Welcome to the wiki!Edit
Hello ScarletTwig, and welcome to the Call of Duty Wiki! Thanks for your contributions. We hope you'll stick around to make even more!
Have you created your user page yet? It's your own personal page, and you can do anything you want with it! Your user page will also help us get to know you as an editor better.
Here are some links that you may find helpful:
We hope you enjoy editing here, and look forward to seeing you around!
I Quit, You Win Edit
Alright, I'm done. I'll stop trying to repost my Trivia fact. You are the one who keeps on deleting it, right? In fact, I won't make anymore bad edits considering I'm going to stop editing at all, I'll just look. Bye! Derpcheeze (talk) 03:06, April 11, 2016 (UTC)
Wrong Person? Edit
Yeah, the complete and total cluster fuck that is zombies lore (and how the information is given to us) is so damn annoying and why I want them to release a game that explains everything properly. And yeah, it'd probably be a good idea to state the prices are listed in USD! Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 23:30, May 2, 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Twigy!21:31, May 7, 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, upon thinking about it I guess it is a term, and sorry about what i said, I guess retard is a little harsh. By the way, like your profile pic.
"What does being a Brony have todo with anything? So far you two are taking this way to heart and your comments/actions are starting to skirt into the rather dickish side"
This is a nice try, but these things don't work on me. Use a better bait next time.
And you know what being a brony has to do...
Listen, please, I'm not taking this way to heart, but let me sum it up. Yes, I shouldn't have said bitch. I apologize for that, and will not say it again. I also posted a message on DEFCON SHARK's wall saying that I think it best that we not talk to each-other nor for him to post anymore things like what he's been posting, whatever, you get my point. But I guess you could say I don't like Crazy sam10, basically. Do you remember the whole thing before my block? Certainly gives me no reason to like nor respect him. I have more respect for the other admins, and heck, even a few of the non-admins. But really man. YOU go look at what I wanted to post on the Honey Badger page. There was nothing wrong with it at all, there were similar conparisons on other pages, just take a look at weapons from MW3 and Ghosts, and I know you'll find quite a few. Tell me, without any influence from Crazy sam10, what was wrong with me comparison? I really do think Cray sam10 is still mad at me and is trying to shut me down, which is why I prefer not to talk to him at all, and consult other admins. That is not disrespectful, I am not REPORTING him, I am just asking questions basically regarding whether he had right to remove my edit, Admin or not. Take a look please, and tell me what was wrong with it. Maybe some wording, but certainly not that much.
Black Ops 3Edit
Hey mate! I've got this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX8JrMmEWc4 This video is showing the censoration of Black Ops 3, when the Player is attacked by a robot in Black Ops mission. This video is real. Marec2 (talk) 07:58, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
Looks great. Once I find out how our background works we can use that for our logo.
19:29, November 7, 2016 (UTC)
I would expect having both is tinged on a bit of overkill, but i'm happy to replace all the model images with First Person ones if due calls (Since the lighting is horrible in the menu and makes some camos look exactly the same if you don't zoom in)
It happened similarly to MWR attachment images, where i replaced the models with the first person images.
There's also the case of weapon kits such as Competition and Pride, where each weapon has a different variant of the weapon kit (ie the M21 has the Great Britain flag, the Dragunov is just red, the M40 has American Flags etc) and as a result carries patterns and designs to other parts of weapons not normally covered by camouflages, to a point where first person images won't suffice. I would assume i keep doing third person images as first person isn't showing the entire weapon, and on the wiki we want the entire weapon shown (i assume)
So any guidance on which one to use would be absolutely wonderful <3
Well shit, my bad then! Sorry about that, I just saw that there wasn't text below the template and jumped to conclusions, didn't even think of scrolling down. Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 09:18, March 24, 2017 (UTC)
Is it really? Huh. Usually CoD games are 18+. That's something I didn't know. But if it's part of a bundle, with the main game being 18+, why is the secondary game lower in terms of age? Activision screwup or something else? Either way.12:57, April 10, 2017 (UTC)
So key locked in the box then huh? CoaZ deletes my comment and then locks my blog because I beat him in the argument we were having. How is that fair? The real question I have is why are you the one messaging me instead of CoaZ? I know why. Its because he is biased and angry, and he knows he doesn't have a leg to stand on. This wiki sucks, mainly in part due to the people running it. --Boomer8 (Contact) 23:43, June 19, 2017 (UTC)
Just because certain terms that aren't associated with games at all like classifiying an incredibly power Zed as a Zombie Lord, doesn't necessarily mean it makes it incorrect, and it certainly doesn't affect a wikis' quality control in a bad way. As long as it's close to what the article is related too, it will still be good. Other wiki's out there wouldn't have the same exact rule that you all possess, but I'm afraid it sounds rather too overboard in terms of administration. ChocolateElemental (talk) 22:11, June 27, 2017 (UTC)
"I'll start hitting people with a wooden spoon if people keep forgetting subst" Edit
Guess I'm not using subst anymore ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°).
