Call of Duty Wiki
Call of Duty Wiki
No edit summary
Line 59: Line 59:
 
{{Template:Support|Not in perfect shape, but it isn't bad and doesn't need the Drive's attention anymore. }} [[User:Seijana|Seijana]] 19:44, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
{{Template:Support|Not in perfect shape, but it isn't bad and doesn't need the Drive's attention anymore. }} [[User:Seijana|Seijana]] 19:44, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
===Neutral===
 
===Neutral===
  +
It good... max sudrow 20:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC)maxx1222
 
===Oppose===
 
===Oppose===
 
{{Oppose|The trivia section needs improvement and carries some information in other parts of the page. Delete that stuff and take out the "you"s and I'll support.}} [[File:BOofficialicon.jpg‎|40px]]<font style="background:black">[[User:Poketape|<font color="white">'''Poketape'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Poketape|<font color="white"><u>Talk</u></font>]]</sup></font> 03:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 
{{Oppose|The trivia section needs improvement and carries some information in other parts of the page. Delete that stuff and take out the "you"s and I'll support.}} [[File:BOofficialicon.jpg‎|40px]]<font style="background:black">[[User:Poketape|<font color="white">'''Poketape'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Poketape|<font color="white"><u>Talk</u></font>]]</sup></font> 03:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 20 March 2011

Archive:Replacement filing cabinet
1. 12/13/09 - 7/18/10
2. 7/19/10 - 12/6/10
3. 12/7/10 -
Please Remember to Sign Your Posts Using ~~~~


Please note that you must have 50 main space edits to vote. Ineligible votes will be struck through and ignored.
To see how many mainspace edits you have, see this page.


Any questions or comments concerning the Improvement Drive? Talk to Argorrath for any Improvement Drive information.


This page is for requesting an improvement drive article. To nominate an article for the Improvement Drive, put {{Request for Improvement}} on top of the requested page and add the name of the page and why you think it deserves to be the improvement drive article below the line on this page. If you think a page is too good to be an improvement drive article, you can also submit a vote to take it out of the improvement drive article group. You can vote on and nominate multiple articles at the same time. Articles are not competing with each other, and multiple articles can be added to the improvement drive at the same time. Any article in the improvement drive cannot be a featured article until it is taken out of the group.

Qualifications

Article must have some problems such as:

  • Article written in first person and/or biased.
  • Article doesn't contain any images.
  • Article is short.
  • Article isn't categorized and/or sourced where needed.
  • Article has frequent spelling and/or grammatical errors.

Voter qualifications

  • Voter must be a registered user who has either accumulated 50 edits on this wiki, or has proven that they otherwise know what they are doing, per COD:IAR (policy pending).

Current Improvement Drive Articles

Requests for Improvement Drive Status

Please post all nominations below.


Russo-American War

This article needs a bit of help, IMO. The layout could do with improvement, and the article is full of speculation relating to organisations like NATO, which is also real-life info.

Support

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. Sgt. S.S. 18:13, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Look good to me... max sudrow 16:45, March 20, 2011 (UTC)maxx1222

Comments

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Wasn't the ID closed? PierogiTalk 00:07, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

It is now open. To get the community to fix current ID articles and then submit them for removal, I periodically close the ID. This makes sure people aren't just adding articles instead of actually editing them. File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 03:15, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Nacht der Untoten

This page looks fine to me.

Support

Pictogram voting support Support — As nominator.US Army OF-2 Rambo362 US Army OF-2 20:28, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Not in perfect shape, but it isn't bad and doesn't need the Drive's attention anymore. Seijana 19:44, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

It good... max sudrow 20:30, March 20, 2011 (UTC)maxx1222

Oppose

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — The trivia section needs improvement and carries some information in other parts of the page. Delete that stuff and take out the "you"s and I'll support. File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 03:29, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

I looked at the page and noted two things, 1. the page is generally clear of you's of any kind, and 2. there is no trivia section. The trivia is a sub-page. US Army OF-2 Rambo362 US Army OF-202:22, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
I count the trivia section as part of the page unless nominated separately. Until the trivia is cleared, I won't support. File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 03:14, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Poketape. PierogiTalk 00:06, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comment

Just Like Old Times/Trivia

I edited the page a lot so it looks pretty good now.

Support

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 17:10, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — looks much better than it was. elmo's ujelly? ramblings 13:16, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Support — Per all. PierogiTalk 16:50, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comment

Utility

Support

Pictogram voting support Support — as nominator. look bad to me max sudrow 16:45, March 20, 2011 (UTC)maxx1222

Neutral

Oppose

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — It looks fine to me. PierogiTalk 16:46, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comment