I was just watching the Call of Duty: ELITE briefing a while ago, and when I saw the clan feature, I thought "Who are some friends that can be in my clan?" Of course, I instantly thought of an ELITE clan for the Wiki! Would you guys support having an official Call of Duty Wiki ELITE clan? Please explain why or why not.
Support
Support — As nominator. DarkMetroid567 00:47, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Support — I figured we'd do this any way, since we already have a wiki clan. File:Ireland flag.gifCoaZTalkFile:Ireland flag.gif 00:53, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Support — Per all. Tr0529 I'm a nub 01:55, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Support — I'm not in the Wiki clan because I like having my own clan tag, but this way I can be included. File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 01:24, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Support--- This is a great idea, except we'd run out of space in the clan. Still a good idea though.Hip-techboy Christmas 02:06, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Support — Why not? It's just for a bit of fun. 
17:19, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Support — I thought Bovell already created one -_- 
DrkDragonz66 
Talk Contribs Combat Arms 04:04, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
Support — If we ran out of space we could make [CDW2] a clan, besides it adds a more social aspect to the game. The Wikia Contributor T | C | E | Q00:14, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support — It is a good idea. It is for fun, nothing much else. -- -- mr_expert talk 15:03, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support — We can always make more than one clan for the wiki. Think of them as companies or something. Heck have each crat' be a captain/clan leader, problem solved. Carbonite 0 22:43, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comment — ^Yes, I think that's a swell idea my boy. Hip-techboy Christmas --22:46, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support — I'm not getting ELITE but for the people that do, this is probably a easy and great idea Damac1214 23:14, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support — Why not? The first clan even was a ton of fun and this would be another way for users on the wiki to have fun. PandaElDiablo|talk| 
23:32, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support — - A great way for the Wiki's clan to extend itself. It just makes sense to have one registered under ELITE. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 20:57, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
Support — I see no disadvantages of this. Smuff[citation provided] 20:59, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Support — Per Hippie. Template:Sig/MLG 12:54, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
Weak Support — It would seem like a nice clan, though I'm unsure how it'll work out. User:THEROFLBOAT 01:38, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose — No, ELITE Won't come out for the wii, it just won't. Besides, we have the CDWC. 
Reznov115TalkFile:Anim-tactical-nukeemblem.gif 18:11, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- The wii gaming community is small as it is, not to mention the CoD wiki wii community. PierogiTalk 18:13, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- So the Wiki can't have a clan because it won't work for Wii? So if Wii doesn't get it, no one does? Sounds like jealousy. DarkMetroid567 00:52, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Vote stuck out due to irrelevancy in the arguments. Reznov is free to re-submit a vote but with different arguments. Just because the Wii doesn't get it doesn't mean no one does. 17:19, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose — CDWC can cover more anyway, but the ELITE users can make their own clans aside from the wiki. YELLOWLUCARIO TALK 20:51, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- "CDWC can cover more anyway" What are you seriously talking about? 17:19, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- It means that CDWC can have more than 100 members, and covers more than MW3 and BO, and ELITE can't do that, as far as is known (you're not gonna get ELITE for games like COD:Zombies and Mobilized, but in CDWC we can cover them) YELLOWLUCARIO TALK 17:23, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Does CDWC have stat comparison and other social stuff? No. ELITE does many things the CDWC does not do. The CDWC things can cover other stuff, but we might as well use ELITE for MW2 and BO.DarkMetroid567 00:04, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
- It means that CDWC can have more than 100 members, and covers more than MW3 and BO, and ELITE can't do that, as far as is known (you're not gonna get ELITE for games like COD:Zombies and Mobilized, but in CDWC we can cover them) YELLOWLUCARIO TALK 17:23, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm thinking this vote should be counted as invalid, as their is not serious meditated reasoning, just something he typed up.
- "Per Reznov" is not valid, and as it seems neither does "per YR". The Wikia Contributor T | C | E | Q00:08, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Is it possible to withdraw a vote or something, I've decided that I don't care. DogNut327 00:11, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Just strike it out. DarkMetroid567 02:32, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose — Ok, I am likely going to get pwned here. Pretty much, CDWC covers more. ELITE only covers Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3. Besides, I don't know about you guys, but I am really not all that interested in stats. Also, will this phase out the CDWC? Reznov115Talk
- CDWC does NOT cover more. We should be using ELITE anyways for BO and MW3 while still keeping CDWC. ELITE and CDWC are different in their own ways. Oh, and one more thing... YOU'RE OPPOSING BECAUSE YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT STATS? Hmmmm.... DarkMetroid567 22:30, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose — ELITE clans are limited in numbers (100 members), and I foresee problems waiting to happen if the same criteria of CDWC entry is applied to this. Unless admittance to this ELITE clan is elaborated upon, and is more strict than its counterpart, people are going to be left out. 
Bovell Talk | Contrib. 01:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Well we can make it stricter, then :P 01:45, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
Discussion
You do know this is the war room not the "let's go and make something new for no reason"? -- CakeMixPie. 00:49, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- This is discussion for whoever approves a Wiki Clan for when Modern Warfare 3 comes out. Some people might not like the idea. Besides, the War Room completely allows this. Otherwise, threads like the On this Day feature would not make any sense. DarkMetroid567 00:51, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
ELITE clans are limited to 100 players. Additionally, a #CoDWiki group exists for those with access to the Beta. Bovell Talk | Contrib. 01:58, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Is #CoDWiki a clan? I'm a bit confused by the difference between clans and groups (I don't have ELITE). File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 04:07, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- What do we do if all the spots are filled and people still want to join? And will this be a extension of the CDWC or a new thing cause, I'm alitte confused. REDSKIN-26
13:28, September 5, 2011 (UTC) - And who formed #CoDWiki anyway? File:Ireland flag.gifCoaZTalkFile:Ireland flag.gif 16:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
- What do we do if all the spots are filled and people still want to join? And will this be a extension of the CDWC or a new thing cause, I'm alitte confused. REDSKIN-26
- Does #CoDWiki exist only on Xbox 360, or on PS3 too? Hiptechboy 00:44, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
Question — Can users only join one clan at a time or can they be in multiple clans? File:BOofficialicon.jpgPoketape Talk 04:03, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
Comment — I would like to make this perfectly clear to all, so forgive me if I come across brashly. CDWC ELITE WILL BE AN EXTENSION CDWC, NOT A STRAIGHT REPLACEMENT. Even though ELITE IS ACTUALLY FREE TO GET, It could serve as one. There are NO VISIBLE DOWN SIDES to having an ELITE clan for the wiki. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 21:04, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Why would this phase out the CDWC? ELITE and CDWC are do different things. DarkMetroid567 22:39, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. TheDocRichtofen (Talk) 08:25, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
If the CDWC clan gets full, why can't we just make another group that shows that the clan is still growing, ex. Call of Duty Wiki Clan (cont.)? File:Ireland flag.gifCoaZTalkFile:Ireland flag.gif 16:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Yea, like the idea Carbonite suggested. Hip-techboy Christmas 16:26, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
- I guess. I didn't read his suggestion. File:Ireland flag.gifCoaZTalkFile:Ireland flag.gif 19:44, September 10, 2011 (UTC)