About the tool for transparencyEdit
This is it, if you're asking. 21:48, November 15, 2017 (UTC)
- I thought you were talking about this in AW's Garand image. Anyway yeah, I know that they're at an odd angle by default, but can't they be rotated like in BO3 and IW? 21:56, November 15, 2017 (UTC)
Question from DEFCON SHARK:Edit
RE:RE:Chat ban Edit
I don't believe you that it has been talked about. And assuming it was talked about, why are you the messenger? You aren't even a staff member, nor do I recall you being involved in any of it. Sigmund Fraud Talk Contributions 01:41, November 21, 2017 (UTC)
Hello apologies to bother ya. I was just curious about what it was that was against the policies or whatever it was. I edited alot today so i don't know which one it was.. The-Russian-Loli (talk) 02:47, May 18, 2018 (UTC)The-Russian-Loli
Um, the MAUL already appears. As for another choice, I'd suggest the Pancor Jackhammer; as much as CoD =/= realism in firearms, so far they haven't made the same mistake as other games of including a weapon that has was only produced in three examples with only one surviving. 11:10, May 24, 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for making my CWL-NA Pack post more complete, thanks. SalutaryAxe.
Re: Edits on Moon Wiki page Edit
Okay, so if I applied for the position of Design Lead for Zombies at Treyarch and replaced all existing staff working on Zombies with my friends, and we decided to replace zombies with fluffy, cute yet violent, blood-soaked unicorns, would anyone consider that a fact? The way I see it, anything that retcons the original can be considered non-canon, especially if the brains behind the original had nothing to do with the retcon. If Joel Schumacher turned Batman into a whiny, girly, brat who wears rainbow coloured banana hammocks, still played by Christian Bale for the sequel to The Dark Knight Rises, would that be considered a fact? Would anyone consider that a fact? Haha. Even if DC stated it was canon? Besides, I think it's always best to preserve the original since it's... well... the original and came first, you know? And I wouldn't be removing anything, just relocating it to a new home and I'd make sure the readers can still easily access it. I understand if you say no but I personally think the pages would benefit from a change that. It'd also prevent the pages from becoming a hassle to go through if Treyarch decides to release additional story info. It'd be kinda like categorizing music folders on your iPod or whatever, no one wants all their songs in one place as it becomes more of a hassle to find what you wanna to listen to with each song you add, but if your songs are categorized into 2 or 3 folders, it's easier to find what you want and more convenient MythicSpider (talk) 01:18, July 20, 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not caught up on DC but both the zombies and DC retcons are shitty decisions shoehorned in by a new team and sort of serve as a big "f*ck you" to the brains behind the original. And yeah, I think upon opening the page, readers may be confused if it's not made crystal clear what's been changed, which it would be. I love reading up on original story, I love the community coming up with their own ideas but the Campaign Team have really restricted the communities creativity and removed any mystery, discovery, replay value and timelessness old school zombies once had, all for a bit of recognition and some brownie points. I'd essentially be doing what the new Halloween movie is doing: removing the sequels from the original timeline and creating a new timeline for those who actually enjoyed the sequels. It's harmless and is not only more convenient for readers but also benefits both sides of the community MythicSpider (talk) 11:09, July 20, 2018 (UTC)
It is trivial because it is the only faction in which you they are enemies and friends 9 with the one playable character, Mitchell)
(AceTabK67) 12:46, August 19, 2018 (UTC)Hey thanks removing red links,because sometimes i dont know how to place a link in your profile or article.
all i did is wrote anything truthful that happen in the CoD games & all that.i played them myself.
For 1,the part of those "yellow dots" after completing each allied missions(like after you beat the american missions,you got the british,there's a lotta papers on each missions,you pass...
& i was telling anyone how to get a bren gun in single player of CoD:UO
do you have Call of Duty:United Offensive?
look,all i just did is add more names in some of the Call of Duty 3 Missions,but it's because they are there.i played those missions a few times as well as seeing them on youtube.
just thought i let you know...
- I'd appreciate if someone actually replied. Can I make the changes? I don't see why you'd say no considering it would be beneficial to both sides of the community. Let's at least try to come to some sort of compromise. Please? MythicSpider (talk) 13:25, October 1, 2018 (UTC)
Middle Eastern CountryEdit
Is there anybody high up I could talk to about appealing the verdict unnamed middle eastern country page? Or some place where I could argue the case for it's existance? (A bully user (talk) 04:18, September 29, 2018 (UTC))
Hey i just wanted to thank you for cleaning up some of the pages i made by making them look more presentable.
Message recieved Edit
Hey Twig i just got your message you left on my page and just wanted to let you know that ill make sure to properly name any images before i upload them(im assuming that was the issue.) anyway thanks a bunch for helping me out with adding new zombies info by cleaning up the pages i post and making them more presentable. Churnovisk (talk) 23:39, October 24, 2018 (UTC)Churnovisk
I'm sorry that i uploaded a poor image i'm trying to help the wiki not destroy it...
