Changes: Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

Revision as of 20:47, 16 May 2012

Archive:

1. 12/13/09 - 3/26/11
2. 3/28/11 - 4/25/12

Please Remember to Sign Your Posts Using ~~~~

Any questions or comments concerning the Improvement Drive? Talk to Argorrath for any Improvement Drive information.

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put {{Request for Improvement}} on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications

Article must have some problems such as:

Article written in first person and/or biased.
Article doesn't contain any images.
Article is short.
Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Voter qualifications

Voter must be a registered user who has either accumulated 50 mainspace edits on this wiki, or has proven that they otherwise know what they are doing, per COD:IAR.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

Requests for Improvement Drive Status

Please post all nominations below.

Removal of Hill 400 (2)

Adding onto criticism and advice from the last nomination, I've elaborated more on the plot of the mission, and added a gallery. With that, this article should be good to go.

Support

Support — As nominator. ParagonX7 _跟我谈天 http://i.imgur.com/3hrm0HS.png 16:03, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Fresher articles that are worse off must be the main focus. Let's get this one out. YELLOWLUCARIO ^TALK 17:03, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Yeah, this article's good. Poketape ^Talk 19:49, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support — The Wikia Contributor ^T ^| ^C ^| ^E ^| ^Q 22:37, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Looks much better than last time. Argorrath _{おしゃべり} 01:23, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Red skin -26 22:40, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Neutral — Not quite sure yet. http://i.imgur.com/vm7BQ.png 17:08, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Passes, Article will be removed. Poketape ^Talk 20:46, May 16, 2012 (UTC)

Sentry Grenade Launcher

Not that it's short, but it could use some rewriting and grammar fixes.

Support

Support — As nominator. Wuster1000 ^{NOT BACK} 22:02, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Neutral — Sure isn't the best article around. I'm still not sure if it should go on ID though. Red skin -26 21:39, May 15, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Removal of Sicily 1

After getting to elaborate on this article and giving it some meat, and making on par with most of the Campaign levels, I've added a "Plot" "Characters" "Weapon Loadout" and a "Gallery". With that I think that this article is good to go.

Support

Support — As Nominator Argorrath _{おしゃべり}02:11, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Looks good to me. Zombie Dropper^Talk 23:41, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Article has improved drastically, still not the greatest article out there, but good enough to be taken off ID. Red skin -26 21:11, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support — Per Nom The Wikia Contributor ^T ^| ^C ^| ^E ^| ^Q 23:22, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 *[[Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript]]
 *[[Damage Multiplier]]
-*[[Hill 400]]
 *[[GRU]]
 *[[Battle of Kursk]]