Call of Duty Wiki:Requested Improvement Drive Articles

Archive: 1. 12/13/09 - 3/26/11 2. 3/28/11 - 4/25/12 3. 4/26/12 -

Please Remember to Sign Your Posts Using ~~~~

Any questions or comments concerning the Improvement Drive? Talk to Argorrath for any Improvement Drive information.

This page is for requesting an Improvement Drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put {{Request for Improvement}} on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be an Improvement Drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an Improvement Drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the Improvement Drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the Improvement Drive at the same time. Any article in the Improvement Drive cannot be a Featured Article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications

Article must have some problems such as:

• Article written in first person and/or biased.
• Article doesn't contain any images.
• Article is short.
• Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
• Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Current Improvement Drive Articles

• Theater
• Paris
• Eclipse Easter Egg/Transcript
• Damage Multiplier
• GRU
• Battle of Kursk
• Closing In
• Ridley
• Jonathon Shephard
• Sentry Grenade Launcher

Requests for Improvement Drive Status

Please post all nominations below.

Remove Road to Remagen

The article has been given a lot of progression, It has been given a Gallery, Plot (or mission summary), Weapon Loadout, and a Characters list. It has improved greatly and is on par with many other campaign articles so I say it is good enough to be taken off ID.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As Nominator. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}04:19, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Per Nom. Redskin-26 01:40, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — Per Nominator. Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 18:22, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
4. Support — Article was greatly improved. Poketape ^Talk 18:19, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
5. Support — Per nom The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
6. Support — Per nomination. The page looks great. DarkMetroid567^okay 01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
7. Support — Article has greatly improved. Per all. Pierogi^Talk 15:36, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
8. Support — Per Nom. http://i.imgur.com/VwuEI.pngSXe Fiend · talkhttp://i.imgur.com/VwuEI.png15:49, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Nomination Passes, Article will be Removed. Poketape ^Talk 18:46, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of GRU

All though GRU isn't the best article out there, it seems hard to edit the article due to the article seemingly out of info. The faction is briefly mentioned and other than nthat seems that we have used all the info we can giv out unless it is intertwined with a further CD game, and I think its time to get it out of the ID.Argorrath _{おしゃべり}07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As Nom Argorrath _{おしゃべり}07:05, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
2. Support — Per nomination. DarkMetroid567^okay 01:16, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
3. Support — As good as it can be now. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose — Since it's not done it shouldn't be removed. The Wikia Contributor ^{T | C | E | Q} 19:22, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose — It seems to miss out the info it needs. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 19:39, June 21, 2012 (UTC) Changing vote. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG. Redskin-26 21:47, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
4. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly  23:34, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
5. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG Pierogi^Talk 00:51, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
6. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG Madnessfan34537 http://i.imgur.com/lL5xjBH.png 08:28, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
7. Oppose — Per TWC and MLG http://i.imgur.com/E2uiO5T.png Smilular^Talk http://i.imgur.com/KNXWYe1.png 20:43, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

   Inb4 C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 20:46, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Comment — What is there to put in there, from what I see, nothing else of GRU is even mentioned, all we have is the intel to be fair they weren't explained almost at all, It just seems hard to upgrade a article that doesn't have much of an impact in Black Ops, only being mentioned as a faction of BO. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}01:11, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

For example, put the message the article talks about in the article. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 16:23, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Nomination Fails, Article will not be removed. Poketape ^Talk 18:48, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

I would say the voting is still a little bit in progress. Argo just added some sufficient stuff today, and most of the opposers haven't checked at it yet. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 18:52, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

It's easier to just nominate it again, waiting for the opposing votes to notice would take longer. Poketape ^Talk 22:26, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Beachhead (developer)

I know that I don't have fifty mainspace edits but I know that this article must be improved. I was surfing the wiki when I came across this one-sentence, imageless aritcle that had to be improved. It has been abandoned for over 6 months. Template:XJoonblitz/Signature 17:39, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. As Nominator XJoonblitz (talk) 14:13, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

You can still nominate/vote even without 50 mainspace edits, the requirement was removed a while ago. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 14:15, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Is it because of COD:IAR ? XJoonblitz (talk) 14:24, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, we decided to remove the whole voting requirement (other than having an account) some time ago here. --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 14:28, July 6, 2012 (UTC)