Twig, I just added flags and a person. What the hell did i do?!
How do i liecenese Images?
RE: Blops 4 AttachmentsEdit
Wait, isn't there any Hardcore mode in BO4? Anyway, I'm pretty sure it's better if we keep on using first person as the main view for our attachments images, regardless of the HUD. Although you could at the same time add some third-person images for the attachments that aren't very clearly visible in FPS view. 23:40, November 7, 2018 (UTC)
- Well, anything you like :P Although I'd suggest starting with some weapons like the VKM 750 (dat fat barrel), Cordite, Saug 9mm, SG12, and the handguns. In addition to the idle images, you could also put some images about inspecting the operator-modded weapon, as long as this gives visual details that are worth it. On another note, some images could benefit from replacement to better quality ones, if you're in the mood: 1, 2, 3 and 4 (the latter two are dark compared to the in-game view). 22:13, November 11, 2018 (UTC)
- Alrighty. Also, am I crazy, or did they change the KN-57's texture to say "7.62x23mm" on the receiver cover as opposed to 7.62x39mm? (I wonder if they also changed this on the magazine or they kept it as it was - the latter wouldn't surprise me) 23:21, November 11, 2018 (UTC)
"Really need to make one for warning about licenses"Edit
I just wanted to say, the Magmagat and Acidgat are (while an upgrade to the blundergat) still are there own separate wonder weapons with there own steps to them, and the elemental knife is a melee only available from dying in the robots on origins with the upgraded punch, sorry for trying to share my opinion, I hope you are happy
I beleive that it is kind of rude to not even acknowledge the elemental knife as I have not seen one page on it on this entire wiki and I would like to say it is rude of you to just delete it instead of just explaining so I can go ahead and make my own way to that conclusion. I thank you for the final time and goodnight, please don´t message me again.
I asked you politely not to message me again and no, this is not the iron fist, it is a totally different thing, look it up. you die in a robot with the iron fist to get it, and it is more powerful then any melee in the games. I will be making a page for it soon wether you like it or not. Now I tell you, don´t message me again.
actually also, just because something is an upgrade of another doesn´t mean that it isn´t a different thing. Now please don´t message me again, and good night GoldenPlayz14 (talk) 01:47, November 16, 2018 (UTC)
Hey,its fine if you undo my edits,I'll be leaving this wiki once i get your message.
AceTabk67 07:30, November 30, 2018 (UTC)
Fine but i could leave this wiki even though i liked call of duty.
AceTabk67 07:43, November 30, 2018 (UTC)
This layout is new to me, so im a bit lost ATM. Feel free to remove any of my edits if they cause a problem.
So I noticed you reverted my edit on the Barrett .50cal page which added this:
"All depictions of the Barrett .50cal have mirrored ejection ports (i.e. the ejection port is on both sides of the weapon), but the left side never opens when performing a dry reload."
for basically, "falling under COD:IRL".
But if that is the case, shouldn't this bit from the AS50's trivia also fall under COD:IRL?
"The AS50 is modeled with an ejection port on each side; while the port to the left opens and closes when the action cycles, the rifle actually ejects spent casings to the right."
(not asking out of anger, more out of confusion. Both bits of trivia describe similar things; IMO if one of the two were to violate COD:IRL, both of them should be in violation)
FrostRC™ 08:04, December 28, 2018 (UTC)
Adding onto this person's edit that is COD:IRL edit, i posted how the gas block on the M16A4/M4A1 is chopped off when an optic is put on them. How is that a IRL edit? You can see it in-game if you do put a optic on one. ExodusBF4 (talk) 00:28, December 3, 2019 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Happy New Year!Edit
I am no longer using my previous account, i will stick to my old one.
RE: Don't delete discussions Edit
I read the post you left in my talk page after deleting the old discussions for a second time. I assumed i forgot to hit delete, and did not realize it was restored.
Call of Duty 1 editsEdit
Hello, I was thinking about helping to work on some of the original/Classic CoD mission pages (mainly add plots) and I saw that for the Camp Toccoa page there was already a plot in place, which you had deleted earlier. Could you tell me why that one was deleted so that I don't make the same mistake? Thanks!
Okay, I added a plot and some other things. If you think it's good, I can make similar additions to the other pages.
Last question: some of the pages have detailed gameplay walkthroughs in place of descriptions. Should I delete those, work around them, or just leave those pages alone?
I'm leaving. Edit I noticed all of my edits keep getting reverted, and i don't want to keep making bad contributations to this fine wiki. So, i'll just stop making edits and leave. If you ask Ultimate94ninja, you will know that he has had to put up with me quite a few times, as well as some other admins on other wikis. I don't want to make a shitty reputation here as i have other wikis, so i'll just leave for the overall betterment of the community. I hope you can understand.
Saw on the DDD page that you should strikethrough your old posts you don't want to be there...so...is me striking this all through correct then?
