Call of Duty Wiki
Register
Call of Duty Wiki
Line 103: Line 103:
 
#Explains all the story related topic, plenty of pic, I don't see a reason why not. andrewp1017, 07:17, March 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Explains all the story related topic, plenty of pic, I don't see a reason why not. andrewp1017, 07:17, March 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Looks good [[User:TimelessPeople|TimelessPeople]] ([[User talk:TimelessPeople|talk]]) 14:39, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Looks good [[User:TimelessPeople|TimelessPeople]] ([[User talk:TimelessPeople|talk]]) 14:39, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#Great article <span style="border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px; border: 2px dotted pink; background-color:black; box-shadow: 0 0 3px blue;">[[User:Noob tub3r|<span style="font-family:microsoft sans serif; color:green;">Noob tub3r</span>]] [[User talk:Noob tub3r|<sup><span style="font-family:microsoft sans serif; color:yellow;">talk</span></sup>]]</span> 13:37, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:37, 28 March 2013

Shortcut:
COD:FA
COD:AOTM
Please Remember to Sign Your Posts Using ~~~~

This page is for requesting a featured article. To nominate an article for featured status put {{Request for Featured}} on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it make good featured article status below the line on this page. Users can only support one article, there are no neutral or oppose votes (if you wish to change your vote, strikethrough your current vote first). Instead of a support template, please use numbering (# in the very beginning of a paragraph) instead.

Previously featured articles

Qualifications

  • Article cannot have been featured previously.
  • Article must be written in third person and must be completely unbiased, containing no impersonal "you"s and retaining consistent use of italics and bold.
  • Article must contain at least three images (excluding icons) with as high quality as possible, unless the topic is one that does not have any available images.
  • Article must have seven paragraphs of factual, unbiased information, preferably more, unless the topic of the article does not have enough facts available to warrant them.
  • Article must be properly categorized and sources must be provided when facts cannot be proven in-game.
  • Templates used in the article must be identical to templates used in pages of the same category (for example, using the Weapon Infobox template correctly).
  • Article cannot be in the Improvement Drive.

It is also good to remember that the 'featured' status means that the article is good. Opinions on the subject of the article have no value in voting or nominating (for example voting for MP5 because "it is a good gun" would be an invalid vote).

Nominations

Please post all nominations below this line.


UH-60 Blackhawk

Like i said before, this article is good, well described, well organized and with good gallery.

  1. As nominator --Cataphract_%28Civ5%29.png SlavByzantine_%28Civ5%29.pngTalkDromon_%28Civ5%29.png 18:05, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. i liek, particularly the images. Template:Sig/MLGisNot4Me 18:10, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom Iw5 cardicon soapN7 TC 19:57, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I agree with MGLisNot4Me, the pictures are very good quality, Doublekill10 (talk) 21:05, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I agree with Slav(Delija), it has very good gallery with many good images that are well described,   Thom-293_Profile.png FrostX12 Talk B312.png , 2:30 , March 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per all. Cooljoshua13 (talk) 03:31, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per all. Unrelatedly it's been 2+ years since any vehicle has been FA status. Jurassic park787 Ignite the Revolution! 02:51, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Kar98k

I'd like to nominate the Kar98k article. It's informative, accurate and has plenty good-quality images, with images for most (if not all) of the games it appears in.

  1. As the nominator Executioner Menu Icon BOIIAugFC Talk Page 18:30, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Task Force 141

This article is probably the best faction article I could find on this wiki. It gives short bios of notable members, good images, and excellent formatting for the amount of information contained in this article. This is a great article that I cannot find any reasons that it shouldn't be Featured Article.

  1. As nominator. Personal The Antibrony Sig Talk page 03:20, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. For reasons already stated by The Antibrony, this is indeed a complete, well-rounded article. Per nom. MarksmanFTW (talk) 21:30, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per nom justxjeff 14:46, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
  4. We don't get alot of those. Per nom. --Personal AndImBatman Sig imageBats a.k.a Rarity Filly  21:15, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per nom. Redskin-26 16:55, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Explains all the story related topic, plenty of pic, I don't see a reason why not. andrewp1017, 07:17, March 22, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Looks good TimelessPeople (talk) 14:39, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Great article Noob tub3r talk 13:37, March 28, 2013 (UTC)