Call of Duty Wiki

Editing

L96A1

1
  • The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit. If you are undoing an edit that is …
Latest revision Your text
Line 66: Line 66:
 
The L115 Isolator, unfortunately, is statistically inferior to the '''[[D115 Disassembler]]''', which shares pretty much the same stats as the L115 Isolator, with the sole differences being a larger magazine size of 10 vs the L115 Isolator's 8, and the drastically higher rate of fire. As such, there is little to no reason to use the L115 Isolator if the player is capable of obtaining the D115 Disassembler, besides the L96A1's superior performance to the [[Dragunov]] in the earlier rounds.
 
The L115 Isolator, unfortunately, is statistically inferior to the '''[[D115 Disassembler]]''', which shares pretty much the same stats as the L115 Isolator, with the sole differences being a larger magazine size of 10 vs the L115 Isolator's 8, and the drastically higher rate of fire. As such, there is little to no reason to use the L115 Isolator if the player is capable of obtaining the D115 Disassembler, besides the L96A1's superior performance to the [[Dragunov]] in the earlier rounds.
   
This weapon can be considered a successor to the [[PTRS-41]] from ''[[Call of Duty: World at War]]'', due to their similar damage output, ammo capacity (non Pack-a-Punched), mag size, and bolt-action fire, although its reload time is some degree faster and its cycling rate is slower.
+
This weapon can be considered a successor to the [[PTRS-41]] from ''[[Call of Duty: World at War]]'', due to their similar damage output, ammo capacity (non Pack-a-Punched), mag size, and sluggish bullet output, although its reload time is some degree faster and its cycling rate is slower.
   
 
===L96A1 vs. L115 Isolator===
 
===L96A1 vs. L115 Isolator===
  Loading editor