Please feel free to correct me on that, i really don't want to upset you.
Friendly Question... Edit Am i doing good here so far? I kinda went sperg mode for a bit and decided i was gonna leave, but now i'm actually making edits and all that, and i wanted to know from a higher-up if i'm even doing good at it or not. If my edits are bad, you can tell me. Whatever i can do to contribute, i will do. ^_^
Thanks for the feedback, i want to be a good editor here...unlike my time spent on the Battlefield wiki, i intend to do well. Until next time~
Please check the discussions page under general for the newest post i made; i think some editors here should be reminded of what i said in case they forget. I can imagine you know what's it is like to have to fix a billion (not literally, a hyperbole) grammar mistakes and making everything impersonal. Other than that, i have nothing else to say.
Well, that's unfortunate. I will still keep correcting those mistakes, regardless if people know about it or not.
Just a quick question, how do i link related articles to an article at the top of a page? For example, i wanted to link the "follow the player around air scorestreaks" (Warbird, AH-6 Overwatch, those ones that fly over you and follow you around) at the top of the Warden from IW but i don't know how to do that; i wish to do that with other pages if the need arises. How do i do that?
Follow-up to my last post, i found the template, but sadly it seems i cannot add extra sections to it so i can cover more "For similar X, see Y, Z, ect.". Another thing, i was looking at some pages that are highly incomplete, how could i mark them as stubs so they can be added onto? For example, the Ball Turret Gunner from CoD WWII is missing alot of informantion, stats, and images.
In regards to deleting my edit on the 205 Brecci...i mean, i'm not mad that you reverted my edit, but i don't really see why. On the page for the MP40 on World at War, it's described as a "menace" as i called the Brecci, and it talks about how notorious it is. How is what i said any different?
Adding image requests on AW weapon variants Edit As most users here know, Advanced Warfare weapon variants do not have enough images with them. I was wondering, what is the name of the template that requests somebody makes the background behind the weapon transparant, the one that requests more images and the one that asks for better images overall/ more of them? I tried adding the "stub" template, but it was put at the bottom of the page, not the top. I'm new to editing in terms of templates, and the more..."complicated" things here on the CoD Wiki. I want to see some better images for those supply drop variants, and yes, i know, they will likley never actually be put in as...well, images aren't really put in the proper places a lot of the time, sadly. Can i have help with that? I'd love to see the quality of those images improved, and more of them added.
Quick edit, this is what i am looking for:
Why did you give me a warning on my user profile for those images? I don't see what's wrong with the screenshots i took...
Am i doing well? Edit I've been trying to make as many helpful edits as i possibly can to articles that need, them within reason (I don't own really any DLC, save for the free ones and i don't own any CoD games past Black Ops 3, as i don't have a next gen console...not like i even want one). If there is any feedback you have for me, or pages that i can improve, please let me know. I would love to help out the wiki as much as i can ^_^
In order of the points you made:
1. Uh, no. Saying that Shadow Company is a PMC unit is speculation. I questioned that label, and never a received a shred of conclusive evidence. Reread carefully.
2. So three biased mods is the consensus? Right, noted.
3. So if you see speculation on a wiki, you shouldn't discuss it until it gets resolved? Really? Right, sure.
4. Lol, no. I'm not "gaming the systeem". Here's what happened: I saw speculation, I questioned it, I didn't receive an answer, but I'm somehow the guy at fault? Right. If you recall (which you probably don't, because I'm assuming you didn't take the time to read through the whole discussion), the mods essentially decided that, they are PMCs because it makes the most sense. No concrete evidence, no reference to an explicit statement in-game labeling them as such, no nothing. Just feels before reals.
Love the last part: " Enough is enough. It's over." Well guys, she said was over, so I guess that's it.
You guys are mods - act like it. Be objective. Be open-minded. Don't scoff at opinions and declare a discussion "done" just because you feel like it.
ghost is in mwr as an emblem in the multiplayer —Unsigned comment was added by Ximbachiefx
Forgot that policy,but since there's almost nothing to do here because it is one of the most organized and complete wikis ive ever entered.
