Call of Duty Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Sactage (4)

Sactage^{Talk • Contribs • Edit count}

I'd like to nominate Sactage for bureaucrat, because I think that with Modern Warfare 3 not too far around the corner, we could do with another bureaucrat, and I believe Sactage to be the best choice.

We could do with another bureaucrat because at the moment, there are only 2 active bureaucrats, with Bovell and Chiafriend12 being at semi-activity, and Azuris being at around three-fifths-activity. Also, we will be getting a lot of traffic, so it's probably best to have another active bureaucrat on the team.

I think Sactage is the best choice because he shows consistently helpful and appropriate behaviour, and conversely, he doesn't overburden people with rules and regulations. In short - he has a character which is fit for a bureaucrat. He's also very active even during school, which is a useful bonus.

Consider your votes carefully, remember that there aren't as many active bureaucrats as it may seem. Thanks!      22:19, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. he didn't ask anyone this time. I did this completely out of my own accord.      22:19, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to thank Callofduty4 for nominating me for bureaucrat, and I accept his nomination with gratitude. User:Sactage/s.js 22:35, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As nominator.      22:19, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
2. Support — Per Nom RC™ 22:21, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
3. Weak Support — I guess he'll find the tools useful. Template:Sig/MLG 22:21, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
4. Support — Per (omnom)nom. Senior Sammich Need help? 22:22, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
5. Support — I don't see why not. DrkDragonz66   Talk  Contribs  Combat Arms   22:24, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
6. Support — Per nomnom.-Diegox223 ^{Zed's dead, baby.}22:31, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
7. Support — I don't see why the hell not. For all I care, they could make Diegox a Sysop. Actually.....that gave me an idea. Metl^Talk23:06, September 12, 2011 (UTC) -- Not a valid reason to support. User:Sactage/s.js 23:29, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

   Isn't "Why the hell not" valid? The rest is useless in terms of consensus, but the first sentence is valid I think. Template:Sig/MLG 06:19, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

8. Support — Sure, Sactage is a very good user, and the wiki would greatly benefit from him becoming a bureaucrat. Hip-techboy ^Christmas --23:09, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
9. Support — Eh, well, per the reasons of my nomination for him. Pierogi^Talk 01:50, September 13, 2011 (UTC)
10. Support — per all my reasons on his last RfB nominated by me. Maybe three times is the charm eh? File:20PX SIG.gif Talk 06:15, September 13, 2011 (UTC)
11. Support — Per nom. elmo's ramblings 06:33, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

• {{Support|At the present time, a fine choice for a bureaucrat. Nikolai Cannot Die 07:35, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral leaning towards Oppose — While we may be a little short of B'crats right now, I rarely see Sactage on the wiki. File:Ireland flag.gifCoaZ^TalkFile:Ireland flag.gif 04:11, September 13, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Weak Oppose — I don't find any need for the tools as of now. COD:R is full iirc, same with Blog Patrol. There is no 'need' for BCrats as of now. Also, we haven't lost any Bcrats since this have we :P "The main point of my vote is still that we don't need a new bureaucrat at the moment... Flag of the United Kingdom (3-5).svg Callofduty4 Bata India flag.gif 21:56, August 2, 2011 (UTC)" (Please correct me if I'm wrong) _Sp3c^Talk_ 22:50, September 12, 2011 (UTC)

   I'd assume COD:R would be opened back up to requests closer to the release of Modern Warfare 3, and notice that is a point Callofduty4 brings up in the nomination. Also, what Callofduty4 said in that quoted statement was over one month ago, things have changed since then. User:Sactage/s.js 23:13, September 12, 2011 (UTC)