Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/SXe Fiend

SXe Fiend^{Talk • Contribs • Edit count}

Hello, CoDE here, and I am here to nominate SXe Fiend, one of the most unique editors I have ever met, for administrator. SXe Fiend literally amazes me with his spectacular editing, as well as other users, which is why he was nominated as User of the Month for February. His perfomance in editing and dedication simply matches even the best editors here. Here are many reasons why he should gain sysop rights:

• His amount of edits are 6 times over 1,000.
• His amount of time in this wiki is over a year.
• He has a ton of mainspace edits(excluding blog comments and userpage edits).
• He is active in other wiki communities aswell.
• Our community is growing everyday, so why not another admin.
• A very active user, the last time I checked his userpage he had 3,000 edits, but currently now, he has 6,000 edits.
• He is a custodian, meaning if he has these sysop rights, the more unnecessary images he will clean and delete aswell.
• His dedication in editing is almost unmatched.
• Of course, he knows and follows all the policies here.
• His behavior and conduct is great, whereas he has a clean record of bans given.

He has perfected his current tools, but with the admin tools(if granted), his editing will become more effective. Don't get me wrong I'm jealous of his works here, but I'm forced to write this request because I personally think he needs these rights in order for his great work to be upgraded. CoDE-2KGo to my talk page!22:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As nominator. CoDE-2KGo to my talk page!22:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
2. Strong Support — I give my full support here, this guy is a great editor, and I'm absolutely certain he'd make great use of the admin tools. Leon S. Kennedy ^{AKA Shepard} 03:10, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
3. Strong Support — SXe Fiend is a great editor, he even has a UotM to prove it, so I think he should get this Adminship. Metl^Talk 03:27, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose — I have no doubt that SXe is a great user, but the RfA presented isn't very well written and doesn't really show how he needs the tools at the moment. Lyra_(SPNKR)^{& Bon Bon forever <3} 22:16, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
2. Oppose — I am not convinced SXe Fiend needs administrator rights at this time. DarkMetroid567^okay 22:25, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
3. Oppose — I'm not sure that SXe Fiend needs the tools. Conqueror of all Zombies 22:27, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
4. Not Yet — The guy is a great editor and everything but I don't think he's ready for Sysop, well at least not yet. Angel of Anarchy _(Jeremy14) · Talk!22:37, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
5. Not Yet — While SXe is an exceptional editor that shows promise, I feel he is not yet ready to receive sysop rights. http://i.imgur.com/E2uiO5T.png Smilular^Talk http://i.imgur.com/KNXWYe1.png 03:15, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
6. Not Yet — Per smil. http://i.imgur.com/vm7BQ.png 03:26, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
7. Not Yet — A great editor, and a good friend. But I am not sure he is ready for Admin tools at this time. http://i.imgur.com/KUDLq.png 03:32, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
8. Not Yet — Per all Qw3rty! 03:34, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
9. Oppose — While I'm pretty sure SxE would make a great admin, there's just a reason I'm opposing: The format the RfA is written doesn't clearly convinces me that the user is in need of sysop tools at the moment, since some, if not all, of the points given are just a regular over a year user, with some exceptions such as custodian. Every average-good user can fill out most of these points.-Diegox223 ^{Zed's dead, baby.}03:45, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

   What? So you think he'd make a good admin, but you are opposing simply because of the way the RfA is written? I frankly think that, if the user would make a good admin, he should be supported, regardless of how well the RfA is written. Just the way I see it. Leon S. Kennedy ^{AKA Shepard} 03:57, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

   The RfA needs to show you on what and why a user needs sysop tools. As I said in my vote, most of the points here can and have been made by the most active users, so it doesn't really show anything beyond on why he (and all the people who have achieved those merits) is (are) good editor(s). If Redskin's or Sam's RfA would've been written poorly or like this, I bet most of the people would've opposed.-Diegox223 ^{Zed's dead, baby.}04:04, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

10. Oppose — Per Smilular --Guitar t-bone^{Talk to AJ} 03:48, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
11. Oppose — I just don't think there is an explicit need for SXe to gain sysop tools. Carb⁰
12. Oppose — Barely an activity in the War Room shows me that he should be more involved with the community before acquiring these flags. -- <choose><option>azuris_</option><option> Azuris^talk</option> 04:11, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments/Questions

Comment — "One of the most unique editors." Every editor here is unique, and one can not be more unique than another. Jussayin'. Lyra_(SPNKR)^{& Bon Bon forever <3} 22:13, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, and according to me, he is one of the most unique I've met. CoDE-2KGo to my talk page!22:17, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure how that even works. Raven's wing ^Talk22:22, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comment — "Don't get me wrong I'm jealous of his works here, but I'm forced to write this request..." What do you mean by this?.-Diegox223 ^{Zed's dead, baby.}03:54, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

He probably just worded that wrong. Metl^Talk 05:22, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comment — When, exactly did SXe accept his nomination? DarkMetroid567^okay 04:18, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

That's what I'm asking. CoDE-2KGo to my talk page!06:54, April 30, 2012 (UTC)