AceTabk67 01:32, April 17, 2019 (UTC)
I'll concede the argument, but I will point out that most of the MW2 intro cutscenes essentially use images from Google Maps to mark the players location and the intro to Second Sun puts Ramirez and Hunter 2-1 across the street from the Art Museum of the Americas. Of Their Own Accord, Second Sun, and Whiskey Hotel all have notable landmarks in the right location, ie: Washington Monument, the DoC, Eisenhower Building, but the DoJ is just weirdly out of place. But I guess that's just a "me" thing as this type of stuff tilts me off the planet.The115Annilation (talk) 04:59, April 25, 2019 (UTC)The115Annilation (I don;t know how signatures work if I messed that up)
Modern Warfare 4Edit
Hello. I've watched on the Youtube, the Modern Warfare 4 is coming soon. Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFJzw2GlsHA It's not fake, it's real. But the details are unknown, but the game is coming in 2019. That's the video on Youtube, leaked information. Im sorry, but i've listened the hungarian website, that the Modern Warfare 4 is really coming in 2019, but it's unknown, when month is coming, maybe november, or october. That's all i know. Marec2 (talk) 22:08, April 28, 2019 (UTC)
Article will be deleted Edit
I see that 'But it won't be long before Codename: Article will be deleted. This article is a target for speedy deletion because Unneeded, and Unneeded. We don't really need to link other Wikis due to the lack of crossovers,' has been added to the page I have started, The pages are for only the basic info about the devices i.e. PlayStation Vita (with a link PS Vita) of a console system i.e. PlayStation that Call of Duty can be played on with a Template:Wikialink if a user of the Call of Duty Wiki to the PlayStation Wiki to lean about more info about console system, (the PlayStation). Mr Taz (talk) 21:16, April 30, 2019 (UTC)
- You say that this wiki is on the games. Not the consoles, (as I said above before you edited it removing future links calling them redlinks) the pages will only have basic info about the consoles showing the progression of the technology that allows new features in Call of Duty to be used (Keeping a lid on the info unlike using Wikipedia) and a Wikialink to the consoles wiki to lean about more info about console system on the other wiki not on this wiki Mr Taz (talk) 22:19, April 30, 2019 (UTC).
Re:Recent Image Edit
Arthur's Jail Cell KeyEdit
It may already be on Arhur's page, but just like Booze and Candy, it is just as important or even more important the the other two items and deserves it's own page so new players could find the inofrmation ASAP.The Inner Hate (talk) 04:08, June 3, 2019 (UTC)
you cant denny that he is supprting the ypg terrorists he did confirm it he said it he said they are based on the ypg freedom fighter at least admit it and write that he is getting critics from turks because he supports terrorists
you cant denny that he is supprting the ypg terrorists he did confirm it he said it he said they are based on the ypg freedom fighter at least admit it and write that he is getting critics from turks because he supports terrorists
Taylor kurosaki is a ypg supporter why do you denny it ?
keep deleting the truth the ypg is a terrorist organisation
Hello. I was wondering about my last post and why it was deleted. Was it violating the rule 18, where it states; "Threads that are simply complaining about something without any attempts to create discussion will be deleted." Surely it wasn't just about ranting. Johnny Casey (talk) 21:40, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe so. The main statement about my last post was more of a grenade thrown by allies which causes the player to die unfortunately, not a well-known grenade spamming by enemies which as you've stated, overdone. I have aware of people ranting about grenade spammings in WAW, but my post was something different. I thought there aren't enough any reference about people discussing grenades thrown by allies which can kill you, so I decided to make one for myself. I'm not entirely sure what it was so 'ranty' about it as well. I do believe I tried my best to exclude any kind of my personal feelings about such feature in the game, and rather try to be as informative as possible; how is this happening, and how to deal with it. Sure, there is a statement about; "This is the reason why I die" which might be considered as a simple 'rant', but that wasn't the big part of my whole post. My intention was; "This is a thing that you should be look out for, and it's a thing you might not have noticed" which I believe not as close to being a simple rant. Also, I have to address the fact that I didn't get any forms of notification which regards my post's removal. I've experienced this issue from other FANDOM wiki, so I 'assume' this wiki shares the same rule as the other; "moderators have the right to not inform the OP about his/her post's getting removed for violating one of the rules"; or something like that. If I didn't know better, I would have assumed that some kind of error has been occured and causes my post to be deleted. I'm not entirely sure there is any rule about this, but I think moderators should address the users before any attempt to delete any post of theirs. I might present this as a feedback. Johnny Casey (talk) 22:58, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
Understandable, and I expected as such. As I stated, I might have to discuss later for the feedbacks. Now on to other matter I have stated; whether my last post was a simple rant or not. Johnny Casey (talk) 23:12, June 10, 2019 (UTC)
So what now, about my last post? I have stated that my post was not a mere ranting about grenade spam, and the conversation sort of has ended after that. You agree to mine or..? Johnny Casey (talk) 12:05, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
You're making a false accusation here. You stated that my post contains infamous "Grenade spam in WaW" which was overdone, while it does not contain such reference. My last post was not intended to be a simple rant about grenade spamming, nor it cotains any regardings about grenade spamming, or ranting. There was a statement; "As the difficulty progress, AI throws grenade more frequently."; but it was only threre to explain another; "...but your allies tend to throw grenades a lot as the difficulty gets higher."; which leads to the topic I wanted to mention, and again, this 'topic' wasn't even close to being a rant about grenade spammings. I already explained myself what post was about and how is it different than a simple rant you have accused it for, so unless you can present any reference which regards both "Grenade spammings" and "a simple rant"; which I believe my post contains none of these, you have clearly misunderstood my post, and made a false accusation for violating one of the community rules. Johnny Casey (talk) 17:48, June 11, 2019 (UTC)
Messages from Discord Edit
You're stating like as if Discord does not have any chat logs and rules, and us discussing this matter is not even close to being 'socical'. But we can do this in your way, if you so desire.
