Changes: Forum:The talk pages.

Revision as of 21:18, 13 October 2012

Forums: Index → War Room → The talk pages.

I've recently noticed that the talk pages (Not including User talk pages) haven't been used that much and I thought that the main reason would be because there's a different page for them. So I thought we could use talk pages on the same page like they do on the Fan-Fiction wiki. _ Cod monan Talk _ 08:22 October 13 2012

Discussion

What you mean is that you think we should enable article comments. 2 2 2 ^talk 07:33, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Why do we need them to be used? There's no point in that. Enabling article comments will just clog up the Wiki Activity and make it harder to fight vandalism. Joseph Tan ^{l talk l edit count l contribs l}

*cough* --MLGisNot4Me ^talk 08:08, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Well if it will clog up the Wiki Activity then I understand, but I thought it would be much more easy to enable Article comments. _ Cod monan

Talk _ 10:31 October 13 2012

Strong Oppose Completely unnecessary, it will overcrowd pages, making it hard for mobile users, and people with old computers to work on the wiki. Vandalism will be hard, and also we don't have a big talk for every page. It should stay the way it is. --Bats a.k.a Rarity Filly 11:34, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose Article comments are not really needed for a wiki such as this. It may promote a lot of comments on pages regarding opinons, instead of comments to help improve the page.

Crazy sam10 • Talk

20:39, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Nope nope nope nope nope - Article comments seriously increase page loading times and aren't really for discussing how to run a page, they're more for, well, commenting. Here's an example for you - Seddie. Smuff^{[citation provided]} 20:42, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose- Per Smuff. And would bog down edits, and also make it significantly harder to fight vandalism that occurs on the page. Argorrath _{おしゃべり}20:47, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Dear god no - They're a pain in the ass to moderate and they aren't needed at all. --KλT 20:58, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Naw - I will get Tunselous on this. 21:18, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:58, 13 October 2012 (view source) KATANAGOD (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:18, 13 October 2012 (view source) Drkdragonz66 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	'''Dear god no''' - They're a pain in the ass to moderate and they aren't needed at all. --[[User:KATANAGOD\|KλT]] 20:58, October 13, 2012 (UTC)		'''Dear god no''' - They're a pain in the ass to moderate and they aren't needed at all. --[[User:KATANAGOD\|KλT]] 20:58, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	'''Naw''' - I will get Tunselous on this. {{Signature/Drkdragonz66/2}} 21:18, October 13, 2012 (UTC)