FANDOM


Replacement filing cabinet This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page, other than for maintenance.

Request for Adminship: Dolten
Submitted: 21:11, September 30, 2010 (UTC), by Dolten
Closed: 06:33, October 14, 2010 (UTC), by Ukimies
Result: Unsuccessful

DoltenEdit

I, Dolten am nominating myself for Adminship.

I have a watchful and nearly constant watch on the War Room, as well as the Recent Changes.


I would help the Wiki greatly with the acquisition of SysOp tools. The largest way being dealing with vandals, they have became more rampant as of late and will continue to do so in the months before and after the release of Black Ops. And for that my friends, we will need more admins for.

Furthermore, I will become more active as fall and winter carry on. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 21:11, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

And that makes it okay? You should know better than that, I don't care if an admin said you could - you still vandalized. --azuris_ 22:24, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
There are admins on here that have vandalized dozens of times and everyone forgets about it, I do it once and I can never live it down. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 22:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


SupportEdit

Pictogram voting support Support — Dolten is a well known, and more importantly, a well trusted editor. He vandalsied once yes - but with permission from an admin. Besides, nobody minded. A Lonely Nomad 21:14, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — <Dolten is an amazing editor with no records of vandal or flame. He seems to solve any situation. This editor has a strong knowledge in general (as well as about CoD). I will always look up to him.>M249 menu icon CoD4gamemasta424 TalkM249 menu icon CoD4 21:40, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Dolten has vandalized before, userpages (but only when it was requested), and the main page twice. --azuris_ 21:42, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
I vandalised the main page once, with an admin request. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 22:21, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — - he sould be a admin becuse he has never been rude or dissrespectful in any way exept when he "Took a shit" on the home page.CoD1 Weapon PPShSignatureSpecialOpsGenralMinigunRay Gun 3rd person view WaW 22:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

@SOGM and ALN: Please revise your votes to actually reflect why you feel that Dolten should be an administrator. Imrlybord7 14:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting support Strong Support — Dolten has edited here for a long time, I think it is time for him to get SYOP powers. CrossbowcacFall 50 cal. Talk?Crossbowcac. 02:03, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

NeutralEdit

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral leaning towards Support — I'd have supported per nomination, but for CE and Dunn's reasons in the Oppose section -Personal StB sig StB Flag 21:30, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral leaning towards Oppose — I think that's just what the wiki needs, Shotrocket. Spock1nlmgr Rank-E4-Specialist

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — Per shotrocket. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 21:42, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral leaning towards Support — While I do agree with Shotrocket, you are always undoing vandalism and contributing to discussions in the War Room, which kinda outweighs the bias. ScavengePro1Eltomo85 talk 20:38, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — Your a great editor and everything, but some of the points against you restrict me from voting yes, so i'll keep my vote as Neutral US Army OF-2 Rambo362 US Army OF-2

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — You are a great editor, but your maturity amongst other things is the only thing keeping me neutral, your dedication is admirable and I could see you as an admin in the future, provided you mature a bit. --ukimies {talk | irc | administration} 19:29, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting neutral Neutral — I completely agree with Ukimes. You're a good editor, but you can be mean and insulting at times that don't call for it. Personal Poketape 8-bit Price Emblem flippedPoketape Talk8-bit Price Emblem MW2 23:39, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

Pictogram voting oppose Strong Oppose — I remember you saying you "quit" all wikis. Also, this is a huge no-no. --azuris_ 21:15, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — At the moment we do not need more admins in my opinion. Sorry, you'll just have to wait until we need new ones. --Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 21:18, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Cpl.Dunn -- IDave Ja VuTalkcontribs 21:21, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

User only has 15 main space edits, ineligible to vote. Personal WHISKEY35 signature Talk 21:52, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — You have demonstrated the dedication and understanding, but not the maturity. I believe that at some point you will most likely become an admin if you work on your user interaction and debate tactics, provided you don't quit the wiki too many times in the interim (I meant that in a light-hearted way). Imrlybord7 21:20, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Considering the number of green names both here and in the RC, I don't see a need for another administrator at this time. Also, per above and from conversations on the IRC, I'm not sure if you would be the best person for adminship. Ajraddatz Talk 23:46, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Did't you say you'd quit all of your wikis? Besides we don't need more admins at the moment. DevilWarrior112 15:21, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Sorry, but you're not THAT active and you constantly threaten to quit Wikia or go inactive. Pirateflag emblem MW2 The Smuff 17:36, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — Per Smuff.First Sergeant Emblem MW2 Sgt. Guthix's mage2T C E

Pictogram voting oppose Oppose — While you are a great editor and contributor, I have seen you use harsh words and at times you can be extremely biased. However, my point below changes my vote to Oppose. Personal Joe Copp sig 23:59, October 13, 2010 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Care to give a reason CE? A Lonely Nomad 21:19, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @Cpl. Dunn: Black Ops is right around the corner, thats why I put this up. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 21:20, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @ CE: You guys told me to do that. :/ DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 21:23, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

We told you to vandalize our user pages, NOT the main page - when you did that, I was really disappointed. If we did tell you to do that, then I am very disappointed in those who did tell you to do that. --azuris_ 21:31, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Dunn, that is not a valid reason to oppose a bid for adminship. Imrlybord7 21:25, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Per BordM249 menu icon CoD4gamemasta424 TalkM249 menu icon CoD4 21:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @Imrlybord7 Yes it is. If we don't need anymore admins at the moment, why can't I say it? --Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 21:29, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Because that simply isn't how adminship works. If you feel that someone would make a good admin, vote support. If not, oppose. If you are neutral, vote neutral. The only time the current number of admins matters is if the current admin team is insufficient to run the wiki. Imrlybord7 21:37, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Ya know, you might expect an RfA to be spelled correctly. Personal Joe Copp sig 22:05, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @Shotrocket06: Everyone makes spelling mistakes, you can't hold that against him. --Cpl. Dunn(Talk) 22:13, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Remember the Permabannning TMOI forum?

Dolten, you were a huge supporter of that forum. And the fact that you supported it that much made me think that you don't know what actually warrants a block. And you could block someone for a personal/baised reason. --azuris_ 22:15, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

If I had that to do over I wouldn't have supported that. Although if it came up again right now I may think about it. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 22:24, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @Speical Ops Genral Minigun, care to elaborate? M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 22:29, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — @Fall .50 cal, so has Darth, but we don't give him sysop powers. M1911 smallYüri KaslovM1911 small right 22:28, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — Just to inform everyone, more admins Will be needed. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 17:16, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Questions Edit

Pictogram voting question Question
"I have a watchful and nearly constant watch on the War Room," - why does War Room activity make you think you would be a good admin?
"I would help the Wiki greatly with the aquasition of SysOp tools." how so?
Why do you feel more administrators are needed?
What will you do as an administrator? --azuris_ 21:39, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment Comment — CE, it doesn't work that way. You know enough about me to know if I'm ready or not, it would only be a wast of my time to explain why I should be an admin. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 22:12, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

It does work that way, because not everyone knows you enough to see if you are ready for adminship. And you're making it sound like it's just for the hell of it, which it's not - this is supposed to be a very, very, serious discussion. Just because I know why you want to be an admin doesn't mean that everyone does. --azuris_ 22:17, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
You're the only one asking.

And for the hell of it? I thought you were smarter than that. DoltenDolten signature USMC logo Let's Talk 17:02, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Just because he's the only one asking doesn't mean others don't want to know. What you just said demonstrates a lack of control when questioned, and because of that I change my vote to Oppose. Personal Joe Copp sig 23:59, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.