If the timeline forks after WaW, that would mean Reznov is a part of both, which also means Black Ops and Modern Warfare are part of the same timeline. And they are, considering Kravchenko became intertwined with MW3.
- Kravchenko was an easter egg. Also if it SPLITS that means that BO and MW are different timelines.
N7 TC 09:58, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Kravchenko is not an easter egg, as he really was alive. And again, it can't split if Reznov and Roebuck and both in Black Ops, but still apart of Timeline 1 as WaW is.
Should we make the split in timelines occur before the war ends? As it stands, we have both versions of the capture of the Reichstag on this page. MetlTalk 18:30, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
I reckon it should be changed. 182.239.213.217 22:51, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
If the events In World At War are included in both this and the Black Ops timeline, then doesn't that mean that the World War 2 timeline and the Black Ops timeline are intertwined?
Wasn't said somewhere that Cpt. Price (WWII) is the grandfather of John Price (MW)? If yes, wouldn't that mean that the WWII-timeline and the MW-timeline are interwined, too? --> The timelines are not only one - nor they are completely seperated. ... maybe I just try to say now: It is good like it is at the moment :p 82.83.62.14 01:56, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
Removing WaW?
I think WaW should be exclusive to the Black Ops Timeline, the reason being is that Final Fronts and WaW have similar storylines, but have moments that contradicts each other TheAwesomeHyperon (talk) 19:54, December 30, 2015 (UTC)