What I don't understand is, why my last post, and last post only was violating the rule about 'No ranting'. I have made couple of other posts, and from your standard, those could have been removed for violating the same rule. For example, 'BAR problem in WAW' could have been constituted as a 'rant about missing shots in game', and for 'Hardest mission in WAW', it could have been constituted as a 'rant about the campaign difficulty'. But those posts were not removed, unlike my last post. (Note that this doesn't mean my other posts are the ones that should be deleted instead).This makes me to believe, that the title 'Grenade' in my last post, and the overall amount of mentionings about 'grenades' in general have made you think that; "Here we go. Another grenade rant." which was the main reason of your decision for removing my last post. As I stated myself before, my last post was not just about a simple grenade rant that was already discussed through out people, nor there was any particular reference which constitutes as a rant. You certainly miscomprehended my post, and made a false accusation for I have violated one of the community rules. Johnny Casey (talk) 04:11, June 15, 2019 (UTC)
On Op.Little Sature (Level)Edit
just so you know,i added that line on the page,because it's true,there is a Nagant M1895 on the opening loading screen.
(188.8.131.52 06:55, July 15, 2019 (UTC))
Why don't you add your version yourself,infact,you might add the loading pic,just to show readers?
(184.108.40.206 07:22, July 15, 2019 (UTC))
Hey, I am not here to fight or anything, but what was exactly wrong with that trivia point? I know that CoD is fiction and all, but how is pointing out that O.P.S. fighting with Contras on that map is odd breaks that rule? Not sure what's wrong with saying that its possible that Contras on the Shattered might actually be Sandinistas either. JohnSmirnov (talk) 23:02, August 16, 2019 (UTC)
Reply to the answer: I understand and do agree that such things as theories, picking on certain details etc are not needed, as it will create a mess in a way, but I don't see anything particularly wrong in pointing strange and nonsensical details (I know that CoD portrays details in its own way for the sake of the story, but its a different thing), or voicing assumptions if it doesn't go the wrong road. Speaking about "speculation" aspect, I can still see some things on the Wiki that have more-or-less speculative tone, such as Royal Air Force's World War 2 section that says that they were presumably replaced with American Air Force in the campaign. I agree that such things as theories, picking etc are not needed, as it will create a mess. JohnSmirnov (talk) 12:10, August 17, 2019 (UTC)
Alright. Peter WAS a Doctor. Forgot about the COTD radios. Also I tried deleting the talks on my page because them being there bothers me. 2600:1:9C0E:B525:5028:648F:EBF4:7C3BImperialUndead115
Quit with the talks, thank you. Edit
Forgot about the COTD radios mentioning Peter as a "Docotr". Also, can you quit with the talks on my page? Them being there bothers me. Thanks.
Hey there, but sorry to interruptEdit
This message might sound nonsense for others i actually created my own custom wiki:
https://act67s-custom-call-of-duty.fandom.com/wiki/ACT-67%27s_Custom_Call_of_Duty_Wiki (Sorry i dunno how to edit a website link ok?)
If you want to edit there, it is ok,but no vandalizing as usual, and you can transfer some or majority of original CoD Content to there, and don't forget you can create your own personal Character/s,Weapons/s,Vehicle articles that will give you a personal style if you wanted to if you joined and contributed to my wiki.
This can sound complicated and boring, but it is your choice, so
Bravo 6, going dark 10:04, August 26, 2019 (UTC)
Re: Images Edit
I am currently updating the mobile main page. Uploading photos for the mobile main does not give an option to license or name images. The intent is to manually name/license all images after the mobile main is complete. --awyman13 (Talk/Work) 04:27, August 31, 2019 (UTC)
RE: Bad Image Edit
Hey, so I am a bit lost on some things you have pointed out in regarding to my images being "Violation" of the Image Policy, these would include:
- Contained a banned image effect
- Concerned real life info
- Duplicate file/superseded
- Tampered with a photo-editing program
If you could go more in depth on these claims, that could really help me out, Thanks!
"Glitches are not Trivial".
Okay, there was no "Glitches" segment that I could find so please let me know where I should post it.
Turzy310 message Edit
Call of Duty doesn't accept real life trivia and only accepts trivia relating to the game because Call of Duty is a fictional game.
I really didn't take Black Ops seriously because it claims to be set in the 1960s and the firearms and vehicles are from the 1970s.
The Talking Angela and Tom picture is used only as my user page because it's my favorite characters.
Golden Pack-a-Punch Machine in Black Ops 4Edit
Hello mate. Do you see the video in Youtube ? The video's name is Golden Pack-a-Punch Machine.
I don't really know how everything works here, still learning the ropes. I don't even know if this is a private DM or not. About the edit to the COD Ghosts wiki thing, and your response, "uh reason", I honestly have no idea what is going on.
All I know is that I wanted to add in new charatcers to the US Marine faction (Cpl. Taylor; Pvt. Wilson; Stephens) by changing the v.d.e character category inbox thing but I have no idea how to so I was testing out different tests to see what worked and what didn't. None worked and I think I may have accidentally saved one of the tests I was doing.
If it has caused any problems, my deepest apologies as I have no idea how to get back to have of the pages I previous went on or how to change it.
Hometown Walkthrough Removal Edit
If this wiki not a guide, then maybe get rid of the walkthroughs on all the other preexisting pages. Levels such as Loose Ends and The Enemy of my Enemy have had walkthroughs since god knows when, so maybe consider getting rid of those as well. Those are what made me think walkthroughs can be made on this wiki.
Signed, "Git Gud"
Thanks for the heads up, I'm pretty new and I don't quite have the full grip on the technical requirements and other related guidelines. I'll be sure to properly license all images hereafter. DankDengar (talk) 16:10, November 14, 2019 (UTC)
What is the proper procedure for naming images? I'm not sure what the protocol is. I apologize for the errors, as I am new to licensing and naming images as well as relatively new to the wiki. I appreciate your help Twig.
throwing knife edit Edit
How is that "uneeded"? Players do that with throwing knives/combat axes/ etc. in all the games they are in. Entire montages of just cross-map throwing knife kills exist. ExodusBF4 (talk) 00:25, December 3, 2019 (UTC)ExodusBF4
I would like to license current images uploaded by me Edit
I have some images uploaded by me here and would like to license them and wanted to know the process how to do!
Ok, i can let go of the comment, but check your facts before deleting something. The Minebea PM-9 is built directly off the Uzi. http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Minebea_M-9#Minebea_M-9 The PM-9 is indeed a variant of the Uzi. If you disagree, take it up with IMFDB and Minebea. I'm just stating a fact. ExodusBF4 (talk) 00:37, December 30, 2019 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Technically, the Vepr is an AK variant. Do you want to keep arguing with me over facts that are well-established, or will you pull things out of thin air to try and win an argument with me that you started? ExodusBF4 (talk) 01:34, December 30, 2019 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Image stuff Edit
I don't really know how to liscense an image, so should i just delete the changes i made to Weapon Camouflage? I don't feel like getting in trouble for this. ExodusBF4 (talk) 22:12, January 4, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Also, you were leaving me warnings as i was editing the page, i didn't even notice you were leaving me messages until i was done. Sorry if you thought i was ignoring your warnings, i didn't see the unread message badge until i was done. ExodusBF4 (talk) 22:15, January 4, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
I would agree that Spring Knife needs to be merged with Ballistic Knife. However, i will vote yes for the Reaver C86 being merged with the Crossbow page, but that's not really up to me, so i'll let staff decide on that. Otherwise, yes, Manual Crossbow and Spring Knife need to be merged into the respective Crossbow and Ballistic Knife page. ExodusBF4 (talk) 07:39, January 5, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Sound files cont. Edit
I guess what i'm getting is that it's just a major pain in the ass to extract hundreds of weapon audio files and update said pages with them? I can understand that, since such a project would take quite a long time and it would be for a rather small note i'm sure most people don't even notice here. ExodusBF4 (talk) 05:12, January 11, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
S&D question Edit
So, on search and destroy, if both teams are tied at three wins each, overtime round starts what happens if both teams tie again, as in nobody dying but the attacking team never plants the bomb, AKA everybody just stands around until the time runs out will the game just end with a huge tie of 4 wins to 4 wins? i've never seen it happen, so i'm just wondering if you know ExodusBF4 (talk) 04:14, January 14, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Hmmmm...i would test this with bots, but i forgot for the tiebreaker round the bots would just plant the bomb anyways, and i can't kill them or else i win....i'd need to get a bunch of friends (somehow) on a cod game we all have and test this out, but that will probally never happen. Anyways, i've never seen a sudden death round, but i assume the win would automatically go to the defending team. ExodusBF4 (talk) 04:32, January 14, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
KSG page merge Edit
Should the KSG and KSG 12 pages be merged? I really don't see a purpose of them being different pages, the only real difference between them is the KSG fires slugs. ExodusBF4 (talk) 06:46, January 19, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
It seems that all the evidence that could be used against splitting them and vice versa was already said by several people, but the page was split anyways. Shame, it really doesn't make any sense. ExodusBF4 (talk) 09:00, January 19, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Hello. I wanted to apologize for the way I acted last week. I realize now how immature I was being. I was hoping to get a second chance to join the Discord server. Emen383 (talk) 00:58, January 27, 2020 (UTC)
RE: Recent BlockingEdit
Had to leave due to important stuff to do, so I didn't take the time to check his spam and threats in detail. I extended the block now.21:58, February 14, 2020 (UTC)
- Yup! It went fine. 22:53, February 14, 2020 (UTC)
"Yes however, This really has been a thing for most games. We didn't do it with BO4 even when weaponry got magazine size changes." So you're saying you want outdated information on this wiki? Doesn't make much sense. Season 2 update to MW just added akimbo and rebalanced some perks, wouldn't it be a good thing to update the info? It's like buying a plain doughnut when you are being offered frosted ones for free. ExodusBF4 (talk) 02:59, February 26, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4 Alright, can you give me permission to update the perk pages then at the very least? ExodusBF4 (talk) 03:25, February 26, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Hereare the Feburary 11th patch notes, use this if you want to update the perks. I'm going to sleep right now (becuase i have school in the morning), so i might get to it later when i get home but i would kindly prefer if somebody else does it for now. Also, thanks for keeping my Akimbo change. I'm getting this info from ExclusiveAce's recent vids on the new patches IW released. ExodusBF4 (talk) 05:24, February 26, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
If that's the case, then it's definitely best to keep the leaked stuff off the wiki. I haven't been keeping up with the leaks in the slightest, so I don't even know what they're about (let alone Acti going after leakers). Conqueror of all Zombies (talk) 23:27, February 26, 2020 (UTC)
Frustrating stinger reverting Edit
Most players do not know that the Stinger can kill infantry. It's an extremley rare occurance. Wouldn't it make sense to include that as trivia? Both you and Conqueror of all Zombies are starting to frustrate me with this constant reverting. I want to include that as trivia, is it really that bad for me to put it in there? Yes, you and some players might know it can get infantry kills, but most people don't. ExodusBF4 (talk) 00:19, February 27, 2020 (UTC)ExodusBF4
Sorry, idk how to respond to replies on a edit.
Technically, any name they're called is an alias. I've seen this in so many places, it should be fine here.
We passed your RfA and you should now have admin rights. Congrats and thanks for your help around here and the Discord server!10:51, March 13, 2020 (UTC)
About CODM WeaponsEdit
I am one of the people who contribute to the CODM information here and I saw your message about the new weapons, I will follow your advice I'll leave it to specify on the weapon page, which update is part of. I would just like to leave a note for you regarding that, there are 2 types of updates in the CODM. At the beginning of the new season, there is the "update of the season" and then in the middle of the season there is usually another update within the season that usually has some name. So when I put it, for example: "Weapon X - Season X" is a weapon that came in the season update. When I put it: "Weapon X - Season X - Y Update" is a weapon that came during that update that was released within the season. All the information provided by me is official, nothing is an invention. I'm always following updates closely, including the official ones provided on the official CODM subreddit. Thanks. (Marcello Julio (talk) 03:30, March 14, 2020 (UTC))
Grammatical error Edit
Sorry, clicked publish before I finished my summary.
"NPCs" means multiple non player characters. "NPC's" means the property of a single non-player character. Since Granite Team consisted of multiple individuals "NPC's" is not grammatically correct.
MW2 remastered triva Edit
Loose Ends Remastered videosEdit
Hello mate. Why you deleted the Loose Ends Remastered videos ? I like it, and i liked them, so why you deleted it ? It's not spam, and not fake, it's real. But i'm not adding them, because i think it needs license, or something. Original vs Remastered videos need to compare them, i like it to compare, like comparison, between Original and Remastered version of Loose Ends videos. :) Marec2 (talk) 19:35, April 4, 2020 (UTC)
Missions on Game PagesEdit
Hey, this is in regards to my reverted edit on the Black Ops II page. I can understand it being more "efficient" maybe to just use a template listing the missions, but I don't feel like it serves the article well. There are several game pages on here that have them written out as full lists with short descriptions for the individual missions... I think that's a helpful feature to have. I have multiple times been trying to find a specific mission on a game's page. It's annoying having to click through all of them to find the one you're looking for if you only have names in a template. My edit didn't have descriptions because I'm not familiar enough to add them myself, but I still think it's better using a format that allows people to add them later.
ALSO the navboxes don't show up on mobile at all, so it effectively makes that part of the article inaccessible to anyone trying to use the site on their phone or tablet. You click on that section and it's like there is nothing in it. Do you mind if I undo your revert? - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 02:51, April 7, 2020 (UTC)
- I mean you could call it an issue on the Fandom side, but like... it's fixable on our end so why shouldn't we? It seems weird to just be okay with most of the site's audience not being able to access content because technically it's someone else's fault. Like, what's the point of having a wiki if we're not trying to make information accessible?
- I guess you could say it looks a little cleaner, but I would argue otherwise. To me it just looks like less information, that you have to click an extra time to open, in a smaller and harder to read font. Ultimately I am new on this wiki and you're an existing admin, so if you're really deadset against it I don't think any further arguing on my part will be helpful. It seems like a good simple solution to an obvious easily fixable problem though! Let me know if you reconsider, otherwise NNTR. - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 04:49, April 7, 2020 (UTC)