 16:58, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per nom. Appears to be one of the better character pages on the wiki, and it has enough detail and images to be considered a featured article in my eyes. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwotalk  22:20, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  7. -- laagone (talk)  18:20, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Pave Low[]

A well written vehicle article, as well as a great amount of pictures and trivia.

  1. As nominator LtGenSpartan Perfect plans aren't 20:34, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Page looks great for featured.  http://i.imgur.com/GYKM9PK.jpg feargmtalk  21:04, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[]

Modern Warfare (series)[]

I think that it is time for this page to be featured. Great amount of info, nice gallery and trivia, and well organized. More than enough to be featured article.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 19:24, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. -- laagone (talk)  10:22, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Pack-a-Punch Machine[]

I think this would make a good page to be featured. Good info spanning across a couple titles, pretty good sized trivia section, loads of videos to watch pertaining to the page subject. 

  1. As nom  Kylet357 · talk  19:42, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. This is a highly detailed, organized, and well written article. Per nom MarksmanFTW (talk) 20:31, October 30, 2013 (UTC)


Charlie Don't Surf[]

I feel like this should be featured. It has a good description, great detail, a nice walkthrough of the level, and lots of trivia. Very similar to a previous featured article. (One Shot, One Kill)

  1. Nomming this LtGenSpartan If your attack is going too well, you're walking into a trap 21:53, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Redemption[]

This page would be excellent as a featured article. It features good pictures (and concept art), proper subpages for trivia/transcript, and has correct formatting. The overall article is long and all information is very useful, as the level itself is one of the most complex in Black Ops. I only see good content on this page, and nothing bad that wouldn't make it worthy of this award.

  1. As nom. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwotalk  00:33, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[]

Call of Duty: Black Ops II[]

This page should be featured. It is one of the longest non-featured articles, very well written, has a few videos, many, many pictures, and quite a bit of trivia.

  1. As nominator LtGenSpartan Never trust a 2nd Lieutenant who says "In my Experiences" 21:51, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Article looks great, definitely long enough and covers most, if not all details of BOII's life span. As per previously stated, all videos and photos are up to date, and the article uses correct templates and it has more than enough citations for the information. http://i.imgur.com/4XBy83R.pngAntiScootaTwotalk  19:53, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Very good article. -- laagone (talk)  19:58, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. sounds good to me. KλT 03:56, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yep  Kylet357 · talk  04:05, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
  6. I don't like the game, but article is good. --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 11:29, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms